Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in antimicrobial therapy for sepsis

Patterns, outcomes, and preventability of clinically manifest drug-drug interactions in older outpatients: a subgroup analysis from a 6-year-long observational study in North India

Older adults are vulnerable to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Evidence on clinically manifest DDIs in older outpatients is scanty. The present study aims to report clinically manifest DDIs, their risk factors, and preventive measures. A subgroup analysis of a 6-year (2015-2021) long prospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in North India. Older outpatients with ADRs constituted the study participants. Among 933 ADRs reported in 10,400 patient registrations, clinically manifest DDIs were involved in 199 (21.3%). DDIs accounted for 29.9%, 26.5%, and 21.3% of drug-related metabolic, vascular, and nervous system disorders, respectively. Movement disorders (n = 18), hypotension (n = 16), and hypoglycemia (n = 15) were the most common manifestations. Eighty-six percent of DDIs were of the pharmacodynamic type, and 13.1% were immune-mediated. Around 35% of DDIs resulted in hospitalization, with hyponatremia, movement disorder, and renal impairment as the common reasons. Older adults with Parkinsonism, infection, coronary artery disease, neuropsychiatric disease, and diabetes mellitus, respectively, had 3.28, 2.85, 1.97, 1.76, and 1.80 times higher odds of DDIs. Those receiving ≥ 10 drugs had 5.31 times higher odds of DDIs compared to individuals receiving 1-4 drugs. "Avoiding the causative drug," "optimal monitoring of the patient," and "start-low and go-slow" policy together could prevent 85% of DDIs. In conclusion, every fifth case of ADRs and nearly one third of ADR-related hospitalizations in older adults are related to DDIs. Movement disorder, hypotension, and hypoglycemia are the common manifestations. A holistic approach with drug omission, optimal patient monitoring, and slow titration of therapy can prevent significant DDIs in older adults.

Role of a Real-Time TDM-Based Expert Clinical Pharmacological Advice Program in Optimizing the Early Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment of Continuous Infusion Beta-Lactams among Orthotopic Liver Transplant Recipients with Documented or Suspected Gram-Negative Infections

(1) Objectives: To describe the attainment of optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients treated with continuous infusion (CI) beta-lactams optimized using a real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided expert clinical pharmacological advice (ECPA) program during the early post-surgical period. (2) Methods: OLT recipients admitted to the post-transplant intensive care unit over the period of July 2021-September 2023, receiving empirical or targeted therapy with CI meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, or ceftazidime-avibactam optimized using a real-time TDM-guided ECPA program, were retrospectively retrieved. Steady-state beta-lactam (BL) and/or beta-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) plasma concentrations (Css) were measured, and the Css/MIC ratio was selected as the best PK/PD target for beta-lactam efficacy. The PK/PD target of meropenem was defined as being optimal when attaining a fCss/MIC ratio > 4. The joint PK/PD target of the BL/BLI combinations (namely piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam) was defined as being optimal when the fCss/MIC ratio > 4 of the BL and the fCss/target concentration (CT) ratio > 1 of tazobactam or avibactam, or the fAUC/CT ratio > 24 of vaborbactam were simultaneously attained. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for testing potential variables that were associated with a failure in attaining early (i.e., at first TDM assessment) optimal PK/PD targets. (3) Results: Overall, 77 critically ill OLT recipients (median age, 57 years; male, 63.6%; median MELD score at transplantation, 17 points) receiving a total of 100 beta-lactam treatment courses, were included. Beta-lactam therapy was targeted in 43% of cases. Beta-lactam dosing adjustments were provided in 76 out of 100 first TDM assessments (76.0%; 69.0% decreases and 7.0% increases), and overall, in 134 out of 245 total ECPAs (54.7%). Optimal PK/PD target was attained early in 88% of treatment courses, and throughout beta-lactam therapy in 89% of cases. Augmented renal clearance (ARC; OR 7.64; 95%CI 1.32-44.13) and MIC values above the EUCAST clinical breakpoint (OR 91.55; 95%CI 7.12-1177.12) emerged as independent predictors of failure in attaining early optimal beta-lactam PK/PD targets. (4) Conclusion: A real-time TDM-guided ECPA program allowed for the attainment of optimal beta-lactam PK/PD targets in approximately 90% of critically ill OLT recipients treated with CI beta-lactams during the early post-transplant period. OLT recipients having ARC or being affected by pathogens with MIC values above the EUCAST clinical breakpoint were at high risk for failure in attaining early optimal beta-lactam PK/PD targets. Larger prospective studies are warranted for confirming our findings.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing regimen optimization of teicoplanin in critically ill patients with sepsis

Objectives: Teicoplanin has been extensively used in the treatment for infections caused by gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, current teicoplanin treatment is challenging due to relatively low and variable concentrations under standard dosage regimens. This study aimed to investigate the population pharmacokinetics (PPK) characteristics of teicoplanin in adult sepsis patients and provide recommendations for optimal teicoplanin dosing regimens. Methods: A total of 249 serum concentration samples from 59 septic patients were prospectively collected in the intensive care unit (ICU). Teicoplanin concentrations were detected, and patients' clinical data were recorded. PPK analysis was performed using a non-linear, mixed-effect modeling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate currently recommended dosing and other dosage regimens. The optimal dosing regimens were defined and compared by different pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters, including trough concentration (C_min), the ratio of 24-h area under the concentration-time curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC_0-24/MIC), as well as the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against MRSA. Results: A two-compartment model adequately described the data. The final model parameter estimates for clearance, central compartment volume of distribution, intercompartmental clearance and peripheral compartment volume were 1.03 L/h, 20.1 L, 3.12 L/h and 101 L, respectively. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was the only covariate that significantly affected teicoplanin clearance. Model-based simulations revealed that 3 or 5 loading doses of 12/15 mg/kg every 12 h followed by a maintenance dose of 12/15 mg/kg every 24 h-72 h for patients with different renal functions were required to achieve a target C_min of 15 mg/L and a target AUC_0-24/MIC of 610. For MRSA infections, PTAs and CFRs were not satisfactory for simulated regimens. Prolonging the dosing interval may be easier to achieve the target AUC_0-24/MIC than reducing the unit dose for renal insufficient patients. Conclusion: A PPK model for teicoplanin in adult septic patients was successfully developed. Model-based simulations revealed that current standard doses may result in undertherapeutic C_min and AUC, and a single dose of at least 12 mg/kg may be needed. AUC_0-24/MIC should be preferred as the PK/PD indicator of teicoplanin, if AUC estimation is unavailable, in addition to routine detection of teicoplanin C_min on Day 4, follow-up therapeutic drug monitoring at steady-state is recommended.

Linezolid Administration to Critically Ill Patients: Intermittent or Continuous Infusion? A Systematic Literature Search and Review

A judicious antibiotic therapy is one of the challenges in the therapy of critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock. The pathophysiological changes in these patients significantly alter the antibiotic pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) with important consequences in reaching the therapeutic targets or the risk of side effects. The use of linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic, in intensive care is such an example. The optimization of its therapeutic effects, administration in intermittent (II) or continuous infusion (CI) is gaining increased interest. In a systematic review of the main databases, we propose a detailed analysis of the main PK/PD determinants, their relationship with the clinical therapeutic response and the occurrence of adverse effects following II or CI of linezolid to different classes of critically ill patients or in Monte Carlo simulations.

Chinese ICU physicians' knowledge of antibiotic pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD): a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Patients with sepsis have a high mortality rate, accumulated evidences suggest that an optimal antibiotic administration strategy based on pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) can improve the prognosis of septic patients. Therefore, we assessed Chinese intensive care unit (ICU) physicians' knowledge about PK/PD.

METHODS

In December 2019, we designed a questionnaire focused on Chinese ICU physicians' knowledge about PK/PD and collected the questionnaires after 3 months. The questionnaire was distributed via e-mail and WeChat, and was distributed to ICU doctors in 31 administrative regions of China except Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan. The passing score was corrected by the Angoff method, and the ICU physicians' knowledge about PK/PD was analysed accordingly.

RESULTS

We received a total of 1,309 questionnaires and retained 1,240 valid questionnaires. The passing score was 90.8, and the overall pass rate was 56.94%. The pass rate for tertiary and secondary hospitals was 59.07% and 37.19%, respectively. ICU physicians with less than 5 years of work experience and resident physician accounted for the highest pass rate, while those with between 5 to 10 years of work experience and attending accounted for the lowest pass rate. The majority of participants in the Chinese Critical Care Certified Course (5C) were from Jiangsu and Henan provinces, and they had the highest average scores (125.8 and 126.5, respectively). For Beijing and Shanghai, the average score was only 79.4 and 90.9, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Chinese ICU physicians' knowledge about PK/PD is unsatisfactory. Therefore, it is essential to strengthen ICU physicians' knowledge about PK/PD.

Ensuring target concentrations of antibiotics in critically ill patients through dose adjustment

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotics are commonly prescribed in critical care, and given the large variability of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in these patients, drug PK frequently varies during therapy with the risk of either treatment failure or toxicity. Therefore, adequate antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients is very important.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the basic principles of PK and pharmacodynamics of antibiotics and the main patient and pathogen characteristics that may affect the dosage of antibiotics and different approaches to adjust doses.

EXPERT OPINION

Dose adjustment should be done for aminoglycosides and glycopeptides based on daily drug concentration monitoring. For glycopeptides, in particular vancomycin, the residual concentration (Cres) should be assessed daily. For beta-lactam antibiotics, a loading dose should be administered, followed by three different possible approaches, as TDM is rarely available in most centers: 1) antibiotic regimens should be adapted according to renal function and other risk factors; 2) nomograms or software can be used to calculate daily dosing; 3) TDM should be performed 24-48 h after the initiation of treatment; however, the results are required within 24 hours to appropriately adjust dosage regimens. Drug dosing should be reduced or increased according to the TDM results.

Antifungal Drugs TDM: Trends and Update

PURPOSE

The increasing burden of invasive fungal infections results in growing challenges to antifungal (AF) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This review aims to provide an overview of recent advances in AF TDM.

METHODS

We conducted a PubMed search for articles during 2016-2020 using "TDM" or "pharmacokinetics" or "drug-drug-interaction" with "antifungal," consolidated for each AF. Selection was limited to English language articles with human data on drug exposure.

RESULTS

More than 1000 articles matched the search terms. We selected 566 publications. The latest findings tend to confirm previous observations in real-life clinical settings. The pharmacokinetic variability related to special populations is not specific but must be considered. AF benefit-to-risk ratio, drug-drug interaction (DDI) profiles, and minimal inhibitory concentrations for pathogens must be known to manage at-risk situations and patients. Itraconazole has replaced ketoconazole in healthy volunteers DDI studies. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling is widely used to assess metabolic azole DDI. AF prophylactic use was studied more for Aspergillus spp. and Mucorales in oncohematology and solid organ transplantation than for Candida (already studied). Emergence of central nervous system infection and severe infections in immunocompetent individuals both merit special attention. TDM is more challenging for azoles than amphotericin B and echinocandins. Fewer TDM requirements exist for fluconazole and isavuconazole (ISZ); however, ISZ is frequently used in clinical situations in which TDM is recommended. Voriconazole remains the most challenging of the AF, with toxicity limiting high-dose treatments. Moreover, alternative treatments (posaconazole tablets, ISZ) are now available.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM seems to be crucial for curative and/or long-term maintenance treatment in highly variable patients. TDM poses fewer cost issues than the drugs themselves or subsequent treatment issues. The integration of clinical pharmacology into multidisciplinary management is now increasingly seen as a part of patient care.

Are Antibiotics Appropriately Dosed in Critically Ill Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance? A Narrative Review

AIMS

Augmented renal clearance (ARC), which is commonly defined as increased renal clearance above 130 ml/min/1.73 m², is a common phenomenon among critically ill patients. The increased elimination rate of drugs through the kidneys in patients with ARC can increase the risk of treatment failure due to the exposure to subtherapeutic serum concentrations of medications and affect the optimal management of infections, length of hospital stay, and outcomes. The main goal of this review article is to summarize the recommendations for appropriate dosing of antibiotics in patients with ARC.

METHODS

This article is a narrative review of the articles that evaluated different dosing regimens of antibiotics in patients with ARC. The keywords "Augmented Renal Clearance," "Critically ill patients," "Drug dosing," "Serum concentration," "Beta-lactams," "Meropenem," "Imipenem," "Glycopeptide," "Vancomycin," "Teicoplanin," "Linezolid," "Colistin," "Aminoglycosides," "Amikacin," "Gentamycin," "Fluoroquinolones," "Ciprofloxacin," and "Levofloxacin" were searched in Scopus, Medline, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases, and pediatric, nonhuman, and non-English studies were excluded.

RESULTS

PK properties of antibiotics including lipophilicity or hydrophilicity, protein binding, the volume of distribution, and elimination rate that affect drug concentration should be considered along with PD parameters for drug dosing in critically ill patients with ARC.

CONCLUSION

This review recommends a dosing protocol for some antibiotics to help the appropriate dosing of antibiotics in ARC and decrease the risk of subtherapeutic exposure that may be observed while receiving conventional dosing regimens in critically ill patients with ARC.

Continuous Infusion of Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Meropenem in ICU Patients Without Renal Dysfunction: Are Patients at Risk of Underexposure?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Morbidity and mortality from serious infections are common in intensive care units (ICUs). The appropriateness of the antibiotic treatment is essential to combat sepsis. We aimed to evaluate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment of meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam administered at standard total daily dose as continuous infusion in critically ill patients without renal dysfunction and to identify risk factors of non-pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment.

RESULTS

We included 118 patients (149 concentrations), 47% had microorganism isolation. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [median (interquartile range, IQR) values in isolated pathogens were: meropenem: 0.05 (0.02-0.12) mg/l; piperacillin: 3 (1-4) mg/l]. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainments (100%fC_ss≥1xMIC, 100%fC_ss≥4xMIC and 100%fC_{ss ≥ 8xMIC}, respectively) were: 100%, 96.15%, 96.15% (meropenem) and 95.56%, 91.11%, 62.22% (piperacillin) for actual MIC; 98.11%, 71.70%, 47.17% (meropenem, MIC 2 mg/l), 95.83%, 44.79%, 6.25% (piperacillin, MIC 8 mg/l), 83.33%, 6.25%, 1.04% (piperacillin, MIC 16 mg/l) for EUCAST breakpoint of Enterobacteriaceae spp. and Pseudomonas spp. Multivariable linear analysis identified creatinine clearance (CrCL) as a predictive factor of free antibiotic concentrations (fC_ss) of both therapies (meropenem [β = - 0.01 (95% CI - 0.02 to - 0.0; p = 0.043)] and piperacillin [β = - 0.01 (95% CI - 0.02 to 0.01, p < 0.001)]). Neurocritical status was associated with lower piperacillin fC_ss [β = - 0.36 (95% CI - 0.61 to - 0.11; p = 0.005)].

CONCLUSION

Standard total daily dose of meropenem allowed achieving pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainments in ICU patients without renal dysfunction. Higher doses of piperacillin/tazobactam would be needed to cover microorganisms with MIC > 8 mg/l. CrCL was the most powerful factor predictive of fC_ss in both therapies.

Antimicrobial Dose Reduction in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Myth or Real Need? A Practical Approach for Guiding Dose Optimization of Novel Antibiotics

Acute kidney injury represents a common complication in critically ill patients affected by septic shock and in many cases continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may be required. In this scenario, antimicrobial dose optimization is highly challenging as the extracorporeal circuit may cause several pharmacokinetic alterations, which add up to volume of distribution and clearance variations resulting from sepsis. Variations in CRRT settings (i.e. modality of solute removal, type of filter material, blood flow rate and effluent flow rate), coupled with the presence of residual and/or recovering renal function, may cause dynamic variations in the clearance of hydrophilic antimicrobials. This means that dose reduction may not always be needed. Nowadays, the lack of pharmacokinetic data for novel antimicrobials during CRRT limits evidence-based dose recommendations for critically ill patients in this setting, thus making available evidence hardly applicable in real-world scenarios. This review aims to summarize the major determinants involved in antimicrobial clearance, and the available pharmacokinetic studies performed during CRRT involving novel antibiotics used for the management of multidrug-resistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections (namely ceftolozane–tazobactam, ceftazidime–avibactam, cefiderocol, imipenem–relebactam, meropenem–vaborbactam, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, and fosfomycin), providing a practical approach in guiding dose optimization in this special population.

Antibiotic therapy in sepsis: No next time for a second chance!

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Appropriate antibiotic therapy remains the cornerstone of sepsis and septic shock management.

COMMENT

Although the early initiation of antimicrobial agents in the treatment of sepsis is widely acknowledged, the selection and adjustment to optimal dosage can be equally important. Since significant pathophysiological changes in the critically ill patients lead to altered pharmacokinetics of antibiotics, early consideration of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties is necessary for optimal antibiotic dosing in sepsis and should be integrated in practice.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Where possible, an individualized antibiotic dosing approach through the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service should replace the conventional dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis. Finally, antimicrobial stewardship can help improve clinical outcomes.

A narrative review of predictors for β-lactam antibiotic exposure during empirical treatment in critically ill patients

INTRODUCTION

: Emerging studies suggest that antibiotic pharmacokinetics (PK) are difficult to predict in critically ill patients. The high intra- and inter-patient PK variability makes it challenging to accurately predict the appropriate dosage required for a given patient. Identifying patients at risk could help clinicians to consider more individualized dosing regimens and perform therapeutic drug monitoring. We provide an overview of relevant predictors associated with target (non-)attainment of β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients.

AREAS COVERED

: This narrative review summarizes patient and clinical characteristics that can help to predict the attainment of target serum concentrations and to provide guidance on antimicrobial dose optimization. Literature was searched using Embase and Medline database, focusing on β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients.

EXPERT OPINION

: Adequate concentration attainment can be anticipated in critically ill patients prior to initiating empiric β-lactam antibiotic therapy based on readily available demographic and clinical factors. Male gender, younger age, and augmented renal clearance were the most significant predictors for target non-attainment and should be considered in further investigations to develop dosing algorithms for optimal β-lactam therapy.