Stumbles in Sjögren's syndrome drug development: where to look for the next big leap?

What can patients tell us in Sjögren's syndrome?

In Sjögren's Syndrome (SS), clinical heterogeneity and discordance between disease activity measures and patient experience are key obstacles to effective therapeutic development. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are useful tools for understanding the unmet needs from the patients' perspective and therefore they are key for the development of patient centric healthcare systems. Initial concern about the subjectivity of PROMs has given way to methodological rigour and clear guidance for the development of PROMs. To date, several studies of patient stratification using PROMs have identified similar symptom-based subgroups. There is evidence to suggest that these subgroups may represent different disease endotypes with differing responses to therapeutic interventions. Stratified medicine approaches, alongside sensitive outcome measures, have the potential to improve our understanding of SS pathobiology and therapeutic development. The inclusion of PROMs is important for the success of such approaches. In this review we discuss the opportunities of using PROMs in understanding the pathogenesis of and therapeutic development for SS.

The Transcriptome of Paired Major and Minor Salivary Gland Tissue in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome

Background

While all salivary glands (SGs) can be involved in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS), their respective role in pathogenesis remains unclear. Our objective was to assess immunopathway activation in paired parotid and labial gland tissue from biopsy-positive and biopsy-negative pSS and non-SS sicca patients.

Methods

Paraffin-embedded, paired parotid and labial salivary gland tissue and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained from 39 pSS and 20 non-SS sicca patients. RNA was extracted, complementary DNA libraries were prepared and sequenced. For analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), patients were subdivided based on fulfillment of ACR-EULAR criteria and histopathology.

Results

With principal component analysis, only biopsy-positive pSS could be separated from non-SS sicca patients based on SG gene expression. When comparing the transcriptome of biopsy-positive pSS and biopsy-negative non-SS sicca patients, 1235 and 624 DEGs (FDR<0.05, log2FC<-1 or >1) were identified for parotid and labial glands, respectively. The number of DEGs between biopsy-negative pSS and non-SS sicca patients was scarce. Overall, transcript expression levels correlated strongly between parotid and labial glands (R² = 0.86, p-value<0.0001). Gene signatures present in both glands of biopsy-positive pSS patients included IFN-α signaling, IL-12/IL-18 signaling, CD3/CD28 T-cell activation, CD40 signaling in B-cells, DN2 B-cells, and FcRL4+ B-cells. Signature scores varied considerably amongst pSS patients.

Conclusion

Transcriptomes of paired major and minor SGs in pSS were overall comparable, although significant inter-individual heterogeneity in immunopathway activation existed. The SG transcriptome of biopsy-negative pSS was indistinguishable from non-SS sicca patients. Different patterns of SG immunopathway activation in pSS argue for personalized treatment approaches.