PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTORs from Physcomitrella patens are active in Arabidopsis and complement the pif quadruple mutant

The phytochrome-interacting factor genes PIF1 and PIF4 are functionally diversified due to divergence of promoters and proteins

Phytochrome-interacting factors (PIFs) are basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors that regulate light responses downstream of phytochromes. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), 8 PIFs (PIF1-8) regulate light responses, either redundantly or distinctively. Distinctive roles of PIFs may be attributed to differences in mRNA expression patterns governed by promoters or variations in molecular activities of proteins. However, elements responsible for the functional diversification of PIFs have yet to be determined. Here, we investigated the role of promoters and proteins in the functional diversification of PIF1 and PIF4 by analyzing transgenic lines expressing promoter-swapped PIF1 and PIF4, as well as chimeric PIF1 and PIF4 proteins. For seed germination, PIF1 promoter played a major role, conferring dominance to PIF1 gene with a minor contribution from PIF1 protein. Conversely, for hypocotyl elongation under red light, PIF4 protein was the major element conferring dominance to PIF4 gene with the minor contribution from PIF4 promoter. In contrast, both PIF4 promoter and PIF4 protein were required for the dominant role of PIF4 in promoting hypocotyl elongation at high ambient temperatures. Together, our results support that the functional diversification of PIF1 and PIF4 genes resulted from contributions of both promoters and proteins, with their relative importance varying depending on specific light responses.

Phytochrome-Interacting Proteins

Phytochromes are photoreceptors of plants, fungi, slime molds bacteria and heterokonts. These biliproteins sense red and far-red light and undergo light-induced changes between the two spectral forms, Pr and Pfr. Photoconversion triggered by light induces conformational changes in the bilin chromophore around the ring C-D-connecting methine bridge and is followed by conformational changes in the protein. For plant phytochromes, multiple phytochrome interacting proteins that mediate signal transduction, nuclear translocation or protein degradation have been identified. Few interacting proteins are known as bacterial or fungal phytochromes. Here, we describe how the interacting partners were identified, what is known about the different interactions and in which context of signal transduction these interactions are to be seen. The three-dimensional arrangement of these interacting partners is not known. Using an artificial intelligence system-based modeling software, a few predicted and modulated examples of interactions of bacterial phytochromes with their interaction partners are interpreted.

Functions of Phytochrome-Interacting Factors (PIFs) in the regulation of plant growth and development: A comprehensive review

Transcription factors play important roles in governing plant responses upon changes in their ambient conditions. Any fluctuation in the supply of critical requirements for plants, such as optimum light, temperature, and water leads to the reprogramming of gene-signaling pathways. At the same time, plants also evaluate and shift their metabolism according to the various stages of development. Phytochrome-Interacting Factors are one of the most important classes of transcription factors that regulate both developmental and external stimuli-based growth of plants. This review focuses on the identification of PIFs in various organisms, regulation of PIFs by various proteins, functions of PIFs of Arabidopsis in diverse developmental pathways such as seed germination, photomorphogenesis, flowering, senescence, seed and fruit development, and external stimuli-induced plant responses such as shade avoidance response, thermomorphogenesis, and various abiotic stress responses. Recent advances related to the functional characterization of PIFs of crops such as rice, maize, and tomato have also been incorporated in this review, to ascertain the potential of PIFs as key regulators to enhance the agronomic traits of these crops. Thus, an attempt has been made to provide a holistic view of the function of PIFs in various processes in plants.

DELLA proteins regulate spore germination and reproductive development in Physcomitrium patens

Proteins of the DELLA family integrate environmental signals to regulate growth and development throughout the plant kingdom. Plants expressing non-degradable DELLA proteins underpinned the development of high-yielding 'Green Revolution' dwarf crop varieties in the 1960s. In vascular plants, DELLAs are regulated by gibberellins, diterpenoid plant hormones. How DELLA protein function has changed during land plant evolution is not fully understood. We have examined the function and interactions of DELLA proteins in the moss Physcomitrium (Physcomitrella) patens, in the sister group of vascular plants (Bryophytes). PpDELLAs do not undergo the same regulation as flowering plant DELLAs. PpDELLAs are not degraded by diterpenes, do not interact with GID1 gibberellin receptor proteins and do not participate in responses to abiotic stress. PpDELLAs do share a function with vascular plant DELLAs during reproductive development. PpDELLAs also regulate spore germination. PpDELLAs interact with moss-specific photoreceptors although a function for PpDELLAs in light responses was not detected. PpDELLAs likely act as 'hubs' for transcriptional regulation similarly to their homologues across the plant kingdom. Taken together, these data demonstrate that PpDELLA proteins share some biological functions with DELLAs in flowering plants, but other DELLA functions and regulation evolved independently in both plant lineages.

Moss transcription factors regulating development and defense responses to stress

Transcription factors control gene expression, leading to regulation of biological processes that determine plant development and adaptation to the environment. Land colonization by plants occurred 450-470 million years ago and was accompanied by an increase in the complexity of transcriptional regulation associated to transcription factor gene expansions. AP2/ERF, bHLH, MYB, NAC, GRAS, and WRKY transcription factor families increased in land plants compared with algae. In angiosperms, they play crucial roles in regulating plant growth and responses to environmental stressors. However, less information is available in bryophytes and only in a few cases is the functional role of moss transcription factors in stress mechanisms known. In this review, we discuss current knowledge of the transcription factor families involved in development and defense responses to stress in mosses and other bryophytes. By exploring and analysing the Physcomitrium patens public database and published transcriptional profiles, we show that a high number of AP2/ERF, bHLH, MYB, NAC, GRAS, and WRKY genes are differentially expressed in response to abiotic stresses and during biotic interactions. Expression profiles together with a comprehensive analysis provide insights into relevant transcription factors involved in moss defenses, and hint at distinct and conserved biological roles between bryophytes and angiosperms.

Molecular mechanisms involved in functional macroevolution of plant transcription factors

Transcription factors (TFs) are key components of the transcriptional regulation machinery. In plants, they accompanied the evolution from unicellular aquatic algae to complex flowering plants that dominate the land environment. The adaptations of the body plan and physiological responses required changes in the biological functions of TFs. Some ancestral gene regulatory networks are highly conserved, while others evolved more recently and only exist in particular lineages. The recent emergence of novel model organisms provided the opportunity for comparative studies, producing new insights to infer these evolutionary trajectories. In this review, we comprehensively revisit the recent literature on TFs of nonseed plants and algae, focusing on the molecular mechanisms driving their functional evolution. We discuss the particular contribution of changes in DNA-binding specificity, protein-protein interactions and cis-regulatory elements to gene regulatory networks. Current advances have shown that these evolutionary processes were shaped by changes in TF expression pattern, not through great innovation in TF protein sequences. We propose that the role of TFs associated with environmental and developmental regulation was unevenly conserved during land plant evolution.

Light- and hormone-mediated development in non-flowering plants: An overview

Light, hormones and their interaction regulate different aspects of development in non-flowering plants. They might have played a role in the evolution of different plant groups by conferring specific adaptive evolutionary changes. Plants are sessile organisms. Unlike animals, they lack the opportunity to abandon their habitat in unfavorable conditions. They respond to different environmental cues and adapt accordingly to control their growth and developmental pattern. While phytohormones are known to be internal regulators of plant development, light is a major environmental signal that shapes plant processes. It is plausible that light-hormone crosstalk might have played an important role in plant evolution. But how the crosstalk between light and phytohormone signaling pathways might have shaped the plant evolution is unclear. One of the possible reasons is that flowering plants have been studied extensively in context of plant development, which cannot serve the purpose of evolutionary comparisons. In order to elucidate the role of light, hormone and their crosstalk in the evolutionary adaptation in plant kingdom, one needs to understand various light- and hormone-mediated processes in diverse non-flowering plants. This review is an attempt to outline major light- and phytohormone-mediated responses in non-flowering plant groups such as algae, bryophytes, pteridophytes and gymnosperms.

PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTORs in the moss Physcomitrella patens regulate light-controlled gene expression

Phytochromes are red and far-red light receptors in plants that control growth and development in response to changes in the environment. Light-activated phytochromes enter the nucleus and act on a set of downstream signalling components to regulate gene expression. PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTORs (PIFs) belong to the basic helix-loop-helix family of transcription factors and directly bind to light-activated phytochromes. Potential homologues of PIFs have been identified in ferns, bryophytes and streptophyte algae, and it has been shown that the potential PIF homologues from Physcomitrella patens, PIF1 to PIF4, have PIF function when expressed in Arabidopsis. However, their function in Physcomitrella is still unknown. Seed plant PIFs bind to G-box-containing promoters and, therefore, we searched the Physcomitrella genome for genes that contain G-boxes in their promoter. Here, we show that Physcomitrella PIFs activate these promoters in a G-box-dependent manner, suggesting that they could be direct PIF targets. Furthermore, we generated Physcomitrella pif1, pif2, pif3 and pif4 knock out mutant lines and quantified the expression of potential PIF direct target genes. The expression of these genes was generally reduced in pif mutants compared to the wildtype, but for several genes, the relative induction upon a short light treatment was higher in pif mutants than the wildtype. In contrast, expression of these genes was strongly repressed in continuous light, and pif mutants showed partial downregulation of these genes in the dark. Thus, the overall function of PIFs in light-regulated gene expression might be an ancient property of PIFs.

Contrasted evolutionary trajectories of plant transcription factors

Because of their prominent roles in plant development, transcription factors (TF) play central roles as drivers of innovation in the evolution of the green lineage (viridiplantae). The advent of massive sequencing combined with comparative genetics/genomics allows a rigorous investigation of how TF families have contributed to plant diversification from charophyte algae to bryophytes to angiosperms. Here, we review recent progress on TF family reconstruction and the identification of distantly related TFs present throughout the evolutionary timeline from algae to angiosperms. These data provide examples of contrasting evolutionary trajectories of TF families and illustrate how conserved TFs adopt diverse roles over the course of evolution.

PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR8 Inhibits Phytochrome A-Mediated Far-Red Light Responses in Arabidopsis

PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTORs (PIFs) are a group of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors that repress plant light responses. PIF8 is one of the less-characterized Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) PIFs, whose putative orthologs are conserved in other plant species. PIF8 possesses a bHLH motif and an active phytochrome B motif but not an active phytochrome A motif. Consistent with this motif composition, PIF8 binds to G-box elements and interacts with the Pfr form of phyB but only very weakly, if at all, with that of phyA. PIF8 differs, however, from other PIFs in its protein accumulation pattern and functional roles in different light conditions. First, PIF8 inhibits phyA-induced seed germination, suppression of hypocotyl elongation, and randomization of hypocotyl growth orientation in far-red light, but it does not inhibit phyB-induced red light responses. Second, PIF8 protein accumulates more in far-red light than in darkness or red light. This is distinct from the pattern observed with PIF3, which accumulates more in darkness. This PIF8 accumulation pattern requires degradation of PIF8 by CONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENIC1 (COP1) in darkness, inhibition of COP1 by phyA in far-red light, and promotion of PIF8 degradation by phyB in red light. Together, our results indicate that PIF8 is a genuine PIF that represses phyA-mediated light responses.

Reproductive Induction is a Far-Red High Irradiance Response that is Mediated by Phytochrome and PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR in Marchantia polymorpha

Land plants have evolved a series of photoreceptors to precisely perceive environmental information. Among these, phytochromes are the sole photoreceptors for red light (R) and far-red light (FR), and play pivotal roles in modulating various developmental processes. Most extant land plants possess multiple phytochromes that probably evolved from a single phytochrome in the common ancestor of land plants. However, the ancestral phytochrome signaling mechanism remains unknown due to a paucity of knowledge regarding phytochrome functions in basal land plants. It has recently been reported that Mpphy, a single phytochrome in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha, regulates typical photoreversible responses collectively classified as low fluence response (LFR). Here, we show that Mpphy also regulates the gametangiophore formation analogous to the mode of action of the far-red high irradiance response (FR-HIR) in angiosperms. Our phenotypic analyses using mutant plants obtained by CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing revealed that MpFHY1, an ortholog of FAR-RED ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL1, as well as Mpphy is critical for the FR-HIR signaling in M. polymorpha. In addition, knockout of MpPIF, a single PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR gene in M. polymorpha, completely abolished the FR-HIR-dependent gametangiophore formation, while overexpression of MpPIF accelerated the response. FR-HIR-dependent transcriptional regulation was also disrupted in the Mppif mutant. Our findings suggest that plants had already acquired the FR-HIR signaling mediated by phytochrome and PIF at a very early stage during the course of land plant evolution, and that a single phytochrome in the common ancestor of land plants could mediate both LFR and FR-HIR.

CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Knockout of Physcomitrella patens Phytochromes

Here we describe procedures for gene disruption and excision in Physcomitrella using CRISPR/Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/CRISPR-associated 9) methods, exemplarily targeting phytochrome (PHY) gene loci. Thereby double-strand breaks (DSBs) are induced using a single guide RNA (sgRNA) with the Cas9 nuclease, leading to insertions or deletions (indels) due to incorrect repair by the nonhomologous-end joining (NHEJ) mechanism. We also include protocols for excision of smaller genomic fragments or whole genes either with or without homologous recombination-assisted repair. The protocol can be adapted to target several loci simultaneously, thereby allowing the physiological analysis of phenotypes that would be masked by functional redundancy. In our particular case, multiple PHY gene knockouts would likely be valuable in understanding phytochrome functions in mosses and, perhaps, higher plants too. Target sites for site-directed induction of DSBs are predicted with the CRISPOR online-tool and are inserted in silico into sequence matrices for the design of sgRNA expression cassettes. The resulting DNAs are cloned into Gateway DONOR vectors and the respective expression plasmids used for moss cotransformation with a Cas9 expression plasmid and a selectable marker (either on a separate plasmid or on one of the other plasmids). After the selection process, genomic DNA is extracted and transformants are analyzed by PCR fingerprinting.