Dermatological Testing of an Emollient-Treated Menstrual Pad with a Novel Foam Absorbent Core

Safety Evaluation of Absorbent Hygiene Pads: A Review on Assessment Framework and Test Methods

Disposable absorbent hygiene products have evolved for superior performance, enhancing the convenience of daily lives. However, the use of disposable hygiene pads has brought safety concerns on chemical exposure, and significant efforts have been made to assess the potential risks associated with use of hygiene pads. This article intends to overview the safety assessment framework of diapers and feminine pads, which includes hazard identification, hazard characterization, exposure assessment, risk characterization, and post-market risk management. Risk assessment of various constituents are reviewed for quantification methods and conservative estimation of exposure parameters. By reviewing the up-to-date considerations in risk assessment, we aim to provide insightful discussion on safety evaluation of current versions of disposable absorbent products. More clinical testing and post-market surveillance are needed for continuous monitoring of potential health impacts of advanced products and constituents.

Specific dermatological benefits associated with quantities of lotion transferred to the skin

BACKGROUND

A growing number of manufacturers are taking advantage of the ability of absorbent consumer products to deliver lotion to the skin. The lotion is included on these products to help protect the skin from adverse skin effects that can occur, including: (1) irritation, (2) over hydration of the stratum corneum, (3) dryness that can occur from extended exposure to highly absorbent consumer products, and (4) changes in pH.

OBJECTIVE

This manuscript presents results of a quantitative lotion transfer study of adult incontinence products. Resulting lotion transfer is compared to the results of several separate experiments in which specific skin benefits have been correlated to lotion concentrations.

METHODS

The behind-the-knee (BTK) lotion transfer protocol was used to quantitate lotion transfer from adult incontinence (AI) test products constructed using 2 lotion formulations and 2 configurations of lotion application. A modified arm patch protocol, in which skin sites of a measured dimension were pre-treated with specific volumes of lotion, was used to evaluate protective effects of lotion against exposure to irritants, and over hydration from wetted absorbent products.

RESULTS

After a 6-hours continuous exposure in the BTK the 5-stripe lotion configuration products transferred (adjusted mean ± SE) 94 ± 11-104 ± 11 μg/cm² lotion. After 24 hours of wear, transfer had increased to 127 ± 22 and 149 ± 24 μg/cm² , respectively. The single-block configuration products transferred 289 ± 10-316 ± 10 μg/cm² (P = .04). Transfer after 24 hours of wear was 328 ± 23 and 472 ± 21 μg/cm² , respectively (P < .0001). Several protocols were used to evaluate the concentration of lotion required to provide four specific skin benefits. In studies evaluating protection against irritants, skin site pre-treated with lotion were patched with 0.5% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS). Protective effects were assessed by visual assessment of erythema and trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL). In the first experiment, lotion pre-treatment concentrations as low as 165 μg/cm² exhibited significantly (P < .05) lower erythema and TEWL compared to the positive irritant control (ie, no lotion pre-treatment and SLS only). In the second experiment, lotion pre-treatment concentrations of 80 μg/cm² (P = .018) exhibited significantly (P = .018) lower TEWL. In two studies on protection from over hydration, lotion pre-treatment sites were subsequently patched with wetted absorbent consumer products. The change in TEWL was used as a measure of over hydration. Lotion concentrations significantly reduced the increase in TEWL at 80 μg/cm² (P = .007) and 70 μg/cm² (P ≤ .05). A BTK study was used to evaluate the ability of lotion to prevent dryness. After 6 hours of wear, test products transferring lotion concentrations of 110 or 133 μg/cm² produced significantly lower scores for dryness compared to products transferring 48 or 69 μg/cm² . Using collagen sheets to mimic the stratum corneum, an in vitro study was conducted to measure the ability of lotion to prevent passage of high pH buffer solution. Results demonstrated that the lowest concentration of lotion that was tested (110 μg/cm² ) interfered with passage of the high pH buffer through the collagen sheet, delaying the rise in pH.

CONCLUSIONS

We can conclude that pretreatment with 110 μg/cm² lotion acts as a barrier to high pH fluids such as urine. Using the measurement of lotion transfer from the AI products, together with the results of studies conducted to determine the concentration of lotion required to provide specific skin benefits, we conclude that the five-stripe lotion configuration AI test products transferred enough lotion (ie, ≥80 μg/cm² ) to provide skin protection with regard to: (1) irritant effects and (2) excess moisture. The single-block AI test products also transferred enough lotion to provide these skin benefits (ie, ≥165 μg/cm² ), and the additional benefits of skin protection against: (3) dryness, and (4) changes in pH.

Assessing the dermal compatibility of a new female incontinence product line

CONTEXT

We have developed a line of products designed to better meet the overall needs of women suffering from urinary incontinence. The products are more discrete and contain a unique odor neutralizing technology (ONT).

OBJECTIVE

This paper describes the overall skin compatibility program for this product line in which the new products were compared to negative controls and/or commercially marketed reference products with an established history of safe use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Test products consisted of several product forms (light pads/pantiliners, moderate pads, briefs and taped diapers) with ONT and having various degrees of protection. Studies were conducted using standard protocols for 4-day and 21-day cumulative irritation, the Human Repeat Insult Patch Test (HRIPT), and the Behind-the-Knee (BTK) test for mechanical and chemical irritation. In one 4-day irritation study and one HRIPT, test subjects consisted of individuals with self-assessed sensitive skin. In addition, one 4-day study was conducted using normal skin sites, and sites compromised by tape stripping. Nonirritant controls were physiologic saline and/or current, commercially marketed incontinence products. All responses were evaluated by visual scoring of erythema. In addition, in the BTK, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and adverse sensory effects collected from panelists' daily diaries were also evaluated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Two 4-day cumulative irritation studies and one 21-day study demonstrated that a wide range of product forms (liners, light and moderate pads, briefs and adult diapers) produced skin reactions similar to the nonirritant controls. The 4-day study conducted using sensitive skin subjects showed good skin compatibility, and the test products were comparable to the nonirritant controls. In the 4-day study with both normal and compromised skin sites, test products produced mean erythema scores similar to the nonirritant controls. Three HRIPT separate studies confirm that the products do not induce contact sensitization, including one study conducted on individuals with self-assessed sensitive skin. In the BTK, test and control products produced similar irritation, as assessed by erythema, TEWL and sensory effects.

CONCLUSION

The results from the patch tests and mechanical irritation test demonstrate good skin compatibility of the new line of products with the unique ONT. In addition, the forms of the product (i.e. liner, pad or brief), were equally compatible with skin.