Airborne concentrations of benzene associated with the historical use of some formulations of liquid wrench

Modeling occupational exposure to solvent vapors using the Two-Zone (near-field/far-field) model: a literature review

The Two-Zone model is used in occupational hygiene to predict both near-field and far-field airborne contaminant concentrations. A literature review was carried out on 21 scientific publications in which the Two-Zone model was used to assess occupational exposure to solvent vapors. Data on exposure scenarios, solvents, generation/emission rates, near- and far-field parameters, and model performance were collected and analyzed. Over the 24 exposure scenarios identified, 18 were evaluated under controlled conditions, 5 under normal workplace activities, and 1 was reported based on literature data. The scenarios involved a variety of tasks which consisted, mostly, of cleaning metal parts, spraying solvents onto surfaces, spilling liquids, and filling containers with volatile substances. Twenty-eight different solvents were modeled and the most commonly tested were benzene, toluene, and acetone. Emission rates were considered constant in 16 scenarios, exponentially decreasing in 6 scenarios, and intermittent in 2 scenarios. Four-hundred-and-forty-six (446) predicted-to-measured concentration ratios were calculated across the 21 studies; 441 were obtained in controlled conditions, 4 under normal workplace activities, and 1 was calculated based on the literature data. For controlled studies, the Two-Zone model predictive performance was within a factor of 0.3-3.7 times the measured concentrations with 93% of the values between 0.5 and 2. The model overestimated the measured concentrations in 63% of the evaluations. The median predicted concentration for the near-field was 1.38 vs. 1.02 for the far-field. Results suggest that the model might be a useful tool for predicting occupational exposure to vapors of solvents by providing a conservative approach. Harmonization in model testing strategies and data presentation is needed in future studies to improve the assessment of the predictability of the Two-Zone model. Moreover, this review has provided a database of exposure scenarios, input parameter values, and model predictive performances which can be useful to occupational hygienists in their future modeling activities.

The near field/far field model with constant application of chemical mass and exponentially decreasing emission of the mass applied

The near field/far field (NF/FF) model is a contaminant dispersion construct that permits making airborne contaminant exposure estimates for an individual located close to an emission source. In the present analysis, chemical emission involves a constant mass rate of chemical application to surfaces, denoted I (mg/min), and an exponentially decreasing rate of emission of the chemical from the surfaces with rate constant α (min(-1)). The time-dependent emission rate function is: G(t), mg/min = I - I exp(- αt), where time t is in minutes. The exact time-dependent equations for the contaminant concentration in the NF and the FF are presented. These equations are used to revise a previous analysis of a study in which a penetrant liquid containing benzene was applied to parts on a work table in a test room. The previous analysis assumed that the benzene was applied as a bolus at the start of a 15-min use period, whereas the present analysis assumes the same total benzene mass was applied at a uniform rate over the 15-min use period, but with the same evaporation rate constant α. The new G(t) function leads to a lower 15-min time weighted average NF benzene concentration that better matches the experimental data. It is also shown that the exact equation for the NF concentration is well approximated by combining two well-mixed single-zone equations. The approximation method is mathematically simpler and obviates the need to derive the exact NF equation.

Benzene Exposures and Risk Potential for Vehicle Mechanics from Gasoline and Petroleum-Derived Products

Benzene exposures among vehicle mechanics in the United States and abroad were characterized using available data from published and unpublished studies. In the United States, the time-weighted-average (TWA) airborne concentration of benzene for vehicle mechanics averaged 0.01-0.05 ppm since at least the late 1970s, with maximal TWA concentrations ranging from 0.03 to 0.38 ppm. Benzene exposures were notably lower in the summer than winter and in the Southwest compared to other geographic regions, but significantly higher during known gasoline-related tasks such as draining a gas tank or changing a fuel pump or fuel filter. Measured airborne concentrations of benzene were also generally greater for vehicle mechanics in other countries, likely due to the higher benzene content of gasoline and other factors. Short-term airborne concentrations of benzene frequently exceeded 1 ppm during gasoline-related tasks, but remained below 0.2 ppm for tasks involving other petroleum-derived products such as carburetor and brake cleaner or parts washer solvent. Application of a two-zone mathematical model using reasonable input values from the literature yielded predicted task-based benzene concentrations during gasoline and aerosol spray cleaner scenarios similar to those measured for vehicle mechanics during these types of tasks. When evaluated using appropriate biomarkers, dermal exposures were found to contribute little to total benzene exposures for this occupational group. Available data suggest that vehicle mechanics have not experienced significant exposures to benzene in the workplace, except perhaps during short-duration gasoline-related tasks, and full-shift benzene exposures have remained well below current and contemporaneous occupational exposure limits. These findings are consistent with epidemiology studies of vehicle mechanics, which have not demonstrated an increased risk of benzene-induced health effects in this cohort of workers. Data and information presented here may be used to assess past, current, or future exposures and risks to benzene for vehicle mechanics who may be exposed to gasoline or other petroleum-derived products.

The role of exhaust ventilation systems in reducing occupational exposure to organic solvents in a paint manufacturing factory

This paper presents the successful design and implementation of several exhaust ventilation systems in a paint manufacturing factory. The ventilation systems were designed based on American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists recommendations. The duct works, fans, and other parts were made and mounted by local manufacturers. The concentrations of toluene and xylene as the common solvents used in paint mixing factories were measured to evaluate the role of ventilation systems in controlling the organic solvents. Occupational exposure to toluene and xylene as the major pollutants was assessed with and without applying ventilation systems. For this purpose, samples were taken from breathing zone of exposed workers using personal samples. The samples were analyzed using Occupational Safety and Health Administration analytical method No.12. The samples were quantified using gas chromatography. The results showed that the ventilation systems successfully controlled toluene and xylene vapors in workplace, air well below the recommended threshold limit value of Iran (44.49 and 97.73 ppm, respectively). It was also discovered that benzene concentration in workplace air was higher than its allowable concentrations. This could be from solvents impurities that require more investigations.

Occupational exposures associated with petroleum-derived products containing trace levels of benzene

Benzene may be present as a trace impurity or residual component of mixed petroleum products due to refining processes. In this article, the authors review the historical benzene content of various petroleum-derived products and characterize the airborne concentrations of benzene associated with the typical handling or use of these products in the United States, based on indoor exposure modeling and industrial hygiene air monitoring data collected since the late 1970s. Analysis showed that products that normally contained less than 0.1% v/v benzene, such as paints and paint solvents, printing solvents and inks, cutting and honing oils, adhesives, mineral spirits and degreasers, and jet fuel typically have yielded time-weighted average (TWA) airborne concentrations of benzene in the breathing zone and surrounding air ranging on average from <0.01 to 0.3 ppm. Except for a limited number of studies where the benzene content of the product was not confirmed to be <0.1% v/v, airborne benzene concentrations were also less than current occupational exposure limits (e.g., threshold limit value of 0.5 ppm and permissible exposure limit of 1.0 ppm) based on exceedance fraction calculations. Exposure modeling using Monte Carlo techniques also predicted 8-hr TWA near field airborne benzene concentrations ranging from 0.002 to 0.4 ppm under three hypothetical solvent use scenarios involving mineral spirits. The overall weight-of-evidence indicates that the vast majority of products manufactured in the United States after about 1978 contained <0.1% v/v benzene, and 8-hr TWA airborne concentrations of benzene in the workplace during the use of these products would not have been expected to exceed 0.5 ppm under most product use scenarios. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene for the following free supplemental resource: a document containing exposure modeling scenarios and results, historical benzene content of petroleum-derived products, and air monitoring results.].

Worker exposure to methanol vapors during cleaning of semiconductor wafers in a manufacturing setting

An exposure simulation was conducted to characterize methanol exposure of workers who cleaned wafers in quality control departments within the semiconductor industry. Short-term (15 min) and long-term (2-4 hr) personal and area samples (at distances of 1 m and 3-6 m from the source) were collected during the 2-day simulation. On the first day, 45 mL of methanol were used per hour by a single worker washing wafers in a 102 m(3) room with a ventilation rate of about 10 air changes per hour (ACH). Virtually all methanol volatilized. To assess exposures under conditions associated with higher productivity, on the second day, two workers cleaned wafers simultaneously, together using methanol at over twice the rate of the first day (95 mL/hr). On this day, the ventilation rate was halved (5 ACH). Personal concentrations on the first day averaged 60 ppm (SD = 46 ppm) and ranged from 10-140 ppm. On the second day, personal concentrations for both workers averaged 118 ppm (SD = 50 ppm; range: 64-270 ppm). Area concentrations measured on the first day at 1 m from the source and throughout the balance of the room averaged 29 ppm (SD = 19 ppm; range: 4-83 ppm) and 18 ppm (SD = 12 ppm; range: 3-42 ppm), respectively. As expected, area concentrations measured on the second day were higher than the first and averaged 73 ppm (SD = 25 ppm; range: 27-140 ppm) at 1 meter and 48 ppm (SD = 13 ppm; range: 21-67 ppm) throughout the balance of the room. The results of this simulation suggest that the use of methanol to clean semiconductor wafers without the use of local exhaust ventilation and with relatively low room ventilation rates is unlikely to result in worker exposures exceeding the current ACGIH(R) threshold limit value of 200 ppm. This study also confirmed prior studies suggesting that when a relatively volatile chemical is located within arm's length (near field), breathing zone concentrations will be about two- to threefold greater than the room concentration when the air exchange rate is 5-10 ACH.