Qualitative risk assessment of follicle stimulating hormone injectable products

Determining the cost-effectiveness of follitropin alfa biosimilar compared to follitropin alfa originator in women undergoing fertility treatment in France

Objective

The study assessed cost-effectiveness of follitropin alfa biosimilar versus the originator in terms of cost per cumulative live-birth (CLB) for the French healthcare system based on real-world evidence. Follitropin alfa biosimilars have been shown to have comparable clinical outcomes to the originator, in both clinical studies and real-world settings, in terms of oocyte retrieval and cumulative live-birth rate (CLBR). Previous health economic studies comparing the cost-effectiveness of follitropin alfa biosimilars against the originator utilised clinical trial data, leaving ambiguity over cost-effectiveness in real-world settings. Additionally, previous cost-effectiveness analysis has been performed for live-births following only fresh embryo transfers, whereas, fresh and frozen transfers are common in clinical practice. This study investigates the cost per CLB, which more closely models clinical practice.

Study design

A decision-tree cost-effectiveness model was developed based on the total costs and CLBR per ovarian stimulation (OS) for a follitropin alfa biosimilar (Bemfola®, Gedeon Richter Plc, Budapest, Hungary) and the originator (Gonal-f®, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). A time horizon of one year from oocyte retrieval to embryo transfer was used but costs from resulting transfers were also included. Clinical inputs were taken from the REOLA real-world study or clinician insights, while acquisition costs were taken from French public databases. The output was cost per CLB following one OS. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the largest model drivers.

Results

Cost per CLB was €18,147 with follitropin alfa biosimilar and €18,834 with the originator, saving €687 per CLB following OS with the biosimilar. When wastage estimates were considered the biosimilar cost saving is estimated to be between €796 and €1155 per CLB further increasing cost savings. Irrespective of wastage, if used ubiquitously throughout France for ART, the biosimilar could save the French health system €13,994,190 or lead to 771 more births when compared to its higher-cost originator. Sensitivity analysis showed that the originator's relative CLBR had the greatest impact on the model.

Conclusion

This analysis demonstrates that the follitropin alfa biosimilar, Bemfola®, is a more cost-effective option for OS compared with the originator from a French healthcare payer perspective, in terms of cost per CLB.

A real-world study of ART in France (REOLA) comparing a biosimilar rFSH against the originator according to rFSH starting dose

BACKGROUND

Since the first launch of a biosimilar recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), Bemfola®, in Europe in 2014, it has been possible to study in routine clinical care throughout France the effectiveness of a biosimilar rFSH including according to different rFSH starting doses.

METHODS

REOLA was a non-interventional, retrospective, real world study using anonymized data from 17 Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) centres' data management systems across France including 2,319 ART ovarian stimulation cycles with Bemfola® and 4,287 ART ovarian stimulation cycles with Gonal-f®. For both products, four populations were studied according to starting dose of rFSH: < 150 IU, 150 - 224 IU, 225 - 299 IU and ≥ 300 IU. The primary endpoint was the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) per commenced ART ovarian stimulation cycle including all subsequent fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers starting during a follow up period of at least 1 year following oocyte retrieval.

RESULTS

A direct relationship of increasing rFSH starting dose with increasing age, increasing basal FSH, decreasing AMH and increasing body mass index was noted. No clinically relevant differences were seen in all outcomes reported, including the cLBR, between Bemfola® and Gonal-f®, but for both drugs, an association was seen with increasing rFSH starting dose and decreasing cLBR.

CONCLUSIONS

The REOLA study demonstrates that the cLBR with Bemfola® is very similar to Gonal-f® across all patient subpopulations. The cLBR is inversely related to the rFSH starting dose irrespective of the drug used, and the REOLA study provides reassurance of the clinical effectiveness of a biosimilar rFSH used in a real world setting.

Risk of dosing errors in ART treatment: user experience of single- vs multi-use follitropin alfa pens

Background: This user experience study evaluated the suitability of single-use versus multi-dose follitropin alfa pen injectors for self-administration by women undergoing fertility treatment.Methods: Twenty-four fertility patients and 19 specialist nurses were recruited in four European countries to assess their use of Bemfola (a single-use pen), Gonal-f®, and Ovaleap® (multi-use pens). Participants completed usability tests in which their performance in assembling and administering doses of each pen was assessed against defined critical steps for ensuring safe and correct administration.Results: Critical error rates among nurses were 4%, 40%, and 49% for Bemfola®, Ovaleap®, and Gonal-f®, respectively; and among patients were 7%, 16%, and 38%. The most frequently reported critical errors occurred with the multi-use pens and were incorrect/lack of priming and failure to check the dose window prior to setting a new dose. The need to 'top up' doses from a new pen or cartridge when a pen contained insufficient dose also caused errors. The single-use pens did not cause these errors. Overall, 63% of nurses and 67% of patients had most confidence in Bemfola® for correct dosing and self-administration.Conclusions: Single-use pens require fewer preparation and administration steps than multi-use pens and are associated with fewer critical handling errors.