Cellphone-distracted crashes of novice teen drivers: Understanding associations of contributing factors for crash severity levels and cellphone usage types

Unraveling the differences in distracted driving injury severities in passenger car, sport utility vehicle, pickup truck, and minivan crashes

Distracted driving poses a significant risk on the roadway users, with the level of distraction and crash outcomes varying depending on the type of vehicle. Drivers of passenger cars, sport utility vehicles (SUVs), pickup trucks, minivans experience distinct levels of distraction, leading to potential crashes. This study investigates into the severity of driver injuries resulting from distracted driving in these vehicle categories, shedding light on the variations in single-vehicle crashes. Focusing on single-vehicle crashes in Florida during 2019, involving passenger cars, SUVs, pickup trucks, and minivans caused by distracted driving, the study examines various distractions such as, electronic communication devices (cell phones), electronic devices (navigation systems, music players), internal and external disturbances, texting, and inattentive driving. To analyze the severity of injuries resulting from distracted driving in passenger cars, SUVs, pickup trucks, and minivans, the study employs random parameter multinomial logit models with heterogeneity in means and variances. The model estimates highlight thirty-five significant factors influencing the severity of driver injuries resulting from distracted driving. Notably, the impact of these factors varies significantly depending on the vehicle type (i.e., passenger cars, SUVs, pickup trucks, and minivans). While many explanatory variables are specific to each vehicle type, only one factor (restraint belt usage) is common across all vehicle types, with varying magnitudes in injury outcomes. The likelihood ratio tests indicate that injury severity must be analyzed and modeled separately for passenger cars, SUVs, pickup trucks, and minivans. Vehicle characteristics play a crucial role in driver distraction and crash outcomes. Analyzing a year of crash data, categorized by four vehicle types, has provided valuable insights into distracted driving patterns in passenger cars, SUVs, pickup trucks, and minivans, influencing potential prevention strategies. To combat against distracted driving effectively, priority should be given to driver education and training, roadway design, vehicle technology, enforcement, and automobile insurance. The automobile industry, especially for passenger cars, SUVs, pickup trucks, and minivans, should consider implementing advanced in-vehicle technologies tailored to the specific characteristics of each vehicle type (e.g., advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS)) to proactively prevent driver distraction. These proactive measures will contribute significantly to enhancing road safety and reducing the risks associated with distracted driving.

Crashes involving distracted pedestrians: Identifying risk factors and their relationships to pedestrian severity levels and distraction modes

The concept of distracted pedestrians and its impact on highway safety has gained increasing attention in recent years. However, studies focusing exclusively on distracted pedestrian crashes are less pervasive than distracted driving. In addition, most prior studies investigate the harmful effect of cellphone usage while walking, without considering other forms of pedestrian distraction. Also, the existing literature provides limited knowledge on comprehending the affinities between pedestrian distraction and safety consequences. This study aims to reveal the chain of contributing factors involved in distracted pedestrian crashes, considering both pedestrian severity levels and specific distraction-related tasks. Ten years (2010-2019) of related crashes were extracted from the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD) database, and association rule mining (ARM) was applied to identify the meaningful crash patterns. Different distracting activities of pedestrians were introduced from the narratives of police-investigated crash reports. The study findings exhibit the complex nature of distracted pedestrian crashes by highlighting the intricate relationships between risk factors. On road segments, distracted male pedestrians aged 41-64 were more likely to be fatal/severely injured in dark-not-lighted conditions. Crashes involving pedestrians using electronic devices were often found at intersections. Distractions caused by pets, persons, or objects were strongly associated with crossing segments in rural settings. In-person conversation while standing on roadways in urban residential locations without traffic controls was found to increase vulnerability. Working on vehicles while wearing dark clothes and in dark-not-lighted conditions was identified as an influential factor in crash occurrence. Moreover, careless or inattentive actions of pedestrians while playing on the road segments were associated with a high likelihood of crashes. These study outcomes are crucial in uncovering the coexisting crash characteristics related to distracted pedestrians, which can be helpful in targeting and developing effective educational, design, and enforcement strategies to improve pedestrian safety.

Data mining approach to explore emergency vehicle crash patterns: A comparative study of crash severity in emergency and non-emergency response modes

Emergency vehicle crashes, involving police vehicles, ambulances, and fire trucks, pose a serious traffic safety concern causing severe injury and deaths to first responders and other road users. However, limited research is available focusing on the contributing factors and their interactions related to these crashes. This research aims to address this gap by 1) identifying patterns of emergency vehicle crashes based on severity levels in both emergency and non-emergency modes and 2) comparing the associations by response modes for the related fatal, nonfatal injury, and no-injury crashes. Two national crash databases, Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and Crash Report Sampling System (CRSS), were utilized for police-reported emergency vehicle crashes from January 2016 to February 2020. Association rule mining (ARM) was employed to reveal the association between factors that strongly contributed to these crashes. The generated rules were validated using the lift increase criterion (LIC). The results showed the complex nature of risk factors influencing the severity of emergency vehicle crashes. The fatal consequences of speeding with no seatbelt usage were evident for emergency mode, whereas none of these risky driving attributes was observed for non-emergency mode. In addition, the analysis identified the risk of fatal emergency vehicle crashes involving pedestrians in dark-lighted conditions in both response modes. Regarding nonfatal injury severity, angle collisions were more likely to occur at urban intersections during emergencies, while rear-end crashes were more frequent on segments with a posted speed limit of 40-45 mph during non-emergency incidents. The outcomes also revealed that the no-injury crashes involving fire trucks exhibited different patterns depending on the response mode. The findings of this study can guide in making effective strategies to improve safe driving behavior of first responders. The identified associations provide insights into the factors that can be controlled to ensure safe operation of emergency vehicles on the road.

Drivers' self-regulatory behaviors in active and responsive scenarios

OBJECTIVE

Drivers usually appear to self-regulate their driving behaviors in situations considered to be challenging, such as mobile phone-distracted driving. It is important to clarify how drivers self-regulate their actual behaviors. In addition, few studies investigated driver distraction in active and responsive scenarios. Therefore, the present study aimed to gain a better understanding of drivers' actual self-regulation of driving behaviors and phone use behaviors while mobile phone-distracted driving in active and responsive scenarios. The contribution of compensatory beliefs to self-regulation was also explored.

METHODS

This study was conducted using a 2 (mobile phone use behaviors: phone calling vs. WeChat messaging) × 2 (scenarios: active vs. responsive) within-group design. A total of 34 participants completed a driving simulation experiment. The dependent variables of drivers' driving behaviors, phone use behaviors, and physiological data were collected. Participants' compensatory belief was also measured.

RESULTS

The results showed that the speed reduction in the stages with WeChat messaging was significantly greater than that in the stages with phone calls, and the speed reduction in the responsive scenario was significantly greater than that in the active scenario. Participants would adopt relatively equal phone-use-related self-regulatory behaviors in active and responsive scenarios. Participants with higher compensatory beliefs had relatively greater speed reduction in most scenarios, but fewer phone-use-related self-regulatory behaviors. In addition, the respiratory rate could contribute to evaluating the changes in drivers' physiological status during phone calling-distracted driving.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants would self-regulate driving behaviors and phone use behaviors according to different distracted driving tasks and scenarios. The driving-related self-regulation in WeChat messaging scenarios and responsive scenarios was greater. There was a trend in the effect of compensatory beliefs on actual self-regulatory behaviors, which needs to be further verified in the future. This study contributes to the verification of the different actual driving-related and phone-use-related self-regulatory behavior of drivers in active and responsive mobile phone distracted driving scenarios.