1
|
Bergdahl C, Wolf O, Rydberg EM, Möller M, Wennergren D. Low risk of early conversion to surgery in non-surgically treated proximal humeral fractures - An observational cohort study of 31,761 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register. Injury 2024; 55:111679. [PMID: 38897070 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The majority of all proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are treated non-surgically. Due to the risk of early secondary fracture displacement patients with non-surgically treated PHFs routinely undergo serial clinical and radiological evaluations. However, the value of these routine follow-up visits is unclear. This study aimed to examine the rate of early conversion to surgery in non-surgically treated PHFs. Moreover, the associations between patient and fracture characteristics and the risk of conversion to surgery were explored in order to assess the need for routine follow-ups. METHODS Data on all patients aged ≥18 years with a non-surgically treated PHF registered between 2013 and 2021 were extracted from the Swedish Fracture Register. Early change of treatment from non-surgical to surgical is an optional treatment modality in the SFR. The rate of early conversion to surgery within 60 days from injury was analyzed in relation to age and sex of the patient, energy level at injury and fracture morphology according to the AO/OTA classification. RESULTS A total of 31,761 primarily non-surgically treated PHFs (mean age 70 years: 76 % female) were included in the study. The overall rate of early conversion to surgery was 3.7 %. Younger age and increasing fracture severity were associated with a higher conversion rate to surgery. Patients ≥80 years and those with the three most common fracture types (A1, A2, and B1) had <2 % early conversion to surgery. In contrast, patients with C-type fractures, unstable/displaced fractures (A3, B2, and C2), or fracture dislocations (A1.3, B3, and C3) had a substantially higher risk (5.0-20 %) of early conversion. CONCLUSION The overall risk of early conversion to surgery in non-surgically treated PHFs is low and can be further predicted based on patient age and fracture morphology. These results could have implications regarding which patients are in need of routine follow-ups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II; Retrospective design; Prognosis study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Bergdahl
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg/Mölndal, Sweden.
| | - Olof Wolf
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Emilia Möller Rydberg
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg/Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Michael Möller
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg/Mölndal, Sweden
| | - David Wennergren
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg/Mölndal, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu Z, Chang Z, Zhang W, Qi H, Guo H, Li J, Qi L, Nie S, Tang P, Liang Y, Wei X, Chen H. Biomechanical evaluation of novel intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1182422. [PMID: 37936824 PMCID: PMC10627012 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1182422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: A novel intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation method was introduced, which achieved good clinical results in complex proximal humeral fractures; however, evidence of its comparability with traditional fixation is lacking. This biomechanical study aimed to compare it with traditional fixation devices in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures. Methods: Three-part proximal humeral fractures with osteopenia were created on 12 pairs of fresh frozen humerus specimens and allocated to three groups: 1) lateral locking plate, 2) intramedullary nail, and 3) intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation. The specimens were loaded to simulate the force at 25° abduction. Thereafter, an axial stiffness test and a compound cyclic load to failure test were applied. Structural stiffness, number of cycles loaded to failure, and relative displacement values at predetermined measurement points were recorded using a testing machine and a synchronized 3D video tracking system. Results: In terms of initial stiffness and the number of cycles loaded to failure, the intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation group showed notable improvements compared to the other groups (p <0.017). The mean relative displacement value of measurement points in the intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation group was smaller than that in the other two groups. However, there was no significant difference until 10,000 cycles. The mean relative displacement of the intramedullary nail group (3.136 mm) exceeded 3 mm at 7,500 cycles of loading. Conclusion: In this test model, axial fixation can provide better mechanical stability than non-axial fixation. The intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation is better able to prevent the varus collapse for elderly proximal humeral fractures with posteromedial comminution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengguo Zhu
- The Department of Orthopaedic, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
- The Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Chinese PLA General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China
| | - Zuhao Chang
- The Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- AI Sports Engineering Lab, School of Sports Engineering, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongzhe Qi
- The Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Guo
- The Second Surgical Department, Beijing Municipal Corps Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force, Beijing, China
| | - JiaQi Li
- The Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Chinese PLA General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China
| | - Lin Qi
- The Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Chinese PLA General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China
| | - Shaobo Nie
- The Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Chinese PLA General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China
| | - Peifu Tang
- The Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Chinese PLA General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China
| | - Yonghui Liang
- The Department of Orthopaedic, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xing Wei
- The Department of Orthopaedic, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Chen
- The Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Chinese PLA General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Revision Rates and Associated Risk Factors after Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11247256. [PMID: 36555873 PMCID: PMC9786091 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aims at answering the following questions (1) How high is the revision rate after osteoarthritis-, and rotator cuff-related compared to proximal humerus fracture (PHF)-related shoulder arthroplasty? (2) What are the associated risk factors for a revision after shoulder arthroplasty? Shoulder arthroplasty procedures occurring between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019 were identified from the Medicare database. First, revision rates for PHF patients and age- and sex-matched non-fracture patients, grouped into osteoarthritis-related and rotator cuff-related arthroplasty, were compared. Second, revision rates between total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty after PHF were compared. Semiparametric Cox regression was applied, incorporating 23 demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic covariates, to investigate risk factors for revision surgery. Between the considered time period from 2009 through 2019, a total number of 47,979 PHFs was identified. A shoulder arthroplasty procedure was performed in n = 2639 (5.5%, 95%CI: 4.8-6.1) of the cases. The five-year survivorship of the implant was 96.3 (95%CI: 93.8-97.9) after hemiarthroplasty and 96.1% (05%CI: 94.2-97.3) after total shoulder arthroplasty. To compare the revision rates, n = 14,775 patients with osteoarthritis and n = 4268 patients with rotator cuff arthropathy, who received a shoulder arthroplasty, served as a non-fracture control group. Patients receiving a rotator cuff-related arthroplasty were more likely to require a revision compared to patients treated for osteoarthritis (HR: 1.27, 95%CI: 1.04-1.44, p = 0.018). Identified significant risk factors for revision surgery after shoulder arthroplasty included age ≤ 75 years, male sex, and osteoporosis. High implant survival was found for hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of PHF in elderly patients. The risk of revision surgery was elevated in patients receiving a rotator cuff-related arthroplasty as well as in patients with osteoporosis, male patients and patients older than 75 years.
Collapse
|
4
|
BRORSON S, VIBERG B, GUNDTOFT P, JALAL B, OHRT-NISSEN S. Epidemiology and trends in management of acute proximal humeral fractures in adults: an observational study of 137,436 cases from the Danish National Patient Register, 1996-2018. Acta Orthop 2022; 93:750-755. [PMID: 36148615 PMCID: PMC9500535 DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2022.4578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) can be managed surgically or non-surgically. Locking plates have been the preferred head-preserving surgical technique while hemiarthroplasty (HA) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been used in joint replacement surgery. We describe the epidemiology and trends in management of acute PHF in Denmark with a focus on (i) changes in the incidence of PHF; (ii) changes in the proportion of surgical cases; and (iii) changes in preferred surgical techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data on diagnoses and interventions was retrieved from the Danish National Patient Register. Patients aged 18 years and above were included. Surgical treatment was defined as the diagnosis of PHF combined with a predefined surgical procedure code within 3 weeks of injury. Data on plate osteosynthesis, HA, RSA, and "other techniques" was retrieved. Non-surgical treatment was defined as no relevant surgical procedure code within 3 weeks. RESULTS We identified 137,436 PHF (72% women) in the Danish National Patient Register. The overall mean incidence was 138/100,000/year (500 for women 60 years or above). Non-surgical treatment accounted for 119,966 (87%). The 17,470 surgical procedures included 42% locking plates, 34% arthroplasties, and 25% other techniques. The rate of surgery declined from 17% in 2013 to 11% in 2018. INTERPRETATION The overall incidence of PHF remained stable between 1996 and 2018 but the absolute number increased. The approach to PHF remains predominantly non-surgical. The number of surgeries in Denmark have decreased since 2013, especially for locking plates and HA, while RSA is increasingly used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stig BRORSON
- Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics, Zealand University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen
| | - Bjarke VIBERG
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Lillebaelt, University Hospital of Southern Denmark and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital
| | - Per GUNDTOFT
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kolding Hospital
| | - Bamo JALAL
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zealand University Hospital
| | - Søren OHRT-NISSEN
- Spine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Möller M, Wolf O, Bergdahl C, Mukka S, Rydberg EM, Hailer NP, Ekelund J, Wennergren D. The Swedish Fracture Register - ten years of experience and 600,000 fractures collected in a National Quality Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:141. [PMID: 35148730 PMCID: PMC8832767 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05062-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Before the creation of the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR), there was no national quality register that prospectively collects data regarding all types of fractures regardless of treatment in an emergency setting. Observational data on fractures registered in a sustainable way may provide invaluable tools for quality improvements in health care and research. DESCRIPTION Ten years after its implementation, the Swedish Fracture Register has 100% coverage among orthopaedic and trauma departments in Sweden. The completeness of registrations reached in 2020 69-96% for hip fractures at the different departments, with the majority reporting a completeness above 85%. The Swedish Fracture Register is a fully web-based national quality register created and run by orthopaedic professionals, with financial support from public healthcare providers and the government. All users have full access to both the registration platform and all aggregated statistics in real time. The web-based platform was created for use in health quality registers and it has easily gained acceptance among users. The register has gradually developed by the addition of more fracture types and skeletal parts. Research activity is high and 31 scientific publications have been published since 2016. The strategy from the start was to publish validation data and basic epidemiological data. However, over the past few years, publications on outcomes, such as re-operations and mortality, have been published and four register-based, randomised, controlled trials are ongoing. CONCLUSION It is possible to create a fracture register, to gain professional acceptance and to collect fracture data in a sustainable way on a national level if the platform is easy to use. Such a platform can also be used as a randomisation platform for prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Möller
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. .,Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg/Mölndal, Sweden.
| | - Olof Wolf
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Carl Bergdahl
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg/Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Sebastian Mukka
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Science (Orthopaedics), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Emilia Möller Rydberg
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg/Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Nils P Hailer
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jan Ekelund
- Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - David Wennergren
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg/Mölndal, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|