1
|
Karras M, Delhomme P, Csillik A. Better understanding female and male driving offenders' behavior: Psychological resources and vulnerabilities matter! ACCIDENT; ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION 2024; 194:107373. [PMID: 37944190 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Although driving risk taking appears to be mainly male, an increase in driving violations has been observed in recent years among French female drivers. The main objective of the present study was to explore the driving behaviors, psychological resources, and vulnerabilities of female and male driving offenders participating in a French driver rehabilitation program. The second aim was to examine to what extent females' and males' resources and vulnerabilities predicted their violations, engagement in distracting activities while driving, and prosocial driving behaviors. In the course of 110 rehabilitation programs, 1686 driving offenders (22.4% females) completed a paper-and-pencil questionnaire. Compared to male offenders, females were more likely to have received a higher education, be divorced, or separated, and drive fewer annual kilometers. They also had had fewer demerit points than males in the last three years. They were more empathetic but also more impulsive than their male counterparts and less self-compassionate and mindful. Regression and moderation analyses revealed that, across genders, certain psychological resources such as mindfulness can be considered as protective factors for driving offenders as they tend to decrease dangerous behaviors and increase prosocial ones, while vulnerabilities such as aggressive driving anger expression seem to have the opposite effect. Our results provide a better understanding of driving offenders' behavior and the influence of personal dispositions. They also open new interesting research avenues in the prevention of dangerous behaviors among this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Karras
- Université Paris Nanterre, Laboratoire CLIPSYD, Nanterre F-92000, France.
| | - Patricia Delhomme
- Univ Gustave Eiffel, Université Paris Cité, LaPEA, Versailles F-78000, France
| | - Antonia Csillik
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, équipe EPSAM, Metz F-57000, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang Z, Chen F, Liu S, Dai M, Zhang H. Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief-Mindful Self-Care Scale: A Translation and Validation Study. Front Psychol 2021; 12:715507. [PMID: 34484076 PMCID: PMC8414633 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to translate the Brief-Mindful Self-Care Scale (B-MSCS) into Chinese and validate its reliability and validity among hospice nurses. Methods: A total of 510 hospice nurses were recruited from three provinces in China. The reliability of the translated scale was measured by internal consistency, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability. The validity of the translated scale was evaluated by expert consultation, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The Cronbach's α value of the Chinese version of B-MSCS was 0.920, and the Cronbach's α value of the dimensions ranged from 0.850 to 0.933. The split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were 0.770 and 0.723, respectively. Furthermore, the content validity index of the scale (S-CVI) was 0.946. The 6-factor structure, supported by the eigenvalues, total variance explained, and scree plot were obtained by using exploratory factor analysis. Moreover, as a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, the model fitting indexes were all in the acceptable range. Conclusion: The Chinese version of B-MSCS had suitable reliability and validity among hospice nurses. The developed scale will evaluate the level of mindful self-care of Chinese hospice nurses, providing an opportunity for development of targeted educational plans. Each item is a direct guide for hospice nurses to develop their mindful self-care practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Yang
- Department of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China
| | - Fengmin Chen
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China
| | - Siqi Liu
- Department of Nursing, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China
| | - Ming Dai
- Department of Nursing, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, China
| | - Huijun Zhang
- Department of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baltruschat S, Mas-Cuesta L, Cándido A, Maldonado A, Verdejo-Lucas C, Catena-Verdejo E, Catena A. Repeat Traffic Offenders Improve Their Performance in Risky Driving Situations and Have Fewer Accidents Following a Mindfulness-Based Intervention. Front Psychol 2021; 11:567278. [PMID: 33551896 PMCID: PMC7854448 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Risky decision-making is highly influenced by emotions and can lead to fatal consequences. Attempts to reduce risk-taking include the use of mindfulness-based interventions (MBI), which have shown promising results for both emotion regulation (ER) and risk-taking. However, it is still unclear whether improved emotion regulation is the mechanism responsible for reduced risk-taking. In the present study, we explore the effect of a 5-week MBI on risky driving in a group of repeat traffic offenders by comparing them with non-repeat offenders and repeat offenders without training. We evaluated the driving behavior of the participants through a driving simulation, and self-reported emotion regulation, both before and after the intervention. At baseline, poor emotion regulation was related to a more unstable driving behavior, and speeding. The group that received mindfulness training showed improved performance during risky driving situations and had fewer accidents, although their overall driving behavior remained largely unchanged. The observed trend toward improved emotion regulation was not significant. We discuss whether other effects of MBI – such as self-regulation of attention – could underlie the observed reduction in risky driving in the initial stages. Nonetheless, our findings still confirm the close relationship between emotion regulation skills and risky driving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Baltruschat
- Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Laura Mas-Cuesta
- Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Antonio Cándido
- Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Antonio Maldonado
- Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | | | | | - Andrés Catena
- Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stephens AN, O'Hern S, Young KL, Chambers R, Hassed C, Koppel S. Self-reported mindfulness, cyclist anger and aggression. ACCIDENT; ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION 2020; 144:105625. [PMID: 32526500 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Anger is a common behaviour exhibited by road users when one's goals are perceived to have been blocked by another. Recent research has demonstrated that, generally, cyclists tend to deal with anger in constructive ways. However, when anger does manifest, it can result in behaviours that increase their crash risk. Amongst motor vehicle drivers, mindfulness levels have been associated with less anger and appear to mediate anger and associated aggression. The current study sought to understand whether mindfulness has similar associations with anger and aggression in a sample of cyclists. A total of 583 cyclists (males = 68 %) completed an online questionnaire that sought information on their levels of mindfulness, current mindfulness practices and tendencies for anger and aggression while cycling. The relationships between these were then examined using structural equation modelling. The results showed that cyclists with higher mindfulness levels tended to report less anger across a range of situations (e.g., interactions with pedestrians, cyclists, motor vehicle drivers and police). Both direct and indirect (through anger) relationships were found between mindfulness and aggression, again showing that more mindful cyclists tended to engage in less frequent aggression. These findings align with recent research investigating this relationship amongst motor vehicle drivers and suggest that mindfulness may be a promising strategy to reduce or avoid anger and aggression in cyclists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A N Stephens
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
| | - S O'Hern
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, & Monash Institute of Transport Studies, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - K L Young
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - R Chambers
- Campus Community Division, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - C Hassed
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - S Koppel
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koppel S, Bugeja L, Hua P, Osborne R, Stephens AN, Young KL, Chambers R, Hassed C. Do mindfulness interventions improve road safety? A systematic review. ACCIDENT; ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION 2019; 123:88-98. [PMID: 30468950 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Mindfulness has been identified as a potentially effective intervention for reducing road trauma. In this paper, we report on the results of a systematic review which examined the evidence regarding the relationship between mindfulness and road safety. The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017075704). The primary outcomes measured were crash or near-crash rates and the secondary outcomes were driving violations (including speeding and texting while driving) and driving performance (i.e., errors in driving simulator, etc.). This review was registered with PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017075704. A systematic search of databases from the disciplines of public health, psychology and transport safety (Ovid Cochrane Library, Ovid PsycINFO, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL PLUS, Ovid TRANSPORT and TRID: TRIS and ITRD database) was conducted on February 7th 2018. Seventeen studies (12 cross-sectional and 5 case-control) published between 2011 and 2017 met the inclusion criteria. These all focused on the association between mindfulness or mind-wandering on road safety measures including driving performance (vehicle control, reaction time), compliance with speed zones and traffic signals, near-crash and crash rates, as well as propensity to engage in distracted driving behaviours. The results of the review suggest that mindfulness may be particularly useful for preventing distracted driving. However, a number of limitations in the existing research are noted. It is clear that more research is warranted to specifically investigate the effectiveness of mindfulness as an intervention for reducing road trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sjaan Koppel
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia.
| | - Lyndal Bugeja
- Health Law and Ageing Research Unit, Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Phuong Hua
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Rachel Osborne
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Amanda N Stephens
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Kristie L Young
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
| | | | - Craig Hassed
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, VIC 3168, Australia
| |
Collapse
|