Clinical effectiveness and versatility of a sealing hemostatic patch (HEMOPATCH) in multiple surgical specialties

Interaction analysis of subgroup effects in randomized trials: the essential methodological points

Subgroup analysis aims to identify subgroups (usually defined by baseline/demographic characteristics), who would (or not) benefit from an intervention under specific conditions. Often performed post hoc (not pre-specified in the protocol), subgroup analyses are prone to elevated type I error due to multiple testing, inadequate power, and inappropriate statistical interpretation. Aside from the well-known Bonferroni correction, subgroup treatment interaction tests can provide useful information to support the hypothesis. Using data from a previously published randomized trial where a p value of 0.015 was found for the comparison between standard and Hemopatch® groups in (the subgroup of) 135 patients who had hand-sewn pancreatic stump closure we first sought to determine whether there was interaction between the number and proportion of the dependent event of interest (POPF) among the subgroup population (patients with hand-sewn stump closure and use of Hemopatch®), Next, we calculated the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) and the "attributable proportion" (AP). The p value of the interaction was p = 0.034, the RERI was - 0.77 (p = 0.0204) (the probability of POPF was 0.77 because of the interaction), the RERI was 13% (patients are 13% less likely to sustain POPF because of the interaction), and the AP was - 0.616 (61.6% of patients who did not develop POPF did so because of the interaction). Although no causality can be implied, Hemopatch® may potentially decrease the POPF after distal pancreatectomy when the stump is closed hand-sewn. The hypothesis generated by our subgroup analysis requires confirmation by a specific, randomized trial, including only patients undergoing hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic stump after distal pancreatectomy.Trial registration: INS-621000-0760.

Pancreatic stump closure after distal pancreatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing non-autologous versus no reinforcement: Value of prediction intervals

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis of randomized trials aimed to assess the benefits and harms of non-autologous versus no reinforcement of the pancreatic stump following distal pancreatectomy (DP).

METHODS

It was performed in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2 Guidelines. (registered in PROSPERO ID: EROCRD42021286863).

RESULTS

Nine relevant articles (between 2009 and 2021) were retrieved, comparing non-autologous reinforcement (757 patients) with non-reinforcement (740 patients) after PD. Pooled analysis showed a statistically significant lower rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in the reinforcement group (RR ​= ​0.677; 95 ​% CI [0.479, 0.956], p ​= ​0.027). The 95 ​% predictive interval (0.267-1.718) showed heterogeneity. Non-autologous reinforcement other than with "Tachosil®" was effective (subgroup analysis). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that covering the stump with non-autologous reinforcement other than Tachosil® had a preventive effect on the onset of POPF.

Principles of minimize bleeding and the transfusion of blood and its components in operated patients - surgical aspects

One of the target of perioperative tratment in surgery is decreasing intraoperative bleeding, which increases the number of perioperative procedures, mortality and treatment costs, and also causes the risk of transfusion of blood and its components. Trying to minimize the blood loss(mainly during the operation) as well as the need to transfuse blood and its components (broadly understood perioperative period) should be standard treatment for a patient undergoing a procedure. In the case of this method, the following steps should be taken: 1) in the preoperative period: identyfication of risk groups as quickly as possible, detecting and treating anemia, applying prehabilitation, modyfying anticoagulant treatment, considering donating one's own blood in some patients and in selected cases erythropoietin preparations; 2) in the perioperative period: aim for normothermia, normovolemia and normoglycemia, use of surgical methods that reduce bleeding, such as minimally invasive surgery, high-energy coagulation, local hemostatics, prevention of surgical site infection, proper transfusion of blood and its components if it occurs; 3) in the postoperative period: monitor the condition of patients, primarily for the detection of bleeding, rapid reoperation if required, suplementation (oral administration preferred) nutrition with microelements (iron) and vitamins, updating its general condition. All these activities, comprehensively and in surgical cooperation with the anesthesiologist, should reduce the blood loss and transfusion of blood and its components.

Clinical and cost outcomes of a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated patch versus drainage after axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer: results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between breast cancer patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection with postoperative management using a polyethylene glycol-coated patch versus axillary drainage. The direct costs associated with both postoperative management strategies were also evaluated.

METHODS

This was a multicentre RCT in women with breast cancer who underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04487561). Patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive either drainage or a polyethylene glycol-coated patch as postoperative management. The primary endpoints were the need for an emergency department visit for any event related to the surgery and the rate of seroma development.

RESULTS

A total of 227 patients were included , 115 in the patch group (50.7 per cent) and 112 (29.4 per cent ) in the drainage group. The incidence of emergency department visits was significantly greater for patients with drainage versus a polyethylene glycol-coated patch (incidence rate difference 26.1 per cent, 95 per cent c.i. 14.5 to 37.7 per cent; P < 0.001). Conversely, the seroma rate was significantly higher in the polyethylene glycol-coated patch group (incidence rate difference 22.8 per cent, 95 per cent c.i. 6.7 to 38.9 per cent; P < 0.0055). Compared with drainage, using a polyethylene glycol-coated patch resulted in cost savings of €100.41 per patient. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio analysis found that drainage was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €7594.4 for no need for hospital admission and €491.7 for no need for an emergency department visit.

CONCLUSION

Compared with patients who received drainage after axillary lymph node dissection, the use of a polyethylene glycol-coated patch resulted in a higher rate of seroma, but a lower number of postoperative outpatient or emergency department visits and thus a reduction in overall costs.

Real-World Data on the Usage of Hemopatch® as a Hemostat and Dural Sealant in Cranial and Spinal Neurosurgery

Background and objectives Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a significant complication in cranial and spinal interventions. Hemostatic patches such as Hemopatch^® are therefore used to support the watertight closure of the dura mater. Recently, we published the results of a large registry documenting the effectiveness and safety of Hemopatch^® in various surgical specialties, including neurosurgery. Here we aimed to analyze the outcomes from the neurological/spinal cohort of this registry in more detail. Methods Based on the data from the original registry, we performed a post hoc analysis for the neurological/spinal cohort. The Hemopatch^® registry was designed as a prospective, multicenter, single-arm observational study. All surgeons were familiar with the application of Hemopatch^® and it was used at the discretion of the responsible surgeon. The neurological/spinal cohort was open for patients of any age if they had received Hemopatch^® during an open or minimally invasive cranial or spinal procedure. Patients with known hypersensitivity to bovine proteins or brilliant blue, intraoperative pulsatile severe bleeding, or an active infection at the potential target application site (TAS) were excluded from the registry. For the posthoc evaluation, we stratified the patients of the neurological/spinal cohort into two sub-cohorts: cranial and spinal. We collected information about the TAS, intraoperative achievement of watertight closure of the dura, and occurrence of postoperative CSF leaks. Results The registry comprised 148 patients in the neurological/spinal cohort when enrolment was stopped. The dura was the application site for Hemopatch^® in 147 patients (in one patient in the sacral region after tumor excision), of which 123 underwent a cranial procedure. Twenty-four patients underwent a spinal procedure. Intraoperatively, watertight closure was achieved in 130 patients (cranial sub-cohort: 119; spinal sub-cohort: 11). Postoperative CSF leakage occurred in 11 patients (cranial sub-cohort: nine; spinal sub-cohort: two). We observed no serious adverse events related to Hemopatch^®. Conclusion Our post hoc analysis of real-world data from a European registry confirms the safe and effective use of Hemopatch^® in neurosurgery, including cranial and spinal procedures, as also observed in some case series.

Hemopatch to Prevent Lymphatic Leak after Robotic Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study investigates whether the application of Hemopatch, a novel hemostatic patch, could prevent lymphatic leak after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (BPLND). This is a prospective, single-center, phase III randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of Hemopatch in preventing lymphatic leak after RARP and BPLND. Participants were randomized to receive RARP and BPLND, with or without the use of Hemopatch, with an allocation ratio of 1:1. The primary outcome is the total drain output volume. The secondary outcomes include blood loss, operative time, lymph node yield, duration of drainage, drain output per day, hospital stay, transfusion and 30-day complications. A total of 32 patients were recruited in the study. The Hemopatch group had a significantly lower median total drain output than the control group (35 mL vs. 180 mL, p = 0.022) and a significantly lower drain output volume per day compared to the control group (35 mL/day vs. 89 mL/day, p = 0.038). There was no significant difference in the other secondary outcomes. In conclusion, the application of Hemopatch in RARP and BPLND could reduce the total drain output volume and the drain output volume per day. The use of Hemopatch should be considered to prevent lymphatic leakage after RARP and BPLND.

Metabolic Study of Tetra-PEG-Based Hydrogel after Pelvic Implantation in Rats

In vivo metabolism of polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogels has rarely been studied. In this study, we prepared a chemically crosslinked hydrogel formulation using 14C-labeled tetra-armed poly (ethylene glycol) succinimidyl succinate (Tetra-PEG-SS) and 3H-labeled crosslinking agent for implantation into the pelvis of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. This radioactive labeling technique was used to investigate the radioactivity excretion rates in of feces and urine, the blood exposure time curve, and the radioactivity recovery rate in each tissue over time. We showed that the primary excretion route of the hydrogel was via urine (3H: about 86.4%, 14C: about 90.0%), with fewer portion through feces (3H: about 6.922%, 14C: about 8.16%). The hydrogel metabolites exhibited the highest distribution in the kidney, followed by the jejunal contents; The 3H and 14C radioactivity exposures in the remaining tissues were low. We also showed that the 3H and 14C radioactivity recovery rates in the blood were usually low (<0.10% g−1 at 12 h after implantation), even though, in theory, the hydrogel could be absorbed into the blood through the adjacent tissues. By using a combination of HPLC-MS/MS and offline radioactivity counting method, we established that the tetra-PEG-based hydrogel was mainly metabolized to lower-order PEG polymers and other low-molecular-weight substances in vivo.

Hemopatch® is effective and safe to use: real-world data from a prospective European registry study

Surgical procedures are often impeded by bleeding and/or leakage of body fluids. These complications cannot always be resolved by conventional surgical techniques. Hemopatch^® is a hemostatic patch that also functions as a sealant. Here we document the effectiveness and safety of Hemopatch^® for routine procedures of multiple surgical disciplines. To this end, we performed a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, observational registry study. Patients were eligible if they had received Hemopatch^® during an open or minimally invasive procedure in one of these specialties: hepatobiliary, cardiovascular, urological, neurological/spinal, general, or lung surgery. Patients were excluded if they had a known hypersensitivity to bovine proteins or brilliant blue, intraoperative pulsatile or severe bleeding and/or infection at the target application site (TAS). The primary endpoint for intraoperative effectiveness was hemostasis assessed as the percentage of patients achieving hemostasis within 2 min and the percentage of patients achieving hemostasis without re-bleeding at the time of surgical closure. The registry enrolled 621 patients at 23 study sites in six European countries. Six hundred twenty patients had completed follow-up information. Hemostasis within 2 min was achieved at 463 (74.5%) of all 621 TASs. Hemostasis without re-bleeding was observed at 620 (99.8%) TASs. Adverse events were reported in 64 patients (10.3%). This Hemopatch^® registry shows that Hemopatch^® efficiently establishes hemostasis and sealing in a variety of surgical specialties, including minimally invasive procedures. Furthermore, we provide evidence for the safety of Hemopatch^® across all the specialties included in the registry. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03392662.

Effectiveness of Hemopatch® versus Surgicel® Original to control mild and moderate liver bleeding

Background

Adjunct hemostats can be of use in certain surgical settings. We compared the effectiveness of two hemostats, Hemopatch® and Surgicel® Original in controlling bleeding from liver lesions in an experimental model.

Methods

Control of grades 1 (mild) and 2 (moderate) bleeding (according to the Validated Intraoperative Bleeding [VIBe] SCALE) was assessed for 10 min after Hemopatch® (n = 198) or Surgicel® Original (n = 199) application on 397 liver surface lesions. The primary endpoint was hemostatic success (reaching VIBe SCALE grade 0 at 10 min). The secondary endpoint was time to hemostasis (time to reach and maintain grade 0). A generalized linear mixed model and an accelerated failure time model were used to assess the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.

Results

The overall hemostatic success rate of Hemopatch® was statistically significantly superior to that of Surgicel® Original (83.8% versus 73.4%; p = 0.0036; odds ratio [OR] 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33–4.27) and time to hemostasis was reduced by 15.9% (p = 0.0032; 95% CI 0.749–0.944). Grade 2 bleeds treated with Hemopatch® had statistically significantly higher hemostatic success (71.7% versus 48.5%; p = 0.0007; OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.58–5.58) and shorter time to hemostasis (49.6% reduction, p = 3.6 × 10^–8); differences for grade 1 bleeds (hemostatic success rate or time to hemostasis) were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Hemopatch® provided better control of VIBe SCALE bleeding compared to Surgicel® Original for Grade 2 bleeds in this porcine model, highlighting the importance of choosing a suitable hemostat to optimize control of bleeding during surgery.

Subtotal cholecystectomy for Mirizzi syndrome: Should we ever remove the stone? A case report

Introduction and importance

Mirizzi Syndrome is a rare complication of cholelithiasis.

In this case report the Authors present an original surgical approach for the treatment of complicated gallbladders, based on open subtotal cholecystectomy, leaving in situ the stone. This is the first case showing safety and reliability of the present strategy at a four-year follow-up.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old patient came to our emergency room with abdominal pain, leukocytosis and fever. At surgical exploration he presented a sclerotic retraction of the gallbladder together with an intrahepatic abscess, that forced us first to perform an open subtotal cholecystectomy, resecting the gallbladder cranially and leaving in situ the stone.

Clinical discussion

The post-operative course was uneventful. The four-year clinical, US and CT scan follow-up was negative and the patient referred a normal quality of life. The present strategy could be considered an intraoperative rescue option in such a complex operative scenario in which is impossible to safely remove the stone.

Conclusion

This case report demonstrates how in selected cases, when absolutely necessary and unavoidable without high risks, the stone can be left in situ as an eventual stone resection would be extremely risky.

•

Subtotal cholecystectomy is a well-known and established procedure in case of difficult gallbladders as in Mirizzi syndrome.

•

A traditionally accepted part of this technique is to remove the stone together with the gallbladder.

•

In selected cases the removal of the stone could be difficult and even dangerous for the patient.

•

Necessity of stone removal in difficult gallbladders should be carefully counterbalanced with possible local complications.

•

Four-year follow-up without complications is showing that in selected cases the stone can be left in situ.

Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of a sealant hemostatic patch for preventing cerebrospinal fluid leaks in cranial surgery

BACKGROUND

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak remains a significant source of morbidity after neurosurgical procedures. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch (PCC) in different neurosurgical procedures.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center cohort study in patients who underwent a cranial neurosurgical procedure. After collecting multiple data variables, patients were divided into two groups depending on the use of PCC as sealant on dural closure following procedures.

RESULTS

Data from 230 patients were collected (PCC, 128; control group, 102). Incidence of CSF leakage was significantly lower in the PCC group (p < .001). Complications that were significantly lower in PCC than the control group included surgical infection (p = .022), and hydrocephalus (p = .017), as well as reduced rates of reintervention (p < .001) and shorter hospital stays (p = .028). Factors associated with a higher incidence of CSF leakage included posterior fossa procedures, reinterventions, and the need for CSF drainage placement. PCC reduced the risk of suffering CSF leakage by more than 75% (p = .002) once adjusted for age, surgical approach, type of cranial opening, reintervention, CSF drainage, dural substitute, and dural defect coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm PCC as an effective means of preventing CSF leakage following cranial neurosurgery with fewer associated complications.

Polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch (hemopatch®) in open partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE

To describe the results of a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch, Hemopatch^® on blood loss, surgical time and renal function in partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

Out of a single surgeon cohort of n = 565 patients undergoing conventional open PN (CPN) between 01/2015 and 12/2017 at the University of Munich a consecutive subgroup (n = 42) was operated on using a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen-based sealant Hemopatch^® (Baxter International Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA) (HPN).

RESULTS

Median age was 65.2 years (range 12.7-95.2) with median follow-up of 9.43 months (0.03-49.15). Baseline renal function (CKD-EPI) was 78.56 ml/min/1.73 m² (range 20.38-143.09) with a non-significant decline to 74.78 ml/min/1.73 m² (range 3.75-167.74) at follow-up. In CPN 46% had low complexity, 33% moderate complexity and 20% high complexity lesions with 33% low, 40% moderate and 27% high complexity masses in HPN. Median tumor size was 4.3 cm (range 1-38 cm) in CPN with 4.8 cm (range 3.8-18.3 cm) with HPN, p = 0.293. Median blood loss and duration of surgery was significantly lower in the HPN group vs. CPN (146 ml ± 195 vs. 114 ml ± 159 ml; p = 0.021; 43 min ± 27 for HPN vs. 53 min ± 49; p = 0.035) with no difference in clamping time (12.6 min ± 8.6 for HPN vs. 12.0 min ± 9.5; p = 0.701).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemopatch^® supported renoraphy shows promising results compared to standard renoraphy in PN. No side effects were seen. Further studies should evaluate the prevention of arterio-venous or urinary fistulas. In complex partial nephrectomies Hemopatch^® supported renoraphy should be considered.

Clinical Impact of Stump Closure Reinforced With Hemopatch on the Prevention of Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Randomized Trial

Introduction

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most dreaded complication after distal pancreatectomy (DP). This multicenter randomized trial evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of Hemopatch in preventing clinically relevant (grades B/C according to the ISGPS classification) POPF after DP.

Material and methods

After stump closure, patients were randomized to affix Hemopatch to the stump or not. Statistical significance was set at 0.025. Clinical significance was defined as the number of patients needed to treat (NNT) to avoid 1 B/C POPF.

Results

Of 631 eligible patients, 360 were randomized and 315 analyzed per protocol (155 in the standard closure group; 160 in the Hemopatch group). The rates of B/C POPF (the primary endpoint) were 23.2% and 16.3% (P = 0.120), while the number of patients with 1 or more complications (including patients with B/C POPF) was 34.8% and 24.4% (P = 0.049) in the standard and Hemopatch groups, respectively. In patients with hand-sewn stump and main duct closure, the rates were 26.2% versus 10.0% (P = 0.014) and 23.3% versus 7.7% (P = 0.015) in the standard and Hemopatch groups, respectively. The NNT in these 2 subgroups was 6 and 6.4, respectively.

Conclusion

The results of the first randomized trial evaluating Hemopatch-reinforced pancreatic stump after DP to prevent type B/C POPF do not allow us to conclude that the risk of B/C POPF was lower. Based on the NNT, however, routine use of Hemopatch after DP may result in fewer complications (including POPF) overall, especially in cases with hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic stump or main pancreatic duct.

The use of state-of-the-art haemostatic materials in gastrointestinal surgery

Haemostatic materials such as: gelatine sponges, oxygenated cellulose meshes, tissue sealants, collagen matrices with human thrombin and fibrinogen are gaining on popularity in gastrointestinal surgery, especially in colorectal surgery. We searched for available scientific publications in the Pubmed and Cochrane database on the use of individual hemostatic materials in the field of gastrointestinal surgery. The analysis focused on the assessment of the safety of the use of individual materials in terms of the rate of bleeding complications and the rate of anastomotic leakage cases. The use of haemostatic materials has for years been a recognized method of reducing the rate of intra- and postoperative complications, both in gastrointestinal surgery and in other surgical specialties. Based on the available studies, it can be concluded that the use of hemostatic materials such as matrices, sponges and adhesives in gastrointestinal surgery, even in patients at high risk of anastomotic leakage and bleeding complications, reduces the incidence of complications. The growing popularity of haemostatics and sealants in surgery means that they are currently used in a wide range of indications, and surgeons are more and more willing to use them even in case of standard surgical procedures, which is reflected in the available studies. Choosing a haemostat should be a conscious decision, taking into account the site and type of bleeding, mechanism of action, ease of use, efficacy, safety, and price, among others.

Hemopatch® as a Hemostatic Agent is Safe in Partial Nephrectomy: A Large, Single-Surgeon Retrospective Evaluation

Introduction

Partial nephrectomy (PN) has evolved into the surgical standard of care for localized renal lesions. Hemostatic agents (HA) support the surgeon in achieving local hemostasis during PN. We previously reported initial results with the HA Hemopatch^® in PN. We now report our experiences with Hemopatch^® in a larger and more challenging single-surgeon PN cohort.

Methods

Our study included 45 patients who underwent PN due to suspicious renal lesions between December 2013 and March 2018. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using the HA Hemopatch^®. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were assessed.

Results

Preoperative median tumor diameter was 27 mm. Median PADUA and RENAL nephrometry scores were 7 and 6, respectively. In 13.3% of the cases an additional HA was applied. Intraoperative and postoperative bleeding occurred in 2.2% and 8.9%, respectively. Median total blood loss was 200 ml. Urgent pedicle clamping due to bleeding was necessary in 2 (4.4%) patients. The transfusion rate was 8.9%. There were no conversions.

Conclusion

We confirmed our initial results demonstrating feasibility and reliability of Hemopatch^® during PN. Notably, the cohort consists of selected patients. Prospective randomized studies are needed for comparison of different types of HA with regard to perioperative outcome.

Tisseel® versus Hemopatch® for dural sealing in neurosurgery. A prospective study in a tertiary center

BACKGROUND

Dural repair is a potential source of complications in neurosurgery. We make a comparison in pseudomeningocele and CSF leak incidence with the sealants Tisseel® and Hemopatch®.

METHODS

We collected 147 patients from September 2017 to December 2018 in a prospective observational study. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with an intradural cranial or spinal surgery whose dura was closed with a fibrin sealant. Primary endpoints were the incidence of pseudo meningocele and CSF leak. Secondary endpoints were the surgical-site infection, epidural hematoma, and the influence of previous surgery.

RESULTS

In 65 and 82 patients Tisseel® and Hemopatch® were used as sealants respectively. The incidence of CSF leak presented a significant statistical relation with the use of Tisseel® in a univariate and multivariate analysis. Infratentorial surgery presented a higher incidence of pseudomeningocele and CSF leak, but the approach used was not a significant factor in multivariate analysis. Patients who were operated previously had a higher risk present a postoperative complication.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of pseudomeningocele and CSF leak was higher with Tisseel® compared with Hemopatch® with a statistic significant relation in case of CSF fistulae. The procedure done may be a confusion factor in our study. There was no report of adverse effects or a higher incidence of complications. However, it is recommended to plan randomized trials with larger samples to get stronger evidence.

Use of hemostatic agents for surgical bleeding in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Biomaterials perspective

In recent years, there was an abrupt increase in the incidence of renal tumors, which prompt up the appearance of cutting-edge technology, including minimally invasive and organ-preserving approaches, such as laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). LPN is an innovative technique used to treat small renal masses that have been gaining popularity in the last few decades due to its promissory results. However, the bleeding control remains the main challenge since the majority of currently available hemostatic agents (HAs) used in other surgical specialities are inefficient in LPN. This hurried the search for effective HAs adapted for LPN surgical peculiarities, which resulted on the emergence of different types of topical HAs. The most promising are the natural origin HAs because of their inherent biodegradability, biocompatibility, and lowest toxicity. These properties turn them top interests' candidates as HAs in LPN. In this review, we present a deep overview on the progress achieved in the design of HAs based on natural origin polymers, highlighting their distinguishable characteristics and providing a clear understanding of their hemostat's role in LPN. This way it may be possible to establish a structure-composition properties relation, so that novel HAs for LPN can be designed to explore current unmet medical needs.

Nanostructured fibrin agarose hydrogel as a novel haemostatic agent

Blood loss remains a major concern during surgery and can increase the morbidity of the intervention. The use of topical haemostatic agents to overcome this issue therefore becomes necessary. Fibrin sealants are promising haemostatic agents due to their capacity to promote coagulation, but their effectiveness and applicability need to be improved. We have compared the haemostatic efficacy of a novel nanostructured fibrin‐agarose hydrogel patch, with (c‐NFAH) or without cells (a‐NFAH), against two commercially available haemostatic agents in a rat model of hepatic resection. Hepatic resections were performed by making short or long incisions (mild or severe model, respectively), and haemostatic agents were applied to evaluate time to haemostasis, presence of haematoma, post‐operative adhesions to adjacent tissues, and inflammation factors. We found a significantly higher haemostatic success rate (time to haemostasis) with a‐NFAH than with other commercial haemostatic agents. Furthermore, other relevant outcomes investigated were also improved in the a‐NFAH group, including no presence of haematoma, lower adhesions, and lower grades of haemorrhage, inflammation, and necrosis in histological analysis. Overall, these findings identify a‐NFAH as a promising haemostatic agent in liver resection and likely in a range of surgical procedures.