Effects of continuous and pulsatile flows generated by ventricular assist devices on renal function and pathology

The impact of preoperative kidney replacement therapy on kidney outcome and survival in patients with left ventricular assist device

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been highlighted as a new treatment option in the end-stage heart failure (HF). Kidney outcome after LVAD in severe cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) patients requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is unclear. We investigated the impact of preoperative KRT on kidney function and survival in LVAD patients with severe CRS. A total of 50 patients followed up for at least 1 year after LVAD implantation was analyzed. The primary outcomes were estimated glomerular filtration rate and survival rate. Patients were divided into two groups depending on in-hospital KRT before LVAD implantation: the control group (n = 33) and the KRT group (n = 17). Postoperative KRT was performed for 76.5% of patients in the KRT group, and all of them discontinued KRT before discharge. There were no statistically significant differences in the degree of eGFR decline in survivors according to preoperative KRT. Although there were no statistically significant differences in the degree of eGFR decline in survivors regardless of preoperative KRT, old age (β -0.94, p < 0.01), preexisting chronic kidney disease (β -21.89, p < 0.01), and high serum creatinine (β -13.95, p < 0.01) were identified as independent predictors of post-LVAD eGFR decline. Mortality rate was higher, and more patients progressed to end-stage kidney disease in KRT group than control group. However, LVAD still can be considered as the treatment option in end-stage HF patients with severe CRS requiring KRT, especially in those with young age and previous normal kidney function.

Distinctive kidney function trajectories following left ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess for distinct kidney function trajectories following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. Cohort studies of LVAD recipients demonstrate that kidney function tends to increase early after LVAD placement, followed by decline and limited sustained improvement. Inter-individual differences in kidney function response may be obscured.

METHODS

We identified continuous flow LVAD implantations in US adults (2016-2017) from INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support). Primary outcomes were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trajectories pre-implantation to ∼12 months. Latent class mixed models were applied to primary and validation samples. Clinical differences among trajectory groups were investigated.

RESULTS

Among 4,615 LVAD implantations, 5 eGFR trajectory groups were identified. The 2 largest groups (Groups 1 and 2) made up >80% of the cohort, and were similar to group average trajectories previously reported, with early eGFR rise followed by decline and stabilization. Three novel trajectory groups were found: worsening followed by sustained low kidney function (Group 3, 10.1%), sustained improvement (Group 4, 3.3%), and worsening followed by variation (Group 5, 1.7%). These groups differed in baseline characteristics and outcomes. Group 4 was younger and had more cardiogenic shock and pre-implantation dialysis; Group 3 had higher rates of pre-existing chronic kidney disease, along with older age.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel eGFR trajectories were identified in a national cohort, possibly representing distinct cardiorenal processes. Type 1 cardiorenal syndrome may have been predominant in Group 4, and parenchymal kidney disease may have been predominant in Group 3.

Hemodynamic Effect of Pulsatile on Blood Flow Distribution with VA ECMO: A Numerical Study

The pulsatile properties of arterial flow and pressure have been thought to be important. Nevertheless, a gap still exists in the hemodynamic effect of pulsatile flow in improving blood flow distribution of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) supported by the circulatory system. The finite-element models, consisting of the aorta, VA ECMO, and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) are proposed for fluid-structure interaction calculation of the mechanical response. Group A is cardiogenic shock with 1.5 L/min of cardiac output. Group B is cardiogenic shock with VA ECMO. Group C is added to IABP based on Group B. The sum of the blood flow of cardiac output and VA ECMO remains constant at 4.5 L/min in Group B and Group C. With the recovery of the left ventricular, the flow of VA ECMO declines, and the effective blood of IABP increases. IABP plays the function of balancing blood flow between left arteria femoralis and right arteria femoralis compared with VA ECMO only. The difference of the equivalent energy pressure (dEEP) is crossed at 2.0 L/min to 1.5 L/min of VA ECMO. PPI’ (the revised pulse pressure index) with IABP is twice as much as without IABP. The intersection with two opposing blood generates the region of the aortic arch for the VA ECMO (Group B). In contrast to the VA ECMO, the blood intersection appears from the descending aorta to the renal artery with VA ECMO and IABP. The maximum time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) of the renal artery is a significant difference with or not IABP (VA ECMO: 2.02 vs. 1.98 vs. 2.37 vs. 2.61 vs. 2.86 Pa; VA ECMO and IABP: 8.02 vs. 6.99 vs. 6.62 vs. 6.30 vs. 5.83 Pa). In conclusion, with the recovery of the left ventricle, the flow of VA ECMO declines and the effective blood of IABP increases. The difference between the equivalent energy pressure (EEP) and the surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE) indicates the loss of pulsation from the left ventricular to VA ECMO. 2.0 L/min to 1.5 L/min of VA ECMO showing a similar hemodynamic energy loss with the weak influence of IABP.

Acute Response of Human Aortic Endothelial Cells to Loss of Pulsatility as Seen during Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) results in short-term (3-5 h) exposure to flow with diminished pulsatility often referred to as "continuous flow". It is unclear if short-term exposure to continuous flow influences endothelial function, particularly, changes in levels of pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic cytokines. In this study, we used the endothelial cell culture model (ECCM) to evaluate if short-term (≤5 h) reduction in pulsatility alters levels of pro-inflammatory/pro-angiogenic cytokine levels. Human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) cultured within the ECCM provide a simple model to evaluate endothelial cell function in the absence of confounding factors. HAECs were maintained under normal pulsatile flow for 24 h and then subjected to continuous flow (diminished pulsatile pressure and flow) as observed during CPB for 5 h. The ECCM replicated pulsatility and flow morphologies associated with normal hemodynamic status and CPB as seen with clinically used roller pumps. Levels of angiopoietin-2 (ANG-2), vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), and hepatocyte growth factor were lower in the continuous flow group in comparison to the pulsatile flow group whereas the levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1), granulocyte colony stimulating factor, interleukin-8 (IL-8) and placental growth factor were higher in the continuous flow group in comparison to the pulsatile flow group. Immunolabelling of HAECs subjected to continuous flow showed a decrease in expression of ANG-2 and VEGF-A surface receptors, tyrosine protein kinase-2 and Fms-related receptor tyrosine kinase-1, respectively. Given that the 5 h exposure to continuous flow is insufficient for transcriptional regulation, it is likely that pro-inflammatory/pro-angiogenic signaling observed was due to signaling molecules stored in Weible-Palade bodies (ET-1, IL-8, ANG-2) and via HAEC binding/uptake of soluble factors in media. These results suggest that even short-term exposure to continuous flow can potentially activate pro-inflammatory/pro-angiogenic signaling in cultured HAECs and pulsatile flow may be a successful strategy in reducing the undesirable sequalae following continuous flow CPB.

The contribution of cardiac and extracardiac factors to NT-proBNP concentrations in patients with advanced heart failure before and after left ventricular assist device implantation

The clinical significance of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is not fully explored. NT-proBNP concentrations are influenced by body composition, renal function and intracardiac pressures; dynamic measures pre- and post-LVAD implantation. We sought to identify the individual contribution of cardiac and extracardiac factors to NT-proBNP concentrations in advanced heart failure patients before and after LVAD implantation. We retrospectively collected data from 63 patients implanted with a LVAD with NT -proBNP measurements (2006-2019). Hemodynamic measurements were obtained through right heart catheterization (RHC). Univariable linear regression and multivariable stepwise regression models were used to analyze variables associated with NT-proBNP concentrations in the pre- and post-LVAD setting. Paired t-test was performed on a subpopulation of 13 patients with complete data. We found significant differences in all extracardiac (BMI, creatinine, eGFR) and all invasive hemodynamic measurements pre-LVAD compared to post-LVAD. NT-proBNP decreased by 83 %, in the subpopulation of 13 patients: 736 pmol/L [IQR 498-1330] to 126 pmol/L [IQR 74.8-241.7]. In multivariable analysis, only creatinine remained significantly associated with NT-proBNP before LVAD implant (p = 0.016), whereas pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was the only independent variable associated with NT-proBNP after LVAD implant (p < 0.0001). Creatinine and PCWP were the only independent factors associated with NT-proBNP concentrations before and after LVAD implantation, respectively. Invasive hemodynamic measurements were more closely associated with NT-proBNP concentration after LVAD than extracardiac factors and reversely pre-LVAD, suggesting that NT-proBNP serves as a useful biomarker of cardiac conditions post-LVAD implantation.

Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Kidney Injury Outcomes Post Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant

Introduction

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are used as a bridge to heart transplant or destination therapy for patients with the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 or 4 heart failure. Acute kidney injury (AKI) or need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) post-LVAD implant can lead to poor outcomes. Identifying risk factors of AKI post-LVAD implant can help stratify potential LVAD candidates.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of all patients who received continuous-flow LVAD at our institution from January 2015 until August 2017. We calculated the incidence of AKI and the need for RRT post-LVAD implant, as well as the rate of renal recovery and survival rates at 30 days and 1-year post-LVAD implant. The presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and proteinuria was assessed, and kidney ultrasound results were reviewed on all patients, if available. CKD was present if estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was <60 mL/min per 1.73m² for ≥3 months preceding LVAD implant and/or presence of proteinuria ≥ 20 mg/dL on two or more urine samples prior to LVAD implant and/or an abnormal kidney ultrasound with increased echogenicity, small size <9 cm or scarring. AKI was defined as per the current Kidney Disease Initiative Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines.

Results

A total of 137 patients received LVAD during this time period. There were 112 males and 25 females with a mean age of 59.2 years. Incidence of AKI and the need for RRT post-LVAD implant were 64% and 19.7%, respectively. Sub-group analysis was performed based on the presence of CKD, advanced CKD stage (Stage 1-2 vs 3-5), proteinuria and abnormal kidney ultrasound. The incidence of AKI post-LVAD implant was significantly higher if baseline CKD was present (P = 0.028), and patient had an advanced CKD stage (P = 0.008). The need for RRT post-LVAD implant was significantly higher if baseline CKD was present (P = 0.015), and the patient had an abnormal kidney ultrasound (P = 0.04). Thirty-day and one-year mortality rates post-LVAD implants were 4.3% and 21.1%, respectively for the entire cohort. Out of the 27 patients requiring RRT, nine (33.3%) came off RRT before one year. Compared to the eGFR on the day of LVAD implant, eGFR at 30 days post-LVAD implant was higher in 57% and lower in 42% patients. At one year, this eGFR improvement reversed and eGFR was lower in 67% and higher in 32% patients.

Conclusion

The incidence of AKI and need for RRT post-LVAD implant are very high. The presence of CKD, advanced CKD stage, and an abnormal kidney ultrasound are statistically significant risk factors of AKI post-LVAD implant and/or need for RRT. Identifying these renal risk factors can help stratify the potential LVAD candidates. Only one out of three patients requiring RRT achieved dialysis independence by one-year post-LVAD implant.