Comparison of early vascular morphological changes between bioresorbable poly-L-lactic acid scaffolds and metallic stents in porcine iliac arteries

Recent advances in the design of cardiovascular materials for biomedical applications

Biomaterials dominate the field of cardiovascular therapeutics, a multitude of which have been used to repair and replace injured heart tissue. This field has evolved beyond the simple selection of compatible materials and now focuses on the rational design of controlled structures that integrate with the cardiovascular system. However, the compatibility of these materials with the blood presents a major limitation to their clinical application. In this context, surface modification strategies can enhance blood compatibility and several recent advances in this area have emerged. This review summarizes the recent applications of biomaterials in cardiovascular therapies, the improvements in their biocompatibility and the surface modification technologies that have the potential to improve clinical outcomes.

Comparative Analysis of the Paclitaxel-Eluting Peripheral Igaki-Tamai Stent and the Drug-Free Igaki-Tamai Stent Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Histological Analysis in a Porcine Iliac Artery Model

BACKGROUND

The combination of a bioresorbable scaffold and antiproliferative drugs is a promising treatment for peripheral artery disease. The novel paclitaxel-eluting peripheral Igaki-Tamai stent (PTX-ITS) has the same backbone design as the drug-free peripheral Igaki-Tamai stent and a paclitaxel coating. Arterial responses to the PTX-ITS and ITS using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and histological analysis in a porcine iliac artery model were compared.Methods and Results:In total, 6 PTX-ITSs and 6 ITSs implanted in porcine iliac arteries were evaluated. Quantitative measurements of the scaffold, lumen, neointimal areas, and percent area stenosis were performed using OCT at 1 and 3 months. Histological evaluations (PTX-ITS [n=5], ITS [n=4]) were performed following euthanasia at 3 months. Injury, inflammation, endothelialization, and fibrin scores were measured. Baseline angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups. The ITS group showed significantly smaller scaffold areas than the PTX-ITS group at 1 month (18.50±3.62 mm²vs. 23.54±3.64 mm²; P=0.037) and 3 months (15.82±2.57 mm²vs. 21.67±3.57 mm²; P=0.009). Percent area stenosis was significantly lower in the PTX-ITS group at 3 months (28.70±7.24% vs. 40.36±7.07%; P=0.018). Histological evaluations revealed similar low-grade inflammatory reactions for both scaffolds.

CONCLUSIONS

PTX-ITSs showed significantly better suppression of late scaffold shrinkage and lower in-scaffold stenosis for up to 3 months. Additionally, PTX-ITSs exhibited high biocompatibility, which is comparable to ITSs.

Early-Stage Vascular Response between Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Free Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in the Small-Sized Peripheral Artery: A Preclinical Study in Porcine Femoral Arteries

BACKGROUND

The clinical benefits and outcomes of the interventional treatment of small-sized infrapopliteal arteries using stent implantation remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of drug-free bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) with that of bare metal stent (BMS) in endovascular treatment of small-sized peripheral arteries.

METHODS

In this study, drug-free BVS and BMS were used in eight porcine models. We compared the angiographic and histomorphometric findings in the two groups at 4 weeks. In each pig, BVS and BMS of adequate sizes were implanted in the small branch (<3 mm) of the femoral artery. Angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and histomorphometric analysis were performed at 4 weeks.

RESULTS

In the 4-week follow-up angiography and IVUS examination, the minimal luminal diameter was smaller and diameter stenosis was more severe in the BVS group. Histomorphometric findings indicated that the lumen area in the BVS group was smaller (0.34 ± 0.28 mm² vs. 1.40 ± 0.52 mm², P < 0.001), whereas the neointimal area (2.70 ± 1.28 mm² vs. 1.76 ± 0.66 mm², P = 0.013), area stenosis (85.18 ± 13.14 % vs. 54.99 ± 16.13 %, P < 0.001), inflammatory score (2.07 ± 0.861 vs. 28 ± 0.39, P = 0.003), and fibrin scores (1.24 ± 0.70 vs. 0.79 ± 0.72, P = 0.043) were significantly higher in the BVS group. The injury score was higher in the BMS group. In histopathologic findings, restenosis was mainly due to recoil and distortion of the scaffold in the BVS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with BMS, drug-free BVS was not feasible for small-sized peripheral arteries based on the angiographic, IVUS, and histomorphometric results primarily due to insufficient mechanical support.