Minimizing re-excision after breast conserving surgery - a review of radiofrequency spectroscopy for real-time, intraoperative margin assessment

Reducing re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery with Margin Probe: systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Different intraoperative techniques with varying levels of evidence are available to decrease positive surgical margins during breast conserving surgery. The aim of this review is to assess the effectiveness of the MarginProbe® device as an intraoperative adjunct tool in reducing positive surgical margins, and subsequently exploring the effect on patient re-excision rates.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic review of the available medical literature was conducted from 2007 to March 2022. A literature search of Cochrane, PubMed and Embase by two independent reviewers reviwers was performed to identify eligible articles looking at the primary outcome of percentage reduction in patient re-excision rates using MarginProbe®. Secondary outcomes analysed were comparison of tissue volume removed, absolute and relative reduction in re-excision rate, cosmetic outcome, as well as MarginProbe® sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

A total of 12 full text articles were identified. An independent samples t-test using a total of 2680 patients found a 54.68 per cent reduction in re-excision rate with the use of MarginProbe®, which was statistically significant with a large effect size (P < 0.001; d = 1.826). Secondary outcomes showed a relatively higher sensitivity of the MarginProbe® device, at the expense of decreased specificity, and no significant impact on cosmesis and volume of breast tissue excised.

CONCLUSION

MarginProbe® is an effective intraoperative adjunct in breast-conservation surgery that reduces patient re-excision rates, with no adverse effects relating to breast cosmesis or increase in volume of excised tissue.

Comparison of Efficacy and Psychology of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Modified Radical Mastectomy on Patients with Early Breast Cancer under Graded Nursing

Objective

To compare the efficacy and psychology of breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer (BC) under graded nursing.

Methods

Forty-one early breast-conserving surgery BC patients admitted to our hospital from April 2020 to March 2022 were regarded as group A, and 52 with modified radical surgery were seen as group B. The operating time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay were compared, and the postoperative adverse effects were counted. In addition, patients' psychology and quality of life were assessed using the HAMD, HAMA, and QLSBC rating scales. At the time of discharge, a treatment satisfaction survey was conducted.

Results

The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay of patients in group A were lower than those in group B (P < 0.05). After treatment, the HAMD and HAMA scores were lower in group A than in group B, while the QLSBC scores and treatment satisfaction were higher (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Breast-conserving surgery under graded nursing is less damaging to early BC patients. It can effectively shorten the postoperative recovery process and improve the psychology and quality of life, so it has higher clinical applicability.