Major challenges in accurate mutation detection of multifocal lung adenocarcinoma by next-generation sequencing

Multiple primary lung cancer: Updates and perspectives

Management of multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) remains challenging, partly due to its increasing incidence, especially with the significant rise in cases of multiple lung nodules caused by low-dose computed tomography screening. Moreover, the indefinite pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria, and treatment selection add to the complexity. In recent years, there have been continuous efforts to dissect the molecular characteristics of MPLC and explore new diagnostic approaches as well as treatment modalities, which will be reviewed here, with a focus on newly emerging evidence and future perspectives, hope to provide new insights into the management of MPLC and serve as inspiration for future research related to MPLC.

Real-world data on ALK rearrangement test in Chinese advanced non-small cell lung cancer (RATICAL): a nationwide multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) test in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can help physicians provide target therapies for patients harboring ALK gene rearrangement. This study aimed to investigate the real-world test patterns and positive rates of ALK gene rearrangements in advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

In this real-world study (ChiCTR2000030266), patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent an ALK rearrangement test in 30 medical centers in China between October 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Interpretation training was conducted before the study was initiated. Quality controls were performed at participating centers using immunohistochemistry (IHC)-VENTANA-D5F3. The positive ALK gene rearrangement rate and consistency rate were calculated. The associated clinicopathological characteristics of ALK gene rearrangement were investigated as well.

RESULTS

The overall ALK gene rearrangement rate was 6.7% in 23,689 patients with advanced NSCLC and 8.2% in 17,436 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. The quality control analysis of IHC-VENTANA-D5F3 revealed an intra-hospital consistency rate of 98.2% (879/895) and an inter-hospital consistency rate of 99.2% (646/651). IHC-VENTANA-D5F3 was used in 53.6%, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in 25.4%, next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 18.3%, and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) in 15.9% in the adenocarcinoma subgroup. For specimens tested with multiple methods, the consistency rates confirmed by IHC-VENTANA-D5F3 were 98.0% (822/839) for FISH, 98.7% (1,222/1,238) for NGS, and 91.3% (146/160) for RT-PCR. The overall ALK gene rearrangement rates were higher in females, patients of ≤ 35 years old, never smokers, tumor cellularity of > 50, and metastatic specimens used for testing in the total NSCLC population and adenocarcinoma subgroup (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the real-world variability and challenges of ALK test in advanced NSCLC, demonstrating a predominant use of IHC-VENTANA-D5F3 with high consistency and distinct clinicopathological features in ALK-positive patients. These findings underscore the need for a consensus on optimal test practices and support the development of refined ALK test strategies to enhance diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic decision-making in NSCLC.

Genomic Staging of Multifocal Lung Squamous Cell Carcinomas Is Independent of the Comprehensive Morphologic Assessment

INTRODUCTION

Morphologic and molecular data for staging of multifocal lung squamous cell carcinomas (LSCCs) are limited. In this study, whole exome sequencing (WES) was used as the gold standard to determine whether multifocal LSCC represented separate primary lung cancers (SPLCs) or intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs). Genomic profiles were compared with the comprehensive morphologic assessment.

METHODS

WES was performed on 20 tumor pairs of multifocal LSCC and matched normal lymph nodes using the Illumina NovaSeq6000 S4-Xp (Illumina, San Diego, CA). WES clonal and subclonal analysis data were compared with histologic assessment by 16 thoracic pathologists. In addition, the immune gene profiling of the study cases was characterized by the HTG EdgeSeq Precision Immuno-Oncology Panel.

RESULTS

By WES data, 11 cases were classified as SPLC and seven cases as IPM. Two cases were technically suboptimal. Analysis revealed marked genomic and immunogenic heterogeneity, but immune gene expression profiles highly correlated with mutation profiles. Tumors classified as IPM have a large number of shared mutations (ranging from 33.5% to 80.7%). The agreement between individual morphologic assessments for each case and WES was 58.3%. One case was unanimously interpreted morphologically as IPM and was in agreement with WES. In a further 17 cases, the number of pathologists whose morphologic interpretation was in agreement with WES ranged from two (one case) to 15 pathologists (one case) per case. Pathologists showed a fair interobserver agreement in the morphologic staging of multiple LSCCs, with an overall kappa of 0.232.

CONCLUSIONS

Staging of multifocal LSCC based on morphologic assessment is unreliable. Comprehensive genomic analyses should be adopted for the staging of multifocal LSCC.

Using molecular characteristics to distinguish multiple primary lung cancers and intrapulmonary metastases

Objectives

Multiple lung cancers may present as multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC) or intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) with variations in clinical stage, treatment, and prognosis. However, the existing differentiation criteria based on histology do not fully meet the clinical needs. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may play an important role in assisting the identification of different pathologies. Here, we extended the relevant data by combining histology and NGS to develop detailed identification criteria for MPLC and IPM.

Materials and Methods

Patients with lung cancer (each patient had ≥2 tumors) were enrolled in the training (n = 22) and validation (n = 13) cohorts. Genomic profiles obtained from 450-gene-targeted NGS were analyzed, and the new criteria were developed based on our findings and pre-existing Martini & Melamed criteria and molecular benchmarks.

Results

The analysis of the training cohort indicated that patients identified with MPLC had no (or <2) trunk or shared mutations. However, 98.02% of mutations were branch mutations, and 69.23% of MPLC had no common mutations. In contrast, a higher percentage of trunk (33.08%) or shared (9.02%) mutations were identified in IPM, suggesting significant differences among mutated components. Subsequently, eight MPLC and five IPM cases were identified in the validation cohort, aligning with the independent imaging and pathologic distinction. Overall, the percentage of trunk and shared mutations was higher in patients with IPM than in patients with MPLC. Based on these results and the establishment of new determination criteria for MPLC and IPM, we emphasize that the type and number of shared variants based on histologic consistency assist in identification.

Conclusion

Determining genetic alterations may be an effective method for differentiating MPLC and IPM, and NGS can be used as a valuable assisting tool.

Towards the molecular era of discriminating multiple lung cancers

In the era of histopathology-based diagnosis, the discrimination between multiple lung cancers (MLCs) poses significant uncertainties and has thus become a clinical dilemma. However, recent significant advances and increased application of molecular technologies in clonal relatedness assessment have led to more precision in distinguishing between multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastasis (IPMs). This review summarizes recent advances in the molecular identification of MLCs and compares various methods based on somatic mutations, chromosome alterations, microRNAs, and tumor microenvironment markers. The paper also discusses current challenges at the forefront of genomics-based discrimination, including the selection of detection technology, application of next-generation sequencing, and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH). In summary, this paper highlights an entrance into the primary stage of molecule-based diagnostics.

A novel NGS-based diagnostic algorithm for classifying multifocal lung adenocarcinomas in pN0M0 patients

The classification of multifocal lung adenocarcinomas (MLAs), including multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas (MPLAs) and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs), has great clinical significance in staging and treatment determination. However, the application of molecular approaches in pN0M0 MLA diagnosis has not been well investigated. Here, we performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis in 45 pN0M0 MLA patients (101 lesion pairs) who were initially diagnosed as having MPLA by comprehensive histologic assessment (CHA). Five additional patients with intrathoracic metastases were used as positive controls, while 197 patients with unifocal lung adenocarcinomas (425 random lesion pairs) were used as negative controls. By utilizing a predefined NGS criterion, all IPMs in the positive control group could be accurately classified, whereas 13 lesion pairs (3.1%) in the negative control cohort were misdiagnosed as IPMs. Additionally, 14 IPM lesion pairs were diagnosed in the study group, with at least 7 misdiagnoses. We thus developed a refined algorithm, incorporating both NGS and histologic results, that could correctly diagnose all the known MPLAs and IPMs. In particular, all IPMs identified by the refined algorithm were diagnosed to be IPMs or suspected IPMs by CHA reassessment. The refined algorithm-diagnosed MPLAs patients also had significantly better progression-free survival than the refined algorithm-diagnosed IPMs (p < 0.0001), which is superior to conventional NGS or CHA diagnoses. Overall, we developed an NGS-based algorithm that could accurately distinguish IPMs from MPLAs in MLA patients. Our results demonstrate a promising clinical utility of NGS to complement traditional CHA-based MLA diagnosis and help determine patient staging and treatment.

Differential Diagnostic Value of Histology in MPLC and IPM: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The paramount issue regarding multiple lung cancer (MLC) is whether it represents multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) or intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM), as this directly affects both accurate staging and subsequent clinical management. As a classic method, histology has been widely utilized in clinical practice. However, studies examining the clinical value of histology in MLC have yielded inconsistent results; thus, this remains to be evaluated. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the differential diagnostic value of histology in MPLC and IPM and to provide evidence-based medicine for clinical work.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched to collect relevant literature according to PRISMA, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were set up to screen and assess the literature. The data required for reconstructing a 2 × 2 contingency table were extracted directly or calculated indirectly from the included studies, and statistical analysis was carried out by using Stata 15, Meta-DiSc 1.4, and Review Manager 5.4 software.

Results

A total of 34 studies including 1,075 pairs of tumors were included in this meta-analysis. Among these studies, 11 were about the M-M standard and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71–0.84) and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.38–0.55), respectively; 20 studies were about CHA and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72–0.80) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68–0.79), respectively; and 3 studies were about the “CHA & Lepidic” criteria and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.85–0.99) and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.21–0.73), respectively. The combined pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and the area under the SROC curve of the 34 studies were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73–0.86), 0.64 (95% CI: 0.51–0.76), 2.25 (95% CI: 1.59–3.17), 0.31 (95% CI: 0.23–0.43), 7.22 (95% CI: 4.06–12.81), and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77–0.84), respectively.

Conclusion

The current evidence indicated that histology had a moderate differential diagnostic value between MPLC and IPM. Among the three subgroups, the “CHA & Lepidic” criteria showed the highest sensitivity and CHA showed the highest specificity. Further research is necessary to validate these findings and to improve clinical credibility.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022298180.

Mutational Pattern in Multiple Pulmonary Nodules Are Associated With Early Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma

The clinical significance of mutation in multiple pulmonary nodules is largely limited by single gene mutation-directed analysis and lack of validation of gene expression profiles. New analytic strategy is urgently needed for comprehensive understanding of genomic data in multiple pulmonary nodules. In this study, we performed whole exome sequencing in 16 multiple lung nodules and 5 adjacent normal tissues from 4 patients with multiple pulmonary nodules and decoded the mutation information from a perspective of cellular functions and signaling pathways. Mutated genes as well as mutation patterns shared in more than two lesions were identified and characterized. We found that the number of mutations or mutated genes and the extent of protein structural changes caused by different mutations is positively correlated with the degree of malignancy. Moreover, the mutated genes in the nodules are associated with the molecular functions or signaling pathways related to cell proliferation and survival. We showed a developing pattern of quantity (the number of mutations/mutated genes) and quality (the extent of protein structural changes) in multiple pulmonary nodules. The mutation and mutated genes in multiple pulmonary nodules are associated with cell proliferation and survival related signaling pathways. This study provides a new perspective for comprehension of genomic mutational data and might shed new light on deciphering molecular evolution of early stage lung adenocarcinoma.

Establishment of Criteria for Molecular Differential Diagnosis of MPLC and IPM

BACKGROUNDS

Differential diagnosis of multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) and intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) is one difficulty in lung cancer diagnosis, and crucial for establishment of treatment strategies and prognosis prediction. This study aims to establish the criteria for molecular differential diagnosis of synchronous MPLC and IPM by the next-generation sequencing (NGS) method.

METHODS

Training cohort included 30 synchronous MPLC (67 samples) patients and 5 synchronous IPM (13 samples) patients with adenocarcinoma. Criteria of MPLC/IPM differential diagnosis were established by results from a NGS-based 605-gene panel test. Subsequently, 16 patients (36 samples) were recruited as the validation cohort to verify the criteria.

RESULTS

IPM lesions showed a high degree of mutation overlap with an average concordance rate of 60.2% (range: 15.8%-91.7%). IPM lesions had at least three common alterations, including both high-frequency driver gene alterations and low-frequency gene alterations. In contrast, the average concordance rate of MPLC was 11.0% (range: 0.0%-100.0%), among which 66.7% (20/30) of patients had no common alterations (concordance rate: 0%). In the remaining 10 patients, 9 had only one overlapping alteration while 1 had two overlapping alterations, in which 6 patients had EGFR L858R overlapping mutation. Alterations were classified into trunk, shared, and branch subtypes. Branch alterations accounted for 94.4% of mutations in MPLC, while accounted for only 45.0% in IMP. In contrast, the ratio of trunk (38.3%) and shared (16.7%) alterations in IPM was significantly higher. The criteria for differentiating MPLC from IPM using 605-gene panel was established: 1) MPLC can be interpreted if no overlapping alterations is found; 2) MPLC is recommended if one overlapping high-frequency drive gene alteration and/or one overlapping low-frequency gene alteration are/is found; 3) IPM can be interpreted if more than three common alterations are found. Subsequently, 16 patients were recruited as the validation cohort in the single-blind manner to verify the criteria, and 14 MPLC and 2 IPM were identified, which was 100% consistent with the results from independent imaging and pathological diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

NGS detection can distinguish synchronous MPLC from IPM and is a useful tool to assist differential diagnosis.