Pharmacologic management of non-neurogenic functional obstruction in women

Lower urinary tract dysfunction in the central nervous system neurogenic bladder and the real-life treatment outcome of botulinum toxin A

Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) is common in patients with central nervous system (CNS) lesions. Cases of cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), Parkinson's disease, dementia, and other intracranial lesions develop poor bladder control with or without urinary difficulty due to loss of cortical perception of bladder filling sensation and poor coordination of urethral sphincter relaxation during reflex micturition. Patients with CNS lesions usually have overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms, including urgency, frequency, incontinence, voiding symptoms of dysuria, large postvoid residual volume, and retention. In elderly patients with severe CNS disease the OAB symptoms are usually difficult to adequately relieve by medical treatment, and thus, their quality of life is greatly. Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is currently licensed and has been applied in patients with idiopathic and neurogenic OAB due to spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis. However, the application of BoNT-A in the treatment of urinary incontinence due to NLUTD in chronic CNS lesions has not been well-documented. Although cohort studies and case series support BoNT-A treatment for neurogenic OAB, chronic urine retention after intravesical BoNT-A injection for OAB and exacerbated urinary incontinence after urethral BoNT-A injection for voiding dysfunction have greatly limited its application among patients with NLUTD due to CNS lesions. This article reviews the pathophysiology and clinical characteristics of NLUTD in patients with CNS lesions and the clinical effects and adverse events of BoNT-A injection for patients with NLUTD. A flowchart was created to outline the patient selection and treatment strategy for neurogenic OAB.

Nonneurogenic female bladder outlet obstruction: Conservative and medical management

INTRODUCTION

In nonneurogenic female bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), management goals include reduction of outlet resistance to increase urinary outflow and improve bladder voiding to prevent or reduce lower and upper urinary tract (LUT and UUT) function deterioration, by correcting the underlying etiology. As significant progress has been achieved in the conservative and pharmacological management of nonneurogenic female BOO, the purpose of this article is to review and summarize the current literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this narrative review, a PubMed® search was performed by cross-referencing the keywords "female bladder outlet obstruction," "female voiding dysfunction," "conservative management," "pharmacological management," and "treatment" with various terms related to the management of female BOO. Clinical practice guidelines and landmark reviews from the most renowned experts in the field were also used.

MANAGEMENT

This review discusses and summarizes the conservative and pharmacological management of nonneurogenic female BOO based on the most relevant data currently available in the literature.

CONCLUSION

The recent advances in the understanding of underlying mechanisms involved in female BOO allow for more individualized management. Conservative and pharmacological options show interesting outcomes, particularly in the context of a functional cause of BOO. Overall, the level of evidence is still low regarding the use of conservative and pharmacological measures and more long-term data are required.

ICS-SUFU standard: Theory, terms, and recommendations for pressure-flow studies performance, analysis, and reporting. Part 2: Analysis of PFS, reporting, and diagnosis

AIMS

The Working Group (WG), initiated by the International Continence Society (ICS) Standardisation Steering Committee and supported by the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction, has revised the ICS Standard for pressure-flow studies of 1997.

METHODS

Based on the ICS standard for developing evidence-based standards, the WG developed this new ICS standard in the period from May 2020 to December 2022. A draft was posted on the ICS website in December 2022 to facilitate public discussion and the comments received have been incorporated into this final release.

RESULTS

The WG has recommended analysis principles for the diagnosis of voiding dysfunction for adult men and women without relevant neurological abnormalities. New standard terms and parameters for objective and continuous grading of urethral resistance (UR), bladder outflow obstruction (BOO) and detrusor voiding contraction (DVC) are introduced in this part 2 of the standard. The WG has summarized the theory and recommendations for the practice of pressure-flow study (PFS) for patients in part 1. A pressure-flow plot is recommended for the diagnosis of every patient, in addition to time-based graphs. Voided percentage and post void residual volume should always be included in PFS analysis and diagnosis. Only parameters that represent the ratio or subtraction of pressure and synchronous flow are recommended to quantify UR and only parameters that combine pressure and flow in a product or sum are recommended to quantify DVC. The ICS BOO index and the ICS detrusor contraction index are introduced in this part 2 as the standard. The WG has suggested clinical PFS dysfunction classes for male and female patients. A pressure-flow scatter graph including every patient's pdet at maximum flow (pdetQmax ) with maximum flow rate (Qmax ) point should be included in all scientific reports considering voiding dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

PFS is the gold standard used to objectively assess voiding function. Quantifying the dysfunction and grading of abnormalities are standardized for adult males and females.

Effect of the symptom-based alpha-blocker treatment on lower urinary tract symptoms in women: systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of alpha blockers in women with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Methods

We conducted systematic review and meta-analysis on published a priori protocols. We searched multiple data sources for published and unpublished randomized controlled trials in any language. Primary outcomes included urologic symptom scores, quality of life, and overall adverse events. We performed meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 and rated the certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.

Results

Alpha blockers likely reduced urological symptom score (mean difference: -1.50, 95% confidence interval: -2.91 to -0.09; moderate certainty of evidence). Alpha blockers may improve quality of life (standardized mean difference: -0.35, 95% confidence interval: -0.85 to 0.15; low certainty of evidence) and have little to no difference in overall adverse events (risk ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 0.55 to 2.15; low certainty of evidence). Based on five studies comparing combination therapy with alpha blockers and anticholinergics to anticholinergic monotherapy, combination therapy likely results in little to no difference in urological symptom score (mean difference: -0.35, 95% confidence interval: -1.98 to 1.27; moderate certainty of evidence) and quality of life (mean difference: -0.11, 95% confidence interval: -0.48 to 0.27; moderate certainty of evidence). We are very uncertain about the effect of combination therapy on overall adverse events (risk ratio: 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.40 to 2.84; very low certainty of evidence).

Conclusion

Alpha blocker monotherapy for the women with lower urinary tract symptoms regardless of the underlying cause likely has satisfactory efficacy compared with placebo. However, combination therapy with anticholinergics likely has no additional effect on urologic symptom score and quality of life compared with anticholinergic monotherapy.