Resilience across the Transition to Cancer Survivorship

Social Support Buffers the Effect of Social Deprivation on Comorbidity Burden in Adults with Cancer

BACKGROUND

Adults with cancer have higher rates of comorbidity compared to those without cancer, with excess burden in people from lower socioeconomic status (SES). Social deprivation, based on geographic indices, broadens the focus of SES to include the importance of "place" and its association with health. Further, social support is a modifiable resource found to have direct and indirect effects on health in adults with cancer, with less known about its impact on comorbidity.

PURPOSE

We prospectively examined associations between social deprivation and comorbidity burden and the potential buffering role of social support.

METHODS

Our longitudinal sample of 420 adults (Mage = 59.6, SD = 11.6; 75% Non-Hispanic White) diagnosed with cancer completed measures at baseline (~6 months post-diagnosis) and four subsequent 3-month intervals for 1 year.

RESULTS

Adjusting for age, cancer type, and race/ethnicity, we found a statistically significant interaction between social support and the effect of social deprivation on comorbidity burden (β = -0.11, p = 0.012), such that greater social support buffered the negative effect of social deprivation on comorbidity burden.

CONCLUSION

Implementing routine screening for social deprivation in cancer care settings can help identify patients at risk of excess comorbidity burden. Clinician recognition of these findings could trigger a referral to social support resources for individuals high on social deprivation.

Physical health and function trajectories in adults with cancer: psychosocial predictors of class membership

PURPOSE

To prospectively examine different trajectories of recovery, across different aspects of physical health and function and to examine trajectory class membership.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 569 recently diagnosed adult cancer patients (Mage = 58.7) between 2019 and 2022 identified through the Rapid Case Ascertainment resource of The Yale Cancer Center. Patients were diagnosed with breast (63.8%), prostate (25.3%), or colorectal cancer (10.9%) within six-months of baseline assessment. Participants completed comprehensive psychosocial and health survey measures (SF-12) through REDCap at five time points. Growth mixture modeling examined unconditional distinct trajectories for four aspects of physical health and function. We fit logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression models to estimate associations between psychosocial predictors of trajectory class membership for each of the four aspects.

RESULTS

We identified distinct trajectories of physical health and function. Over one-third (38.4%) of the sample experienced low and declining scores in their ability to accomplish work/regular daily activities due to physical health. Over half (54.9%) demonstrate moderately stable general health with no improvement over time. A small but significant subset of the sample (3%, 5.7%, 5%) was in the moderate and declining groups with sharp decline in physical function, bodily pain, and general health, after treatment. Different predictors of trajectory class membership were also found.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed heterogeneity in physical health and function trajectories and different patterns of predictors for each aspect of physical health and function. Findings have the potential to inform screening and intervention efforts to help those who may need additional support.

Breast Cancer and the Brain: A Comprehensive Review of Neurological Complications

Breast cancer, one of the most prevalent malignancies globally, poses a substantial health burden with its diverse neurological complications. This comprehensive review examines the intricate landscape of breast cancer's neurological effects, encompassing brain metastases, non-metastatic complications, and their profound influence on the quality of life, prognosis, and survival of affected individuals. The mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and treatment modalities of brain metastasis and the critical role of interdisciplinary collaboration in their management are explored. Additionally, we address non-metastatic neurological complications, including paraneoplastic syndromes, treatment-related side effects, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, and radiation-induced neurotoxicity, shedding light on the challenges they present and the importance of cognitive and emotional well-being. Prognostic factors and survival rates are discussed, emphasizing the complexity of variables impacting patient outcomes. Lastly, we underscore the vital role of collaborative care in addressing these multifaceted challenges, highlighting future research directions and the ongoing quest to enhance the quality of life for breast cancer patients.

Perceived negative consequences of cancer and psychological distress in survivors: the moderating role of social support

PURPOSE

Many cancer survivors experience psychological distress at some point during their care. The degree to which individuals perceive negative consequences of cancer has been associated with psychological distress, including anxiety and depression. Identifying psychosocial factors that buffer the effects of illness perceptions on distress may provide a target for intervention to improve the psychological health of cancer survivors. As such, the present study aimed to examine whether social support moderates the relationship between perceived negative consequences of cancer and psychological distress.

METHODS

The current longitudinal study of 413 cancer survivors (64% female, 58% breast cancer, Mage = 59.68, SD = 11.41) examined social support as a potential moderator of the relationship, hypothesizing that greater overall perceived social support would buffer the relationship between perceived negative consequences of cancer and subsequent symptoms of anxiety and depression.

RESULTS

Perceived negative consequences of cancer predicted anxiety and depression over time (p < .05), but social support had a buffering effect on the perceived negative consequences of cancer-anxiety relationship (β =  - .20, p < .001) as well as the perceived negative consequences of cancer-depression relationship (β =  - .11, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that social support is a protective factor over time against the pathway of illness perceptions leading to psychological distress among cancer survivors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Interventions that improve social support in cancer survivors may attenuate psychological distress and help support these individuals in their survivorship journey.

Disruption in Cancer Care During Early Survivorship due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine

PURPOSE

The extent to which adults with cancer during early survivorship experienced disruptions in care due to COVID-19 pandemic, as well as their experiences with the transition to telemedicine, remains understudied.

METHODS

We examined cancer care disruption and satisfaction with telemedicine due to COVID-19 in 361 adults (Mage = 59.42, SD = 11.3) with breast, prostate or colorectal cancer during early survivorship. The Telemedicine Satisfaction and Usefulness Questionnaire (TSUQ) and patient self-report Cancer Care Disruption Index (CCDI) was administered via RedCap survey.

RESULTS

The most prevalent areas of patient-reported cancer care disruption included supportive care appointments canceled/postponed (57%), in-person appointments changed to virtual appointments (56%), social work services canceled (32%), palliative care appointments canceled/postponed (24%), elective surgeries related to cancer postponed (23%), and screening tests postponed (19%). Regarding patient satisfaction with telemedicine, 78.0% "agree" or "strongly agree" that they were satisfied with the overall telemedicine system. Most survivors reported satisfaction with their doctor dealing with problems (88.2%), doctors answering patient questions (92.7%), and engaged patients in care (86.1%), However, 49.3% of cancer patients disagreed that virtual visits are as satisfying as in-person visits and 35.6% were dissatisfied with the lack of physical contact during virtual visits.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cancer survivorship care, with supportive care, social work services, and mode of delivery (in-person vs. virtual) particularly affected. The downstream impact of cancer care disruption in those living with cancer during the pandemic as well as the quality of telehealth modality as part of cancer survivorship care delivery await future investigation.