Eptacog beta: a novel recombinant human factor VIIa for the treatment of hemophilia A and B with inhibitors

Current status and future prospects of activated recombinant coagulation factor VIIa, NovoSeven®, in the treatment of haemophilia and rare bleeding disorders

rFVIIa, a human recombinant activated coagulation factor VII, has been used worldwide for more than two decades for the treatment of bleeding episodes and prevention of bleeding in patients undergoing surgery/invasive procedures with congenital haemophilia A or B with inhibitors (CHwI A or B), acquired haemophilia (AH), congenital factor VII deficiency and Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT), refractory to platelet transfusion. The approved dosage, administration and indication of rFVIIa in the US, Europe and Japan differ, depending on the needs of the patient population and regulatory practices. This review presents an overview of the current status and future prospects, including that from a Japanese perspective, of using rFVIIa in the treatment of approved indications. The efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in the approved indications has been demonstrated in several randomised and observational studies and data from registries. The overall incidence of thrombosis across all approved indications in a retrospective safety assessment of clinical trials and registries, prelicensure studies and postmarketing surveillance studies of rFVIIa use was 0.17%. Specifically, the risk of thrombotic events was 0.11% for CHwI, 1.77% for AH, 0.82% for congenital factor VII deficiency and 0.19% for GT. Emerging non-factor therapies such as emicizumab have changed the treatment landscape of haemophilia A, including preventing bleeding in patients with CHwI. However, rFVIIa will continue to play a significant role in the treatment of such patients, particularly during breakthrough bleeding or surgical procedures.

Intravenous Hemostats: Foundation, Targeting, and Controlled-Release

Uncontrollable blood loss is the greatest cause of mortality in prehospital patients and the main source of disability and death in hospital care. Compared with external hemostats, intravenous hemostats are more appropriate for preventing and treating uncontrolled bleeding in vivo and large bleeding on the body surface. This Review initially establishes intravenous hemostats' response basis, including the coagulation mechanism, fibrinolytic pathway, and protein corona. Second, the study of advancement of intravenous hemostat targeting was expanded from two perspectives, cellular hemostatic agents and synthetic hemostatic agents. Meanwhile, after discussing the progress of controlled-release intravenous hemostats with platelets as the stimuli, this Review offers insight into the possibility of controlled-release intravenous hemostats with microenvironment as the stimuli, combining the studies of controlled-release targeted thrombolysis.

Early stage clinical trials for the treatment of hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A is a severe bleeding disorder affecting about 1 in 5,000 males. The gold standard for prophylaxis and treatment of acute bleeding has been factor (F) VIII concentrate. A multitude of treatment modalities are now available and under clinical investigation.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses ongoing/recently completed early-phase clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in patients with hemophilia A through April 2022. These new pipeline therapies are focused on addressing the safety and efficacy of new factor-related products, non-factor related products, and gene therapy options for hemophilia.

EXPERT OPINION

Current standard of care effectively prevents and treats acute bleeding and has significantly improved the quality of life in hemophilia. The biggest challenges in the improvement of care are treatment-related burden and the burden of cost in developing countries. New drugs under development are likely to enter practice by the end of this decade and address many of the unmet needs particularly of those with severe disease. Data is limited in unique populations (e.g. congenital/inherited FVIII inhibitors, non-severe hemophilia A, women/girls with hemophilia and children) which are important areas for future research; additional clinical trials and long-term outcome data are necessary prior to incorporating these new therapies in our treatment arsenal.

Bleeding in patients with hemophilia who have inhibitors: Modeling US medical system utilization and cost avoidance between recombinant factor VIIa products with different clinical dosing requirements

BACKGROUND: A mainstay of treatment in patients with hemophilia with inhibitors (PWIs) is the use of a recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) bypassing agent. A new rFVIIa product may allow reduced rFVIIa utilization for on-demand treatment of bleeding episodes (BEs). OBJECTIVE: A decision analytic health economic model was developed to compare the utilization and consequent need for bleed-related clinical encounters of 2 rFVIIa products, with the International Nomenclature Name of eptacog alfa (EA) and eptacog beta (EB). METHODS: This study uses recent, peer-reviewed, and published data from clinical trials with similar endpoints for 1 million insured male lives in the United States. rFVIIa product utilization was modeled in hemophilia (A and B) PWI for on-demand treatment of BEs with rFVIIa treatment. Estimated annual BE rates were modeled to include prophylaxis and on-demand management. The clinical encounter avoidance estimates are based on refractory bleeding through 24 hours. RESULTS: In a cohort of 1 million insured, 5-6 patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors annually receive on-demand treatment for a total of 59 mild/moderate BEs. The model suggests that EB requires less unit utilization per BE (13,125 μg and 17,850 μg for the 75μg/kg and 225μg/kg dose regimens, respectively) than EA 90 μg/kg dosing (20,178μg), with wholesale acquisition costs expanding the difference. Further, both EB initial dose regimens would permit decreased total nonmedication health plan spending for the acute treatment of BEs by reducing the need for clinical encounters arising from BEs that fail to respond within 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: With reduced infusion requirements, the model consistently shows that EB could generate lower insured-cohort drug utilization, as well as reduce costly clinical encounters by keeping mild and moderate BEs amenable to home bypassing agent management. DISCLOSURES: The article was funded by HEMA Biologic, LLC. The authors approved all content and results in this article without being subject to sponsor censorship. Mr Jensen, Mr Cyr, and Ms Hathway are employees of PRECISIONheor, which provides consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry, including HEMA Biologics, LLC. Dr Batt is an advisor to PRECISIONheor. Dr Alexander is a former employee of HEMA Biologics, LLC, and provides consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry.

The safety of activated eptacog beta in the management of bleeding episodes and perioperative haemostasis in adult and paediatric haemophilia patients with inhibitors

Introduction

Haemophilia patients with inhibitors often require a bypassing agent (BPA) for bleeding episode management. Eptacog beta (EB) is a new FDA‐approved recombinant activated human factor VII BPA for the treatment and control of bleeding in haemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors (≥12 years of age). We describe here the EB safety profile from the three prospective Phase 3 clinical trials performed to date.

Aim

To assess EB safety, immunogenicity and thrombotic potential in children and adults who received EB for treatment of bleeding and perioperative care.

Methods

Using a randomized crossover design, 27 subjects in PERSEPT 1 (12‐54 years) and 25 subjects in PERSEPT 2 (1‐11 years) treated bleeding episodes with 75 or 225 μg/kg EB initially followed by 75 μg/kg dosing at predefined intervals as determined by clinical response. Twelve PERSEPT 3 subjects (2‐56 years) received an initial preoperative infusion of 75 μg/kg (minor procedures) or 200 μg/kg EB (major surgeries) with subsequent 75 μg/kg doses administered intraoperatively and post‐operatively as indicated. Descriptive statistics were used for data analyses.

Results

Sixty subjects who received 3388 EB doses in three trials were evaluated. EB was well tolerated, with no allergic, hypersensitivity, anaphylactic or thrombotic events reported and no neutralizing anti‐EB antibodies detected. A death occurred during PERSEPT 3 and was determined to be unlikely related to EB treatment by the data monitoring committee.

Conclusion

Results from all three Phase 3 trials establish an excellent safety profile of EB in haemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors for treatment of bleeding and perioperative use.

Eptacog Beta for Bleeding Treatment and Prevention in Congenital Hemophilia A and B With Inhibitors: A Review of Clinical Data and Implications for Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, dosing and administration, safety, clinical efficacy, and role of eptacog beta in the treatment of congenital hemophilia with inhibitors.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of PubMed (1966 to August 2021) was conducted using the keywords eptacog beta, recombinant FVII, and hemophilia.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All relevant published articles and prescribing information on eptacog beta for the treatment of congenital hemophilia with inhibitors were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Eptacog beta is a novel recombinant activated factor VII (rVIIa) product that demonstrated efficacy in controlling bleeding and associated pain in patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. Eptacog beta has limited Food and Drug Administration-approved and off-label indications compared with other bypassing agents (BPAs; activated prothrombin complex concentrates [aPCC; eptacog alfa]). Eptacog beta costs less than eptacog alfa, but still more than aPCCs.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review provides insight into the role of eptacog beta for treatment of congenital hemophilia with inhibitors and reviews important health system formulary considerations for available BPAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Eptacog beta is more cost-effective than eptacog alfa and, as such, may become the preferred rVIIa formulary product. However, eptacog alfa availability remains necessary for the treatment of disorders where eptacog beta has limited data. aPCC should remain the first-line BPA for the treatment of bleeding in patients with inhibitors with no contraindications to use because of its equivocal efficacy and safety and in light of the magnitude of cost savings associated with this strategy.