Management of pregnant women with antiphospholipid antibodies

Clinical phenotype, treatment strategy and pregnancy outcome of non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

PROBLEM

To illustrate the clinical features, treatment strategy, and pregnancy outcome of patients with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS), non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (NC-OAPS) METHOD OF STUDY: A single-center nested case-control study was designed. Patients with a diagnosis of OAPS and NC-OAPS were enrolled. The medical history, coagulation status, and antibody profile data were collected. Patients were given standard anticoagulation therapy with or without glucocorticoids (GC) and/or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) during pregnancy and were observed for their pregnancy outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients with OAPS and 120 patients with NC-OAPS were finally included, of whom 55 patients met the clinical criteria (subgroup C) and 65 met the laboratory criteria (subgroup L). Pregnancy morbidity showed significant differences: gravida, pregnancy loss in OAPS versus NC-OAPS. The coagulation function was not significantly different between OAPS and NC-OAPS groups, while TT and FIB were significantly higher in the subgroup C. Thromboelastography (TEG) results showed a significantly lower ANGEL in the NC-OAPS group, a higher ANGEL and lower EPL, LY30 in the subgroup L. No differences between groups were observed in treatment strategy. The pregnancy outcomes were not significantly different between NC-OAPS and OAPS groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and laboratory differences were found between OAPS and NC-OAPS groups in this study. Patients in different subgroups of NC-OAPS could be identified with different clinical phenotypes. A relatively hypercoagulable status existed in the OAPS group compared to NC-OAPS, and also in the subgroup L.

Hydroxychloroquine as an Immunomodulatory and Antithrombotic Treatment in Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired highly prothrombotic disorder in which thrombo-inflammatory antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) cause thrombosis via multiple mechanisms, including endothelial damage and activation. Obstetric complications in APS are caused by placental thrombosis, inflammation and complement activation. Anticoagulation is poorly effective in some patients especially those with triple positive aPL who are at ~30% risk of thrombosis recurrence within 10 years. Increasing therapeutic anticoagulation intensity may be beneficial but leads to excess bleeding with serious complications, such as intracerebral haemorrhage. Nonetheless, anticoagulation is still the mainstay of treatment despite the autoimmune nature of APS. The antimalarial immunomodulatory drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been used for many years for the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases. HCQ has complex pleiotropic mechanisms of action upon multiple cell types. The proposed biological processes that HCQ regulates support the hypothesis that it may be a successful adjunctive treatment in the prevention of recurrent thrombosis and pregnancy complications.

Comparison of non-criteria antiphospholipid syndrome with definite antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review

Objectives

Patients with laboratory or clinical manifestations suggestive of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) but not fulfilling the classification criteria constitute a clinical challenge. This study aims to compare non-criteria APS (NC-APS) with definite APS in terms of clinical manifestations, therapies, and outcomes.

Methods

A systematic review of observational studies comparing definite and NC-APS was performed searching four electronic databases. Data on clinical manifestations, therapies and clinical outcomes was extracted.

Results

Sixteen studies, assessing a total of 3,798 participants, were included. Seven out of 10 studies found no significant difference in the prevalence of arterial or venous thrombosis between definite and NC-APS, with two studies on seronegative APS also finding no difference in thrombosis recurrence. Seven out of 12 studies found no significant difference in the prevalence of obstetric manifestations between groups, with the remaining exhibiting conflicting results. In 9 studies comparing treatment frequency in obstetric patients, all but one described similar treatment frequency, with the percentage of NC-APS treated during pregnancy ranging from 26% to 100%. In 10 studies comparing pregnancy outcomes of NC-APS versus definite APS, 7 found similar successful pregnancies/live births. Additionally, 5 studies described improvement of live births in both groups with treatment, with three signalling aspirin monotherapy as efficacious as combination therapy in NC-APS.

Conclusion

This review hints at an absence of marked differences in most evaluated parameters between definite and NC-APS, emphasizing the value of a more active follow-up of these patients. The low-quality available evidence highlights the need for well-defined NC-APS populations in future studies.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42020210674.

Preliminary Study on the Imbalance Between Th17 and Regulatory T Cells in Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Objective

Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) have immune cell abnormalities that remain poorly understood. This study compared primary APS (PAPS) and secondary APS (SAPS) patients with healthy controls with respect to peripheral blood lymphocytes, CD4+T cell subsets, and cytokine levels. The correlation between antiphospholipid antibody titres and T helper 17 (Th17) and T regulatory (Treg) cell subsets was also analyzed, together with the correlations between cytokine profiles and the clinical characteristics of APS patients.

Methods

The retrospective study population consisted of 67 APS patients (12 with PAPS, 55 with SAPS) and 40 healthy controls. Absolute numbers of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and CD4+ T cell subsets were detected by flow cytometry, and serum cytokine levels by flow cytometry bead array.

Results

Patients with SAPS had lower absolute values of T, B and CD4+T cells than the healthy control group, while only natural killer (NK) cell levels were decreased in patients with PAPS. Absolute numbers of T, B, NK, and CD4+T cells were significantly higher in the PAPS than SAPS group. The trends in CD4+T cell subsets were the same in PAPS and SAPS patients as in healthy controls, with increased Th1, decreased Th2, and decreased Treg levels, and thus an increased Th17/Treg ratio. Th2, Th17, and Treg cell counts were higher in the PAPS than SAPS group. Cytokine analysis showed that only IL-10 levels differed between the two APS groups. However, the levels of all of the studied cytokines were higher in APS patients than healthy controls, and correlated with the clinical characteristics of the patients. In the PAPS group, the titres of two autoantibodies correlated positively with the Th17/Treg ratio and negatively with the levels of D-dimer and Treg subsets.

Conclusions

Our study clearly showed that APS patients have immune disturbances, the most prominent of which is an increase in the Th17/Treg ratio, due to a decrease in the number of Treg cells. These abnormalities may be involved in the occurrence and progression of APS. An additional finding was a higher level of peripheral blood lymphocytes in PAPS than SAPS patients, which may be related to the immunosuppressive treatment of SAPS patients.

Management of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: what to do in laboratory scenarios that do not fit the guidelines

Introduction: Some patients with positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have not been included in randomized clinical trials or observational registries and, therefore, information on their risk of obstetric or thrombotic recurrence and optimal treatment is scarce.Areas covered: In the present review, the existing evidence regarding the management of two laboratory scenarios not covered by the guidelines is presented: (1) patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) clinical manifestations and aPL positivity not fulfilling APS laboratory criteria, and (2) the possibility of discontinuing anticoagulation in APS patients whose aPL become persistently negative.Expert opinion: Growing evidence suggests a role for low titers and 'non-criteria' aPL, especially in obstetric APS. Treatment is not formally recommended but might be considered according to the individual's risk profile. Regarding the question of whether or not to discontinue anticoagulants after the 'spontaneous' disappearance of aPL, there is no definite answer. Retrospective studies seem to suggest that withdrawal of anticoagulation could be safe in certain patients with APS, especially in those with a first provoked venous thrombosis and whose aPL became persistently negative during follow-up. Still, before the withdrawal can be recommended in routine clinical practice, multicenter and prospective studies are required to validate this hypothesis.

Management of acute and recurrent pericarditis in pregnancy

This review summarizes the currently available evidence on the management of acute and recurrent pericarditis during pregnancy, focusing on the safety of diagnostic procedures and treatment options for the mother and foetus. Family planning should be addressed in women with recurrent pericarditis of reproductive age and adjustment of therapy should be considered before a planned pregnancy. The treatment of pericarditis in pregnancy is similar to that for non-pregnant women but considers current knowledge on drug safety during pregnancy and lactation. The largest case series on this topic described 21 pregnancies with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis. Pregnancy should be planned in a phase of disease quiescence. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can be used at high dosages until the 20th week of gestation (except low-dose aspirin 100 mg/die). Colchicine is allowed until gravindex positivity; after this period, administration of this drug during pregnancy and lactation should be discussed with the mother if its use is important to control recurrent pericarditis. Prednisone is safe if used at low-medium doses (2,5 - 10 mg/die). General outcomes of pregnancy in patients with pericarditis are good when the mothers are followed by a multidisciplinary team with experience in the field.

"Non-criteria" antiphospholipid syndrome: A nomenclature proposal

The classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) generate discussion, with a growing impression that certain patients not fulfilling these criteria might be inadequately excluded from the classification. Nonetheless, these "non-criteria" patients are heterogeneously defined across different publications. We reviewed the "non-criteria" APS subgroups depicted in the literature and attempted to organize these subsets in a nomenclature proposal that could be used for research purposes. We established four potential patient profiles, grouped under the broad term "non-criteria APS": (A) "Seronegative APS": patients fulfilling clinical criteria, plus "non-criteria" manifestations, with persistently negative antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL); (B) "Clinical non-criteria APS": patients with "non-criteria" manifestations, plus aPL positivity fulfilling the classification criteria; (C) "Incomplete laboratory APS": patients fulfilling clinical criteria, plus positive aPL, but not fulfilling the classification criteria (low titer aPL); and (D) "Laboratory non-criteria APS": patients fulfilling clinical criteria, with negative or low titer criteria aPL, plus positive "non-criteria" aPL. This categorization could allow for a more homogeneous research approach to APS, enabling more sustained and universal conclusions.

Clinical features associated with pregnancy outcomes in women with positive antiphospholipid antibodies and previous adverse pregnancy outcomes: a real-world prospective study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze factors related to pregnancy outcomes in women with positive antiphospholipid antibodies and previous adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) prospectively.

METHODS

Patients' characteristics were described. Factors associated with obstetric complications were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 128 females with 73.4% non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (NC-OAPS) were included. APOs accounted for 38.3%, of which 65.3% were fetal losses. Live birth rates in criteria OAPS and NC-OAPS were similar (76.5% and 74.5%). For the whole patients, antinuclear antibody (ANA) titer ≥ 1:160 (OR 5.064, 95% CI (1.509, 16.995), P = 0.009) was a risk factor for APOs and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) use (OR 0.149, 95% CI (0.029, 0.775), P = 0.024)) was a protective factor. Age (OR 1.159, 95% CI (1.011, 1.329), P = 0.034) and previous APOs ≥ 3 times (OR 3.772, 95% CI (1.14, 12.435), P = 0.029) were risk factors for fetal loss, and LMWH use (OR 0.068, 95% CI (0.009, 0.486), P = 0.007) was a protective factor. Regular rheumatology visits was a protective factor for APOs and fetal loss (OR 0.085, 95% CI (0.024, 0.306), P < 0.001; OR 0.019, 95% CI (0.004, 0.104), P < 0.001). The proportion of it decreased in APOs and fetal loss groups (53.1% and 28.1%). Glucocorticoid use was a risk factor for APOs in NC-OAPS and higher serum C3 levels in the first gestational trimester was a protective factor for fetal loss (OR 3.703, 95% CI (1.402, 9.777), P = 0.008; OR 0.041, 95% CI (0.002, 0.947), P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Age, APO history, ANA titer, LWMH and glucocorticoid use, serum C3 levels, and regular rheumatology visits were related to obstetric complications. Key Points • This was one of the few prospective studies focused on patients with positive antiphospholipid antibodies and previous adverse pregnancy outcomes. The majority were NC-OAPS patients. • The study first evaluated the impact of rheumatologists' monitoring based on individual disease assessments on pregnancy outcomes. The live birth proportion was similar in patients with criteria OAPS and NC-OAPS when treated. • Age, APO history (≥ 3 times), ANA titer (≥ 1:160), LMWH use, glucocorticoid use, and serum C3 were factors related to obstetric complications.

Evidence-Based Prevention of Preeclampsia: Commonly Asked Questions in Clinical Practice

In this review, we discuss the recent literature regarding the prevention of preeclampsia and aim to answer common questions that arise in the routine antenatal care of pregnant women. Prescription of low-dose aspirin for high-risk patients has been shown to reduce the risk of preeclampsia (PE). A daily dose between 100 and 150 mg taken in the evening should be initiated prior to 16 weeks of gestation and can be continued until delivery. Calcium supplementation seems to be advantageous but currently it is only considered for patients with poor dietary intake and high risk for PE. Recent data about heparin are still conflicting, and therefore, heparin can currently not be recommended in the prevention of PE.