1
|
van Dijk MP, Hoozemans MJM, Berger MAM, Veeger HEJ. From theory to practice: Monitoring mechanical power output during wheelchair field and court sports using inertial measurement units. J Biomech 2024; 166:112052. [PMID: 38560959 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
An important performance determinant in wheelchair sports is the power exchanged between the athlete-wheelchair combination and the environment, in short, mechanical power. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) might be used to estimate the exchanged mechanical power during wheelchair sports practice. However, to validly apply IMUs for mechanical power assessment in wheelchair sports, a well-founded and unambiguous theoretical framework is required that follows the dynamics of manual wheelchair propulsion. Therefore, this research has two goals. First, to present a theoretical framework that supports the use of IMUs to estimate power output via power balance equations. Second, to demonstrate the use of the IMU-based power estimates during wheelchair propulsion based on experimental data. Mechanical power during straight-line wheelchair propulsion on a treadmill was estimated using a wheel mounted IMU and was subsequently compared to optical motion capture data serving as a reference. IMU-based power was calculated from rolling resistance (estimated from drag tests) and change in kinetic energy (estimated using wheelchair velocity and wheelchair acceleration). The results reveal no significant difference between reference power values and the proposed IMU-based power (1.8% mean difference, N.S.). As the estimated rolling resistance shows a 0.9-1.7% underestimation, over time, IMU-based power will be slightly underestimated as well. To conclude, the theoretical framework and the resulting IMU model seems to provide acceptable estimates of mechanical power during straight-line wheelchair propulsion in wheelchair (sports) practice, and it is an important first step towards feasible power estimations in all wheelchair sports situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit P van Dijk
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
| | - Marco J M Hoozemans
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique A M Berger
- Centre of Expertise Health Innovation, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - H E J Veeger
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Binnie MJ, Astridge D, Watts SP, Goods PSR, Rice AJ, Peeling P. Quantifying on-water performance in rowing: A perspective on current challenges and future directions. Front Sports Act Living 2023; 5:1101654. [PMID: 37008623 PMCID: PMC10061147 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1101654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Winning times at benchmark international rowing competitions (Olympic Games and World Championships) are known to vary greatly between venues, based on environmental conditions and the strength of the field. Further variability in boat speed for any given effort is found in the training environment, with less controlled conditions (i.e., water flow, non-buoyed courses), fewer world class competitors, and the implementation of non-race specific effort distances and intensities. This combination of external factors makes it difficult for coaches and practitioners to contextualise the performance underpinning boat speed or race results on any given day. Currently, a variety of approaches are referenced in the literature and used in practice to quantify this underpinning performance time or boat speed, however, no clear consensus exists. The use of relative performance (i.e., time compared to other competitors), accounting for influence of the weather (i.e., wind and water temperature), and the novel application of instrumented boats (with power instrumentation) have been suggested as potential methods to improve our understanding of on-water rowing speeds. Accordingly, this perspective article will discuss some of these approaches from recent literature, whilst also sharing experience from current practice in the elite environment, to further stimulate discussion and help guide future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martyn J. Binnie
- Department of Performance Sciences, Western Australian Institute of Sport, Perth, WA, Australia
- School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science), The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Correspondence: Martyn J. Binnie
| | - Daniel Astridge
- Department of Performance Sciences, Western Australian Institute of Sport, Perth, WA, Australia
- School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science), The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Sophie P. Watts
- Department of Performance Sciences, Western Australian Institute of Sport, Perth, WA, Australia
- School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science), The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Paul S. R. Goods
- Department of Performance Sciences, Western Australian Institute of Sport, Perth, WA, Australia
- Murdoch Applied Sports Science Laboratory, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia
- Centre for Healthy Ageing, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Peter Peeling
- Department of Performance Sciences, Western Australian Institute of Sport, Perth, WA, Australia
- School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science), The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Vette VG, Veeger D(HEJ, van Dijk MP. Using Wearable Sensors to Estimate Mechanical Power Output in Cyclical Sports Other than Cycling-A Review. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 23:50. [PMID: 36616649 PMCID: PMC9823913 DOI: 10.3390/s23010050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
More insight into in-field mechanical power in cyclical sports is useful for coaches, sport scientists, and athletes for various reasons. To estimate in-field mechanical power, the use of wearable sensors can be a convenient solution. However, as many model options and approaches for mechanical power estimation using wearable sensors exist, and the optimal combination differs between sports and depends on the intended aim, determining the best setup for a given sport can be challenging. This review aims to provide an overview and discussion of the present methods to estimate in-field mechanical power in different cyclical sports. Overall, in-field mechanical power estimation can be complex, such that methods are often simplified to improve feasibility. For example, for some sports, power meters exist that use the main propulsive force for mechanical power estimation. Another non-invasive method usable for in-field mechanical power estimation is the use of inertial measurement units (IMUs). These wearable sensors can either be used as stand-alone approach or in combination with force sensors. However, every method has consequences for interpretation of power values. Based on the findings of this review, recommendations for mechanical power measurement and interpretation in kayaking, rowing, wheelchair propulsion, speed skating, and cross-country skiing are done.
Collapse
|