Cancellous and cortical bone mineral density around an elastic press-fit socket in total hip arthroplasty

Change in CT-measured acetabular bone density following total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Assessing peri-acetabular bone quality is valuable for optimizing the outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) as preservation of good quality bone stock likely affects implant stability. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of peri-acetabular bone mineral density (BMD) changes over time measured using quantitative computer tomography (CT) and, second, to investigate the influence of age, sex, and fixation on the change in BMD over time.

METHODS

A systematic search of Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases identified 19 studies that measured BMD using CT following THA. The regions of interest (ROI), reporting of BMD results, and scan protocols were extracted. A meta-analysis of BMD was performed on 12 studies that reported measurements immediately postoperatively and at follow-up.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis determined that periacetabular BMD around both cemented and uncemented components decreases over time. The amount of BMD loss increased relative to proximity of the acetabular component. There was a greater decrease in cortical BMD over time in females and cancellous BMD for young patients of any sex.

CONCLUSION

Peri-acetabular BMD decreases at different rates relative to its proximity to the acetabular component. Cancellous BMD decreases more in young patients and cortical bone decreases more in females. Standardized reporting parameters and suggested ROI to measure peri-acetabular BMD are proposed, to enable comparison between implant and patient variables in the future.

Revision in Ceramic-on-Ceramic and Ceramic-on-Polyethylene Bearing in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with Press-fit Cups: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Different Methodological Study Designs

Background

The influence of bearing on revision, especially in press-fit modular cup total hip arthroplasty (THA), remains underexposed.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov in line with the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was overall revision between ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) and all sorts of ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoPE) bearings. As secondary outcomes complications and reasons for revision were compared between bearings. Outcomes were presented in subgroups based on study design (randomized controlled trials (RCT), non-randomized comparative, and registry studies). The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane collaboration's tool and the MINORS criteria.

Results

This meta-analysis included twelve RCTs, three non-randomized comparative studies and two registry studies, including 38,772 THAs (10,909 CoPE and 27,863 CoC). Overall revision showed a lower risk in CoPE compared to CoC in the two registry studies (HR 0.71 (95%CI 0.53; 0.99)) (very low-quality GRADE evidence). In RCTs and non-randomized comparative studies, no difference was observed (low-quality GRADE evidence). Loosening, dislocation, infection, and postoperative periprosthetic fracture showed no significant differences in risk ratio for all designs.

Conclusion

The lower risk of overall revision in registry studies of primary THA with a press-fit modular cup using CoPE bearing compared to CoC should be considered preliminary since this outcome was just slightly significant, based on very low-quality GRADE evidence and based on only two studies with several limitations. Since no difference was observed in the other methodological designs and the separate reasons for revision showed no significant difference in all designs either, no preference for CoC or CoPE can be expressed, and therefore both seem suitable options based on the available literature. More comparative long-term studies are needed to confirm the potential advantages of wear-reduction of both bearings since the currently available literature is limited.

Does Total Hip Arthroplasty Influence the Development and Localization of Sacral Insufficiency Fractures?

BACKGROUND

Sacral insufficiency fractures (SIFs) are fractures related to reduced bone strength. In a previous study, we noticed that many patients with SIF had undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to research the localization of clinically apparent SIFs in relation to unilateral THA as well as the influence of unilateral THA on bone mineral density changes in the sacrum.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 171 patients with SIFs were screened for unilateral THA. In the group of patients with SIF and THA, the rate of SIF ipsilateral and contralateral to the side of the THA was determined. In a second cohort of 39 THA patients with healthy bone, changes in bone mineral density at the sacral alae ipsilateral and contralateral to the THA were analyzed by use of computed tomography immediately postoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 171 patients with SIF, 50 (40 female; mean age, 79 years; range, 54 to 101 years) were previously treated with THA. Of the 50, 31 patients were treated with unilateral THA. The proportion of patients with an SIF contralateral to the THA was 42% (13 of 31) and ipsilateral to the THA was 19% (6 of 31). Twelve patients had bilateral SIFs. The mean age of the THA group without SIF was 62 years (range, 49 to 79 years); 17 were female. The median bone mineral density decreased significantly (p = 0.023), from 35.0 to 13.0 HU, at the sacral ala contralateral to the THA, whereas the decrease of ipsilateral bone mineral density, from 24.0 to 17.0 HU, was not significant (p = 0.361).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of patients with an SIF contralateral to a THA was twice as high as that of patients with an SIF ipsilateral to a THA. These findings are supported by the second cohort's decrease in bone mineral density at the sacral ala contralateral to the THA at 1 year after surgery. We conclude that THA can lead to spatially different remodeling of the sacrum, possibly affecting the development of SIFs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

An Isoelastic Monoblock Cup Retains More Acetabular and Femoral Bone Than a Modular Press-Fit Cup: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

For cup revision after total hip arthroplasty, sufficiently good periacetabular bone stock is a prerequisite for fixation of the revision implant. Cementless cups can lead to a relevant reduction of peri-implant bone mineral density (BMD) through stress-shielding.

METHODS

Fifty patients were included in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Group 1 (RM group) received an isoelastic monoblock cup (RM Pressfit vitamys; Mathys). Group 2 (IT group) received a modular titanium cup (Allofit-S IT Alloclassic with a polyethylene liner; Zimmer). Periacetabular BMD was determined and subdivided into 4 regions of interest by dual x-ray absorptiometry at 1 week (baseline) and at 4 years postoperatively. Our primary outcome was reduction in periacetabular BMD.

RESULTS

Periacetabular BMD was reduced by an average of 15.1% in the RM group and 16.5% in the IT group at 4 years postoperatively. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups over the periacetabular structure as a whole. However, the decrease of BMD in the polar region was significantly different in the RM group (4.9% ± 10.0%) compared with the IT group (15.9% ± 14.9%, p = 0.005). Use of the isoelastic RM cup showed significantly less bone loss than the modular IT cup.

CONCLUSIONS

Relevant loss of BMD at 4 years after surgery was identified in the periacetabular region in both groups. No differences between the 2 cup systems were found when looking at the overall periacetabular region. As a secondary outcome, less postoperative periacetabular bone loss occurred in the polar region when an isoelastic cup was used. Longer follow-up is required to allow for conclusions to be drawn about the long-term course of the 2 cup systems.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Wear and migration are not influenced by head size in a vitamin E-infused highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular cup

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening and periprosthetic osteolysis are frequent complications in total hip arthroplasty requiring revision surgery. Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) implants have improved wear resistance, permitting larger femoral heads. However, such implants may experience surface cracking, mechanical failure, and oxidative damage. Vitamin E-infused HXLPE (VEPE) implants were therefore developed to reduce oxidation without compromising mechanical strength. We addressed the following questions: (1) Does femoral head size affect the midterm annual polyethylene wear rates of VEPE acetabular cups? (2) Does femoral head size affect the midterm migration rates of VEPE acetabular cups? (3) Are clinical outcomes affected by femoral head size?

HYPOTHESIS

Annual wear rate, migration rate, and clinical outcomes of VEPE acetabular cups are independent of femoral head size.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, multicentre, observational study of patients that underwent total hip arthroplasty. Hips were grouped according to the size of femoral head implanted (28 mm, 32 mm, and 36 mm). We determined annual wear rate and migration rate of VEPE acetabular cups using the Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse software. Clinically, we assessed the Harris Hip Score and visual analog score for pain and satisfaction.

RESULTS

We followed 253 patients (267 hips) for a mean of 55.0±20.6 months in the 28 mm, 46.2±21.4 months in the 32 mm, and 43.8±22.6 months in the 36 mm group. The annual wear rate was 0.025 mm per year from 1 year to the last follow-up and remained similar between the groups (p>0.05). Also, mean two-dimensional migration rates did not exceed 0.05 mm from 2 years to the last follow-up and remained similar between the groups (p=0.355). Finally, clinical outcomes also did not differ between the groups (p>0.05). Two patients required revision surgery.

DISCUSSION

Femoral head size did not influence midterm annual wear rate, migration rate, and clinical outcomes of VEPE acetabular cups. Furthermore, wear and cup migration rates were below the reported values leading to osteolysis and aseptic loosening. Nevertheless, studies with extended follow-up periods will be necessary to confirm these results in the long term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.