High dose melphalan is an adequate preparative regimen for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory lymphoma

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Lymphoma Using a Noncryopreserved Platform: An Adapted Sequential Conditioning Maintaining Dose Intensity Does not Affect Transplantation Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a validated therapeutic strategy for lymphoma treatment and precise well-tolerated conditioning. Several conditioning methods are available, but the most commonly used are CVB, BEAM, and ICE, which are conventionally administered in 6 to 7 days. Since 2015, our program has moved toward noncryopreserved platforms that require concise times; therefore, we have modified the conditioning by reducing it to 4 to 5 days. In this study, we show our experience.

METHODS

We compared ASCT performed in our program before and after 2015 in lymphoma patients. Between 2000 and 2014 and from 2015 to 2022, we performed 46 and 61 ASCT procedures, respectively.

RESULTS

Since 2015, we observed a greater number of infused stem cells, fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia (60% vs. 37% P = .008), shorter hospitalizations (30 vs. 18 days P = .001), faster engraftment (20 vs. 14 days P = .001) and better progression-free survival (72 vs. 44 months P = .002). Additionally, a prolonged overall survival was observed at these results, and this prolonged survival is difficult to interpret due to the short follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, conditioning adjusted for a noncryopreserved strategy offers at least similar or even better results than the cryopreserved strategy. Prospective studies are warranted.

Conducting hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in low and middle income countries

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a well-recognized therapeutic procedure; costs limit its widespread use in low and middle income countries (LMIC).

METHODS

Over a 30-year period, we have conducted HSCT in LMIC, making adaptations to the conventional procedures conducted in high-income countries (HIC).

RESULTS

These salient observations stem from our practice: (1) Start with autologous transplantations in patients with hematological malignancies, specifically multiple myeloma; cell freezing devices are not necessary. (2) Next, consider auto-HSCT in patients with autoimmune diseases. (3) Introduce allogeneic transplants, initially using reduced intensity conditioning regimens. Conducting the HSCT on an outpatient basis is cheaper and safer. (4) Do not build HEPA-filtered rooms nor laminar flow cabins. (5) Do not graft cord blood cells nor start a cord blood blank. (6) Engage in haploidentical transplantations which are more feasible and cost-effective. (7) Matched unrelated donors are extremely expensive. (8) Use generic drugs and biosimilars. (9) Blood product irradiation devices are not necessary. (10) Do not try to reproduce other HSCT programs from HIC; develop your own methods.

CONCLUSIONS

HSCT can be conducted in LMIC with reduced costs and similar efficacy, thus making this therapeutic option affordable for more persons.

Busulfan and thiotepa as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: A study of the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMMWP-1801 study)

Background

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Several attempts to improve the efficacy of conditioning regimens have been conducted in MM, but no more effective regimen than conventional high-dose melphalan has been introduced.

Objective

In this study, the efficacy and toxicity of busulfan and thiotepa (BuTT) and those of high-dose melphalan (HD-MEL) were compared retrospectively as a conditioning regimen for ASCT in patients with MM.

Study design

Included in the analysis were 114 patients who received BuTT and 114 patients who received HD-MEL treatment between March 2008 and May 2020. The BuTT regimen consisted of intravenous thiotepa 5 mg/kg once a day from days 7 to 6, followed by intravenous busulfan 3.2 mg/kg once a day from days 5 to 3. The HD-MEL conditioning regimen consisted of melphalan 100 mg/m² once a day from days 3 to 2.

Results

The overall response rate after ASCT did not differ between BuTT and HD-MEL (94.7% in BuTT vs. 97.4% in HD-MEL, p = 0.333). After a median follow-up of 47.6 months, progression-free survival (PFS) tended to be longer in the BuTT group (median PFS, 41.5 months vs. 30.3 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.706; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.497–1.004, p = 0.053). In the subgroup analysis of patients who did not proceed to maintenance or consolidation treatment after ASCT, the difference in PFS became more significant (median PFS, 41.5 months vs. 24.4 months; HR, 0.621; 95% CI, 0.388–0.993; p = 0.047). Additionally, the BuTT group had fewer adverse events, such as grade 3 or 4 stomatitis and diarrhea, than the HD-MEL group (stomatitis, 10.5% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.013; diarrhea, 10.5% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.005). There was no difference in the occurrence of venous-occlusive disease (2.6% in BuTT vs. 0.9% in HD-MEL, p = 0.622).

Conclusion

Our study results suggest that BuTT is an effective alternative conditioning regimen with reduced toxicity in patients with newly diagnosed MM.