Orbital atherectomy for the treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions: evidence, technique, and best practices

Management of Coronary Stent Underexpansion

Coronary stent underexpansion is an important problem and limitation of percutaneous coronary intervention, adversely affecting both short- and long-term patient outcomes. Stent underexpansion occurs when a stent fails to expand adequately compared with the adjacent reference segment, resulting in inadequate luminal gain. Multiple studies suggest that stent underexpansion is associated with increased risks of in-stent restenosis, stent thrombosis, and myocardial infarction, resulting in recurrent symptoms, readmissions, repeat interventions, and increased mortality. Contributing factors for stent underexpansion include severe calcification, inadequate lesion preparation, suboptimal stent deployment, and preexisting in-stent restenosis. Calcific plaques, especially when present behind a previously implanted, underexpanded stent, pose a significant challenge for further stent optimization. These lesions are often resistant to high-pressure balloon dilatation and may require advanced techniques that carry increased risks of complications. Intravascular imaging modalities, such as intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography, have emerged as essential tools in diagnosing and managing stent underexpansion. These techniques provide a more detailed evaluation of the vessel and previously implanted stent, enabling the clinician to understand the exact mechanism of stent failure, and assess plaque burden and morphology, which ultimately helps guide appropriate treatment strategies. Despite the clinical importance of stent underexpansion, there is currently no consensus on its optimal treatment, largely because of the absence of large prospective studies in this area. This comprehensive review aims to summarize the existing evidence, clinical experience, and treatment strategies for coronary stent underexpansion, with the goal of providing practical guidance to clinicians to help optimize percutaneous coronary intervention and patient outcomes.

Methods for treating coronary eruptive calcified nodules

Eruptive calcified nodules (CNs) are a manifestation of severely calcified plaques, which exist in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), non-ACS lesions. Optical coherence tomography is crucial for diagnosing and treating eruptive CNs in clinical practice. Management of eruptive CNs is still a challenge for interventional cardiologists. There have been significant advances in the treatment of eruptive CNs such as intravascular lithotripsy, excimer laser coronary atherectomy, rotational atherectomy, and orbital atherectomy. We find a range of treatment modalities to be effective under different conditions. The selection of these devices should be considered based on guidewire position, lesion characteristics, clinical manifestations, and operator's experiences.

Atherectomy Techniques: Rotablation, Orbital and Laser

Coronary artery disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide despite advancements in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). With an increasing ageing population, there is a significant challenge in addressing severe calcification in atherosclerotic plaque during angioplasty. This review article focuses on atherectomy strategies such as rotational atherectomy (RA), orbital atherectomy (OA) and excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) aimed at modifying calcified lesions and improving PCI outcomes. RA modifies plaque through rotational ablation, OA uses eccentrically mounted diamond-coated crown and has a reduced entrapment risk compared to RA. ELCA uses pulsatile laser energy to precisely ablate plaque tissue. This review provides insights into the mechanisms, procedural techniques and clinical outcomes associated with these calcium modification techniques. The selection of appropriate devices and adequate training are crucial for optimising lesion modification and enhancing procedural success. Further research and standardised protocols are required to overcome challenges associated with using these devices and expand their usage in clinical practice.

Intravascular lithotripsy in coronary arteries: a review of case reports

BACKGROUND

Calcified coronary arteries encountered during percutaneous intervention increase the probability of unsuccessful procedures. Heavy calcification of coronary arteries may lead to suboptimal stent expansion. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel method of transmitting sonic waves in pulses, which fractures the calcific plaque in the vessel with minimal soft tissue injury. This study systematically reviews and summarizes the reported clinical scenarios in which IVL was successfully used in coronary lesions.

MAIN TEXT

Articles were obtained by searching PubMed and Embase databases for IVL use in coronary arteries. We restricted the search to case reports. Our study included 84 patients from 70 case reports/case series. The mean age was 70.3 years (SD 10) and ranged from 27 to 96 years, and 67% were males. The indications for the angiogram that led to the use of IVL include chest pain (37.7%), non-ST elevated myocardial infarction (27.9%), ST elevated myocardial infarction (13.1%), and previous under-expanded stent (8.2%). The IVL was used in the left anterior descending artery (60.7%), right coronary artery (35.7%), left main disease (23.8%), and left circumflex (9.5%). Coronary IVL was safely and successfully used in different clinical scenarios for heavily calcified coronary lesions, including in-stent restenosis of native coronary arteries, saphenous vein grafts, and under-expanded stents. In addition, IVL was successfully used synergistically with orbital and rotational atherectomy and drug-coated balloon angioplasty in select patients.

CONCLUSION

IVL has successfully been used in an expanding array of clinical scenarios.

Calcified coronary lesions: Imaging, prognosis, preparation and treatment state of the art review

Calcific coronary artery stenosis is a complex disease associated with adverse outcomes and suboptimal percutaneous treatment. Calcium plaque modification has emerged as a key strategy to tackle the issues that accompany calcific stenosis - namely reduced device deliverability, unpredictable lesion characteristics, and difficult dilatation. Atherectomy has traditionally been the treatment modality of choice for heavily calcified coronary stenoses. Contemporary technologies have emerged to aid with planning, preparation, and treatment of calcified coronary stenosis in an attempt to improve procedural success and long-term outcomes. In this State Of The Art Review, we synthesize the body of data surrounding the diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of calcific coronary disease, with a focus on i) intravascular imaging, ii) calcific lesion preparation, iii) treatment modalities including atherectomy, and iv) updated treatment algorithms for the management of calcified coronary stenosis.

Orbital atherectomy safety and efficacy: A comparative analysis of ostial versus non-ostial calcified coronary lesions

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of coronary orbital atherectomy (OA) for treatment of ostial lesions are not yet fully established. We sought to evaluate (OA) treatment of severely calcified ostial and non-ostial lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of subjects treated with OA for severely calcified ostial and non-ostial lesions, at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida (MSMCMB) from January 2014 to September 2020, was completed. Study baseline characteristics, lesion and vessel characteristics, procedural outcomes, and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 609 patients that underwent PCI with OA were identified. The majority of patients (81.9 %) had non-ostial lesions, while 16.6 % had ostial lesions (of which 2.8 % classified as aorto-ostial) and 1.5 % had unknown lesion anatomy. The mean age of the overall cohort was 74.0 ± 9.3 years, and 63.5 % were male. All patients received drug-eluting stent (DES) placement, and the overall freedom from MACE was 98.5 %, with no significant difference observed between the ostial and non-ostial groups. The freedom from cardiac death and MI was also similar between the two groups. There were low rates of bleeding complications and severe angiographic complications, and no persistent slow flow/no reflow was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated no significant differences in in-hospital MACE outcomes between patients with ostial versus non-ostial lesions, indicating that OA is a safe and effective treatment option for both lesion types, including those classified as aorto-ostial.

Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Orbital Atherectomy in Improving the Outcome of Percutaneous Corornary Intervention in People With Diabetes

The optimal approach to deal with severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) in people with diabetes remains ill-defined. People with diabetes have a significant risk of developing severe vessel calcification and coronary artery disease (CAD). CAD is the leading cause of death in people with diabetes. Individuals with diabetes mainly present with severe multivessel stenosis, diffuse coronary calcification, and severe atherosclerosis, which are poor prognostic factors of revascularization procedures. Studies have shown that the revascularization of arteries in people with diabetes often results in worse outcomes than in people without diabetes. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been recommended as the standard of care for people with DM and complex anatomic diseases, including left main CAD. However, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is more acceptable to patients in clinical practice because of decreased trauma and rapid recovery. Severe CAC has traditionally been challenging for PCI and a frequent indication for surgical revascularization. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of orbital atherectomy (OA) in improving PCI outcomes in patients with diabetes and identify possible adverse effects that preclude its use.  The study is reported according to PRISMA and analyzed according to Cochrane guidelines on synthesis without meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature search of EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and MEDLINE was conducted for studies that utilized OA before PCI in people with diabetes. A reference list of the eligible articles was also screened. A narrative synthesis was done by representing the data on the effect direction plot, followed by vote counting. Eighteen studies were included in the analysis. Success rate/successful stent delivery was >90%, while freedom from angiographic complication and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were both >80% on the effect direction plot for people with diabetes and those without diabetes. People with diabetes had low event rates similar to those without diabetes. OA appears to be a viable treatment approach for people with diabetes. However, RCTs with a longer duration of follow-up are required to establish the appropriate treatment strategy for severe CAC in people with diabetes.

Rotational Atherectomy, Orbital Atherectomy, and Intravascular Lithotripsy Comparison for Calcified Coronary Lesions

In order to improve the percutaneous treatment of coronary artery calcifications (CAC) before stent implantation, methods such as rotational atherectomy (RA), orbital atherectomy (OA), and coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) were invented. These techniques use different mechanisms of action and therefore have various short- and long-term outcomes. IVL employs sonic waves to modify CAC, whereas RA and OA use a rapidly rotating burr or crown. These methods have specific advantages and limitations, regarding their cost-efficiency, the movement of the device, their usefulness given the individual anatomy of both the lesion and the vessel, and the risk of specified complications. This study reviews the key findings of peer-reviewed articles available on Google Scholar with the keywords RA, OA, and IVL. Based on the collected data, successful stent delivery was assessed as 97.7% for OA, 92.4% for IVL, and 92.5% for RA, and 30-day prevalence of MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Events) in OA-10.4%, IVL-7.2%, and RA-5%. There were no significant differences in the 1-year MACE. Compared to RA, OA and IVL are cost-effective approaches, but this is substantially dependent on the reimbursement system of the particular country. There is no standard method of CAC modification; therefore, a tailor-made approach is required.

Safety and Efficacy of Orbital Atherectomy in the All-Comer Population: Mid-Term Results of the Lower Silesian Orbital Atherectomy Registry (LOAR)

BACKGROUND

Coronary calcifications represent a challenging subset for the interventional cardiologist performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are well-established risk factors for adverse outcomes. Adequate plaque modification prior to stent implantation is critical to achieve an optimal outcome following PCI. Recently, a novel orbital atherectomy device has been introduced into clinical practice to modify calcified plaques. We evaluated the mid-term safety and efficacy of OA in a high-risk "all-comers" population.

METHODS

We evaluated 96 consecutive patients with severely calcified coronary lesions who underwent PCI facilitated by the orbital atherectomy device.

RESULTS

In-hospital MACCE was 5.2% without target lesion revascularization. At 6-month follow-up, the MACCE rate was 10.4% with a concomitant TLR rate of 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our mid-term data showed good safety and efficacy of orbital atherectomy as a plaque-modifying tool in an all-comers cohort with severely calcified coronary lesions.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Discretionary Atherectomy in Patients with Aortic Stenosis: 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample

BACKGROUND

Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) usually have concomitant calcified coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring atherectomy to improve lesion compliance and odds of successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there is a paucity of data regarding PCI with or without atherectomy in patients with AS.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried from 2016 through 2019 using ICD-10 codes to identify individuals with AS who underwent PCI with or without atherectomy (Orbital Atherectomy [OA], Rotational or Laser Atherectomy [non-OA]). Temporal trends, safety, outcomes, costs, and correlates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were assessed using discharge weighted data.

RESULTS

Hospitalizations of 45,420 AS patients undergoing PCI with or without atherectomy were identified and of those, 88.6 %, 2.3 %, and 9.1 % were treated with PCI-only, OA, or non-OA, respectively. There was an increase in PCIs (8855 to 10,885), atherectomy [OA (165 to 300) and non-OA (795 to 1255)], and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use (625 to 1000). The median cost of admission was higher in the atherectomy cohorts ($34,340.77 in OA, $32,306.2 in non-OA) as compared to the PCI-only cohort ($23,683.98). Patients tend to have decreased odds of MACE with IVUS guided atherectomy and PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

This large database revealed a significant increase in PCI with or without atherectomy in AS patients from 2016 to 2019. Considering the complex comorbidities of AS patients, the overall complication rates were well distributed among the different cohorts, suggesting that IVUS guided PCI with or without atherectomy in patients with AS is feasible and safe.

The Role of Intracoronary Imaging for the Management of Calcified Lesions

Interventional cardiologists in everyday practice are often confronted with calcified coronary lesions indicated for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). PTCA of calcified lesions is associated with diverse technical challenges resulting in suboptimal coronary stenting and adverse long-term clinical outcomes. Angiography itself offers limited information regarding coronary calcification, and the adjuvant use of intracoronary imaging such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) can guide the treatment of calcified coronary lesions, optimizing the different stages of the procedure. This review offers a description of why, when, and how to use intracoronary imaging for PTCA of calcified coronary lesions in order to obtain the most favorable results. We used the PubMed and Google Scholar databases to search for relevant articles. Keywords were calcified coronary lesions, intracoronary imaging, IVUS, OCT, coronary calcium modification techniques, PTCA, and artificial intelligence in intracoronary imaging. A total of 192 articles were identified. Ninety-one were excluded because of repetitive or non-important information.

Comparison of Orbital Atherectomy and Rotational Atherectomy in Calcified Left Main Disease: Short-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Coronary calcifications, particularly in left main disease (LMD), are independently associated with adverse outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Adequate lesion preparation is pivotal to achieve favorable short- and long-term outcomes. Rotational atherectomy devices have been used in contemporary practice to obtain adequate preparation of the calcified lesions. Recently, novel orbital atherectomy (OA) devices have been introduced to clinical practice to facilitate the preparation of the lesion. The objective of this study is to compare the short-term safety and efficacy of orbital and rotational atherectomy for LMD.

METHODS

we retrospectively evaluated a total of 55 consecutive patients who underwent the LM PCI supported by either OA or RA.

RESULTS

The OA group consisted of 25 patients with a median SYNTAX Score of 28 (26-36). The Rota group consisted of 30 patients with a median SYNTAX Score of 28 (26-33.1) There were no statistical differences in MACCE between the RA and OA subpopulations when recorded in-hospital (6.7% vs. 10.3% p = 0.619) as well as in a 1-month follow-up after the procedure (12% vs. 16.6% p = 0.261).

CONCLUSION

OA and RA seem to be similarly safe and effective strategies for preparating the lesion in the high-risk population with calcified LMD.

Coronary Intra-orbital Atherectomy Complications and Procedural Failure: Insight From the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database

BACKGROUND

The Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System (Cardiovascular Systems Inc., St. Paul, MN) is the first and only orbital atherectomy system approved by the US FDA for the treatment of severely calcified lesions. While the device has proven to be safe in clinical trials, real-world data are minimal.

METHODS

The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried for reports on the Diamondback 360® Coronary from January 2019 to January 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 566 events were reported during the study period. After the exclusion of duplicate reports, the final cohort included 547 reports. The most common mode of failure was break or separation of a device part (40.4%, n = 221) mainly due to breaking in the tip of the ViperWire (66.1%), driveshaft (22.7%), or crown (12.2%). The most common vessel associated with events was the left anterior descending artery (31.4%), followed by the right coronary artery (26.9%), left circumflex (21.6%), and left main coronary artery (6.4%). The most common clinical adverse outcome was perforation (33.0%, n = 181) with 23.7% resulting in cardiac tamponade. Most perforation cases were treated by covered stent (44.2%), surgery (30.5%), stent (98%), and balloon angioplasty (9%). There were 89 (16.3%) events of death with 67% due to perforation (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study provided a glimpse of real-world adverse outcomes and common modes of failure due to orbital atherectomy. The most common mode of failure was the break or separation of a device part and the most common complication was perforation according to the MAUDE database. It will help physicians to anticipate complications and escalate care appropriately.

Predictors of coronary artery injury after orbital atherectomy as assessed by optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE

The association between the extent of the wire and device bias as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the healthy portion of the vessel and the risk of coronary artery injury after orbital atherectomy (OA) has not been fully elucidated. Thus, purpose of this study is to investigate the association between pre-OA OCT findings and post-OA coronary artery injury by OCT.

METHODS

We enrolled 148 de novo lesions having calcified lesion required OA (max Ca angle > 90°) in 135 patients who underwent both pre- and post-OA OCT. In pre-OA OCT, OCT catheter contact angle and the presence or absences of guide-wire (GW) contact with the normal vessel intima were assessed. Also, in post-OA OCT, we assessed there was post-OA coronary artery injury (OA injury), defined as disappearance of both of intima and medial wall of normal vessel, or not.

RESULTS

OA injury was found in 19 lesions (13%). Pre-PCI OCT catheter contact angle with the normal coronary artery was significantly larger (median 137°; inter quartile range [IQR] 113-169 vs. median 0°; IQR 0-0, P < 0.001) and more GW contact with the normal vessel was found (63% vs. 8%, P < 0.001). Pre-PCI OCT catheter contact angle > 92° and GW contact with the normal vessel intima were associated with post-OA vascular injury (Both: 92% (11/12), Either: 32% (8/25), Neither: 0% (0/111), P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pre-PCI OCT findings, such as catheter contact angle > 92° and guide-wire contact to the normal coronary artery, were associated with post-OA coronary artery injury.

Outcomes of Orbital Atherectomy for the Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Lesions

Background Orbital atherectomy (OA) is used to prepare severely calcified coronary artery lesions before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is used to determine the plaque volume and degree of stenosis within the arterial vessel. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of OA for treating severely calcified coronary lesions and determined if IVUS impacted these outcomes. Methods We retrospectively collected data from a single center of patients with severe coronary artery calcification who underwent OA. The data on baseline characteristics and procedural and clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 374 patients underwent OA. The mean age was 69 ± 12.7; 53.6% were Black, and 38% were female. Hypertension was present in 96% of the patients, followed by hyperlipidemia in 79.4%, diabetes mellitus in 53.7%, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in 22.7%. More patients had presented with a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) compared to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at 36.3% versus 4.3%, respectively. The radial artery was used in 35.4% of the cases, and the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was the most commonly treated vessel with OA at 61%, followed by the right coronary artery (RCA) at 30.7%. IVUS was utilized in 63.4% of cases. The most common complication of the procedure was perforation and dissection at an equal proportion of 1.3% among all patients. The no-reflow rate was 0.5%, and 0.5% developed post-procedural myocardial infarction (MI). The average length of stay was 4.7 days, while a marginal proportion, at 10.5%, had same-day discharge with no recorded complications. Conclusion In this analysis of patients with severely calcified coronary lesions, OA had low rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and was considered a safe and effective treatment for complex coronary lesions.

Contemporary percutaneous management of coronary calcification: current status and future directions

Severe coronary artery calcification is one of the greatest challenges in attaining success in percutaneous coronary intervention, limiting acute and long-term results. In many cases, plaque preparation is a critical prerequisite for delivery of devices across calcific stenoses and also to achieve adequate luminal dimensions. Recent advances in intracoronary imaging and adjunctive technologies now allow the operator to select the most appropriate strategy in each individual case. In this review, we will revisit the distinct advantages of a complete assessment of coronary artery calcification with imaging and application of appropriate and contemporary plaque modification technologies in achieving durable results in this complex lesion subset.

Orbital atherectomy of calcified coronary ostial lesions

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of coronary orbital atherectomy (OA) for the treatment of calcified ostial lesions.

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly being completed in complex patients and lesions. OA is effective for severely calcified coronary lesions; however, there is a dearth of evidence on the use of OA in ostial lesions, especially with long-term outcome data.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent OA of heavily calcified ostial lesions followed by stent implantation from December 2010 to June 2019 at two high-volume PCI centers. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to assess the primary endpoints of 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year freedom-from (FF) major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization), stroke, and stent thrombosis (ST).

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients underwent OA to treat heavily calcified ostial coronary lesions. The mean age was 72 years with a high prevalence of diabetes (55%) and heart failure (36%), requiring hemodynamic support (14%). There was high FF angiographic complications (93%), and at 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year, a high FF-MACE (96%, 91%, and 88%), stroke (98%, 96%, and 96%), and ST (100%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the largest real-world experience of coronary OA use in heavily calcified ostial lesions with long-term outcomes over 2 years. The main finding in this retrospective analysis is that, despite the complex patients and lesions included in this analysis, OA appears to be a feasible and safe treatment option for calcified coronary ostial lesions.

Calcium Modification in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Moderate-severe calcification increases procedural complications and impairs long-term prognosis post-PCI. Intravascular imaging (particularly optical coherence tomography [OCT]) is useful in guiding the treatment of calcified lesions. Weighted sum of calcium length, arc, and thickness on OCT can predict adequate stent expansion, identifying when atherectomy is required. With intravascular imaging guidance, various techniques alone or in combination may be used in an algorithmic fashion to modify calcified lesions. Calcium fracture by balloon angioplasty, cutting/scoring balloons, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), atherectomy devices, or Excimer laser improves stent expansion. Intravascular imaging is essential in the treatment of in-stent restenosis when luminal and/or abluminal peri-strut calcium is present.

Utility of coronary orbital atherectomy with guide-extension system for distally located undilatable in-stent restenosis: A case report

Orbital atherectomy (OA) may be effective in managing undilatable in‐stent restenosis (ISR) despite off‐label indications. We demonstrated that optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI)‐guided OA, with a guide‐extension system was effective even in distally located, undilatable ISR. However, OFDI revealed that inter‐struts calcified neoatherosclerosis remained a challenging issue.

Coronary orbital atherectomy treatment of Hispanic and Latino patients: A real-world comparative analysis

Objectives

To assess coronary orbital atherectomy (OA) use in Hispanic or Latino (HL) patients compared to non‐HL patients.

Background

HL patients are at greater risk of cardiovascular disease mortality compared with Whites with similar coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores. The safety and efficacy of coronary atherectomy in the HL patient population is unknown due to the under‐representation of minorities in clinical trial research.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing coronary OA treatment of severely calcified lesions at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida (MSMCMB) was completed. From January 2014 to September 2020, a total of 609 patients from MSMCMB who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with OA were identified in the electronic health records.

Results

Of those identified, 350 (57.5%) had an ethnicity classification of HL. The overall mean age was 74 years and there was a high prevalence of diabetes in the HL group compared to the non‐HL group (49.7% vs. 34.7%; p = 0.0003). Severe angiographic complications were uncommon and in‐hospital freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, MI, and stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accidents), was 98.5% overall, with no significant difference between the HL and non‐HL groups, despite the higher prevalence of diabetes in the HL group.

Conclusions

This study represents the largest real‐world experience of OA use in HL versus non‐HL patients. The main finding in this retrospective analysis is that OA can be performed safely and effectively in a high‐risk population of HL patients.

Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions: 1-Year Results From the Disrupt CAD III Study

Background

Coronary calcification impairs stent delivery and optimal expansion, a significant predictor of subsequent stent thrombosis and restenosis. Current calcium ablative technologies may be limited by guidewire bias and periprocedural complications. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) delivers acoustic pressure waves to modify calcium, enhance vessel compliance, and optimize stent deployment. The Disrupt CAD III study demonstrated high (92.4%) procedural success and low (7.8%) 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates following IVL, but longer term follow-up is required to determine the durability of clinical benefit and the late impact of optimized stent implantation associated with IVL. This analysis evaluates 1-year outcomes from the Disrupt CAD III study.

Methods

Disrupt CAD III (NCT03595176) was a prospective, single-arm approval study designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of IVL as an adjunct to coronary stenting in de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions (n = 384). MACE was defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization; target lesion failure was defined as cardiac death, MI, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR).

Results

At 1 year, MACE occurred in 13.8% of patients (cardiac death: 1.1%, MI: 10.5%, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization: 6.0%) and target lesion failure occurred in 11.9% (ID-TLR: 4.3%), both driven by non-Q-wave MI (9.2%). Stent thrombosis (definite or probable) occurred in 1.1% of patients (including 1 event [0.3%] beyond 30 ​days).

Conclusions

Disrupt CAD III represents the largest long-term (1-year) analysis of coronary IVL to date. IVL treatment prior to coronary stent implantation in severely calcified lesions was associated with low 1-year rates of MACE, ID-TLR, and stent thrombosis.

Outcomes of rotational atherectomy versus orbital atherectomy for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The optimal approach to deal with severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains ill-defined.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic database search of all published studies comparing Orbital versus Rotational Atherectomy in patients undergoing PCI.

RESULTS

Eight observational studies were included in the analysis. Overall, there were no significant differences in Major-adverse-cardiac-events/MACE (OR: 0.81, CI: 0.63-1.05, p = .11), myocardial-infarction/MI (OR: 0.75, CI: 0.56-1.00, p = .05), all-cause mortality (OR: 0.82, CI: 0.25-2.64, p = .73) or Target-vessel-revascularization/TVR (OR: 0.72, CI: 0.38-1.36, p = .31). However, OA was associated with lower long-term MACE (1-year), (OR: 0.66, CI: 0.44-0.99, p = .04), long-term TVR (OR: 0.40, CI: 0.18-0.89, p = .03), and short-term MI (in-hospital and 30-day) (OR: 0.64, CI: 0.44-0.94, p = .02). OA was associated with more coronary artery dissections (OR: 2.61, CI: 1.38-4.92, p = .003) and device-related coronary perforations (OR: 2.79, CI: 1.08-7.19, p = .03). There were no differences in cardiac tamponade (OR: 1.78, CI: 0.37-8.69, p = .47). OA was noted to have significantly lower fluoroscopy time (MD: -3.96 min, CI: -7.67, -0.25; p = .04) compared to RA. No significant difference was noted in terms of contrast volume between the two groups (OR: -4.35 ml, CI: -14.52, 23.22; p = .65).

CONCLUSION

Although there was no difference in overall MACE, MI, all-cause mortality and TVR, OA was associated with lower long-term MACE and short-term MI. OA is associated with lower fluoroscopy time but higher rates of coronary artery dissection and coronary perforation.

Characteristics of atherosclerosis in femoropopliteal artery and its clinical relevance

Atherosclerosis is a systemic disease with different faces. Despite identical or similar pathogenetic mechanisms, atherosclerotic lesions and their clinical manifestations vary in different parts of the vascular system. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) represents one of the most frequent clinical manifestations of atherosclerosis with predominant location in the superficial femoral artery (SFA). Morphological characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques in peripheral arteries differ from lesions in the coronary and carotid arteries. Plaques in SFA have more fibrotic components, less lipids and inflammatory cells, which makes them more stable and less prone to rupture. Factors that determine the different structure of plaques in SFA compared to coronary arteries include hemodynamic forces, vasa vasorum and calcification. Low shear stress in SFA in the adductor canal is one of the factors which determines frequent atherosclerotic lesions in this region. Lower lipid content and fewer inflammatory cells explain higher stability of SFA plaques. The specific structure of SFA plaques may require preventive and therapeutic measures, which to some extent differ from prevention of coronary atherosclerosis and may include inhibition of fibrotic proliferation in SFA plaques and calcification. Revascularization of PAD differs from procedures used in coronary arteries and requires specific technical expertise and devices.

Percutaneous management of calcified coronary arteries - review of atherectomy and lithotripsy devices and why it is important

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) predisposes to suboptimal revascularization outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite the availability of several plaque modification devices, their rates of use remain low despite the prevalence of CAC encountered in clinical practice. It is important to understand how each device can be utilized in clinical practice in order to improve outcomes after PCI.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article summarizes the most recent clinical evidence for each plaque modification device. Although rotational atherectomy is the most frequently used device for plaque modification, the use of orbital atherectomy (OA) has been increasing. Balloon-based strategies including recent studies evaluating a novel intravascular lithotripsy balloon have shed light on the benefits of nonablative devices in modifying CAC during PCI.

SUMMARY

CAC poses significant technical challenges in achieving optimal stent results. Several intracoronary plaque modification devices are currently available and understanding the technical aspects, indications and contraindications to the use of each device is essential. Although rotational and OA are most commonly used, laser atherectomy and balloon-based devices may offer an advantage in certain lesion subsets.

Japan-USA orbital atherectomy for calcific coronary lesions: COAST study, Hharmonization by Doing proof-of-concept

Effective treatment strategies and medical devices continue to be needed in Japan and the United States of America (US) to mitigate the growing burden of cardiovascular disease and coronary heart disease. Unfortunately, there can be a delay in gaining cardiovascular device approval in Japan after a device has already been approved and is in use in the US. The Harmonization by Doing (HBD) program; however, can eliminate this delay and reduce the cost of completing a clinical trial in Japan. The HBD proof-of-concept study, COAST, resulted in approval of the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System Micro Crown simultaneously in Japan and the US on the same day. Subsequently, the Diamondback 360® Coronary OAS Classic Crown also received approval in Japan. The COAST study provides further evidence that global clinical trials via HBD for medical devices are practical and advantageous.

Contemporary technologies to modify calcified plaque in coronary artery disease

With aging society, one of the more challenging obstacles in percutaneous coronary interventions are calcified coronary lesions. Calcified lesions may impede stent delivery, limit balloon and stent expansion, cause uneven drug distribution, and hinder wire advancement. Even in the setting of acceptable procedural success, vessel calcification is independently associated with increased target lesion revascularization rates at follow-up and lower survival rates. In order to effectively manage such lesions, dedicated technologies have been developed. Atherectomy aims at excising tissue and debulking plaques, as well as compressing and reshaping the atheroma, generally referred to as lesion preparation that enables further balloon and/or stent expansion in contemporary clinical practice. In the current review, we will discuss the available methods for atherectomy, including rotational, orbital, and excimer laser coronary atherectomy, as well as intravascular lithotripsy. In addition, we will review the role of imaging in calcified lesions.

Percutaneous coronary intervention of complex calcific coronary lesions utilizing orbital atherectomy prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease (CAD), often with severe calcification, is present in up to 75% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Management of CAD in such patients is challenging. Orbital atherectomy (OA) is an effective treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions prior to stent implantation. However, there is limited data on the use of OA for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat calcific CAD patients prior to TAVR (OA PCI + TAVR).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with moderate/severe calcific CAD and moderate/severe AS who underwent staged OA PCI + TAVR at one high-volume institution. Data were analyzed to assess the 1-year major adverse cardiac events after index OA PCI [MACE: death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and myocardial infarction (MI)].

RESULTS

There were 18 patients (mean age of 82) treated with staged OA PCI + TAVR, and of those, 10 (56%) were male, 7 (39%) Caucasian, and 11 (61%) Hispanic/Latino. The average left ventricular ejection fraction was 49% and congestive heart failure was present in 12 patients (67%). There were no angiographic complications (0%), stent thrombosis (0%), or stroke events (0%). The 30-day and 1-year MACE rates were 5.6% (0% death, 0% TLR, 5.6% MI) and 17% (0% death, 11% TLR, and 17% MI [all non-Q-wave MI]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center observational cohort series, patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions treated with OA prior to TAVR had low rates of MACE at 30 days and 1 year. The results demonstrate the feasibility and safety of OA for the treatment of complex calcific coronary lesions prior to TAVR. An up-to-date literature review of atherectomy before, during, or after TAVR in patients with concomitant severe AS and calcific CAD is also provided.

TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY

There is limited data on the use of orbital atherectomy (OA) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat calcific coronary artery disease (CAD) patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Our primary aim was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and 1-year outcome of OA PCI pre-TAVR in patients with complex CAD and severe aortic stenosis (AS). We also aimed to provide a brief up-to-date literature review of atherectomy before, during, or after TAVR in patients with concomitant severe AS and calcific CAD. This retrospective cohort study found that OA is feasible and safe for the treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions before TAVR, resulting in acceptable 30-day and 1-year outcomes.

Tip fracture of the crown of orbital atherectomy device in angulated left circumflex lesion

Atherectomy, whether rotational or orbital, is an essential and established method for treatment of calcified coronary lesions. By modifying the plaque, atherectomy lessens the risk of plaque shift and facilities stent delivery and stent expansion. Atherectomy technique is meticulous and challenging especially in tortuous and angulated coronary arteries. Herein, we describe the rare case of occurrence and the management of fracture of the tip of the crown of CSI Diamondback orbital atherectomy device during treatment of severely angulated and calcified ostial left circumflex lesion.

Orbital-Tripsy: Novel Combination of Orbital-Atherectomy and Intravascular-Lithotripsy, in Calcified Coronaries After Failed Intravascular-Lithotripsy

Calcified coronary lesions are notorious for posing technical difficulty during angioplasty. Fortunately, more devices are available to tackle coronary calcifications. However, there remain difficult cases whereby a single modality is insufficient. Here we report the feasibility and success of a case, using Novo combination of Shockwave Lithotripsy after Orbital Atherectomy. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Calcified Lesion Assessment and Intervention in Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Overview of Angioplasty, Atherectomy, and Lithotripsy

Calcific coronary artery disease intervention is associated with uniformly worse short-term procedural and long-term clinical results compared with treatment of non-calcified lesions. Multiple intravascular imaging tools currently exist to aid the identification and detailed characterization of intracoronary calcium, and guide appropriate follow-on management strategies. Several unique device therapies, to include angioplasty, atherectomy, and lithotripsy may be employed to enhance lesion preparation, stent implantation and optimization, and improve patient outcomes. Current low use of both imaging and ablative technologies in the US offers significant future opportunities for improving the comprehensive evaluation and management of these complex lesion subsets and patients.

Additional debulking efficacy of low-speed rotational atherectomy after high-speed rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesion

We aimed to evaluate the additional debulking efficacy of low-speed rotational atherectomy (RA) after high-speed RA by using intravascular imaging. A total of 22 severe calcified coronary lesions in 19 patients (age, 74 ± 10 years; 74% male) were retrospectively analyzed. All of these lesions underwent RA under optical coherence tomography (OCT) or optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) guidance. At first, we performed high-speed RA with 220,000 rpm until the reduction of rotational speed disappeared; then, low-speed RA with 120,000 rpm using the same burr size was performed. OCT or OFDI was performed after both high-speed and low-speed RAs, and the minimum lumen area were compared. The initial and final burr sizes of high-speed RA were 1.5 (1.5-1.75) and 1.75 (1.5-2.0) mm, respectively. The number of sessions, total duration time, and maximum decreased rotational speed during high-speed RA were 11 ± 5 times, 113 ± 47 s, and 4000 (3000-5000) rpm, respectively. During low-speed RA, the number of sessions, total duration time, and maximum reduction of rotational speed were 3 ± 1 times, 32 ± 11 s, and 1000 (0-2000) rpm, respectively. The minimum lumen area was similar between after high-speed and after low-speed RA [2.61 ± 1.03 mm² (after high-speed RA) vs. 2.65 ± 1.00 mm² (after low-speed RA); P = 0.91]. Additional low-speed RA immediately after sufficient debulking by high-speed RA was not associated with increased lumen enlargement. There was no clinical efficacy of low-speed RA after high-speed RA.

Triple-Guidewire Technique for Treating Stent Underexpansion in Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Lesions

Stent underexpansion, a potential complication of percutaneous coronary intervention in severely calcified and stenotic coronary arteries, may result in in-stent thrombosis and restenosis. Different balloon-based and atheroablative techniques have been proposed to reduce the risk of these complications. We describe a simple triple-guidewire technique that we used to treat stent underexpansion in 2 elderly men.

Contemporary Approach to Heavily Calcified Coronary Lesions

Percutaneous treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions still represents a challenge for interventional cardiology, with higher risk of immediate complications, late failure due to stent underexpansion and malapposition, and consequently poor clinical outcome. Good characterisation of calcium distribution with multimodal imaging is important to improve the successful treatment of these lesions. The use of traditional or new dedicated devices for the treatment of calcified lesions allows better lesion preparation; therefore, it is important that we know the different mechanisms and technical features of these devices.

Lesion Preparation with Orbital Atherectomy

Despite significant improvements in stent design, severe coronary calcification continues to impede adequate stent expansion and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Angiography is limited in its ability to detect and comprehensively characterise calcified plaque. Intravascular imaging provides information on lesion morphology guiding appropriate treatment strategies. Orbital atherectomy allows for lesion preparation of severely calcified plaque prior to stent implantation. Utilising a unique mechanism of action incorporating centrifugal forces, a standard 1.25 mm eccentrically mounted and diamond-coated burr orbits bi-directionally to ablate calcified plaque. Lesion preparation with orbital atherectomy allows for modification of calcified plaque to facilitate stent expansion.

Direct Stenting in Patients Treated with Orbital Atherectomy: An ORBIT II Subanalysis

BACKGROUND

Direct stenting offers many potential advantages in appropriately selected lesions. Coronary artery calcification increases the complexity and risk of adverse events associated with percutaneous coronary intervention. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of direct stenting after treatment with orbital atherectomy (OA).

METHODS

ORBIT II was a single-arm trial enrolling 443 subjects with de novo severely calcified coronary lesions treated with OA; direct stenting was utilized in 59.0% of cases. Procedural outcomes and 3-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates were compared in subjects treated with pre-stent balloon dilatation versus direct stenting after OA.

RESULTS

Procedural success (84.2% vs. 93.3%; p = 0.004) was significantly higher in the direct stenting cohort. 3-year MACE occurred less frequently in the direct stenting cohort (29.9% vs. 19.1%; p = 0.006), driven by lower rates of myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization. In a propensity matched analysis, procedural success and 3-year MACE rates were similar in the pre-stent balloon dilatation and direct stenting groups (85.0% vs. 91.8%; p = 0.122 and 28.2% vs. 19.6%; p = 0.078, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Orbital atherectomy facilitates direct stenting and is associated with high procedural success and favorable 3-year outcomes in carefully selected patients. Randomized studies are needed to assess the optimal strategy after lesion preparation with OA.

Orbital Atherectomy: A Comprehensive Review

Successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be challenging in the presence of heavily calcified lesions. Severely calcified lesions are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Recognition of calcification is important before stenting to ensure adequate stent expansion can be attained. Orbital atherectomy is a safe and effective method to ablate calcified plaque. Lesion preparation through plaque modification with orbital atherectomy before stent implantation can help to optimize the results of PCI in these complex lesions.

A focused review on optimal coronary revascularisation in patients with chronic kidney disease: Coronary revascularisation in kidney disease

Concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) is known to have poor outcomes. With a thorough literature review, we discuss the pathophysiological basis behind accelerated atherosclerosis in CKD, and the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in these patients, focusing on drug-eluting stents, coronary artery bypass grafting, and adverse outcomes. We discuss factors contributing to poor outcomes in these patients, and the need for more work in this subgroup.

Plaque modification of severely calcified coronary lesions via orbital atherectomy: Single-center observations from a complex Veterans Affairs cohort

BACKGROUND

Orbital atherectomy (OA) is a known alternative to other atherectomy devices. However, some complex patient demographics (eg, left ventricular ejection fraction <25%) were excluded from the first-in-human trial (ORBIT I) and the pivotal FDA device approval trial (ORBIT II) which evaluated the safety and efficacy of OA in severely calcified de novo coronary lesions. This single-operator cohort study aimed to examine the impact of OA on a real-world complex Veterans Affairs patient subset.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was completed on 40 consecutive patients with severely calcified coronary lesions who underwent OA prior to drug-eluting stent placement at the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center from January 2015 to June 2017.

RESULTS

Orbital atherectomy plus drug-eluting stent placement was successful in all 40 cases. Chocolate focal force balloon angioplasty was the most commonly used post-atherectomy balloon (N = 34, 85%). Few complications were observed, including one case (2.5%) of perforation and one case (2.5%) of no-reflow. Neither acute stent thrombosis nor emergent coronary artery bypass grafting was observed. The intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-determined median [IQR] pre-procedure minimum lumen area and post-procedure minimum stent area (MSA) were 2.8 [2.2, 3.0] mm2 and 8.7 [7.7, 10.0] mm2, respectively (P < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney test). Major adverse cardiovascular events, including all-cause mortality, at 30 days and at a median [IQR] follow-up of 197.5 [35.5, 461.3] days, was 5% and 10%, respectively. During that period, one target vessel revascularization (2.5%) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that OA is a useful tool in performing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention effectively in VA patients with severely calcified coronary lesions. OA plaque modification in combination with a high utilization rate of IVUS and Chocolate focal force angioplasty facilitates stent delivery and optimal stent expansion, resulting in a large MSA.

Procedural and Long-Term Ischemic Outcomes of Tight Subtotal Occlusions Treated with Orbital Atherectomy: An ORBIT II Subanalysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Orbital atherectomy is an effective treatment strategy to modify severely calcified coronary lesions prior to stent placement. Traversing a severely calcified subtotal occlusion with the crown may be more challenging compared with a less severely stenotic lesion. The purpose of this ORBIT II subanalysis was to evaluate outcomes post-orbital atherectomy (OA) treatment of lesions with ≥95% stenosis.

METHODS/MATERIALS

ORBIT II, a single-arm, prospective, multicenter trial, enrolled 443 subjects with severely calcified coronary lesions. Patients with chronic total occlusions were excluded from the trial. Subjects with the OA device activated were stratified based on pre-procedure percent stenosis: ≥95% stenosis (N = 91) and <95% stenosis (N = 341). Procedural success and 3-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates were compared.

RESULTS

The severe angiographic complications rates were 6.6% and 6.7% in the ≥95% and <95% stenosis groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in procedural success (94.5% vs. 88.3%, p = 0.120). 3-year MACE rates were similar (27.1% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.548), as were the rates of cardiac death (5.7% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.665) and MI (7.9% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.244). The TVR rate was higher in the ≥95% stenosis group (19.1% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In ORBIT II, OA treatment of lesions with ≥95% stenosis resulted in a high rate of procedural success. Although the 3-year revascularization rate was higher in the ≥95% stenosis group, it is not unexpected given the challenge of treating such complex lesions. The results of this analysis suggest that OA may be a reasonable treatment strategy for tight, severely calcified subtotal occlusions.

SUMMARY

The purpose of this ORBIT II subanalysis was to evaluate outcomes post-orbital atherectomy (OA) treatment of lesions with ≥95% stenosis. In ORBIT II, OA treatment of lesions with ≥95% stenosis resulted in a high rate of procedural success. Although the 3-year revascularization rate was higher in the ≥95% stenosis group, it is not unexpected given the challenge of treating such complex lesions. The results of this analysis suggest that OA may be a reasonable treatment strategy for tight, severely calcified subtotal occlusions.

Safety of Same-Day Discharge after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Orbital Atherectomy

BACKGROUND

Severely calcified lesions present many challenges to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Orbital atherectomy (OA) aids vessel preparation and treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions. Same-day discharge (SDD) after PCI has numerous advantages including cost savings and improved patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of SDD among patients treated with OA in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective analysis of patients undergoing OA. In-hospital and 30-day outcomes were assessed for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), device-related events and hospital readmissions.

RESULTS

There were 309 patients treated with OA of whom 94 had SDD (30.4%). Among SDD patients, there were no acute procedural complications and all patients were safely discharged on the day of the procedure. MACE at 30 days occurred in 1 patient (1.06%) due to major bleeding in the setting of a gastric arteriovenous malformation. There were 8 patients with unplanned 30-day readmissions (8.5%).

CONCLUSION

SDD after OA in patients with heavily calcified lesions appears to be safe, with low rates of adverse events and readmissions in select patients. In patients with SDD treated with OA, unplanned readmission occurred at a similar rate to the statewide average 30-day PCI readmission rate. Larger studies are needed to confirm the safety of this treatment paradigm and the potential cost savings.