New pharmaceutical approaches for the treatment of food allergies

Fucoxanthin Prevents the Ovalbumin-Induced Food Allergic Response by Enhancing the Intestinal Epithelial Barrier and Regulating the Intestinal Flora

This study aimed to determine whether fucoxanthin alleviated ovalbumin (OVA)-induced food allergy (FA) and explored the possible mechanisms. The results indicated that supplementation with fucoxanthin at 10.0-20.0 mg/kg per day for 7 weeks inhibited food anaphylaxis and the production of immunoglobulin (Ig) E, IgG, histamine, and related cytokines while alleviating allergic symptoms in sensitized mice. Fucoxanthin enhanced the intestinal epithelial barrier by up-regulating tight junction (TJ) protein expression and promoting regenerating islet-derived protein III-gamma (RegIIIγ) and secretory IgA (sIgA) secretion. In addition, fucoxanthin induced the secretion of anti-inflammatory factors (interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)) by regulatory T (Treg) cells and decreased the pro-inflammatory factor levels (IL-4, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-17, and IL-1β), ameliorating intestinal inflammation. Compared with the model group, beneficial bacteria, such as Lactobacillaceae, increased in the intestinal flora, while pathogenic bacteria like Helicobacteraceae, Desulfovibrionaceae, and Streptococcaceae decreased. Therefore, fucoxanthin may effectively prevent FA by enhancing the intestinal epithelial barrier and reshaping the intestinal flora.

Cow's Milk Protein Allergy as a Model of Food Allergies

Cow's milk allergy (CMA) is one of the most common food allergies in infants, and its prevalence has increased over recent years. In the present paper, we focus on CMA as a model of food allergies in children. Understanding the diagnostic features of CMA is essential in order to manage patients with this disorder, guide the use of an elimination diet, and find the best moment to start an oral food challenge (OFC) and liberalize the diet. To date, no shared tolerance markers for the diagnosis of food allergy have been identified, and OFC remains the gold standard. Recently, oral immunotherapy (OIT) has emerged as a new therapeutic strategy and has changed the natural history of CMA. Before this, patients had to strictly avoid the food allergen, resulting in a decline in quality of life and subsequent nutritional, social, and psychological impairments. Thanks to the introduction of OIT, the passive approach involving rigid exclusion has changed to a proactive one. Both the heterogeneity in the diagnostic process among the studies and the variability of OIT data limit the comprehension of the real epidemiology of CMA, and, consequentially, its natural history. Therefore, well-planned randomized controlled trials are needed to standardize CMA diagnosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.

New Developments in Non-allergen-specific Therapy for the Treatment of Food Allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevalence of food allergy is increasing. At the current time, there are no approved treatments for food allergy. Major limitations of immunotherapy are long treatment periods (months or years), frequent clinic visits, high costs, increased risk of adverse events during treatment, and lack of durability of desensitization. Additionally, it is allergen-specific, and in those allergic to multiple allergens, the length and cost of treatment are further increased. In this review, we summarize recent developments in novel non-allergen-specific treatments for food allergy.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of monoclonal antibodies that block IgE or specific pro-allergenic cytokines or their receptors have shown promise in clinical trials for food allergy. The insight we have gained through the use of one drug for the treatment of an atopic disease is quickly being translated to other atopic diseases, including food allergy. The future for food allergy treatment with biologics looks bright.

Oral Immunotherapy (OIT): A Personalized Medicine

Oral Immunotherapy (OIT), a promising allergen-specific approach in the management of Food Allergies (FA), is based on the administration of increasing doses of the culprit food until reaching a maintenance dose. Each step should be adapted to the patient, and OIT should be considered an individualized treatment. Recent studies focused on the standardization and identification of novel biomarkers in order to correlate endotypes with phenotypes in the field of FA.

Immunological Changes Induced in Peach Allergy Patients with Systemic Reactions by Pru p 3 Sublingual Immunotherapy

SCOPE

Sublingual immunotherapy using peach extract enriched in Pru p 3 (Pru p 3-enriched-SLIT) brings a new perspective to treating patients with allergy to lipid transfer proteins. We evaluate the immunological changes induced by Pru p 3-enriched-SLIT during one year.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three groups are included: peach allergic patients who receive Pru p 3-enriched-SLIT, peach allergic untreated patients, and controls. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells are obtained before treatment and at different time-points. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) maturation and lymphocyte proliferation are assessed by flow cytometry. Data showed a significant reduction of moDCs maturation status during one year of treatment and an increase in PD-L1. Moreover, we observed a significant decrease of the Pru p 3-specific proliferation of effector cells and an increase in regulatory T (Treg) cells with higher PD-L1 expression and IL-10 production. These are observed in patients treated only.

CONCLUSION

Successful Pru p 3-enriched-SLIT is linked to an important immunosuppression of allergen-specific effector T cells, potentially due to an increase of allergen-specific Treg cells. These cellular changes are orchestrated by the activity of moDCs promoting the expression of PD-L1 that will participate in the regulatory response. These changes may serve as biomarkers during SLIT alongside other features such as IgE/IgG₄ ratio.