Prolonged clinical effects in modified-release amitriptyline poisoning

Systematic review on the use of activated charcoal for gastrointestinal decontamination following acute oral overdose

INTRODUCTION

The use of activated charcoal in poisoning remains both a pillar of modern toxicology and a source of debate. Following the publication of the joint position statements on the use of single-dose and multiple-dose activated charcoal by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the routine use of activated charcoal declined. Over subsequent years, many new pharmaceuticals became available in modified or alternative-release formulations and additional data on gastric emptying time in poisoning was published, challenging previous assumptions about absorption kinetics. The American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology founded the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative to create a framework for evidence-based recommendations for the management of poisoned patients. The activated charcoal workgroup of the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative was tasked with reviewing systematically the evidence pertaining to the use of activated charcoal in poisoning in order to update the previous recommendations.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was: Does oral activated charcoal given to adults or children prevent toxicity or improve clinical outcome and survival of poisoned patients compared to those who do not receive charcoal?  Secondary objectives were to evaluate pharmacokinetic outcomes, the role of cathartics, and adverse events to charcoal administration. This systematic review summarizes the available evidence on the efficacy of activated charcoal.

METHODS

A medical librarian created a systematic search strategy for Medline (Ovid), subsequently translated for Embase (via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCO), BIOSIS Previews (via Ovid), Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library/DARE. All databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2019. There were no language limitations.  One author screened all citations identified in the search based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Excluded citations were confirmed by an additional author and remaining articles were obtained in full text and evaluated by at least two authors for inclusion. All authors cross-referenced full-text articles to identify articles missed in the searches. Data from included articles were extracted by the authors on a standardized spreadsheet and two authors used the GRADE methodology to independently assess the quality and risk of bias of each included study.

RESULTS

From 22,950 titles originally identified, the final data set consisted of 296 human studies, 118 animal studies, and 145 in vitro studies. Also included were 71 human and two animal studies that reported adverse events. The quality was judged to have a Low or Very Low GRADE in 469 (83%) of the studies. Ninety studies were judged to be of Moderate or High GRADE. The higher GRADE studies reported on the following drugs: paracetamol (acetaminophen), phenobarbital, carbamazepine, cardiac glycosides (digoxin and oleander), ethanol, iron, salicylates, theophylline, tricyclic antidepressants, and valproate. Data on newer pharmaceuticals not reviewed in the previous American Academy of Clinical Toxicology/European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists statements such as quetiapine, olanzapine, citalopram, and Factor Xa inhibitors were included. No studies on the optimal dosing for either single-dose or multiple-dose activated charcoal were found. In the reviewed clinical data, the time of administration of the first dose of charcoal was beyond one hour in 97% (n = 1006 individuals), beyond two hours in 36% (n = 491 individuals), and beyond 12 h in 4% (n = 43 individuals) whereas the timing of the first dose in controlled studies was within one hour of ingestion in 48% (n = 2359 individuals) and beyond two hours in 36% (n = 484) of individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review found heterogenous data. The higher GRADE data was focused on a few select poisonings, while studies that addressed patients with unknown and or mixed ingestions were hampered by low rates of clinically meaningful toxicity or death.  Despite these limitations, they reported a benefit of activated charcoal beyond one hour in many clinical scenarios.

Amitriptyline cream ingestion in a 1-year-old boy

A 1-year-old boy presented to the emergency department with drowsiness after intoxication from amitriptyline cream. The amitriptyline level in his blood was in the high-therapeutic range for adults. He was admitted for cardiac monitoring. Except for a short episode with irregular heart rate, he recovered completely within 24 hours without adjuvant treatment. Amitriptyline is known as an antidepressant but is also prescribed for neuropathic pain. It is usually prescribed in tablet form; the cream is a novel application. In children, intoxication with amitriptyline may cause drowsiness, seizures, coma, hypotension, tachycardia, and life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. This is the first case report presenting intoxication in a child with amitriptyline cream. It stresses the importance of keeping children away from the medicine cabinet, even from creams or ointments.

Efficacy of abdominal computed tomography and nasogastric tube in acute poisoning patients

Abdominal computed tomography aids in the evaluation of the conditions in the stomach and will decrease needless gastric lavage in acute poisoning patients. A 16-year-old girl with a history of schizophrenia with depressive disorder was taken to our hospital. Her Glasgow Coma Scale was 8. Symptoms related to anticholinergic effects were strongly present. Her electrocardiogram showed sinus tachycardia with 60 milliseconds of QRS duration. Computed tomography images showed that the patient had a large amount of debris derived from tablets in her stomach and duodenum. We performed gastric aspiration through a nasogastric tube and not gastric lavage, and it took 5 minutes to complete the procedure. We administered activated charcoal 3 times. Intubation was not performed. Other than tonic-clonic seizure that was observed once, neither cardiovascular nor neurologic symptoms were observed. She recovered fully and admitted that she had ingested more than a hundred tablets almost 10 hours before being brought to our hospital. Computed tomography images show a cluster of tablets and debris to be of a higher density than tissues; this allows quantitative and qualitative evaluations to be performed. We were able to treat the patient with effective use of nasogastric tube.