Methemoglobinemia after ingestion of Chinese herbal medicine in a 9-day-old infant

A systematic review of the reporting of adverse events associated with medical herb use among children

PURPOSE

Information about the safety of herbal medicine often comes from case reports published in the medical literature, thus necessitating good quality reporting of these adverse events. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the comprehensiveness of reporting of published case reports of adverse events associated with herb use in the pediatric population.

METHODS

Electronic literature search included 7 databases and a manual search of retrieved articles from inception through 2010. We included published case reports and case series that reported an adverse event associated with exposure to an herbal product by children under the age of 18 years old. We used descriptive statistics. Based on the International Society of Epidemiology's "Guidelines for Submitting Adverse Events Reports for Publication," we developed and assigned a guideline adherence score (0-17) to each case report.

RESULTS

Ninety-six unique journal papers were identified and represented 128 cases. Of the 128 cases, 37% occurred in children under 2 years old, 38% between the ages of 2 and 8 years old, and 23% between the ages of 9 and 18 years old. Twenty-nine percent of cases were the result of an intentional ingestion while 36% were from an unintentional ingestion. Fifty-two percent of cases documented the Latin binomial of the herb ingredients; 41% documented plant part. Thirty-two percent of the cases reported laboratory testing of the herb, 20% documented the manufacturer of the product, and 22% percent included an assessment of the potential concomitant therapies that could have been influential in the adverse events. Mean guideline adherence score was 12.5 (range 6-17).

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable need for improvement in reporting adverse events in children following herb use. Without better quality reporting, adverse event reports cannot be interpreted reliably and do not contribute in a meaningful way to guiding recommendations for medicinal herb use.

Complementary and alternative medicine for the allergist-immunologist: where do I start?

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies present a growing information management challenge for physicians because nearly 40% of their patients may be using and another 50% may be considering use of CAM as part of their healthcare regimen. The National Health Statistics Reports for 2007 described the most commonly used nonvitamin, nonmineral therapy as natural products (eg, herbals at 17.7%). More than 5% of children under the age of 18 years used CAM for allergic conditions including asthma. The amount and quality of information available and concerns about liability risk represent a challenge for most physicians. This review focuses on considerations for approaching a CAM-related consultation, incorporating legal and logistic factors affecting how such an encounter should be approached. A 10-step process is presented that addresses different components of CAM consultations and what should be documented. Access to timely, high-quality information regarding product specific efficacy and safety data, as found in the Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database, is needed to support CAM consultation efficiently. Understanding of serious adverse events associated with CAM is limited; an international need exists for improved safety surveillance and information sharing. Allergy-immunology, as a specialty with expertise in adverse drug reaction evaluation and management, has a unique opportunity to support enhanced CAM-related adverse events evaluations, reporting, and research.