Maximal vs. explosive knee extensor strength in professional soccer players: inter-limb asymmetries and relationship with knee function

The Influence of Quadriceps Strength and Rate of Torque Development on the Recovery of Knee Biomechanics During Running After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), altered surgical knee biomechanics during running is common. Although greater quadriceps strength is associated with more symmetrical running knee kinetics after ACLR, abnormal running mechanics persist even after resolution of quadriceps strength deficits. As running is a submaximal effort task characterized by limited time to develop knee extensor torque, quadriceps rate of torque development (RTD) may be more closely associated with recovery of running knee mechanics than peak torque (PT).

PURPOSE

To assess the influence of recovery in quadriceps PT and RTD symmetry on knee kinematic and kinetic symmetry during running over the initial 2 years after ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 39 Division I collegiate athletes (106 testing sessions; 19 female) completed serial isometric performance testing and running analyses between 3 and 24 months after ACLR. Athletes performed maximal and rapid isometric knee extension efforts with each limb to assess PT and RTD between-limb symmetry indices (PTLSI and RTDLSI), respectively. Peak knee flexion difference (PKFDIFF) and peak knee extensor moment limb symmetry index (PKEMLSI) during running were computed. Multivariable linear mixed-effects models assessed the influence of PTLSI and RTDLSI on PKFDIFF and PKEMLSI over the initial 2 years after ACLR.

RESULTS

Significant main effects of RTDLSI (P < .001) and time (P≤ .02) but not PTLSI (P≥ .24) were observed for both PKFDIFF and PKEMLSI models. For a 10% increase in RTDLSI, while controlling for PTLSI and time, a 0.9° (95% CI, 0.5°-1.3°) reduction in PKFDIFF and a 3.5% (95% CI, 1.9%-5.1%) increase in PKEMLSI are expected. For every month after ACLR, a 0.2° (95% CI, 0.1°-0.4°) reduction in PKFDIFF and a 1.3% (95% CI, 0.6%-2.0%) increase in PKEMLSI are expected, controlling for PTLSI and RTDLSI.

CONCLUSION

Quadriceps RTDLSI was more strongly associated with symmetrical knee biomechanics during running compared with PTLSI or time throughout the first 2 years after ACLR.

Why Sports Should Embrace Bilateral Asymmetry: A Narrative Review

(1) Background: Asymmetry is ubiquitous in nature and humans have well-established bilateral asymmetries in their structures and functions. However, there are (mostly unsubstantiated) claims that bilateral asymmetries may impair sports performance or increase injury risk. (2) Objective: To critically review the evidence of the occurrence and effects of asymmetry and sports performance. (3) Development: Asymmetry is prevalent across several sports regardless of age, gender, or competitive level, and can be verified even in apparently symmetric actions (e.g., running and rowing). Assessments of bilateral asymmetries are highly task-, metric-, individual-, and sport-specific; fluctuate significantly in time (in magnitude and, more importantly, in direction); and tend to be poorly correlated among themselves, as well as with general performance measures. Assessments of sports-specific performance is mostly lacking. Most studies assessing bilateral asymmetries do not actually assess the occurrence of injuries. While injuries tend to accentuate bilateral asymmetries, there is no evidence that pre-existing asymmetries increase injury risk. While training programs reduce certain bilateral asymmetries, there is no evidence that such reductions result in increased sport-specific performance or reduced injury risk. (4) Conclusions: Bilateral asymmetries are prevalent in sports, do not seem to impair performance, and there is no evidence that suggests that they increase injury risk.