Pharmacokinetic considerations for patients with a history of bariatric surgery

Full-dose rivaroxaban in patients with a history of bariatric surgery: bridging the knowledge gap through a phase 1 study

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery (BS) induces significant changes in gastrointestinal anatomy, potentially influencing the pharmacokinetics of orally administered drugs such as rivaroxaban.

OBJECTIVES

This phase 1 study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of full-dose rivaroxaban in post-BS patients.

METHODS

The ABSORB (Rivaroxaban Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics After Bariatric Surgery and in Morbid Obesity) study was a single-center, nonrandomized, multiple-dose, parallel-design bioequivalence trial. Adult patients with stable weight after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were compared with subjects with class III obesity and healthy controls. Participants received 20 mg of rivaroxaban daily for 8 days.

RESULTS

Post-BS patients exhibited altered rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics, suggesting reduced absorption. Mean area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours after the first dose (RYGB, 1806.8 ng.h/mL; SG, 1648.9 ng.h/mL) was lower compared with that in controls (1893.5 ng.h/mL). At steady state, the area under the concentration-time curve values remained lower in BS groups (RYGB, 2129.9 ng.h/mL; SG, 1946.4 ng.h/mL) than in controls (2224.8 ng.h/mL). The maximum concentration after the first dose was lower in post-RYGB subjects (214.9 ng/mL) than in controls (264.1 ng/mL). This difference was less pronounced at steady state (RYGB, 256.9 ng/mL vs controls, 288.8 ng/mL). Neither BS group met bioequivalence criteria compared with controls, whereas the group with class III obesity met bioequivalence criteria compared with controls at steady state.

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban displayed minor pharmacokinetic variations in post-BS patients. Given reported interindividual variability in the general population, these variations are unlikely to be of clinical significance. Our findings support rivaroxaban use in BS patients, emphasizing the need for further research in this area.

Oral Drug Dosing After Gastric Bypass and Diet-Induced Weight Loss: Simpler Than We Think? Lessons Learned From the COCKTAIL Study

This article summarizes the lessons learned from the COCKTAIL study: an open, three-armed, single-center study including patients with obesity scheduled for treatment with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or nonsurgical calorie restriction, and a normal- to overweight control group. The clinical implications of the results from multiple peer-reviewed articles describing the effects of RYGB, severe caloric restriction, weight loss, and type 2 diabetes on the in vivo activity and protein expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes (cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, and 3A) and transporters (DMETs; organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp)) are discussed in the perspective of three clinically relevant questions: (1) How should clinicians get the dose right in patients after RYGB? (2) Will drug disposition in patients with obesity be normalized after successful weight loss? (3) Are dose adjustments needed according to obesity and diabetes status? Overall, RYGB seems to have a lower impact on drug disposition than previously assumed, but clinicians should pay close attention to drugs with a narrow therapeutic range or where a high maximum drug concentration may be problematic. Whether obesity-related alterations of DMETs normalize with substantial weight loss depends on the DMET in question. Obesity and diabetes downregulate the in vivo activity of CYP2C19 and CYP3A (only obesity) but whether substrate drugs should be dose adjusted is also dependent on other factors that influence clearance, that is, liver blood flow and protein binding. Finally, we recommend frequent and individualized follow-up due to high inter- and intraindividual variability in these patients, particularly following RYGB.

Medication and supplement pharmacokinetic changes following bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of bariatric surgery on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of orally administered medications and supplements.

METHODS

Systematic searches of bibliographic databases were conducted to identify studies. Pooled effect estimates from different surgical procedures were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Quantitative data were synthesized from 58 studies including a total of 1985 participants. Whilst 40 medications and 6 supplements were evaluated across these studies, heterogeneity and missing information reduced the scope of the meta-analysis to the following medications and supplements: atorvastatin, paracetamol, omeprazole, midazolam, vitamin D, calcium, zinc, and iron supplements. There were no significant differences in PK parameters post-surgery for the drugs atorvastatin and omeprazole, and supplements calcium, ferritin, and zinc supplements. Paracetamol showed reduced clearance (mean difference [MD] = -15.56 L/hr, p = 0.0002, I2 = 67%), increased maximal concentration (MD = 6.90 μg/ml, p = 0.006, I2 = 92%) and increased terminal elimination half-life (MD = 0.49 hr, p < 0.0001, I2 = 3%) post-surgery. The remaining 36 medications and 2 supplements were included in a systematic review. Overall, 18 of the 53 drugs and supplements showed post-operative changes in PK parameters.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates heterogeneity in practice and could not reach conclusive findings for most PK parameters. Prospective studies are needed to inform best practice and enhance patient healthcare and safety following bariatric surgery.

Impact of gastric and bowel surgery on gastrointestinal drug delivery

General surgical procedures on the gastrointestinal tract are commonly performed worldwide. Surgical resections of the stomach, small intestine, or large intestine can have a significant impact on the anatomy and physiological environment of the gastrointestinal tract. These physiological changes can affect the effectiveness of orally administered formulations and drug absorption and, therefore, should be considered in rational drug formulation design for specific pathological conditions that are commonly associated with surgical intervention. For optimal drug delivery, it is important to understand how different surgical procedures affect the short-term and long-term functionality of the gastrointestinal tract. The significance of the surgical intervention is dependent on factors such as the specific region of resection, the degree of the resection, the adaptive and absorptive capacity of the remaining tissue, and the nature of the underlying disease. This review will focus on the common pathological conditions affecting the gastric and bowel regions that may require surgical intervention and the physiological impact of the surgery on gastrointestinal drug delivery. The pharmaceutical considerations for conventional and novel oral drug delivery approaches that may be impacted by general surgical procedures of the gastrointestinal tract will also be addressed.

Lisdexamfetamine Pharmacokinetic Comparison Between Patients Who Underwent Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Nonsurgical Controls

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE

The objective of this research was to characterize the impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on the pharmacokinetic properties of the pro-drug lisdexamfetamine and its active metabolite, d-amphetamine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A case-control design was used where patients who had undergone RYGB 9-24 months prior were matched on sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) to nonsurgical controls who had no history of weight loss surgery. Each participant received a single 50 mg dose of lisdexamfetamine, and plasma samples were collected over a 24-h period following dosing. Noncompartmental analyses were used to compare pharmacokinetic measures between groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the RYGB (n = 10) and NSC groups (n = 10) on sex (70% female), age (40.9 ± 9.6 vs. 41.3 ± 8.9 years), BMI (30.3 ± 5.2 vs. 31 ± 5.9 kg/m²), or ethnicity (100% vs. 80% White). The pharmacokinetic parameters between the RYGB and NCS groups were found to be equivalent for lisdexamfetamine and d-amphetamine, including maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC_(0-∞)).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that there is no need to routinely adjust lisdexamfetamine dosing following RYGB. However, given the potential for inter-individual differences, patients who undergo RYGB should be clinically monitored and individualized dosing strategies should be considered for concerns surrounding efficacy or toxicity.

Impact of bariatric surgery on oral anticoagulants pharmacology, and consequences for clinical practice: a narrative review

The prevalence of obesity has been steadily increasing in recent years worldwide. At the same time bariatric surgery, the best therapeutic strategy to date in terms of sustainable weight loss and improvement of associated comorbidities has been also increasing. However, these surgeries, whether primarily restrictive or malabsorptive, raise questions about the pharmacology of oral drugs. Among widely used drugs, anticoagulants are the referent therapy to treat some cardiovascular diseases such as atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. How bariatric surgery may impact pharmacological properties of oral anticoagulants, and more specifically, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are difficult to anticipate. In this review, we describe available data concerning the potential impact of bariatric surgery on the pharmacology of oral anticoagulants. The vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) requirements for the same international normalized ratio target are reduced after bariatric surgery. Limited data available for dabigatran 150 mg twice daily indicate a risk of insufficient efficacy in atrial fibrillation after gastric bypass due to probable impaired absorption. Data for rivaroxaban at the prophylactic dose of 10 mg per day suggest no impact of bariatric surgery from 3 days to 8 months post-surgery. However, no conclusive data are available for other anticoagulants or the use of DOACs at therapeutic doses. To date, DOACs are not recommended in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery, because of limited available data. Pending new studies to confirm the predictable pharmacokinetics and safety of DOACs in this population, especially at therapeutic doses, VKAs remain the first option for chronic anticoagulation.

The rise of one anastomosis gastric bypass: insights from surgeons and dietitians

One anastomosis gastric bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) is an emerging bariatric surgery (BS) technique. We evaluated and compared attitudes of bariatric surgeons and dietitians towards the considerations for choosing BS-type ("Decision-making"), the contributing factors to the rise of OAGB/MGB in Israel ("OAGB/MGB-rise") and notions regarding the occurrence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and nutritional deficiencies following OAGB/MGB. Anonymous online surveys were distributed. The participants were asked to rate by a 10-point Likert scale (0 = not at all; 100 = very much/often) their attitudes towards "Decision-making", "OAGB/MGB-rise" and occurrence of GI symptoms and nutritional deficiencies following OAGB/MGB. For "Decision-making" and "OAGB/MGB-rise", items were considered prioritized where ≥ 50% of the group considered them as 'very-important' (rating ≥ 80). Data on age, sex, years-in-practice and main workplace were also collected. A total of 106 professionals participated in the survey (42 surgeons; 64 dietitians). The respective mean age, years-in-practice and sex were 52.3 ± 8.7 vs. 42.3 ± 9.0 years, 21.0 ± 10.8 vs. 15.5 ± 9.2 years and 85.7% vs. 3.1% males. The inter-observer agreement for prioritized items related to "Decision-making" was fair (Kappa = 0.250; P = 0.257) and both groups prioritized patient's BMI, comorbidities and compliance. The inter-observer agreement for prioritized items related to "OAGB/MGB-rise" was moderate (Kappa = 0.550; P = 0.099) and both groups prioritized ease of performance, shorter operation duration and failure of former restrictive BS. Surgeons reported lower occurrence of nutritional deficiencies and GI symptoms as adverse effects of OAGB/MGB (P ≤ 0.033). The study highlights the views of bariatric surgeons and dietitians concerning factors that underpin the rise of OABG/MGB in Israel and possible rates of GI symptoms and nutritional deficiencies associated with this modality.

Prevalence and Factors Associated With Psychiatric Medication Use in Bariatric Surgery Candidates

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to describe the rates of psychiatric medication use in bariatric surgery candidates and factors associated with psychiatric medication use.

METHODS

Patients from the Toronto Western Hospital Bariatric Surgery Program were recruited from 2011 to 2014. Data extracted included demographics, clinical factors (e.g., mood disorder, anxiety disorder, eating disorder, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7), and psychiatric medication use. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between demographic variables, clinical factors, and psychiatric medication use. Multiple logistic regression was conducted to determine the predictors of clinical factors from demographic variables with psychiatric medication use.

RESULTS

A total of 262 (35.1%) patients were taking at least 1 psychiatric medication and 105 patients (14.1%) were taking more than 1 psychiatric medication. Antidepressants were the most common psychiatric medication reported. The majority of patients taking a psychiatric medication had a psychiatric illness, with 16.0% not having a lifetime diagnosis of a mental illness. Being male and being employed significantly predicted lower odds of being on a psychiatric medication. Older age significantly predicted higher odds of being on a psychiatric medication. Psychiatric disorders were significantly associated with psychiatric medication use independent of demographic variables.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides insights into clinical and demographic factors related to psychiatric medication use in bariatric surgery patients. The findings support careful screening and clarification of psychiatric medications, especially in patients without a formal psychiatric diagnosis.

Impact of body weight, low energy diet and gastric bypass on drug bioavailability, cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic biomarkers: protocol for an open, non-randomised, three-armed single centre study (COCKTAIL)

INTRODUCTION

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) is associated with changes in cardiometabolic risk factors and bioavailability of drugs, but whether these changes are induced by calorie restriction, the weight loss or surgery per se, remains uncertain. The COCKTAIL study was designed to disentangle the short-term (6 weeks) metabolic and pharmacokinetic effects of GBP and a very low energy diet (VLED) by inducing a similar weight loss in the two groups.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This open, non-randomised, three-armed, single-centre study is performed at a tertiary care centre in Norway. It aims to compare the short-term (6 weeks) and long-term (2 years) effects of GBP and VLED on, first, bioavailability and pharmacokinetics (24 hours) of probe drugs and biomarkers and, second, their effects on metabolism, cardiometabolic risk factors and biomarkers. The primary outcomes will be measured as changes in: (1) all six probe drugs by absolute bioavailability area under the curve (AUC_oral/AUC_iv) of midazolam (CYP3A4 probe), systemic exposure (AUC_oral) of digoxin and rosuvastatin and drug:metabolite ratios for omeprazole, losartan and caffeine, levels of endogenous CYP3A biomarkers and genotypic variation, changes in the expression and activity data of the drug-metabolising, drug transport and drug regulatory proteins in biopsies from various organs and (2) body composition, cardiometabolic risk factors and metabolic biomarkers.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The COCKTAIL protocol was reviewed and approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (Ref: 2013/2379/REK sørøst A). The results will be disseminated to academic and health professional audiences and the public via presentations at conferences, publications in peer-reviewed journals and press releases and provided to all participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02386917.