1
|
Lessard-Deschênes C, Goulet MH. The therapeutic relationship in the context of involuntary treatment orders: The perspective of nurses and patients. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2022; 29:287-296. [PMID: 34551167 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Involuntary treatment orders are increasingly being used around the world to allow the treatment of individuals living with a mental illness deemed incapable of giving consent and who are actively refusing treatment. The use of involuntary treatment orders can impact the nurse-patient therapeutic relationship, which is essential to offer quality care and promote recovery. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Nurses and patients do not agree on the possibility to develop a therapeutic relationship, with nurses believing they can build a bond with the patients despite the challenges imposed by the involuntary treatment order, and patients rejecting this possibility. Nurses caring for patients on involuntary treatment orders feel obligated to apply the conditions of this measure, even if it damages the relationship with their patients. This difficult aspect of their work leads them to question their role in relation to the management of involuntary treatment orders. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Nurses need to be aware of the reasons why patients on involuntary treatment orders do not believe in the possibility of building a therapeutic relationship. Nurses need to reflect on and express their concerns about the damaging effects that managing involuntary treatment orders conditions can have on the nurse-patient therapeutic relationship. ABSTRACT: Introduction Involuntary treatment orders (ITO) can impact the nurse-patient therapeutic relationship (TR) negatively. Despite the increasing use of ITOs around the world, few studies have explored their influence on the TR from the perspectives of nurses and patients. Aim To describe the TR in the context of ITOs as reported by nurses and individuals living with a mental illness. Method Secondary data analysis of qualitative interviews with nurses (n = 9) and patients (n = 6) was performed using content analysis. Results Participants described the TR as fundamentally embedded in a power imbalance amplified by the ITO, which was discussed through the conflicting roles of nurses, the legal constraints imposed on patients and nurses, the complex relation between the ITO and the TR, and the influence of mental healthcare settings' context. Discussion Nurses and patients' views were opposed, questioning the authenticity of the relationship. Implications for Practice Nurses should be aware of the patients' lack of faith in the TR to ensure that they are sensitive to patients' behaviours that may falsely suggest that a relationship is established. Further studies should explore ways to alleviate the burden of the management of ITOs on nurses and allow for a trusting relationship to be build.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Lessard-Deschênes
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Hélène Goulet
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Waardt DA, van Melle AL, Widdershoven GAM, Bramer WM, van der Heijden FMMA, Rugkåsa J, Mulder CL. Use of compulsory community treatment in mental healthcare: An integrative review of stakeholders' opinions. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:1011961. [PMID: 36405930 PMCID: PMC9669570 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1011961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple studies have examined the effects of compulsory community treatment (CCT), amongst them there were three randomized controlled trials (RCT). Overall, they do not find that CCT affects clinical outcomes or reduces the number or duration of hospital admissions more than voluntary care does. Despite these negative findings, in many countries CCT is still used. One of the reasons may be that stakeholders favor a mental health system including CCT. AIM This integrative review investigated the opinions of stakeholders (patients, significant others, mental health workers, and policy makers) about the use of CCT. METHODS We performed an integrative review; to include all qualitative and quantitative manuscripts on the views of patients, significant others, clinicians and policy makers regarding the use of CCT, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials (via Wiley), and Google Scholar. RESULTS We found 142 studies investigating the opinion of stakeholders (patients, significant others, and mental health workers) of which 55 were included. Of these 55 studies, 29 included opinions of patients, 14 included significant others, and 31 included mental health care workers. We found no studies that included policy makers. The majority in two of the three stakeholder groups (relatives and mental health workers) seemed to support a system that used CCT. Patients were more hesitant, but they generally preferred CCT over admission. All stakeholder groups expressed ambivalence. Their opinions did not differ clearly between those who did and did not have experience with CCT. Advantages mentioned most regarded accessibility of care and a way to remain in contact with patients, especially during times of crisis or deterioration. The most mentioned disadvantage by all stakeholder groups was that CCT restricted autonomy and was coercive. Other disadvantages mentioned were that CCT was stigmatizing and that it focused too much on medication. CONCLUSION Stakeholders had mixed opinions regarding CCT. While a majority seemed to support the use of CCT, they also had concerns, especially regarding the restrictions CCT imposed on patients' freedom and autonomy, stigmatization, and the focus on medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Guy Antoine Marie Widdershoven
- Department of Ethics, Law, and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jorun Rugkåsa
- Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Centre for Care Research, University of South-Eastern Norway, Porsgrunn, Norway
| | - Cornelis Lambert Mulder
- Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, Epidemiological and Social Psychiatric Research institute (ESPRi), Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Francombe Pridham K, Nakhost A, Tugg L, Etherington N, Stergiopoulos V, Law S. Exploring experiences with compulsory psychiatric community treatment: A qualitative multi-perspective pilot study in an urban Canadian context. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2018; 57:122-130. [PMID: 29548499 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2017] [Revised: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 02/11/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
As medical, ethical and clinical effectiveness debates about the use of compulsory psychiatric treatment continues, it is important to further explore the actual experiences and perspectives of all relevant stakeholders in community treatment orders (CTOs). This qualitative pilot study engaged a total of twenty-seven clients, their family members, and care providers in Toronto, Canada. Semi-structured, one-on-one interviews were conducted between February and July 2013 and analyzed using thematic analysis. Top key themes from all the participants identified include, among others: 1) clients' experiences of coercion while treated under CTO, but a preference for CTOs compared to involuntary hospitalization, nevertheless; 2) limited real opportunities for collaboration in treatment decisions expressed by clients and family members; 3) acceptance of the potential for clinical recovery on CTOs while debating the role of CTO in a broader recovery journey by all stakeholders; 4) general preservation of therapeutic relationships between clients and care providers, while acknowledging the tension of taking on an "enforcer" role by providers; and 5) existence of different avenues for asserting agency by clients. The findings of this research illuminate the nuanced, complex, and adaptive perspectives held by different stakeholders, point to the importance of preserving and enhancing procedural justice in their use, and alert the field to incorporate recovery-based approaches in this controversial practice that is a widely and commonly used clinical tool across many jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Francombe Pridham
- Mental Health Services, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada; Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada.
| | - Arash Nakhost
- Mental Health Services, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada.
| | - Lorne Tugg
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada; North York General Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Nicole Etherington
- Mental Health Services, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada.
| | - Vicky Stergiopoulos
- Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 100 Stokes Street, Toronto, Ontario M6J 1H4, Canada.
| | - Samuel Law
- Mental Health Services, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kidd SA, Davidson L, McKenzie K. Common Factors in Community Mental Health Intervention: A Scoping Review. Community Ment Health J 2017; 53:627-637. [PMID: 28194599 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-017-0117-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2016] [Accepted: 02/02/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
While there is considerable research and commentary devoted to common factors in psychotherapy, their implications for community mental health interventions are much less clear. In response, a scoping review was conducted to answer the question, 'What is the evidence base for common factors in community mental health intervention?' A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar was completed. A total of 60 publications were identified in this review with a focus primarily upon therapeutic alliance. Though methodologically diverse, this review supports the likely importance of alliance in the outcomes of community mental health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean A Kidd
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 1001 Queen St. W., Unit 2-1, #161, Toronto, ON, M6J 1H1, Canada.
| | - Larry Davidson
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kwame McKenzie
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dawson S, Lawn S, Simpson A, Muir-Cochrane E. Care planning for consumers on community treatment orders: an integrative literature review. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16:394. [PMID: 27832769 PMCID: PMC5105250 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-1107-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Case management is the established model for care provision in mental health and is delivered within current care philosophies of person-centred and recovery-oriented care. The fact that people with a mental illness may be forced to receive care and treatment in the community poses challenges for clinicians aiming to engage in approaches that promote shared decision-making and self-determination. This review sought to gain an in-depth understanding of stakeholders' perspectives and experiences of care planning for consumers' on CTOs. METHODS An integrative review method allowed for inclusion of a broad range of studies from diverse empirical sources. Systematic searches were conducted across six databases. Following appraisal, findings from included papers were coded into groups and presented against a framework of case management. RESULTS Forty-eight papers were included in the review. Empirical studies came from seven countries, with the majority reporting on qualitative methods. Many similarities were reported across studies. Positive gains from CTOs were usually associated with the nature of support received, highlighting the importance of the therapeutic relationship in care planning. Key gaps in care planning included a lack of connection between CTO, treatment and consumer goals and lack of implementation of focussed interventions. CONCLUSIONS Current case management processes could be better utilised for consumers on CTOs, with exploration of how this could be achieved warranted. Workers need to be sensitive to the 'control and care' dynamic in the care planning relationship, with person-centred approaches requiring core and advanced practitioner and communication skills, including empathy and trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Dawson
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
| | - Sharon Lawn
- School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Alan Simpson
- School of Health Sciences, Nursing, City University London, London, UK
| | - Eimear Muir-Cochrane
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|