Women 'holding it' in urban India: Toilet avoidance as an under-recognized health outcome of sanitation insecurity

Household Toilet and Sanitation Insecurity is Associated with Urinary Symptoms, Psychosocial Burden, and Compensatory Bladder Behaviors

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether being "at-risk" for toilet and sanitation insecurity in the United States is associated with urinary symptoms, voiding behaviors, and psychosocial burden. Based on census data, nearly 2 million people in the United States do not have access to adequate plumbing. More may have inconsistent access related to cost, inadequate facilities for the number of people in a home, or declining regional infrastructure. The effects of inadequate access in the United States are poorly characterized.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a community-based sample of adults electronically recruited to complete questionnaires on clinical and sociodemographic information, living situations, home toilets and plumbing, urinary symptoms, compensatory bladder behaviors, and psychosocial burden. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess for associations between being at-risk for toilet and sanitation insecurity and urinary and psychosocial symptoms. Linear regression was used to assess for association with adopting compensatory bladder behaviors.

RESULTS

This sample included 4,218 participants, of whom 17% were identified as being at-risk for toilet and sanitation insecurity. Being at-risk for toilet and sanitation insecurity was associated with worse overall urinary symptoms and greater bother from these symptoms, in addition to worse self-assessed mental and physical health, anxiety, stress, depression, and fewer social supports. Finally, those at-risk for toilet and sanitation insecurity were more likely to adopt burdensome and unhealthy compensatory bladder behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

As with other social determinants of health, toilet and sanitation insecurity may be an under-appreciated contributor to urinary symptoms, unhealthy toileting behaviors, and psychosocial distress.

Food, water, and sanitation insecurities: Complex linkages and implications for achieving WASH security

Food, water and sanitation insecurities are complex, multi-dimensional phenomena that entail more than availability and access; food, water, and sanitation resources must be safe and culturally appropriate. Researchers and implementers concerned with these insecurities have demonstrated that there are notable interactions between them resulting in significant psychological and biological outcomes. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in Bangladesh, Kenya (WASH Benefits) and Zimbabwe (SHINE) demonstrated no effect from water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions on linear growth, and mixed evidence on enteropathogen burden and risk of diarrhoea in young children. These data suggest a need for a more comprehensive understanding of WASH security. The risks posed by multiple resource insecurities shift depending on the individual, their movement throughout their day, their economically and socially prescribed roles, and ecological features such as seasonality and precipitation. By more fully integrating food, water and sanitation security in interventions and subsequent impact evaluations, we can achieve WASH security-one that addresses myriad transmission pathways and co-occurring diseases-that ultimately would improve health outcomes throughout the world. In this critical review, we outline the complexity of combined resource insecurities as a step towards transformative WASH.