Improvements in diagnostic tools for early detection of psoriatic arthritis

Enthesopathy in patients with nail psoriasis - a cross-sectional evaluation of clinical, onychoscopic and ultrasonographic features

Background Nail involvement in psoriasis is common and may be an indicator not only of disease severity, but also of the presence of psoriatic arthritis. However, the relationship of nail psoriasis with enthesitis remains under-explored. Aims This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical, onychoscopic (nail dermatoscopic) and ultrasonographic features in patients with nail psoriasis. Materials and Methods All nails of twenty adult patients with nail psoriasis were examined clinically and onychoscopically. Patients were evaluated for psoriatic arthritis (Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis), the severity of cutaneous disease (Psoriasis Area Severity Index) and nail disease (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index). Ultrasonography of the clinically involved digits was performed for evidence of distal interphalangeal joint enthesitis. Results Out of 20 patients, 18 patients had cutaneous psoriasis and 2 had isolated nail involvement. Among the 18 patients with skin psoriasis, 4 had associated psoriatic arthritis. The most commonly observed clinical and onychoscopic features were pitting (31.2% and 42.2%), onycholysis (36% and 36.5%) and subungual hyperkeratosis (30.2% and 30.5%), respectively. Ultrasonographic evidence of distal interphalangeal joint enthesitis was seen in 57% (175/307) of the digits with clinical nail involvement. Enthesitis was more common in patients with psoriatic arthritis (77% vs 50.6%). Nail thickening, crumbling and onychorrhexis (all features of nail matrix involvement) were significantly associated with enthesitis (P < 0.005). Limitation The major limitation was the small sample size and lack of controls. Only the clinically involved digits were evaluated for enthesitis. Conclusion Enthesitis was frequently detected on ultrasonography in patients with nail psoriasis, even in clinically asymptomatic individuals. Nail features of thickening, crumbling and onychorrhexis may predict underlying enthesitis and the potential development of arthritis. A comprehensive evaluation could help identify patients with psoriasis at risk for arthritis, helping improve long-term outcomes.

MRI Findings in Axial Psoriatic Spondylarthritis

Psoriatic arthritis is a significant medical condition with a high prevalence, a wide variety of non-specific symptoms, and a high degree of overlap with other spondylarthritis disorders, particularly ankylosing spondylitis. Hence, knowledge of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) manifestations and a multidisciplinary strategy are required for the better management of these patients. We searched publications from the last 10 years and focused on the most relevant ones which discussed the classification criteria, the MRI characteristics of axial psoriatic arthritis, the importance of MRI for follow up, and the reliability of skin and synovial biopsy. Axial spondylarthritis can be diagnosed and followed up on using the well-established MRI technique and, additionally, a biopsy. The analysis and concordance between them can provide new directions for future studies.

Perceptions of Rheumatologists on Diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis in China

Objective

High prevalence of undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and prolonged diagnostic delay are key troubles in the appropriate management of PsA. To analyze the possible causes for this phenomenon, a web-based nationwide survey was conducted to investigate rheumatologists’ perceptions on PsA diagnosis in China.

Methods

The electronic questionnaire consisting of 38 questions were designed by an expert panel and distributed with the online survey tool Sojump, which is a professional online survey platform. The completed questionnaires by real-name rheumatologists were collected.

Results

A total of 1594 valid questionnaires were included. More than half of Chinese rheumatologists reported it was challenging to make a diagnosis of PsA. The four major challenges were “Difficulties in identification of atypical or hidden psoriasis”, “Absence of diagnostic biomarkers”, “No active self-report of history or family history of psoriasis” and “Various musculoskeletal manifestations”. In diagnosing PsA, minor participants had incorrect knowledge of inflammatory arthropathy (13.7%), acute phase reactant (23.8%), and rheumatoid factor (28.7%). There were no significant differences in the knowledge of PsA and practice habits in diagnosing PsA between modern western medicine (WM)- and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)-rheumatologists. The part-time rheumatologists were not as good as full-time rheumatologists in diagnosing PsA.

Conclusions

About three quarters of Chinese rheumatologists are familiar with the elements in PsA diagnosis and have good practice habits in diagnosing PsA. Four main challenges in making PsA diagnosis are revealed. There was no significant difference in the knowledge of PsA between WM- and TCM-rheumatologists.

Consensus-based recommendations on the diagnosis, referral and clinical management of patients with psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a highly heterogeneous disease with complex manifestations. Limited understanding of the disease and non-availability of local guidelines pose challenges in the management of PsA in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, this expert consensus is aimed to provide recommendations on the management of patients with PsA, including referral pathway, definition of remission and treat-to-target (T2T) approach. A Delphi technique of consensus development was used involving an expert panel comprised of 10 rheumatologists, one dermatologist and one family physician. Based on the review of available published evidence and the opinions of clinical experts, key recommendations were developed. A consensus was achieved in defining the following: management guideline adaptable for Saudi Arabia, most useful screening tool, laboratory investigations, imaging tests and criteria for referring suspected PsA patients to a rheumatologist. In addition, an agreement was achieved in defining the T2T strategy and remission for the clinical management of PsA. Overall, these recommendations provide an evidence-based framework for the management of PsA patients in Saudi Arabia.

Corticosteroid injection treatment for dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis

Dactylitis – a hallmark clinical feature of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) – that occurs in 30–50% of PsA patients, is a marker of disease severity for PsA progression, an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and impairs the motor functions of PsA patients. There is a paucity of evidence for the treatment due to the absence of randomized controlled trials assessing dactylitis as a primary endpoint and current practice arises from the analysis of dactylitis as a secondary outcome. Corticosteroid (CS) injections for dactylitis in PsA patients are a therapeutic treatment option for patients with isolated dactylitis or for patients with flares in tendon sheaths, despite stable and effective systemic treatment. The aim of this narrative review is to briefly illustrate the clinical aspects of dactylitis in PsA, the imaging and clinimetric tools used to diagnose and monitor dactylitis, the current treatment strategies and principally to provide a comprehensive picture of the clinical efficacy and safety with ultrasound-guide and blind techniques of CS injections for dactylitis in PsA patients.

Unmet needs in psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis with a highly variable clinical presentation that does not have a validated molecular or imaging test, making accurate diagnosis a challenge. Consequences of diagnostic delay include irreversible joint damage and significant morbidity. Over the past few decades, there have been major advances in the understanding and treatment of PsA, leading to more targeted therapies. However, there is no current method to predict optimal treatment strategy to achieve minimal disease activity and prevent medication-related adverse events in the management of early disease. PsA is also associated with other comorbidities that include metabolic syndrome and psychosocial burden; two areas that are often unaddressed in the clinical setting and have associated sequelae. This chapter focuses on key domains of unmet needs, which include diagnostic challenges, delay in diagnosis, prognostication systems and stratified medicine approaches and precision medicine strategies for established and emerging therapies.

The value of magnetic resonance imaging for assessing disease extent and prediction of relapse in early peripheral spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the inflammatory burden in pSpA by lower-extremity MRI in an early remission-induction strategy study with TNF blockade. Furthermore, we sought to determine the value of MRI to predict disease relapse versus sustained remission after treatment discontinuation.

METHODS

Thirty-two early pSpA patients with lower limb involvement on clinical examination and confirmed by ultrasonography, participated in a remission-induction trial with a TNF-inhibitor (TNFi). Patients underwent MRI of joints and entheses of the lower extremities at baseline and at clinical remission, after which TNFi treatment was withdrawn. Images were evaluated for joint effusion, joint osteitis, entheseal soft tissue inflammation (STI), and entheseal osteitis.

RESULTS

Joint effusion and enthesitis on clinical examination and ultrasonography correlated well with MRI abnormalities. In addition, a substantial amount of subclinical involvement was seen on MRI, mainly in ankle joints and heel entheses. Inflammation scores were markedly lower in the subclinical joints and entheses versus those clinically involved. Inflammatory load on MRI decreased significantly upon TNFi treatment. Whereas 80% of the clinically involved joints at baseline showed no effusion on remission MRI, two out of three involved entheses at baseline showed residual inflammation. In addition, patients relapsing after treatment discontinuation displayed more entheseal STI on remission MRI compared to those maintaining drug-free remission.

CONCLUSION

Our findings delineate a differential response of synovitis and enthesitis, with enthesitis on MRI responding less upon TNFi treatment. Furthermore, residual entheseal inflammation might be indicative for the need for continuous therapy.

Medical imaging examination in psoriasis and early psoriatic arthritis patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Psoriatic arthritis appears in one in four skin psoriasis patients. Early detection of the presence of joint involvement and early interception of its developments may minimize long-term functional disability, and the radiological methods may be a perfect choice. To summarize and compare different imaging methods for diagnosing early-stage psoriatic arthritis and determine the necessity of joint examination in all psoriasis patients, several electronic databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, were searched for English language studies. A specific selection criterion followed the retrieval of studies. Thirteen studies were finally enrolled in the meta-analysis, eight of which compared the bone changes presentat on medical imaging examination between psoriasis patients without psoriatic arthritis and healthy people; three studies focused on differences between psoriatic arthritis patients and free joint involvement psoriasis patients shown on medical imaging tests. Medical imaging examination, including ultrasound (US), high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT scans (HR-pQCT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), can be good choices for detecting the start of asymptomatic joint inflammation in psoriasis patients, which is essential to early detection and interception of joint damage to lower joint deformities and improve the future quality of life for patients. Additionally, the examination for psoriasis patients with arthralgia is also highly recommended.

Dermatologists' Role in the Early Diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis: Expert Recommendations

Psoriatic arthritis is a common type of inflammatory arthritis found in up to 40% of patients with psoriasis. Because skin involvement usually precedes joint involvement, dermatologists play a key role in early detection. Early diagnosis is important for reducing the risk of irreversible structural damage, attenuating the deterioration of physical function, and improving patients' quality of life. This consensus statement was drafted by a group of 9 dermatologists and 1 rheumatologist to provide simple recommendations to help dermatologists screen for psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis. The experts offer consensus-based guidelines that draw on a review of available scientific evidence and on experience acquired in routine clinical practice.

A dermatologist perspective in the pharmacological treatment of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with psoriasis in 20-30% of patients. PsA presents as a heterogeneous disease involving different domains and burdened by an important impact on function and quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

Dermatologists play an important role in the early detection of PsA because in most patients PsA develop after cutaneous psoriasis. The ideal goal of treating patients with PsA is to optimize the controls of symptoms, improve quality of life, and prevent structural damage and disability. The choice of treatment in patients with PsA should take into account also the skin signs and symptoms. Treatment options include NSAIDs, synthetic DMARDSs, anti-TNF-α agents, anti-IL-12/IL-23 agents, anti-IL-17 agents, PDE4 inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, and co-stimulatory blockers. A narrative review based on electronic searches on PubMed® database was performed. Original articles assessing either the role of the dermatologist in the management of PsA and the available treatments for PsA were included.

EXPERT OPINION

Among different treatments, some drugs show more efficacy in joint signs and symptoms, and poor response on the skin and vice versa. The perspective of the dermatologist in a multidisciplinary setting may provide a helpful tool in the management of patients with PsA.

Effectiveness of Adalimumab for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: An Italian Real-Life Retrospective Study

Background: Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of adalimumab in the real-life setting in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Objective: To evaluate the 2-year retention rate of adalimumab in PsA patients. Potential baseline parameters influencing persistence on treatment were also evaluated.

Methods: PsA patients from 16 Italian Rheumatology Units treated with adalimumab as first- or second-line biological therapy were retrospectively evaluated. Adalimumab retention rate was evaluated at 12 and 24 months. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between predictor variables and adalimumab retention rate.

Results: From 424 patients (53.5% male, aged 48.3 ± 12.8 years) who started treatment with adalimumab, 367 (86.6%) maintained treatment for 12 months and 313 (73.8%) for 2 years. At 24-months, Disease Activity in PsA (DAPSA) remission (defined as ≤4) and Low Disease Activity (LDA) (≤14) were achieved in 22.8% and 44.4% of patients, respectively. Adalimumab treatment significantly decreased the number of tender (7.0 ± 5.7 at baseline vs. 2.3 ± 3.5 at 24 months, p < 0.001) and swollen joints (2.7 ± 2.8 at baseline vs. 0.4 ± 0.9 at 24 months, p < 0.001), DAPSA (25.5 ± 10.9 at baseline vs. 11.0 ± 8.4 at 24 months, p < 0.001), PASI (5.3 ± 5.7 at baseline vs. 2.7 ± 2.8 at 24 months, p < 0.001) and CRP (3.8 ± 6.3 at baseline vs. 1.2 ± 1.7 at 24 months, p < 0.001). Among a range of laboratory and clinical variables, only female gender was associated with improved adalimumab persistence at 24 months (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.2–3.2, p = 0.005).

Conclusions: Independent of a range of predictor variables, adalimumab was shown to be effective, while maintaining a high retention rate after 2 years in PsA patients.

Health professional views on the assessment and management of foot problems in people with psoriatic arthritis in Australia and New Zealand: a qualitative investigation

Background

Active foot disease persists in a high proportion of people with psoriatic arthritis despite the availability of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to modify the course of the disease. Limited information exists on the provision of health care for foot disease in psoriatic arthritis. The objective of this study was to explore the views of health professionals on the assessment and management of people with psoriatic arthritis-related foot involvement.

Methods

Convenience sampling was used to recruit health professionals working in rheumatology outpatient clinics in Sydney, Australia and Auckland, New Zealand. Three focus groups were undertaken to explore the views and experiences of health professionals on the assessment and management of foot problems in people with psoriatic arthritis. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative data was analysed using a constant comparative analytic approach to identify themes.

Results

A total of seventeen health professionals participated including rheumatologists, podiatrists and a physiotherapist. Key themes derived from the focus groups suggest that health professionals perceived that people with psoriatic arthritis-related foot problems experience suboptimal management from symptom onset, to diagnosis and treatment. Frustration was expressed throughout discussions relating to lack of appropriate training and expertise required for the specialised management of foot problems typically encountered with psoriatic arthritis and poor access for patients to specialist podiatry services.

Conclusions

This study provides new insight into the perspectives of health professionals on the management of foot problems related to psoriatic arthritis. Deficiencies in the diagnosis, assessment and treatment of foot problems were revealed. To meet the foot health needs of people with psoriatic arthritis, reducing diagnostic delay, improving knowledge and awareness about the disease among people with psoriatic arthritis and health professionals, and increasing specialist podiatry service provision may be required.

[Medical care situation of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis in Germany : Medical care situation of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA): ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from the perspective of rheumatologists in private practice and hospitals in Germany-Results of the research project "SpA Loop-Life of Outpatients"]

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of spondyloarthritis (SpA) in Germany is approximately 1-1.4% and includes predominantly axial SpA (axSpA) and predominantly peripheral SpA. Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) belongs to the group of axial SpA but also exhibits peripheral manifestations. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) can show purely peripheral or also axial manifestations. The total prevalence of SpA in Germany is approximately 1‑1.4%, the prevalence of AS is ca. 0.5% and PsA 0.2-1.4%. Patients with AS are mainly treated by internal medical rheumatologists but in many places also basically treated by general practitioners and orthopedists. Patients with PsA are mainly diagnosed and treated by rheumatologists and dermatologists working in private practice or in clinical settings. Besides the control of inflammatory activity and prevention or slowing down of the characteristic disease progression, including irreversible structural changes, the main objectives of patients as well as treating physicians are particularly freedom from pain and a quality of life comparable to non-affected persons. Decisive for successful treatment are an early diagnosis and initiation of adequate therapy as well as regular monitoring of disease activity including treatment adjustment taking the needs of the patient into consideration; however, it is unknown how often this is actually successful in routine daily practice in Germany.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the SpA Loop research project was to display the current medical care situation of patients with AS and PsA treated in private practices and hospitals for rheumatology in Germany focusing on patient/physician profiles as well as the diagnostics and treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The instrument for the survey was a standardized questionnaire with 29 multiple choice and perception questions that was distributed to medical specialists in the field of internal medicine and rheumatology.

RESULTS

A high accordance between rheumatologists in private practice and in hospitals was observed with respect to the presentation and perception of the current medical care situation for patients with AS and PsA in Germany. Differences were only occasionally found.

CONCLUSION

The results of this research project reflect the current status of the medical care situation of AS and PsA patients in Germany. They provide information on which areas of the medical care situation can selectively be improved as well as on interesting aspects and points of discussion with respect to the patient population treated.

Management of Psoriatic Arthritis: Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR) Expert Opinions

Objectives

This study aims to establish the first national treatment recommendations by the Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR) for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) based on the current evidence.

Patients and methods

A systematic literature review was performed regarding the management of PsA. The TLAR expert committee consisted of 13 rheumatologists and 12 physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists experienced in the treatment and care of patients with PsA from 22 centers. The TLAR recommendations were built on those of European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2015. Levels of evidence and agreement were determined.

Results

Recommendations included five overarching principles and 13 recommendations covering therapies for PsA, particularly focusing on musculoskeletal involvement. Level of agreement was greater than eight for each item.

Conclusion

This is the first paper that summarizes the recommendations of TLAR as regards the treatment of PsA. We believe that this paper provides Turkish physicians dealing with PsA patients a practical guide in their routine clinical practice.

Power Doppler Ultrasound Evaluation of Peripheral Joint, Entheses, Tendon, and Bursa Abnormalities in Psoriatic Patients: A Clinical Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence rates of peripheral joint, enthesis, tendon, and bursa abnormalities by power Doppler (PD) ultrasonic examination in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriatic patients without clinical signs of arthritis (non-PsA psoriasis group), and healthy individuals, to detect subclinical PsA.

METHODS

A total of 253 healthy volunteers, 242 non-PsA psoriatic patients, and 86 patients with PsA were assessed by 2-dimensional and power Doppler (PD) ultrasound. Peripheral joint, enthesis, tendon, and bursa abnormalities were observed, characterizing abnormal PD. The affected patients and sites with abnormalities in various ages were compared among groups; PD signal grades for the abnormalities were also compared.

RESULTS

In the PsA group, significantly higher percentages of sites showing joint effusion/synovitis, enthesitis, and tenosynovitis in all age groups, and markedly higher rates of sites with bursitis were found in young and middle age groups, compared with the non-PsA and control groups (all p < 0.01). Meanwhile, the non-PsA group showed significantly higher rates of joint effusion/synovitis and enthesitis sites, and elevated PD signal grades of synovitis, enthesitis, and tenosynovitis in comparison with the control group, both in young and middle age groups (all p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Patients with PsA have high percentages and PD signal grades of peripheral joint, tendon, enthesis, and bursa involvement. Young and middle-aged non-PsA patients have high synovitis and enthesitis percentages, and elevated PD signal grades of synovitis, enthesitis, and tenosynovitis.

Multidisciplinary Management of Spondyloarthritis-Related Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease

Introduction

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are chronic autoimmune conditions that share common pathophysiologic mechanisms. The optimal management of patients with IMIDs remains challenging because the coexistence of different conditions requires the intervention of several specialists. The aim of this study was to develop a series of statements defining overarching principles that guide the implementation of a multidisciplinary approach for the management of spondyloarthritis (SpA)-related IMIDs including SpA, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and uveitis.

Methods

A Delphi consensus-based approach was used to identify a core set of statements. The process included development of initial questions by a steering committee, an exhaustive search of the literature using complementary approaches to identify potential statements and two Delphi voting rounds for finalization of the statements.

Results

Consensus was achieved on the related nature of IMIDs, the existence of a high prevalence of multiple IMIDs in a single patient and the fact that a multidisciplinary approach can result in a more extensive evaluation and comprehensive approach to treatment. The goals of a multidisciplinary team should be to increase diagnosis of concomitant IMIDs, improve the decision-making process, and increase patient satisfaction and adherence. Early referral and diagnosis, early recognition of concomitant IMIDs and optimizing treatment to improve patient quality of life are some of the advantages of using multidisciplinary teams. To be effective, a multidisciplinary team should be equipped with the appropriate tools for diagnosis and follow-up, and at a minimum the multidisciplinary team should include a dermatologist, gastroenterologist and rheumatologist; providing psychologic support via a psychologist and involving an ophthalmologist, general practitioners and nurses in multidisciplinary care is also important.

Conclusion

The present Delphi consensus identified a set of overarching principles that may be useful for implementation of a multidisciplinary approach for the management of SpA-related IMIDs.

Funding

Aristea and Hippocrates.

Safety of treatment options for spondyloarthritis: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) are chronic inflammatory diseases with overlapping pathogenic mechanisms and clinical features. Treatment armamentarium against SpA includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs, including sulfasalazine, methotrexate, leflunomide, cyclosporine), targeted synthetic DMARDs (apremilast) and biological DMARDs (TNF inhibitors, anti-IL 12/23 and anti-IL-17 agents).

AREAS COVERED

A narrative review of published literature on safety profile of available SpA treatment options was performed. Readers will be provided with a comprehensive overview on frequent and rare adverse events associated with each drug listed in current SpA treatment recommendations.

EXPERT OPINION

The overall safety profile of such molecules is good and serious adverse events are rare but need to be promptly recognized and treated. However, the monitoring of adverse events is a major challenge for clinicians because it is not adequately addressed by current treatment recommendations. A tailored treatment is crucial and rheumatologists must accurately select patients in order to identify those more susceptible to develop adverse events.

Consensus on the management of patients with psoriatic arthritis in a dermatology setting

BACKGROUND

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with psoriasis (PsO). Early diagnosis and prompt therapeutic intervention are crucial for limiting PsA progression and prevention of disability. Dermatologists are in a privileged position to detect early PsA. The management of patients with PsA in the dermatology setting is widely variable.

OBJECTIVE

To provide practical recommendations for the management of patients with PsA in the dermatology setting including early diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

A consensus document was written by an expert panel composed by dermatologists (n = 12) and rheumatologists (n = 6). Eleven highly relevant questions were selected and elaborated with answers/statements based on a narrative literature review. The resulting document was discussed in a face-to-face meeting adopting a nominal group technique to reach consensus (i.e. 100% agreement) using the Delphi method.

RESULTS

A consensus was achieved in defining the following: the clinical characteristics differentiating inflammatory and non-inflammatory signs and symptoms of joint disease; the most important differential diagnoses of PsA in clinical practice; the most useful screening questionnaires, serum laboratory tests and imaging techniques for the detection of early PsA; the criteria for dermatologist to refer patients with PsO to rheumatologist; the criteria for the diagnosis of PsA; the selection of the indices that the dermatologist could use for measuring the activity and severity of PsA in clinical practice; when systemic steroids and/or intra-articular steroid injections are indicated in the treatment of PsA. Finally, systemic treatments including synthetic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to be considered for the treatment of PsA have been reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementations of these practical recommendations could be very helpful for the management of patients with PsA in the dermatology setting including early diagnosis and treatment.

Enthesitis: A hallmark of psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the growing importance of enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of clinical and imaging methods currently used to assess enthesitis.

METHODS

PubMed literature searches were conducted using the terms psoriatic arthritis, entheses, enthesitis, pathology, imaging, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, clinical, and indices. Articles were deemed relevant if they provided insight into the pathology, monitoring, and/or diagnosis of enthesitis in PsA, or if they discussed clinical or imaging indices used to assess enthesitis.

RESULTS

Enthesitis is an early manifestation of PsA that is associated with increased disease activity and reduced quality of life. A variety of clinical indices exist to assess enthesitis in PsA; however, the Leeds Enthesitis Index and Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score index have been the most frequently used indices in recent clinical trials. Limitations of these indices include an inability to discern structural involvement, risk of missing subclinical enthesitis, and lack of sensitivity in detecting enthesitis, especially in patients with central sensitization and/or pain amplification. Such limitations have led to the emergent importance of imaging techniques in the assessment of enthesitis. Although there have been recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound (US) appears to be the preferred method for detecting enthesitis because it allows for accurate assessment of the soft-tissue components of entheses and also for new bone formation. Hypoechogenicity, increased thickness of tendon insertion, calcifications, enthesophytes, erosions, and Doppler activity have been identified as important US characteristics of enthesitis.

CONCLUSION

Enthesitis is thought to be integrally involved in the pathogenesis of PsA and is associated with worse prognostic outcomes in patients with PsA. A validated US index with entheses that are less confounded by mechanical factors and obesity would be the most effective measure of enthesitis in PsA. As imaging techniques continue to advance, our understanding of enthesitis and its involvement in PsA will also improve.

Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on treatment and use of systemic biological and non-biological therapies in psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The main purpose of this recommendation statement is to provide clinicians with the best available evidence and the best opinion agreed upon by the panelists for a rational use of synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologicals in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. The present document also focuses on important aspects in the management of PsA, such as early diagnosis, therapeutic objectives, comorbidities and optimization of treatment.

METHODS

The recommendations were agreed by consensus by a panel of 8 expert rheumatologists, previously selected by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) through an open call. The phases of the work were: identification of key areas for updating the previous consensus, analysis and synthesis of scientific evidence (modified Oxford system, Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, 2009) and formulation of recommendations based on this evidence and by consensus techniques.

RESULTS

Seventeen recommendations were issued for the treatment of PsA patients. Six of them were of general nature, ranging from the early diagnosis and treatment to the importance of assessing comorbidities. The other 11 were focused on the indications for DMARDs and biological therapy in the distinct clinical forms of the disease. Likewise, the situation of failure of the first biological is addressed and treatment algorithms and a table with the different biological therapies are also included.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the update of SER recommendations for the treatment of PsA with DMARDs and biologics.

The effect of smartphone addiction on hand joints in psoriatic patients: an ultrasound-based study

BACKGROUND

Distal interphalangeal (DIP) arthritis is a frequent form of psoriatic arthritis being often linked to nail psoriasis. Modern society is characterized by overuse of smartphones. Indeed, literature has recently focalized on research into smartphone addiction and health-related problems.

OBJECTIVES

As smartphone addiction is able to determine overuse and repeated movements of DIP joints and nails, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of smartphone use on hand joints of young psoriatic patients.

METHODS

An observational study involving four different groups such as non-smartphone-addicted (SA) psoriatic patients, SA psoriatic patients, non-SA controls and SA controls was performed. Each subject underwent an ultrasound examination of both hands by three independent and blinded to group assignment radiologists. A specific score was used to evaluate the inflammatory state of the analysed joints.

RESULTS

The total ultrasound score was statistically significantly higher in SA controls respect to non-SA controls (3.4 vs. 1.4; P < 0.05) as well as in SA psoriasis patients compared to non-SA psoriatic subjects (15.2 vs. 6.7; P < 0.01). Higher mean of ultrasound score was found for left hand in controls (both SA or not) and for right hand in psoriatic subjects (both SA or not), however without reaching statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Smartphone overuse was found to be linked with higher signs of inflammation of musculoskeletal structures of hands joints in both psoriasis and controls through ultrasound examination. Therefore, smartphone overuse may be a factor which facilitate or speed up the possible development of psoriatic arthritis.