A-to-I RNA editing - thinking beyond the single nucleotide

Cellular RNA and DNA sensing pathways are essential for the dose-dependent response of human monocytes to ionizing radiation

Circulating monocytes are important players of the inflammatory response to ionizing radiation (IR). These IR-resistant immune cells migrate to radiation-damaged tissues and differentiate into macrophages that phagocytize dying cells, but also facilitate inflammation. Besides the effect of damage-associated molecular patterns, released from irradiated tissues, the inflammatory activation of monocytes and macrophages is largely dependent on IR-induced DNA damage and aberrant transcriptional activity, which may facilitate expression of type I interferons (IFN-I) and numerous inflammation-related genes. We analyzed the accumulation of dsRNA, dsDNA fragments, and RNA:DNA hybrids in the context of induction of RNA-triggered MAVS-mediated and DNA-triggered STING-mediated signaling pathways, in primary human monocytes and a monocytic cell line, THP1, in response to various doses of gamma IR. We found that exposure to lower doses (<7.5 Gy) led to the accumulation of dsRNA, along with dsDNA and RNA:DNA hybrids and activated both MAVS and STING pathway-induced gene expression and signaling activity of IFN-I. Higher doses of IR resulted in the reduced dsRNA level, degradation of RNA-sensing mediators involved in MAVS signaling and coincided with an increased accumulation of dsDNA and RNA:DNA hybrids that correlated with elevated STING signaling and NF-κB-dependent gene expression. While both pathways activate IFN-I expression, using MAVS- and STING-knockout THP1 cells, we identified differences in the spectra of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) that are associated with each specific signaling pathway and outlined a large group of STING signaling-associated genes. Using the RNAi technique, we found that increasing the dose of IR activates STING signaling through the DNA sensor cGAS, along with suppression of the DDX41 helicase, which is known to reduce the accumulation of RNA:DNA hybrids and thereby limit cGAS/STING signaling activity. Together, these results indicate that depending on the applied dose, IR leads to the activation of either dsRNA-induced MAVS signaling, which predominantly leads to the expression of both pro- and anti-inflammatory markers, or dsDNA-induced STING signaling that contributes to pro-inflammatory activation of the cells. While RNA:DNA hybrids boost both MAVS- and STING-mediated signaling pathways, these structures being accumulated upon high IR doses promote type I interferon expression and appear to be potent enhancers of radiation dose-dependent pro-inflammatory activation of monocytes.

RNA modifications: importance in immune cell biology and related diseases

RNA modifications have become hot topics recently. By influencing RNA processes, including generation, transportation, function, and metabolization, they act as critical regulators of cell biology. The immune cell abnormality in human diseases is also a research focus and progressing rapidly these years. Studies have demonstrated that RNA modifications participate in the multiple biological processes of immune cells, including development, differentiation, activation, migration, and polarization, thereby modulating the immune responses and are involved in some immune related diseases. In this review, we present existing knowledge of the biological functions and underlying mechanisms of RNA modifications, including N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A), 5-methylcytosine (m⁵C), N¹-methyladenosine (m¹A), N⁷-methylguanosine (m⁷G), N⁴-acetylcytosine (ac⁴C), pseudouridine (Ψ), uridylation, and adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, and summarize their critical roles in immune cell biology. Via regulating the biological processes of immune cells, RNA modifications can participate in the pathogenesis of immune related diseases, such as cancers, infection, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. We further highlight the challenges and future directions based on the existing knowledge. All in all, this review will provide helpful knowledge as well as novel ideas for the researchers in this area.

RESIC: A Tool for Comprehensive Adenosine to Inosine RNA Editing Site Identification and Classification

Adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, the most prevalent type of RNA editing in metazoans, is carried out by adenosine deaminases (ADARs) in double-stranded RNA regions. Several computational approaches have been recently developed to identify A-to-I RNA editing sites from sequencing data, each addressing a particular issue. Here, we present RNA Editing Sites Identification and Classification (RESIC), an efficient pipeline that combines several approaches for the detection and classification of RNA editing sites. The pipeline can be used for all organisms and can use any number of RNA-sequencing datasets as input. RESIC provides (1) the detection of editing sites in both repetitive and non-repetitive genomic regions; (2) the identification of hyper-edited regions; and (3) optional exclusion of polymorphism sites to increase reliability, based on DNA, and ADAR-mutant RNA sequencing datasets, or SNP databases. We demonstrate the utility of RESIC by applying it to human, successfully overlapping and extending the list of known putative editing sites. We further tested changes in the patterns of A-to-I RNA editing, and RNA abundance of ADAR enzymes, following SARS-CoV-2 infection in human cell lines. Our results suggest that upon SARS-CoV-2 infection, compared to mock, the number of hyper editing sites is increased, and in agreement, the activity of ADAR1, which catalyzes hyper-editing, is enhanced. These results imply the involvement of A-to-I RNA editing in conceiving the unpredicted phenotype of COVID-19 disease. RESIC code is open-source and is easily extendable.

RNA Epigenetics: Fine-Tuning Chromatin Plasticity and Transcriptional Regulation, and the Implications in Human Diseases

Chromatin structure plays an essential role in eukaryotic gene expression and cell identity. Traditionally, DNA and histone modifications have been the focus of chromatin regulation; however, recent molecular and imaging studies have revealed an intimate connection between RNA epigenetics and chromatin structure. Accumulating evidence suggests that RNA serves as the interplay between chromatin and the transcription and splicing machineries within the cell. Additionally, epigenetic modifications of nascent RNAs fine-tune these interactions to regulate gene expression at the co- and post-transcriptional levels in normal cell development and human diseases. This review will provide an overview of recent advances in the emerging field of RNA epigenetics, specifically the role of RNA modifications and RNA modifying proteins in chromatin remodeling, transcription activation and RNA processing, as well as translational implications in human diseases.

RNA modifications as a common denominator between tRNA and mRNA

Recent studies underscore RNA modifications as a novel mechanism to coordinate expression and function of different genes. While modifications on the sugar or base moieties of tRNA are well known, their roles in mRNA regulation are only starting to emerge. Interestingly, some modifications are present in both tRNA and mRNA, and here we discuss the functional significance of these common features. We describe key modifications that are present in both RNA types, elaborate on proteins that interact with them, and indicate recent works that identify roles in communicating tRNA processes and mRNA regulation. We propose that as tools are developed, the shortlist of features that are common between types of RNA will greatly expand and proteins that interact with them will be identified. In conclusion, the presence of the same modification in both RNA types provides an intersect between tRNA processes and mRNA regulation and implies a novel mechanism for connecting diverse cellular processes.

Disruption in A-to-I Editing Levels Affects C. elegans Development More Than a Complete Lack of Editing

A-to-I RNA editing, catalyzed by ADAR proteins, is widespread in eukaryotic transcriptomes. Studies showed that, in C. elegans, ADR-2 can actively deaminate dsRNA, whereas ADR-1 cannot. Therefore, we set out to study the effect of each of the ADAR genes on the RNA editing process. We performed comprehensive phenotypic, transcriptomics, proteomics, and RNA binding screens on worms mutated in a single ADAR gene. We found that ADR-1 mutants exhibit more-severe phenotypes than ADR-2, and some of them are a result of non-editing functions of ADR-1. We also show that ADR-1 significantly binds edited genes and regulates mRNA expression, whereas the effect on protein levels is minor. In addition, ADR-1 primarily promotes editing by ADR-2 at the L4 stage of development. Our results suggest that ADR-1 has a significant role in the RNA editing process and in altering editing levels that affect RNA expression; loss of ADR-1 results in severe phenotypes.

RNA Biology Provides New Therapeutic Targets for Human Disease

RNA is the messenger molecule that conveys information from the genome and allows the production of biomolecules required for life in a responsive and regulated way. Most genes are able to produce multiple mRNA products in response to different internal or external environmental signals, in different tissues and organs, and at specific times in development or later life. This fine tuning of gene expression is dependent on the coordinated effects of a large and intricate set of regulatory machinery, which together orchestrate the genomic output at each locus and ensure that each gene is expressed at the right amount, at the right time and in the correct location. This complexity of control, and the requirement for both sequence elements and the entities that bind them, results in multiple points at which errors may occur. Errors of RNA biology are common and found in association with both rare, single gene disorders, but also more common, chronic diseases. Fortunately, complexity also brings opportunity. The existence of many regulatory steps also offers multiple levels of potential therapeutic intervention which can be exploited. In this review, I will outline the specific points at which coding RNAs may be regulated, indicate potential means of intervention at each stage, and outline with examples some of the progress that has been made in this area. Finally, I will outline some of the remaining challenges with the delivery of RNA-based therapeutics but indicate why there are reasons for optimism.

Functional interactions between scaffold proteins, noncoding RNAs, and genome loci induce liquid-liquid phase separation as organizing principle for 3-dimensional nuclear architecture: implications in cancer

The eukaryotic cell nucleus consists of functionally specialized subcompartments. These nuclear subcompartments are biomolecular aggregates built of proteins, transcripts, and specific genome loci. The structure and function of each nuclear subcompartment are defined by the composition and dynamic interaction between these 3 components. The spatio-temporal localization of biochemical reactions into membraneless nuclear subcompartments can be achieved through liquid-liquid phase separation. Based on this organizing principle, nuclear subcompartments are droplet-like structures that adopt spherical shapes, flow, and fuse like liquids or gels. In the present review, we bring into the spotlight seminal works elucidating the functional interactions between scaffold proteins, noncoding RNAs, and genomic loci, thereby inducing liquid-liquid phase separation as an organizing principle for 3-dimensional nuclear architecture. We also discuss the implications in different cancer types as well as the potential use of this knowledge to develop novel therapeutic strategies against cancer.-Rubio, K., Dobersch, S., Barreto, G. Functional interactions between scaffold proteins, noncoding RNAs, and genome loci induce liquid-liquid phase separation as organizing principle for 3-dimensional nuclear architecture: implications in cancer.

A-to-I RNA Editing Affects lncRNAs Expression after Heat Shock

Adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is a highly conserved regulatory process carried out by adenosine-deaminases (ADARs) on double-stranded RNA (dsRNAs). Although a considerable fraction of the transcriptome is edited, the function of most editing sites is unknown. Previous studies indicate changes in A-to-I RNA editing frequencies following exposure to several stress types. However, the overall effect of stress on the expression of ADAR targets is not fully understood. Here, we performed high-throughput RNA sequencing of wild-type and ADAR mutant Caenorhabditis elegans worms after heat-shock to analyze the effect of heat-shock stress on the expression pattern of genes. We found that ADAR regulation following heat-shock does not directly involve heat-shock related genes. Our analysis also revealed that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and pseudogenes, which have a tendency for secondary RNA structures, are enriched among upregulated genes following heat-shock in ADAR mutant worms. The same group of genes is downregulated in ADAR mutant worms under permissive conditions, which is likely, considering that A-to-I editing protects endogenous dsRNA from RNA-interference (RNAi). Therefore, temperature increases may destabilize dsRNA structures and protect them from RNAi degradation, despite the lack of ADAR function. These findings shed new light on the dynamics of gene expression under heat-shock in relation to ADAR function.

In cancer, A-to-I RNA editing can be the driver, the passenger, or the mechanic

In recent years, A-to-I RNA modifications performed by the Adenosine Deaminase Acting on RNA (ADAR) protein family were found to be expressed at altered levels in multiple human malignancies. A-to-I RNA editing changes adenosine to inosine on double stranded RNA, thereby changing transcript sequence and structure. Although A-to-I RNA editing have the potential to change essential mRNA transcripts, affecting their corresponding protein structures, most of the human editing sites identified to date reside in non-coding repetitive transcripts such as Alu elements. Therefore, the impact of the hypo- or hyper-editing found in specific cancers remains unknown. Moreover, it is yet unclear whether or not changes in RNA editing and ADAR expression levels facilitate or even drive cancer progression or are just a byproduct of other affected pathways. In both cases, however, the levels of RNA editing and ADAR enzymes can possibly be used as specific biomarkers, as their levels change differently in specific malignancies. More significantly, recent studies suggest that ADAR enzymes can be used to reverse the oncogenic process, suggesting a potential for gene therapies. This review focuses on new findings that suggest that RNA editing by ADARs can affect cancer progression and even formation. We also discuss new possibilities of using ADAR enzymes and RNA editing as cancer biomarkers, indicators of chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity, and even to be themselves potential therapeutic tools.