The fractions SNARC revisited: Processing fractions on a consistent mental number line

The developmental relationship between nonsymbolic and symbolic fraction abilities

A fundamental research question in quantitative cognition concerns the developmental relationship between nonsymbolic and symbolic quantitative abilities. This study examined this developmental relationship in abilities to process nonsymbolic and symbolic fractions. There were 99 6th graders (M_age = 11.86 years), 101 10th graders (M_age = 15.71 years), and 102 undergraduate and graduate students (M_age = 21.97 years) participating in this study, and their nonsymbolic and symbolic fraction abilities were measured with nonsymbolic and symbolic fraction comparison tasks, respectively. Nonsymbolic and symbolic fraction abilities were significantly correlated in all age groups even after controlling for the ability to process nonsymbolic absolute quantity and general cognitive abilities, including working memory and inhibitory control. Moreover, the strength of nonsymbolic-symbolic correlations was higher in 6th graders than in 10th graders and adults. These findings suggest a weakened association between nonsymbolic and symbolic fraction abilities during development, and this developmental pattern may be related with participants' increasing proficiency in symbolic fractions.

No calculation necessary: Accessing magnitude through decimals and fractions

Research on how humans understand the relative magnitude of symbolic fractions presents a unique case of the symbol-grounding problem with numbers. Specifically, how do people access a holistic sense of rational number magnitude from decimal fractions (e.g. 0.125) and common fractions (e.g. 1/8)? Researchers have previously suggested that people cannot directly access magnitude information from common fraction notation, but instead must use a form of calculation to access this meaning. Questions remain regarding the nature of calculation and whether a division-like conversion to decimals is a necessary process that permits access to fraction magnitudes. To test whether calculation is necessary to access fractions magnitudes, we carried out a series of six parallel experiments in which we examined how adults access the magnitude of rational numbers (decimals and common fractions) under varying task demands. We asked adult participants to indicate which of two fractions was larger in three different conditions: decimal-decimal, fraction-fraction, and mixed decimal-fraction pairs. Across experiments, we manipulated two aspects of the task demands. 1) Response windows were limited to 1, 2 or 5 s, and 2) participants either did or did not have to identify when the two stimuli were the same magnitude (catch trials). Participants were able to successfully complete the task even at a response window of 1 s and showed evidence of holistic magnitude processing. These results indicate that calculation strategies with fractions are not necessary for accessing a sense of a fractions meaning but are strategic routes to magnitude that participants may use when granted sufficient time. We suggest that rapid magnitude processing with fractions and decimals may occur by mapping symbolic components onto common amodal mental representations of rational numbers.

Implicit and explicit spatial-numerical representations diverge in number-form synesthetes

In number-form (NF) synesthesia-a condition in which people report vivid, automatic and consistent mental layouts for numerical sequences-numbers and space are closely linked. These explicit associations are similar to the implicit associations demonstrated by the Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect. Thus, NF synesthesia offers a unique opportunity to investigate spatial-numerical associations. We tested implicit and explicit representations in NF synesthetes using a multiple case-study design. Over two sessions, synesthetes participated in a semi-structured interview focusing on the nature of their associations, as well as SNARC and number line estimation tasks. Contrary to our hypotheses, only one synesthete demonstrated SNARC effects congruent with her reported form, whereas two others exhibited SNARC effects that were the opposite of their explicit NFs. While this inconsistency between implicit and explicit representations may indicate separate underlying cognitive mechanisms, factors such as task-specific constraints and strategic variability must also be considered.

The Relational SNARC: Spatial Representation of Nonsymbolic Ratios

Recent research in numerical cognition has begun to systematically detail the ability of humans and nonhuman animals to perceive the magnitudes of nonsymbolic ratios. These relationally defined analogs to rational numbers offer new potential insights into the nature of human numerical processing. However, research into their similarities with and connections to symbolic numbers remains in its infancy. The current research aims to further explore these similarities by investigating whether the magnitudes of nonsymbolic ratios are associated with space just as symbolic numbers are. In two experiments, we found that responses were faster on the left for smaller nonsymbolic ratio magnitudes and faster on the right for larger nonsymbolic ratio magnitudes. These results further elucidate the nature of nonsymbolic ratio processing, extending the literature of spatial-numerical associations to nonsymbolic relative magnitudes. We discuss potential implications of these findings for theories of human magnitude processing in general and how this general processing relates to numerical processing.

Individual Differences in Implicit and Explicit Spatial Processing of Fractions

Recent studies have explored the foundations of mathematical skills by linking basic numerical processes to formal tests of mathematics achievement. Of particular interest is the relationship between spatial-numerical associations-specifically, the Spatial Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect-and various measures of math ability. Thus far, studies investigating this relationship have yielded inconsistent results. Here, we investigate how individual implicit and explicit spatial representations of fractions relate to fraction knowledge and other formal measures of math achievement. Adult participants (n = 105) compared the magnitude of single digit, irreducible fractions to ½, a task that has previously produced a reliable SNARC effect. We observed a significant group-level SNARC effect based on overall fraction magnitude, with notable individual variability. While individual SNARC effects were correlated with performance on a fraction number-line estimation (NLE) task, only NLE significantly predicted scores on a fractions test and basic standardized math test, even after controlling for IQ, mean accuracy, and mean reaction time. This suggests that-for fractions-working with an explicit number line is a stronger predictor of math ability than implicit number line processing. Neither individual SNARC effects nor NLE performance were significant predictors of algebra scores; thus, the mental number line may not be as readily recruited during higher-order mathematical concepts, but rather may be a foundation for thinking about simpler problems involving rational magnitudes. These results not only characterize the variability in adults' mental representations of fractions, but also detail the relative contributions of implicit (SNARC) and explicit (NLE) spatial representations of fractions to formal math skills.

On the genesis of spatial-numerical associations: Evolutionary and cultural factors co-construct the mental number line

Mapping numbers onto space is a common cognitive representation that has been explored in both behavioral and neuroimaging contexts. Empirical work probing the diverse nature of these spatial-numerical associations (SNAs) has led researchers to question 1) how the human brain links numbers with space, and 2) whether this link is biologically vs. culturally determined. We review the existing literature on the development of SNAs and situate that empirical work within cognitive and neuroscientific theoretical frameworks. We propose that an evolutionarily-ancient frontal-parietal circuit broadly tuned to multiple magnitude dimensions provides the phylogenetic substrate for SNAs, while enculturation and sensorimotor experience shape their specific profiles. We then use this perspective to discuss educational implications and highlight promising avenues for future research.