REP sequences: Mediators of the environmental stress response?

Expression of the ISPpu9 transposase of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 is regulated by two small RNAs and the secondary structure of the mRNA 5'-untranslated region

Insertion sequences (ISs) are mobile genetic elements that only carry the information required for their own transposition. Pseudomonas putida KT2440, a model bacterium, has seven copies of an IS called ISPpu9 inserted into repetitive extragenic palindromic sequences. This work shows that the gene for ISPpu9 transposase, tnp, is regulated by two small RNAs (sRNAs) named Asr9 and Ssr9, which are encoded upstream and downstream of tnp, respectively. The tnp mRNA has a long 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR) that can fold into a secondary structure that likely includes the ribosome-binding site (RBS). Mutations weakening this structure increased tnp mRNA translation. Asr9, an antisense sRNA complementary to the 5′-UTR, was shown to be very stable. Eliminating Asr9 considerably reduced tnp mRNA translation, suggesting that it helps to unfold this secondary structure, exposing the RBS. Ectopic overproduction of Asr9 increased the transposition frequency of a new ISPpu9 entering the cell by conjugation, suggesting improved tnp expression. Ssr9 has significant complementarity to Asr9 and annealed to it in vitro forming an RNA duplex; this would sequester it and possibly facilitate its degradation. Thus, the antisense Asr9 sRNA likely facilitates tnp expression, improving transposition, while Ssr9 might counteract Asr9, keeping tnp expression low.

TnpAREP and REP sequences dissemination in bacterial genomes: REP recognition determinants

REP, diverse palindromic DNA sequences found at high copy number in many bacterial genomes, have been attributed important roles in cell physiology but their dissemination mechanisms are poorly understood. They might represent non-autonomous transposable elements mobilizable by TnpAREP, the first prokaryotic domesticated transposase associated with REP. TnpAREP, fundamentally different from classical transposases, are members of the HuH superfamily and closely related to the transposases of the IS200/IS605 family. We previously showed that Escherichia coli TnpAREP processes cognate single stranded REP in vitro and that this activity requires the integrity of the REP structure, in particular imperfect palindromes interrupted by a bulge and preceded by a conserved DNA motif. A second group of REPs rather carry perfect palindromes, raising questions about how the latter are recognized by their cognate TnpAREP. To get insight into the importance of REP structural and sequence determinants in these two groups, we developed an in vitro activity assay coupled to a mutational analysis for three different TnpAREP/REP duos via a SELEX approach. We also tackled the question of how the cleavage site is selected. This study revealed that two TnpAREP groups have co-evolved with their cognate REPs and use different strategies to recognize their REP substrates.