1
|
Hu Q, Xiao Y, Wei R, Tang T, Wen L, Lu Y, Yu XQ. Identification and functional analysis of CG3526 in spermatogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster. INSECT SCIENCE 2024; 31:79-90. [PMID: 37465843 DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.13243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Spermatogenesis is a critical part of reproduction in insects; however, its molecular mechanism is still largely unknown. In this study, we identified a testis-specific gene CG3526 in Drosophila melanogaster. Bioinformatics analysis showed that CG3526 contains a zinc binding domain and 2 C2 H2 type zinc fingers, and it is clustered to the vertebrate really interesting new gene (RING) family E3 ubiquitin-protein ligases. When CG3526 was knocked down by RNA interference (RNAi), the testis became much smaller in size, and the apical tip exhibited a sharp and thin end instead of the blunt and round shape in the control testis. More importantly, compared to the control flies, only a few mature sperm were present in the seminal vesicle of C587-Gal4 > CG3526 RNAi flies. Immunofluorescence staining of the testis from CG3526 RNAi flies showed that the homeostasis of testis stem cell niche was disrupted, cell distribution in the apical tip was scattered, and the process of spermatogenesis was not completed. Furthermore, we found that the phenotype of CG3526 RNAi flies' testis was similar to that of testis of Stat92E RNAi flies, the expression level of CG3526 was significantly downregulated in the Stat92EF06346 mutant flies, and the promoter activity of CG3526 was upregulated by STAT92E. Taken together, our results indicated that CG3526 is a downstream effector gene in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway that plays a key role in the spermatogenesis of Drosophila.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qihao Hu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Insect Development Regulation and Application Research, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China
| | - Yanhong Xiao
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Insect Development Regulation and Application Research, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China
| | - Runnan Wei
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Insect Development Regulation and Application Research, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China
| | - Ting Tang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Insect Development Regulation and Application Research, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China
| | - Liang Wen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Insect Development Regulation and Application Research, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China
| | - Yuzhen Lu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Insect Development Regulation and Application Research, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China
| | - Xiao-Qiang Yu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Insect Development Regulation and Application Research, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rubin T, Macaisne N, Vallés AM, Guilleman C, Gaugué I, Dal Toe L, Huynh JR. Premeiotic pairing of homologous chromosomes during Drosophila male meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2207660119. [PMID: 36375065 PMCID: PMC9704699 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2207660119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In the early stages of meiosis, maternal and paternal chromosomes pair with their homologous partner and recombine to ensure exchange of genetic information and proper segregation. These events can vary drastically between species and between males and females of the same species. In Drosophila, in contrast to females, males do not form synaptonemal complexes (SCs), do not recombine, and have no crossing over; yet, males are able to segregate their chromosomes properly. Here, we investigated the early steps of homolog pairing in Drosophila males. We found that homolog centromeres are not paired in germline stem cells (GSCs) and become paired in the mitotic region before meiotic entry, similarly to females. Surprisingly, male germline cells express SC proteins, which localize to centromeres and promote pairing. We further found that the SUN/KASH (LINC) complex and microtubules are required for homolog pairing as in females. Chromosome movements in males, however, are much slower than in females and we demonstrate that this slow dynamic is compensated in males by having longer cell cycles. In agreement, slowing down cell cycles was sufficient to rescue pairing-defective mutants in female meiosis. Our results demonstrate that although meiosis differs significantly between males and females, sex-specific cell cycle kinetics integrate similar molecular mechanisms to achieve proper centromere pairing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Rubin
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, CNRS UMR 7241, INSERM U1050, Collège de France and Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
| | | | - Ana Maria Vallés
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, CNRS UMR 7241, INSERM U1050, Collège de France and Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Clara Guilleman
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, CNRS UMR 7241, INSERM U1050, Collège de France and Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Isabelle Gaugué
- Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, CNRS UMR 3215, INSERM U934, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Laurine Dal Toe
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, CNRS UMR 7241, INSERM U1050, Collège de France and Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Jean-René Huynh
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, CNRS UMR 7241, INSERM U1050, Collège de France and Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gadre P, Nitsure N, Mazumdar D, Gupta S, Ray K. The rates of stem cell division determine the cell cycle lengths of its lineage. iScience 2021; 24:103232. [PMID: 34746698 PMCID: PMC8555441 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Adult stem cells and their transit-amplifying progeny alter their proliferation rates to maintain tissue homeostasis. To test how the division rates of stem cells and transit-amplifying progeny affect tissue growth and differentiation, we developed a computation strategy that estimates the average cell-cycle lengths (lifespans) of germline stem cells and their progeny from fixed-tissue demography in the Drosophila testis. Analysis of the wild-type data using this method indicated that during the germline transit-amplification, the cellular lifespans extend by nearly 1.3-fold after the first division and shrink by about 2-folds after the second division. Cell-autonomous perturbations of the stem cell lifespan accordingly altered the lifespans of successive transit-amplifying stages. Remarkably, almost 2-fold alterations in the lifespans of stem cells and their immediate daughters did not affect the subsequent differentiation. The results indicate that the early germline division rates can adjust the following division rates and the onset of differentiation. Prediction of cellular lifespan from the demography of transit-amplifying cells Lifespans of spermatogonial cells change anomalously during transit-amplification Anomalous lifespan extension during transit-amplification precedes the onset of Bam Lifespan changes of early TA stages readjust that of the subsequent stages
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Purna Gadre
- Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400005, India
| | - Nitin Nitsure
- School of Mathematics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400005, India
| | - Debasmita Mazumdar
- Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400005, India.,Biology Department, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, Maharashtra 411008, India
| | - Samir Gupta
- Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400005, India.,Department of Molecular and Life Sciences, University Zurich, 80006 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Krishanu Ray
- Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400005, India
| |
Collapse
|