Failure modes of patellofemoral arthroplasty-registries vs. clinical studies: a systematic review

Outcomes of isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty

Osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral compartment can cause significant functional impairment. Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis affects greater than 10% of males and females over the age of 60. Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) was developed as a joint-preserving procedure that maintains natural knee kinematics in those with isolated patellofemoral disease. First-generation implants were fraught with complications, a high rate of revision, and early conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Second-generation implants have demonstrated significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures, complication rates and implant survivorship. Factors that can affect outcomes include surgical indications, patient selection, and PFA prosthesis design. Modern PFA for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis has comparable outcomes to TKA for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. In this article, we discuss the use of PFA, implant design, the indications and factors affecting outcomes, and comparison to TKA.

Almost 79% survival rate at 10-year follow-up for the patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: An Italian prosthetic registry study

PURPOSE

The aims of the present study were (1) to evaluate the survival of patellofemoral joint (PFJ) arthroplasty in a large cohort of patients using data obtained from an Italian regional arthroplasty registry and (2) to collect clinical outcomes of a subgroup of patients, with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. The hypotheses were that PFJ arthroplasty is a procedure that had good survival and clinical outcomes, not inferior to those reported in the literature for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

The Register of Orthopaedic Prosthetic Implants (RIPO) of Emilia-Romagna (ER) (Italy) database was searched for the inclusion of all PFJ arthroplasties implanted between 2003 and 2019. PFJ arthroplasties were excluded if they were implanted in patients who lived outside of the ER. The survival information was extrapolated from the RIPO considering the partial or total revision of the implant as failure; moreover, a subgroup of patients was contacted and interviewed by telephone to collect clinical outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data. The survival curve was calculated and plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 126 arthroplasties in 114 patients were included in the final analysis (mean age at surgery 60.1 ± 11.5 years old). The main causes of patellofemoral arthroplasty were primary osteoarthritis (88%) and posttraumatic arthritis (7%). The survival was 90.4 ± 30.6 and 78.8 ± 51.5 at 5 and 10 years of follow-up, respectively. At the latest follow-up, 23 implants failed (18.3%). The main cause of revision was osteoarthrosis progression (34.8%). A total of 44 patients were contacted by telephone to collect clinical outcomes: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, functional Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score and Oxford Knee Score. These patients reported good to excellent scores at a medium follow-up of 10.3 ± 4.7 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The PFJ showed good survival and clinical outcomes and could be considered a valuable option for patients affected by isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Return to Sports in Patients Aged 50 Years or Younger After Robotic-Assisted Patellofemoral Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Experience Reporting High Clinical Benefits and High Patient Satisfaction With Return to an Active Lifestyle

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on return to sports and patient psychometric ratings of success after patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) in younger patients with high expectations to return to an active lifestyle.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this article was to determine the role of PFA and its success in meeting patient expectations regarding the return to low-impact recreational sports and an active lifestyle in younger, active patients. It was hypothesized that PFA would allow younger patients to return to low-impact sports and an active lifestyle and achieve high patient psychometric ratings.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

In this 10-year prospective study (2009-2018), robotic-assisted PFA was performed on 44 patients (32 women and 12 men; n = 51 consecutive knees), with a mean age of 37.2 years (range, 21-50 years). The follow-up rate was 98%, with a mean of 5.3 years (range, 2-9.3 years). Primary clinical outcomes were as follows: the validated Cincinnati Knee Rating System sports activity and symptom rating scales, patient psychometric ratings of the substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). Secondary outcomes were the Cincinnati Knee Rating System occupational rating, visual analog pain scale, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. Survivorship was defined by conversion to total knee replacement (TKR).

RESULTS

Before PFA, 78% of patients (35/45 knees) were symptomatic and unable to perform recreational sports, with only 20% of patients (9/45 knees) performing some low-impact sports. After PFA, 80% of patients (36/45 knees) were able to perform low-impact sports, and 7% (3/45 knees) performed jumping-pivoting sports (P < .001). The SCB scored by the patient showed 87% of knees as good, very good, or normal. On the PASS analysis, 89% of patients (95% CI, 76%-96%) were "pleased," and 93% (95% CI, 82%-99%) would undergo surgery again. There were clinically relevant improvements in symptoms of pain, swelling, and giving way (P = .0001). Preoperatively, 91% of knees had moderate to severe pain with activities of daily living, and only 11% of knees had pain at the follow-up. Five of the 50 knees (10%) underwent TKR conversion with one patient lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

PFA resulted in a high return of patients to low-impact sports with high SCB and PASS psychometric ratings. The robotic-assisted 3-dimensional preoperative planning allowed precise intraoperative trochlear implant alignment in knees with severe trochlear dysplasia. PFA is recommended as an alternative treatment in younger patients with end-stage symptomatic patellofemoral arthritis.

REGISTRATION

NCT02738476 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Current outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty for isolated patellofemoral arthritis - A narrative review

Patellofemoral (PFJ) arthritis can be primary, or secondary to underlying trochlea dysplasia and patellofemoral malalignment. Although primary PFJ osteoarthritis affects an older patient population, just like tibiofemoral arthritis, it is common for younger patients to present with isolated PFJ arthritis secondary to an abnormal PFJ. PFJ arthroplasty (PFJA) has many benefits including being less invasive, associated with lower blood loss, is more cost-effective, and leaves the kinematics of the tibiofemoral joint undisturbed. As a result, there are arguably better functional outcomes associated with PFJA, however the historical revision rate of this procedure is high. Although registry outcome data associated with the first generation of PFJ implants shows a higher revision rate compared to TKA, the comparison of PFJ outcomes with TKA is not always age-matched and there is limited comparison on functional and patient-reported outcomes, something which is more important and relevant in a younger patient cohort. Improvements in implant design, instrumentation, surgical technique, and better patient selection has now resulted in outcomes which are comparable to that of TKA, and in some cases even better. This narrative review outlines the current outcomes of PFJA including highlighting factors which need to be considered in optimising outcomes, as well as discussing advanced techniques of robotic assisted PFJA.

Conversion of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty to Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been described as similar to primary TKA, although it may come with more challenges and worse outcomes. With the increased rate of revision following conversion TKA vs primary TKA, robotically assisted TKA provides an alternative technique to manual conversion. We present 3 cases of robot-assisted conversion of prior patellofemoral arthroplasty to TKA with good mechanical and clinical outcomes and no intraoperative complications.

Modern Patellofemoral Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The ideal procedure for isolated patellofemoral arthritis is a controversial topic. Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is an option that aims to restore normal kinematics to the knee while preserving bone. PFA has been shown to have benefits compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in this patient population but has historically had a high failure rate. Revision rates are improving with modern implants and tight indications but still remain higher than TKA. This review summarizes current thinking around PFA using modern implants and techniques in 2023, provides an implant-specific analysis, and assesses how we can improve outcomes after PFA based on the current literature. The aim was to provide an outline of the evidence around PFA on which surgeons can make decisions to optimize patient outcome in this young and active population.

METHODS

Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus) were searched for concepts of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty. After abstract and text review, a screening software was used to assess articles based on inclusion criteria for studies describing indications, outcomes, and techniques for isolated PFA using modern implants, with or without concomitant procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 191 articles were included for further examination, with 62 articles being instructional course lectures, systematic reviews, technique articles, narrative reviews, expert opinions, or meta-analyses. The remaining articles were case reports, trials, or cohort studies. Articles were used to create a thorough outline of multiple recurrent topics in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

PFA is an appealing option that has the potential to provide a more natural feeling and functioning knee for those with isolated PF arthritis. The high rate of revision is a cause for concern and there are several technical details that should be stressed to optimize results. The uncertain outcome after revision to TKA also requires more investigation. In addition, the importance of strict selection criteria and firm indications cannot be stressed enough to optimize longevity and attempt to predict those who are likely to have progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. The development of new third-generation implants is promising with excellent functional outcomes and a much lower rate of maltracking and implant complications compared with earlier generations. The impact of these implants and improvement in surgical techniques on the revision rate of PFA will be determined from longer-term outcomes.

Patellofemoral arthroplasty conversion to total knee arthroplasty: An updated retrieval analysis and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

A prior retrieval analysis found high rates of infection after conversion of PFA to TKA, but was limited by a small sample size. The purpose of this study is to perform a retrieval analysis with clinical correlation on an expanded group of patients to better understand conversion of PFA to TKA.

METHOD

A retrospective review of an implant retrieval registry identified 62 conversions of PFA to TKA between 2004-2021. Implants were analyzed for wear pattern and cement fixation. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic information, perioperative data, prior and subsequent surgical procedures, complications and outcomes. Radiographs performed prior to index PFA and conversion procedures were assessed for KL grading.

RESULTS

Cement fixation was present on 86% of retrieved components and wear was more pronounced on the lateral side. The most common indication for conversion to TKA was progression of OA in 46.8% of patients, followed by unexplained pain in the absence of radiographic or clinical changes (37.1%), loosening (8.1%), mechanical symptoms (4.8%), traumatic (3.2%). Thirteen patient experienced complications requiring additional procedures including arthrofibrosis (n = 4, 7.3%), PJI (n = 3, 5.5%), instability (n = 3, 5.5%), hematoma (n = 2, 3.6%) and loosening (n = 1, 1.8%). Revision components were used in 1.8% of cases and average post-conversion arc of motion was 119 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common reason for PFA conversion to TKA was progression of osteoarthritis. PFA conversion to TKA is technically similar to primary TKA, but complication rates are more consistent with revision TKA in this study.

Long-Term clinical results of patellofemoral arthroplasty for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore the clinical outcomes and long-term survival of patellofemoral arthroplasty in treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied a total of 46 type Y-L-Q PFAs that were designed at our institution in 38 patients. Implant survivorship was analyzed with a follow-up of 18.9-29.6 years. Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and University of California Los Angeles activity scale (UCLA) were used to assess functional outcomes.

RESULTS

The implant survivorship was 83.6% at 15 years, 76.8% at 20 years, and 59.4% at 25 years 14 PFAs in 12 patients were revised into total knee arthroplasty at 16.0 ± 6.7 years; 13 for progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis and one for polyethylene wear. The mean Knee Society Score objective scores and functional scores were 73.0 ± 17.5 (range, 49-95) and 56.4 ± 28.9 (range, 5-90), respectively. The mean Oxford Knee Score was 25.8 ± 11.5 (range, 8-44).

CONCLUSION

Type Y-L-Q patellofemoral arthroplasty can be an effective method for treating isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis with satisfactory survival.

The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Identifying Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Failed Partial Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and patello-femoral arthroplasty are expanding. Despite the lower published infection rates for UKA and patello-femoral arthroplasty than total knee arthroplasty, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a devastating complication and diagnostic thresholds for commonly utilized tests have not been investigated recently. Thus, this study evaluated if diagnostic thresholds for PJI in patients who had a failed partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) align more closely with previously reported thresholds specific to UKA or the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection.

METHODS

We identified 109 knees in 100 patients that underwent PKA with eventual conversion to total knee arthroplasty within a single healthcare system from 2000 to 2021. Synovial fluid nucleated cell count and synovial polymorphonuclear percentage in addition to preoperative serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum C-reactive protein, and serum white blood cell count were compared with Student's t-tests between septic and aseptic cases. Receiver operating characteristic curves and Youden's index were used to assess diagnostic performance and the optimal cutoff point of each test.

RESULTS

Synovial nucleated cell count, synovial polymorphonuclear percentage, and serum C-reactive protein demonstrated excellent discrimination for diagnosing PJI with an area under the curve of 0.97 and lower cutoff values than the previously determined UKA specific criteria. Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rateESR demonstrated good ability with an area under the curve of 0.89.

CONCLUSION

Serum and synovial fluid diagnostic thresholds for PJI in PKAs align more closely with the thresholds established by the 2018 International Consensus Meeting as compared to previously proposed thresholds specific to UKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Results in Better Time-weighted Patient-reported Outcomes After 6 Years than TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In a previous study, we reported the 2-year outcomes of a parallel-group, equivalence, randomized controlled trial (RCT; blinded for the first year) comparing patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) and TKA for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PF-OA). We found advantages of PFA over TKA for ROM and various aspects of knee-related quality of life (QOL) as assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Register data show increases in PFA revision rates from 2 to 6 years after surgery at a time when annual TKA revision rates are decreasing, which suggests rapidly deteriorating knee function in patients who have undergone PFA. We intended to examine whether the early advantages of PFA over TKA have deteriorated in our RCT and whether revision rates differ between the implant types in our study after 6 years of follow-up.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does PRO improvement during the first 6 postoperative years differ between patients who have undergone PFA and TKA? (2) Does the PRO improvement at 3, 4, 5, and 6 years differ between patients who have undergone PFA and TKA? (3) Do patients who have undergone PFA have a better ROM after 5 years than patients who have had TKA? (4) Does PFA result in more revisions or reoperations than TKA during the first 6 postoperative years?

METHODS

We considered patients who had debilitating symptoms and PF-OA as eligible for this randomized trial. Screening initially identified 204 patients as potentially eligible; 7% (15) were found not to have sufficient symptoms, 21% (43) did not have isolated PF-OA, 21% (43) declined participation, and 1% (3) were not included after the target number of 100 patients had been reached. The included 100 patients were randomized 1:1 to PFA or TKA between 2007 and 2014. Of these, 9% (9 of 100) were lost before the 6-year follow-up; there were 12% (6 of 50) and 0% (0 of 50) deaths (p = 0.02) in the PFA and TKA groups, respectively, but no deaths could be attributed to the knee condition. There were no differences in baseline parameters for patients who had PFA and TKA, such as the proportion of women in each group (78% [39 of 50] versus 76% [38 of 50]; p > 0.99), mean age (64 ± 9 years versus 65 ± 9 years; p = 0.81) or BMI (28.0 ± 4.7 kg/m 2 versus 27.8 ± 4.1 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.83). Patients were seen for five clinical follow-up visits (the latest at 5 years) and completed 10 sets of questionnaires during the first 6 postoperative years. The primary outcome was SF-36 bodily pain. Other outcomes were reoperations, revisions, ROM, and PROs (SF-36 [eight dimensions, range 0 to 100 best, minimum clinically important difference {MCID} 6 to 7], Oxford Knee Score [OKS; one dimension, range 0 to 48 best, MCID 5], and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS; five dimensions, range 0 to 100 best, MCID 8 to 10]). Average PRO improvements over the 6 years were determined by calculating the area under the curve and dividing by the observation time, thereby obtaining a time-weighted average over the entire postoperative period. PRO improvements at individual postoperative times were compared for the patients who had PFA and TKA using paired t-tests. Range of movement changes from baseline were compared using paired t-tests. Reoperation and revision rates were compared for the two randomization groups using competing risk analysis.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent PFA had a larger improvement in the SF-36 bodily pain score during the first 6 years than those who underwent TKA (35 ± 19 vs. 23 ± 17; mean difference 12 [95% CI 4 to 20]; p = 0.004), and the same was true for SF-36 physical functioning (mean difference 11 [95% CI 3 to 18]; p = 0.008), KOOS Symptoms (mean difference 12 [95% CI 5 to 20]; p = 0.002), KOOS Sport/recreation (mean difference 8 [95% CI 0 to 17]; p = 0.048), and OKS (mean difference 5 [95% CI 2 to 8]; p = 0.002). No PRO dimension had an improvement in favor of TKA. At the 6-year time point, only the SF-36 vitality score differed between the groups being in favor of PFA (17 ± 19 versus 8 ± 21; mean difference 9 [95% CI 0 to 18]; p = 0.04), whereas other PRO measures did not differ between the groups. At 5 years, ROM had decreased less from baseline for patients who underwent PFA than those who had TKA (-4° ± 14° versus -11° ± 13°; mean difference 7° [95% CI 1° to 13°]; p = 0.02), but the clinical importance of this is unknown. Revision rates did not differ between patients who had PFA and TKA at 6 years with competing risk estimates of 0.10 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.20) and 0.04 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.12; p = 0.24), respectively, and also reoperation rates were no different at 0.10 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.20) and 0.12 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.23; p = 0.71), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our RCT results show that the 2-year outcomes did not deteriorate during the subsequent 4 years. Patients who underwent PFA had a better QOL throughout the postoperative years based on several of the knee-specific outcome instruments. When evaluated by the 6-year observations alone and without considering earlier observations, we found no consistent difference for any outcome instruments, although SF-36 vitality was better for patients who underwent PFA. These combined findings show that the early advantages of PFA determined the results by 6 years. Our findings cannot explain the rapid deterioration of results implied by the high revision rates observed in implant registers, and it is necessary to question indications for the primary procedure and subsequent revision when PFA is in general use. Our data do not suggest that there is an inherent problem with the PFA implant type as otherwise suggested by registries. The long-term balance of advantages will be determined by the long-term QOL, but based on the first 6 postoperative years and ROM, PFA is still the preferable option for severe isolated PF-OA. A possible high revision rate in the PFA group beyond 6 years may outweigh the early advantage of PFA, but only detailed analyses of long-term studies can confirm this.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Patella-Femoral Joint Revision Surgery Following a Rare and Interesting Case of Implant Failure: A Case Report and Retrospective Analysis of Our Hospitals Implant Data

According to the national joint registry, patello-femoral joint (PFJ) replacement accounts for 1% of all knee arthroplasty procedures in the UK, 1014 of which were performed in 2018. The femoro-patella vialla (FPV) implant by MicroPort orthopaedics has a high reported rate of revision, more than four times that of other knee replacements.

The mechanisms of failure are usually loss of fixation at the bone-implant interface. We observe a rare and unusual case form of patella component failure whereby the facets of the implant remain imbedded within the patella as a result of shear force, leaving a loose patella button within the knee.

A literature review was conducted of reported modes of failure of the FPV implant and retrospective analysis of our units’ results looking into rate of revision, modes of failure, and assessment of a single surgeon’s patient outcome measure (Knee Society Scores).

Retrospective analysis of our hospital's data revealed that 11% of FPV implants were revised in our unit, a large percentage of which were due to pain and progressive osteoarthritis. We observed revision rates of 5.84% at 3 years, 10.21% at 5 years, and 13.13% at 10 years, which is favourable to national joint registry revision estimates of 6.99%, 10.13%, and 19.10%, respectively.

Knee Society Scores reveal a mean improvement of 39.65 (−38 to 100) at follow-up following FPV unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. Our unit demonstrated better results from patient outcome measures when compared to literature and a lower rate of revision when compared to national figures.

The lack of retropatellar resurfacing at index surgery is significantly associated with failure in patients following patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty: a multi-center study of more than 260 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up following contemporary patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty (PFIA) and to identify potential risk factors for failure in a multi-center study.

METHODS

All patients who underwent implantation of PFIA between 09/2009 and 11/2016 at 11 specialized orthopedic referral centers were enrolled in the study and were evaluated retrospectively at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Tegner Scale, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and subjective patient satisfaction. Pre- and perioperative risk factors were compared among failures and non-failures to determine potential risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 263 patients (85% follow-up rate) could be enrolled. The mean age at the time of index surgery was 49 ± 12 years with a mean postoperative follow-up of 45 ± 18 months. The overall failure rate was 11% (28 patients), of which 18% (5 patients) were patients with patella resurfacing at index surgery and 82% (23 patients) were patients without initial patella resurfacing. At final follow-up, 93% of the patients who did not fail were satisfied with the procedure with a mean transformed WOMAC Score of 84.5 ± 14.5 points, a mean KOOS Score of 73.3 ± 17.1 points, a mean Tegner Score of 3.4 ± 1.4 points and a mean VAS pain of 2.4 ± 2.0 points. An increased BMI was significantly correlated with a worse postoperative outcome. Concomitant procedures addressing patellofemoral instability or malalignment, the lack of patellofemoral resurfacing at the index surgery and a high BMI were significantly correlated with failure in our patient cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty shows high patient satisfaction with good functional outcomes at short-term follow-up and thus can be considered a viable treatment option in young patients suffering from isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Patellar resurfacing at index surgery is recommended to decrease the risk of failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Onlay Patellofemoral Arthroplasty in Patients With Isolated Patellofemoral Arthritis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) remains controversial due to variable postoperative outcomes and high failure rates. Second-generation (2G) onlay prostheses have been associated with improved postoperative outcomes. This systematic review was performed to assess the current overall survivorship and functional outcomes of 2G PFA.

METHODS

A search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Thirty-three studies published in the last 15 years (2005-2020) were included; of these 22 studies reported patient-reported outcome measures. Operative and nonoperative complications were analyzed. Pooled statistical analysis was performed for survivorship and functional scores using Excel 2016 and Stata 13.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 59.7. When analyzing all studies, weighted survival at mean follow-up of 5.52 was 87.72%. Subanalysis of studies with minimum 5 years of follow up showed a survival of 94.24%. Fifteen studies reported Oxford Knee Score with a weighted mean postoperative Oxford Knee Score of 33.59. Mean American Knee Society Score pain was 79.7 while mean American Knee Society Score function was 79.3. The most common operative complication was OA progression for all implants. The percentage of revisions and conversions reported after analyzing all studies was 1.37% and 7.82% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Safe and acceptable results of functional outcomes and PFA survivorship can result from 2G PFAs at both short and mid-term follow-up for patients with isolated patellofemoral OA. However, long-term follow-up outcomes are still pending for the newer implants. More extensive studies using standardized functional outcomes and long-term cost benefits should be evaluated.

[Patellofemoral inlay implants-an innovation in patellofemoral joint arthroplasty?]

Isolated arthrosis of the patellofemoral joint is a rare and complex disease. After conservative therapy has been exhausted, the orthopedist has various soft-tissue and bone reconstructive procedures as well as cartilage regenerative procedures at his hands. In cases of failed or unsatisfactory therapy, patellofemoral arthroplasty continues to be controversially discussed as an alternative therapy. A closer look at these studies reveals promising results with the correct indication and patient selection. The different prosthesis designs provide good postoperative results while considering general and specific risks. The current generation of patellofemoral inlay prostheses shows high patient satisfaction with significant improvements in knee function and pain relief in mid-term outcomes. However, a relatively high revision rate must be considered.

Contemporary knee arthroplasty: one fits all or time for diversity?

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has historically been the preferred solution for any type of knee osteoarthritis, independently of the number of compartments involved. In these days of patient-specific medicine, mono-compartmental disease could also be approached with a more individualized treatment, such as partial knee arthroplasty (PKA). Off-the-shelf (OTS) implants are often the compromise of averages and means of a limited series of anatomical parameters retrieved from patients and the pressure of cost control by limited inventory. Personalized medicine requires respect and interest for the individual shape and alignment of each patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Pubmed and Google Scholar search were performed with the following terms: "patient-specific knee" and "arthroplasty" and "custom implant" and "total knee replacement" and "partial knee replacement" and "patellofemoral knee replacement" and "bicompartmental knee replacement". The full text of 90 articles was used to write this narrative review.

RESULTS

Unicondylar, patellofemoral and bicompartmental knee arthroplasty are successful treatment options, which can be considered over TKA for their bone and ligament sparing character and the superior functional outcome that can be obtained with resurfacing procedures. For TKA, where compromises dominate our choices, especially in patients with individual variations of their personal anatomy outside of the standard, a customized implant could be a preferable solution.

CONCLUSION

TKA might not be the only solution for every patient with knee osteoarthritis, if personalized medicine wants to be offered. Patient-specific mono-compartmental resurfacing solutions, such as partial knee arthroplasty, can be part of the treatment options proposed by the expert surgeon. Customized implants and personalized alignment options have the potential to further improve clinical outcome by identifying the individual morphotype and respecting the diversity of the surgical population.

Short-term Revision Risk of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Is High: An Analysis from Eight Large Arthroplasty Registries

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is one option for the treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis, but there are limited data regarding the procedure and results. Because isolated patellofemoral arthritis is relatively uncommon, available case series generally are small, and even within national registries, sample sizes are limited. Combining data from multiple registries may aid in assessing worldwide PFA usage and survivorship.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We combined and compared data from multiple large arthroplasty registries worldwide to ask: (1) What proportion of patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty have PFA? (2) What are the patient and prosthesis characteristics associated with PFA in common practice, as reflected in registries? (3) What is the survivorship free from revision of PFA and what are the reasons for and types of revisions?

METHODS

Data were provided by eight registries that are members of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) who agreed to share aggregate data: Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Sweden, Finland, Norway, the Netherlands, and the United States. De-identified data were obtained for PFA performed from either the beginning of year 2000, or the earliest recorded implantation date after that in each individual registry when PFA data collection commenced, up to December 31, 2016. This included patient demographics, implant use, all-cause revision rate (determined by cumulative percent revision [CPR]), and reasons for and type of revision.

RESULTS

During the data collection period, 6784 PFAs were performed in the eight countries. PFAs comprised less than 1% of primary knee replacements in all registries. Patient demographics were comparable in all countries. Patients were generally more likely to be women than men, and the mean age ranged from 50 years to 60 years. All registries showed a high rate of revision for PFA. The 5-year CPR for any reason ranged from 8.0% (95% CI 4.5 to 11.5) in Norway to 18.1% (95% CI 15.5 to 20.7) in the Netherlands. The most common reason for revision across all countries was disease progression (42%, 434 of 1034). Most PFAs (83%, 810 of 980) were revised to a TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

The revision risk of PFA in all registries surveyed was more than three times higher than the reported revision risk of TKA at the same times. The survivorship of PFA is similar to that of the no-longer-used procedure of metal-on-metal conventional hip replacement. Although there may be potential functional benefits from PFA, these findings of consistent and alarmingly high rates of revision should create concern, particularly as this procedure is often used in younger patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Preoperative patellofemoral anatomy affects failure rate after isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To analyze whether preoperative patellofemoral anatomy is associated with clinical improvement and failure rate after isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) using a modern inlay-type trochlear implant.

METHODS

Prospectively collected 24 months data of patients treated with isolated inlay PFA (HemiCAP^® Wave, Arthrosurface, Franklin, MA, USA) between 2009 and 2016, and available digitalized preoperative imaging (plain radiographs in three planes and MRI) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were evaluated using the WOMAC score, Lysholm score, and VAS pain. Patients revised to TKA or not achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the total WOMAC score or VAS pain were considered failures. Preoperative imaging was analyzed regarding the following aspects: Tibiofemoral OA, patellofemoral OA, trochlear dysplasia (Dejour classification), patellar height (Insall-Salvati index [ISI]; Patellotrochlear index [PTI]), and position of the tibial tuberosity (TT-TG and TT-PCL distance).

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients (61% female) with a mean age of 48 ± 13 years could be included. Fifteen patients (37%) were considered failures, with 5 patients (12%) revised to TKA and 10 patients (24%) not achieving MCID for WOMAC total or VAS pain. Failures had a significantly higher ISI, and a significantly lower PTI. Furthermore, the proportion of patients with a pathologic ISI (> 1.2), a pathologic PTI (< 0.28), and without trochlear dysplasia were significantly higher in failures. Significantly greater improvements in clinical outcome scores were observed in patients with a higher preoperative grade of patellofemoral OA, ISI ≤ 1.2, PTI ≥ 0.28, TT-PCL distance ≤ 21 mm, and a dysplastic trochlea.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative patellofemoral anatomy is significantly associated with clinical improvement and failure rate after isolated inlay PFA. Less improvement and a higher failure rate must be expected in patients with patella alta (ISI > 1.2 and PTI < 0.28), absence of trochlear dysplasia, and a lateralized position of the tibial tuberosity (TT-PCL distance > 21 mm). Concomitant procedures such as tibial tuberosity transfer may, therefore, be considered in such patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.