Planning in borderline personality disorder: evidence for distinct subpopulations

Planning functioning and impulsiveness in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Planning ability (PA) is a key aspect of cognitive functioning and requires subjects to identify and organise the necessary steps to achieve a goal. Despite the central role of executive dysfunction in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), deficits in PA have been investigated leading to contrasting results. Given these inconsistencies, the main aim of our work is to give a deeper and clearer understanding of PA in OCD patients. Moreover, we are interested in investigating the relationship between PAs and impulsivity traits and other clinical variables. Sixty-eight OCD patients and 68 healthy controls (HCs) matched for sex and age were assessed through the Stocking of Cambridge (SoC), a computerised version of the Tower of London. We examined planning sub-components for each difficulty levels (from 2 to 5 minimum moves). Our results showed that OCD patients needed longer initial thinking time than HCs during the execution of low demanding tasks (i.e. 2 and 3 moves), while the accuracy level between the two groups did not significantly differ. OCD patients required longer initial thinking time also during high demanding tasks (i.e., 4 and 5 moves), but in this case their accuracy was significantly worse than HCs' one. We did not find any association between impulsivity and PAs. Our results supported the hypothesis that OCD patients were not able to retain in memory the planned sequence and they had to reschedule their movements during the execution. Thus, future studies should deepen the interrelation between working memory and PA to better understand the influence between these two cognitive functions and their interaction with clinical variables in OCD patients.

Dissociation in patients with borderline personality disorder in acute inpatient care - A latent profile analysis

PURPOSE

Dissociation is a common symptom in Borderline Personality disorder (BPD) and its consideration is important for the therapeutic outcome. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to scrutinize the co-occurrence of BPD symptoms and dissociative experiences. In particular, we were interested in the occurrence of specific symptom clusters characterizing qualitatively different patient groups in a clinical sample of BPD patients.

BASIC PROCEDURES

We analyzed the data of 103 patients in a specialized acute inpatient care crisis intervention unit. Measures were the Borderline Symptom List (BSL-95), a German adaption of the Dissociative Experience Scale (FDS), and the Symptom Checklist SCL-90-R. We applied a Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) using the subscales of BSL-95 and FDS to investigate the existence of distinct latent classes of symptom profiles. Afterwards, we related the obtained profiles to other clinical and demographic characteristics.

MAIN FINDINGS

Dissociative experiences of moderate to severe intensity were common among patients with BPD. LPA revealed that a model of three classes fitted the data best: one class was characterized by co-occurrence of severe borderline symptoms and frequent dissociative experiences, one class showed low symptom burden in both measures, and one class showed considerable borderline symptoms but only moderate dissociative experiences. The classes were closely related to the severity of other self-rated psychological problems and showed significantly different occurrences of stress-related comorbid disorders.

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

The results underline that dissociation is an important factor in many (but not all) BPD patients. This should be addressed by increased attention to dissociative symptoms in the diagnostic process and the adjustment of treatment plans.

Executive functioning in people with personality disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes recent executive functions research to better delineate the nosology of personality disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review indicates that there are consistent impairments in executive functioning in people with personality disorders as compared with matched controls. Only five disorders were considered: borderline, obsessive-compulsive, antisocial, narcissistic, and schizotypal. Significant deficits are observed in decision-making, working memory, inhibition, and flexibility. Relevant data for the remaining personality disorders have not yet been published in relation to the executive functions.

SUMMARY

People with personality disorders could present a pattern of neurocognitive alterations that suggest a specific impairment of the prefrontal areas. The executive dysfunctions could partially explain the behavioral alterations in people with personality disorders.Further research should adopt broader considerations of effects of comorbidity and clinical heterogeneity, include community samples and, possibly, longitudinal designs with samples of youth.

Borderline personality disorder and neuropsychological measures of executive function: A systematic review

The notion that neurocognitive deficits may be core to the development of borderline personality disorder (BPD) has received considerable attention in recent years, with growing evidence pointing to cognitive deficits in executive function (EF). A relationship between EF and BPD has long been suggested by evidence of high comorbidity between BPD and disorders characterized by poor EF (e.g. attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder); however, despite a marked increase in studies of EF and BPD in recent years, the precise nature of this relationship remains unclear. We provide a systematic review of this emerging evidence base, with respect to (1) studies of participants diagnosed with BPD in which EF has been indexed in isolation from broader cognitive processes; (2) the specific domains of EF that have been most robustly associated with BPD; and (3) whether deficits in EF are uniquely associated with BPD, independent of comorbid psychopathology. Key directions for future research are discussed with respect to strategies for measuring EF and the need for research designs that control for phenotypic overlap between BPD and related forms of psychopathology.