Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up

Decreased patient comorbidities and post-operative complications in technology-assisted compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The use of computer-assisted and robotic surgery was developed to improve component position and outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The goal of this study is to identify differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, and complications between technology-assisted and conventional TKA.

METHODS

A Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients who underwent technology-assisted and conventional TKA from 2016 to 2018. Analysed variables include demographics, length of stay (LOS), payer-status, geographic region, comorbidities, complications, and mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify differences between both groups.

RESULTS

The analysis includes 2,208,434 TKA patients, of which 2,054,879 (93.05%) were conventional and 153,555 (6.95%) were technology assisted. Patients undergoing technology-assisted TKA were more likely to be older than 65 years, had higher median income quartile, and had surgery in urban teaching hospitals. Patients were less likely to undergo technology-assisted TKA if they were female gender, had Medicare payer status, were black race, were obese, were living in rural location, or had higher Charlson comorbidity score and baseline comorbidities. Technology-assisted TKA patients had shorter LOS, and fewer pulmonary and infection complications.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing technology-assisted TKA are being carefully selected with less baseline comorbidities, improved health, and living in urban areas. Subsequently, those carefully selected patients are discharged home, have a shorted hospital LOS, and have fewer complications compared to conventional TKA. Rural patients, black race and female gender are less likely to undergo technology-assisted TKA, further emphasizing the healthcare disparity for that segment of the population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III.

Comparison with Navigation of a Novel Three-Step Technique for Improving Accuracy of the Distal Femoral Resection during Conventional TKA: A Case-Control Study

Correct placement of the femoral component in the coronal plane during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is related to long-term survival. The aim of this radiographic study was to determine the accuracy of a novel three-step technique for improving the accuracy of the distal femoral cut during conventional technique and compare it with computer navigation during TKA. A total of 458 TKAs were retrospectively analyzed (178 conventional TKAs with the novel technique and 280 navigated TKAs) for postoperative femoral component coronal alignment and compared between the two groups. Mean femoral component coronal alignment was not significantly different (p = 0.314) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the mean femoral component coronal alignment between varus and valgus knees. The number of outliers (90 ± 3 degrees) for femoral component coronal alignment was not significantly different between the two groups when assessed separately for varus and valgus deformities. The mean value of femoral component alignment using the conventional technique in knees with varus deformity <10 degrees was 88.8 degrees, in knees with varus deformity 10 to 20 degrees was 89.4 degrees, and in those with varus deformity >20 degrees was 90.2 degrees. Femoral component alignment in knees with varus <10 degrees was significantly different from those >20 degrees (p = 0.006); there was no significant difference between knees with varus <10 degrees and those with 10 to 20 degrees varus (p = 0.251), nor between 10 and 20 degrees varus knees and those with varus >20 degrees (p = 0.116). Using the novel three-step technique during conventional TKA to perform the distal femoral cut can help achieve femoral component coronal alignment comparable to the navigation technique.

[Future implications of navigation in total knee arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

After more than two decades of experience with computer-assisted knee arthroplasty, extensive experience and study data are available, allowing a profound evaluation. Undoubtedly, computer-assisted knee arthroplasty has been proven to achieve excellent results for implant positioning and long-leg axis reconstruction. Thus, computer-assisted knee arthroplasty represents the current gold standard to avoid unintended malpositioning of total knee components for neutrally aligned implants and individualized implant alignment (kinematic alignment, adjusted mechanical alignment, and others). Previous studies could not show significant differences in functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. However, recent meta-analyses showed relevant advantages of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty. These results could be based on further developments in software-assisted soft tissue balancing and more sensitive evaluation methods of follow-up examinations.

LONG-TERM OUTCOME

Further, international registries show advantages of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty regarding long-term outcomes. In particular, the Australian arthroplasty registry describes a significantly lower revision rate due to aseptic loosening/osteolysis in the computer-assisted knee arthroplasty group, analyzing a period of up to 17 years. These positive effects can already be proven six months following surgery.

FUTURE PROSPECTS

However, despite demonstrated benefits, computer-assisted knee arthroplasty has not yet become established in daily routine, and wide regional variations in its use are observed. Newer developments such as robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty, primarily based on navigation techniques, are currently being heavily promoted. However, this new technology must justify its enormous additional costs and prove its advantages compared to computer-assisted knee arthroplasty. In the backdrop of the development of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty, this might be a difficult task.

Avoidance of intramedullary violation in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty lowers the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: A propensity score matching analysis of 5342 cases

BACKGROUND

Conventional total knee arthroplasty (CONV-TKA) inevitably perturbs femoral medullary canal, disturbs medullary micro-architecture and increases blood loss and inflammatory responses. We hypothesized that avoidance of intramedullary violation may lower the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this study was to verify whether computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (CAS-TKA) lowers the incidence of PJI as compared with CONV-TKA.

METHODS

A propensity score matching study of 5342 patients who underwent CAS-TKA (n = 1085) or CONV-TKA (n = 4257) for primary osteoarthritis of the knee from 2007 to 2015 in our institute was performed. Patients who underwent CAS-TKA were matched to those who received CONV-TKA at a 1:2 ratio according to demographics and comorbidities. PJI was defined according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society diagnostic criteria from the 2013 International Consensus Meeting.

RESULTS

After controlling potential risk factors, the use of CAS-TKA resulted in a lower incidence of PJI as compared with CONV-TKA [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.18-0.99]. The same trend in PJI reduction was observed with the usage of CAS-TKA under sensitivity testing [HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12-0.95]. The cumulative incidence of PJI was lower in the CAS-TKA group than the CONV-TKA group (log-rank test, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Avoidance of intramedullary violation during TKA may play a pivotal role in lowering the incidence of PJI. The use of CAS-TKA can reduce the incidence of PJI, with a better survival rate in terms of being free of PJI, as compared with CONV-TKA.

Robotic-arm-assisted Knee Arthroplasty Associated With Favorable In-hospital Metrics and Exponentially Rising Adoption Compared With Manual Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Technology-assisted knee arthroplasty (KA), including robotic-arm-assisted knee arthroplasty (RA-KA) and computer-assisted (CA-KA) knee arthroplasty, was developed to improve surgical accuracy of implant positioning and alignment, which may influence implant stability, longevity, and functional outcomes. However, despite increased adoption over the past decade; its value is still to be determined.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare robotic-arm (RA)-KA, CA-KA, and manual (M)-KA regarding (1) in-hospital metrics (length of stay [LOS], discharge disposition, in-hospital complications, and hospitalization-episode costs), (2) characterize annual utilization trends, and (3) future RA-KA and CA-KA utilization projections.

METHODS

National Inpatient Sample was queried for primary KAs (unicompartmental/total; 2008 to 2018). KAs were classified by modality (M-KA/CA-KA/RA-KA) using International Classification of Disease-9/10 codes. A propensity score-matched comparison of LOS, discharge disposition, in-hospital complications (implant-related mechanical or procedure-related nonmechanical complications), and costs was conducted. Trends and projected utilization rates were estimated.

RESULTS

After propensity score matched to their respective M-KA cohorts, RA-KA and CA-KA exhibited shorter LOS (RA-KA versus M-KA: 2.0 ± 1.4 days versus 2.5 ± 1.8 days; P < 0.001; CA-KA versus M-KA: 2.7 ± 1.4 days versus 2.9 ± 1.6 days; P < 0.001) and in-hospital implant-related mechanical complications (P < 0.05, each). RA-KA demonstrated lower nonhome discharge (P < 0.001) and in-hospital procedure-related nonmechanical complications (P = 0.005). RA-KA had lower in-hospital costs ($16,881 ± 7,085 versus $17,320 ± 12,820; P < 0.001), whereas CA-KA exhibited higher costs ($18,411 ± 7,783 versus $17,716 ± 8,451; P < 0.001). RA-KA utilization increased from <0.1% in 2008 to 4.3% in 2018. CA-KA utilization rose temporarily to 6.2% in 2014, then declined to pre-2010 levels in 2018 (4.5%). Projections indicate that RA-KA and CA-KA will represent 49.9% (95% confidence interval, 41.1 to 59.9) and 6.2% (95% confidence interval, 5.3% to 7.2%) of KAs by 2030.

DISCUSSION

RA-KA may provide value through improving in-hospital metrics and mitigating net costs. Similar advantages may not be reliably attainable with CA-RA. Because RA-KA is projected to reach half of all knee arthroplasties done in the United States by 2030, further cost analyses and long-term studies are warranted.

Accelerometer-based, hand-held navigation for improved knee alignment in total knee arthroplasty: An observational study

BACKGROUND

Malalignment in total knee arthroplasty has been associated with poor implant longevity and clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of accelerometer-based navigation in restoring the mechanical axis.

METHODS

106 primary total knee arthroplasties performed during February 2016 to September 2017 at a tertiary care centre in India were enrolled in this observational study. We noted the intra-op tourniquet time. Two separate blinded observers measured the preoperative mechanical axis and the post operative radiological results (mechanical axis, coronal and sagittal alignment of femoral and tibial components) and the mean value was taken as final data. Interclass correlation was done to look for variability between the two observers.

RESULTS

The mean pre operative mechanical axis was 13.74 ± 10.44. The mean tourniquet time was 53.14 ± 7.42 min 91.5% (96/106) knees were within ±3° of neutral mechanical axis with a mean of 1.00° ± 2.68°. The femoral and tibial components with coronal alignment within ±3° perpendicular to the mechanical axis were 93.39% (99/106) and 89.62% (95/106) respectively. In the sagittal plane 89.62% of the femoral components and 87.73% of the tibial components were within ±3° perpendicular to the axis of tibia.

CONCLUSION

The Accelerometer based portable navigation system effectively reduces the coronal and sagittal alignment outliers in total knee arthroplasty and has no role in rotational alignment of components.

After 25 years of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty, where do we stand today?

Background

Limb and implant alignment along with soft tissue balance plays a vital role in the outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Computer navigation for TKA was first introduced in 1997 with the aim of implanting the prosthetic components with accuracy and precision. This review discusses the technique, current status, and scientific evidence pertaining to computer-navigated TKA.

Body

The adoption of navigated TKA has slowly but steadily increased across the globe since its inception 25 years ago. It has been more rapid in some countries like Australia than others, like the UK. Contemporary, large console-based navigation systems help control almost every aspect of TKA, including the depth and orientation of femoral and tibial resections, soft-tissue release, and customization of femoral and tibial implant positions in order to obtain desired alignment and balance. Navigated TKA results in better limb and implant alignment and reduces outliers as compared to conventional TKA. However, controversy still exists over whether improved alignment provides superior function and longevity. Surgeons may also be hesitant to adopt this technology due to the associated learning curve, slightly increased surgical time, fear of pin site complications, and the initial set-up cost. Furthermore, the recent advent of robotic-assisted TKA which provides benefits like precision in bone resections and avoiding soft-tissue damage due to uncontrolled sawing, in addition to those of computer navigation, might be responsible for the latter technology taking a backseat.

Conclusion

This review summarizes the current state of computer-navigated TKA. The superiority of computer navigation to conventional TKA in improving accuracy is well established. Robotic-assisted TKA provides enhanced functionality as compared to computer navigation but is significantly more expensive. Whether robotic-assisted TKA offers any substantive advantages over navigation is yet to be conclusively proven. Irrespective of the form, the use of computer-assisted TKA is on the rise worldwide and is here to stay.

Computer and robotic - assisted total knee arthroplasty: a review of outcomes

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful treatment for tricompartmental knee arthritis. Computer navigation and robotic-assisted-surgery (RAS) have emerged as tools that aim to help plan and execute surgery with greater precision and consistency. We reviewed the most current literature to describe the historical background and outcomes compared to conventional TKA.

Methods

A review and synthesis of the literature comparing the patient reported outcomes (PROM’s) of RA TKA and computer-assisted (CA) TKA to conventional TKA was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results

CAS TKA improves accuracy and consistency of implant position, and appears to provide a small improvement in PROMs and implant survival compared to conventional TKA. RTKA similarly improves implant accuracy compared to conventional techniques and early results suggest a similar small benefit in PROMs compared to conventional TKA. A strengthening trend is emerging showing CAS TKA has greatest benefit to implant survival in people under 65. RTKA survival analysis data is more limited and early results do not allow strong conclusions, however early trends are similar to CAS TKA.

Conclusion

Results for CAS-TKA show improvement in alignment, and early clinical outcomes have revealed promising results, with longer-term data and medium-term survival analysis recently emerging showing small benefits over conventional TKA. RTKA represents another phase of development. Early results show similar trends to that of CAS TKA with longer-term data still to come.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Markov Decision Analysis

BACKGROUND

Use of platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) injections for treating knee osteoarthritis has increased over the past decade. We used cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate the value of PRP in delaying the need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

We developed a Markov model to analyze the baseline case: a 55-year-old patient with Kellgren-Lawrence grade-II or III knee osteoarthritis undergoing a series of 3 PRP injections with a 1-year delay to TKA versus a TKA from the outset. Both health-care payer and societal perspectives were included. Transition probabilities were derived from systematic review of 72 studies, quality-of-life (QOL) values from the Tufts University Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, and individual costs from Medicare reimbursement schedules. Primary outcome measures were total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), organized into incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and evaluated against willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000 and $100,000. One and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed as well as a probabilistic analysis varying PRP-injection cost, TKA delay intervals, and TKA outcomes over 10,000 different simulations.

RESULTS

From a health-care payer perspective, PRP resulted in 14.55 QALYs compared with 14.63 for TKA from the outset, with total health-care costs of $26,619 and $26,235, respectively. TKA from the outset produced a higher number of QALYs at a lower cost, so it dominated. From a societal perspective, PRP cost $49,090 versus $49,424 for TKA from the outset. The ICER for TKA from the outset was $4,175 per QALY, below the $50,000 willingness-to-pay threshold. Assuming the $728 published cost of a PRP injection, no delay time that was <10 years produced a cost-effective course. When the QOL value was increased from the published value of 0.788 to >0.89, PRP therapy was cost-effective with even a 1-year delay to TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering direct and unpaid indirect costs, PRP injections are not cost-effective. The primary factor preventing PRP from being cost-effective is not the price per injection but rather a lack of established clinical efficacy in relieving pain and improving function and in delaying TKA. PRP may have value for higher-risk patients with high perioperative complication rates, higher TKA revision rates, or poorer postoperative outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial protocol in China

BACKGROUND

The literature lacks studies that confirm whether the improved radiographic alignment that can be achieved with computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves patients' activities of daily living or the durability of total knee prostheses. Thus, in this protocol, we designed a randomized controlled trial to compare implant alignment, functional scores, and survival of the implant using computer-assisted surgery versus a conventional surgical technique.

METHODS

This prospective, blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at our single hospital. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Jiaxing Second Hospital. The patient inclusion criteria were age 20 to 80 years' old, a body mass index of ≤35 kg/m, and consented for primary knee arthroplasty performed through a medial parapatellar approach by the senior author. We randomized consented study participants on a 1:1 ratio to 1 of 2 study groups using a computer-generated list of random numbers in varying block sizes. The primary outcome in this study was the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Secondary outcomes were the Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, complications, and range of motion together with alignment and rotational positioning of the implant. Statistical significance was defined as a P value of ≤0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Authors hypothesized that computer-assisted surgery in primary TKA improves implant alignment, functional scores, and survival of the implant compared to the conventional technique.

Complications of computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: retrospective cohort of eight hundred and seventy eight consecutive knees

PURPOSE

The main objective was to analyze the computer-assisted navigation (CAN)-specific complications that forced to switch to conventional procedure in primary total knee replacement (TKR). The secondary objective was to determine the influence of those complications on TKR short-term survival.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 878 primary TKR in 753 patients. Two consecutive versions of the OrthoPilot navigation system (Braun Aesculap, Germany) were used during the study time. Specific complications of CAN were defined as those due to the instrumentation (hardware or software failures), which were classified in one of two categories according to whether they occurred during the registration or tracking process.

RESULTS

There were 20 (2.3%) complications related to the navigation system use that forced to switch to conventional surgery: in 11 (1.2%) knees due to loosening of the tracking pins, and in the other nine (1.0%) there were information system failures. There was a trend for a higher conversion rate to conventional surgery with the use of the first version of the software. There were no fractures, infections, or nerve injuries at the pin site. We found no differences in the distribution of baseline variables among those with or without conversion to conventional surgery. There was no significant difference (p = 0.488) in the two year survival between patients with or without conversion.

CONCLUSION

CAN for primary TKR is a safe method with few specific complications that forced to switch from the navigated to the conventional procedure. Conversion to conventional surgery did not affect the short-term survival of TKR.

Outcomes of Computer-Assisted Surgery Compared with Conventional Instrumentation in 19,221 Total Knee Arthroplasties: Results After a Mean of 4.5 Years of Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown improved alignment in association with the use of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) as compared with conventional instrumentation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but have failed to show a consistent clinical benefit. The aim of the present study was to compare the revision rates and functional outcomes following TKA performed with either CAS or conventional instrumentation. Recognizing that selection bias may arise from the preferential use of CAS in difficult or complex cases, the implant survival data and postoperative functional scores were analyzed with reference to whether the surgeon routinely performed TKA with use of CAS or conventional instrumentation.

METHODS

Revision rates and functional data in terms of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 6 months, 5 years, and 10 years were obtained from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) for 19,221 TKAs performed from 2006 to 2018.These data were analyzed by comparing 2 cohorts of patients: those managed by high-volume surgeons who routinely used CAS ("routine CAS" surgeons) and those managed by high-volume surgeons who routinely used conventional instrumentation ("routine conventional" surgeons). The mean duration of follow-up was 4.5 years (range, 0 to 12 years).

RESULTS

The revision rate per 100 component-years was 0.437 for the "routine CAS" surgeons, compared with 0.440 for the "routine conventional" surgeons (p = 0.724). For patients <65 years of age, the revision rate per 100 component-years was equivalent for the "routine CAS" and "routine conventional" surgeons (0.585 compared with 0.508; p = 0.524). The OKS scores were similar at 6 months (38.88 compared with 38.52; p = 0.172), 5 years (42.26 compared with 41.77; p = 0.206), and 10 years (41.59 compared with 41.74; p = 0.893) when comparing the 2 cohorts. Surgeons who had performed >50 TKAs with use of CAS took 10 minutes longer on average than those who used conventional instrumentation (92 compared with 82 minutes; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated no difference in survivorship or functional outcome scores to support using CAS for TKA. Experienced surgeons using CAS had longer operative durations than comparable surgeons using conventional instrumentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Computerized navigation for total hip arthroplasty is associated with lower complications and ninety-day readmissions: a nationwide linked analysis

INTRODUCTION

The objective was to evaluate if the use of CA-THA was associated with lower complications in the first 90 days following THA compared with conventional THA.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was queried to identify patients who underwent THA between 2012 and 2014. The primary outcome was arthroplasty-related complications within the first 90 days following THA. Multivariate models predicting the risk of complications, readmission, and revision-related readmission within 90 days of discharge were created.

RESULTS

A total of 309,252 patients with a minimum 90-day follow-up following elective primary THA were identified. After controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, indication, income, and type of insurance, the use of CA during THA resulted in a 12% reduced odds of 90-day complications (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-0.99, p = 0.04).

DISCUSSION

The use of CA-THA resulted in lower 90-day complication rates and readmission rates compared with traditional THA after controlling for confounding variables. There was no significant difference in the rates of revision surgery between the groups within the first 90 days.

Comparison between navigated reported position and postoperative computed tomography to evaluate accuracy in a robotic navigation system in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Computer navigation increases reproducibility compared to non-navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Robotics navigation is a branch of computer navigation technology that might further improve accuracy of implant placement. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy achieved in TKA with a robotic navigation system.

METHODS

One hundred seventy three knees. System studied: Omni navigation System (OMNI, Raynham, MA). Navigated femoral and tibial cuts were compared to postoperative computed tomography (CT). Measurements reviewed: femoral coronal alignment (FCA), femoral sagittal alignment (FSA), femoral rotational alignment (FRA), tibial coronal alignment (TCA), tibial sagittal alignment (TSA) and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle. Statistical analysis was made using R.

RESULTS

The mean differences between the navigated reported and the CT positions were: FCA: 0.1 ± 1.2° more varus (P = 0.58), FSA: 1.5 ± 0.3° more flexed (P < 0.001), FRA: 0.0 ± 1.7° (P = 0.93), TCA: 0.7 ± 1.1° more varus (P < 0.001), TSA: -1.3 ± 1.5 more negative slope (P < 0.001), HKA angle: 0.4 ± 2.4 more varus (P < 0.049). The percentages of concordance inside a three degree difference were: FCA: 98% (169 knees), FSA: 100% (173 knees), FRA: 94% (162 knees), TCA: 99% (171 knees), TSA: 93% (161 knees) and HKA angle: 83% (144 knees).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed that the robotic navigation system studied is highly accurate regarding final implant positioning for FCA, FRA and TCA. It has less accuracy in FSA, TSA and the HKA angle.

Frontal alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Comparative study between radiographic measurement and surgical navigation

OBJECTIVE

To establish the concordance between angulation of the femoro-tibial mechanical axis measured with x-rays and surgical navigation in both the pre and postoperative period after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was implanted.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Pre and postoperative measurements were analyzed in 88 TKA of the same model and all performed with the same surgical navigation system. The mechanical frontal angle (MFA) and femoro-tibial anatomic angle were measured before and after the TKA. The angulation was digitally measured with a teleradiography. In the navigation, the femoro-tibial angle at rest, forced varus and valgus were registered and the average of these three measurements was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative MFA measured on the radiograph was 4.55°. The mean of the same angle measured on the postoperative radiograph was 1.72°, (p=0.05). The mean of the MFA measured with navigation before TKA was 3.12° and after the implant with navigation was 0.53 (P=.013). The concordance coefficient between the MFA in teleradiography and in navigation was 0.869 (P<.001) preoperatively and 0.709 postoperatively (P=.017).

CONCLUSIONS

We found a strong concordance between radiographic and surgical navigation measurements of the MFA. This may imply that teleradiography is not necessary when using surgical navigation in TKA.

Have the Causes of Revision for Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Changed During the Past Two Decades?

BACKGROUND

Revisions after knee arthroplasty are expected to increase, and the epidemiology of failure mechanisms is changing as new implants, technology, and surgical techniques evolve.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Was there improvement in survival for TKA and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) when comparing two consecutive 11-year periods with similar followups in a national registry? (2) Were there changes in the causes of revision during the two times? (3) Could the changes in revision causes be attributed to patient or implant characteristics?

METHODS

A total of 60,623 TKAs (2426 revisions) and 7648 UKAs (725 revisions) were selected from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and analyzed based on year of primary surgery: 1994 to 2004 (Period 1) and 2005 to 2015 (Period 2). TKAs had median followup of 3.5 years in Period 1 and 4.2 years in Period 2. Median followup for UKAs was 2.7 years in Period 1 and 4.6 years in Period 2. Of the patients included in the registry, 99.6% were accounted for at the time of analysis, whereas 0.4% had moved abroad. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank test to investigate changes in survival. Relative risk of revision in Period 2 relative to Period 1 was calculated for each registered revision cause in a Cox regression model adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis, fixation, and patella resurfacing.

RESULTS

For TKAs, the 10-year Kaplan-Meier survival free from revision improved from Period 1 to Period 2 from 91% (95% CI, 90%-92%) to 94% (95% CI, 94%-95%; p < 0.001). Revisions resulting from aseptic loosening of the femoral component, polyethylene wear/breakage, patellar dislocation, and unexplained pain decreased, whereas revisions resulting from early infection increased. Patients in Period 2 were younger and more often men compared with patients in Period 1. A higher risk of revision was found for male sex (relative risk [RR], 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2; p = 0.048) and age younger than 65 years (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.6-1.9; p < 0.001). With UKAs, the 10-year survival free from revision was 80% (95% CI, 76%-84%) in Period 1 and 81% (95% CI, 79%-83%; p = 0.261) in Period 2. Revisions resulting from tibial aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear/breakage, and periprosthetic fractures decreased, but there were more revisions resulting from progression of osteoarthritis. In Period 2, there were more men and the average age was younger than for patients in Period 1. For UKAs, age younger than 65 years had a higher risk of revision (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.5-2.0; p < 0.001), whereas sex did not affect the risk of revision.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an improvement in survival free from revision for TKA in the last period, but no similar improvement for UKA, and the survivorship for UKAs remains rather dramatically lower than that observed for TKAs. The decision to perform a UKA should be made with the explicit awareness that its survivorship is substantially inferior to that of TKA; any perceived advantages of UKA should be balanced against this issue of its decreased durability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.