Iliopsoas hematomas in people with hemophilia: diagnosis and treatment

Retroperitoneal and lower extremities muscle bleeding in acquired haemophilia A (AHA): Risk factors and implications in disability and survival

AIM

To assess risk factors of retroperitoneal and lower extremity musculoskeletal bleed in acquired haemophilia (AHA) and perform an objective assessment of disability and influence on survival.

METHODS

We included 49 patients with AHA from November 2017 to May 2023. The occurrence of any retroperitoneal or/and lower extremities bleeding manifestation was investigated. On clinical follow-up, we search for compressive femoral neuropathy and quadriceps amyotrophy. The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) was carried out one year after the last bleeding event in all AHA patients.

RESULTS

A 61.2% of patients in our AHA cohort presented with any retroperitoneal and/or lower extremities musculoskeletal manifestation. Those patients had higher percentage of major bleeding EACH2/ISTH criteria (90% vs. 57%, p = .01), needs of blood transfusions (86% vs. 57% of patients, p = .03), and haemostatic by-pass products (90% vs. 63%, p = .02). Hypertension (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-5.9, p = .02), presence of autoimmune disease (HR 13, 95% CI 1.7-99, p = .01), and inhibitor level > 20 BU (HR 2.6 95% CI 1.0-6.8, p = .04) significantly predicted retroperitoneal/lower extremities clinical manifestations. Most frequent sequelae were quad atrophy (30.6%) and femoral nerve palsy (20.4%). Quad atrophy and LEFS scores under 50 were associated with increased mortality (HR 3, 95% CI 1.1-8.6 and HR 12, 95% CI 3.3-45, respectively).

CONCLUSION

AHA with retroperitoneal/lower extremities bleeding involvement is of greater severity and shows high disability and worst survival outcomes. Quadriceps atrophy and LEFS scale scoring under 50 predicted mortality in our AHA patients.

A clinical practice guideline for primary care physiotherapy in patients with haemophilia

INTRODUCTION

As a result of centralisation of haemophilia care to a limited number of intramural settings, many persons with haemophilia have to travel long distances to attend their haemophilia specialised treatment centre. However, regular physiotherapy treatment can be provided by primary care physiotherapists in the person's own region. Due to the rarity of the disease most primary care physiotherapists have limited experience with this population. This study aims to provide a clinical practice guideline for primary care physiotherapists working with persons with bleeding disorders.

METHOD

A list of the most urgent key-questions was derived from a previous study. Literature was summarised using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) evidence-to-decision framework. Recommendations were drafted based on four 90 min consensus meetings with expert physiotherapists. Recommendations were finalised after feedback and >80% consensus of all stakeholders (including PWH, physiotherapists, haematologists and the corresponding societies).

RESULTS

A list of 82 recommendations was formulated to support primary care physiotherapists when treating a person with a bleeding disorder. These recommendations could be divided into 13 categories: two including recommendations on organisation of care, six on therapy for adult patients with bleeding disorders and five on therapy adaptations for paediatric care. Therapy recommendations included treatment after a joint- or muscle bleed, haemophilic arthropathy, chronic synovitis, non-haemophilia related conditions and orthopaedic surgery.

CONCLUSION

An evidence-based practice guideline, based on current evidence from literature and clinical expertise, has been developed for primary care physiotherapists treating a person with haemophilia. To improve care, the recommendations should be implemented in daily practice.

Iliopsoas haemorrhage complicated by femoral neuropathy in patients with haemophilia: a case series report

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to determine the incidence of femoral neuropathy in patients with haemophilia exhibiting iliopsoas haemorrhage.

METHODS

Patients with iliopsoas haemorrhage confirmed by ultrasonography or CT scan were studied retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 44 episodes of iliopsoas haemorrhage occurred in 20 patients with haemophilia (A17, B3). Most episodes in patients without inhibitors (14/16 = 87.5%) were adequately treated followed by prophylaxis. However, 11 of 28 episodes (39.3%) in patients with inhibitors were adequately treated and no prophylaxis was provided. An appropriate rehabilitation programme was arranged during hospitalisation and follow-up. Femoral neuropathy was observed in 28 of 44 episodes, while 16 episodes of persistent femoral neuropathy from previous bleeding were excluded. As a result, 11 of 28 episodes (39.3%) of femoral neuropathy were similarly found amongst patients with and without inhibitors. The mean time of onset and resolution of femoral neuropathy were 3.7 (1.8) and 23.4 (20.5) days after the onset of iliopsoas haemorrhage, respectively. Patients receiving inadequate and delayed replacement had a significantly higher rate of femoral neuropathy than those who received adequate and prompt replacement.

CONCLUSION

Femoral neuropathy following iliopsoas haemorrhage was common in haemophilia patients with and without inhibitors.

A Novel Surgical Classification for Extremity and Pelvic Hemophilic Pseudotumors: The PUMCH Classification

BACKGROUND

A hemophilic pseudotumor (HPT) is a rare and challenging complication of hemophilia for which there is no classification system that provides uniformity of descriptions or that can be used to guide management. We have developed such a classification based on anatomical site, HPT severity, and corresponding surgical treatment.

METHODS

The PUMCH (Peking Union Medical College Hospital) classification was developed on the basis of clinical manifestations and imaging features. Extremity and pelvic HPTs were divided into 4 types and 6 subtypes according to anatomical site and whether or not there was destruction of adjacent bone. Associations between the PUMCH classification and surgical treatment, preoperative comorbidities, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative complication rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients with 53 HPTs that were treated at PUMCH between December 2005 and October 2021 were included. The mean age at the time of surgery was 35.4 ± 11.9 years, and the median follow-up duration was 60.3 months. Twenty-eight HPTs were classified as type I (13 IA, 7 IB, 8 IC); 3, as type II; 6, as type III; and 16, as type IV. All 20 type-IA and IB HPTs were treated with excision, and the 3 type-II HPTs were treated with curettage and bone grafting. Fourteen type-IV pelvic HPTs underwent excision, 2 of which needed concomitant pelvic reconstruction. Six type-IC HPTs and 1 type-III HPT underwent excision and osseous reconstruction. Amputation was required for 1 type-IC and 3 type-III HPTs. Type-IC HPTs had the longest mean operative time (194.3 ± 28.2 minutes) and the greatest intraoperative bleeding (2,000 mL [interquartile range, 1,100 to 3,000 mL]). Postoperative infection was more common in patients with type-III (50.0%) and type-IC (28.6%) HPTs, but not significantly so.

CONCLUSIONS

The PUMCH classification is based on the anatomic pathology and surgical strategy for HPTs. The classification of HPTs corresponds to surgical outcomes, and may be helpful for decision-making regarding their surgical treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Most subjectively affected joints in patients with haemophilia - what has changed after 20 years in Germany?

BACKGROUND

In patients with haemophilia (PwH), most frequently affected joints are the ankle, knee and elbow. Due to improved factor therapy in the last decades, these previous findings have to be verified in Germany.

AIM

The aim of this study is to detect the most affected joint, evaluate the significance of the source of pain and determine the point prevalence of back pain in Germany today.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective study, data of n = 300 patients with severe moderate and mild haemophilia were evaluated regarding the most affected joint, the most common source of pain, and the point prevalence of back pain. An anamnesis questionnaire and the German Pain Questionnaire were used for this assessment.

RESULTS

The most affected joint in German PwH is still the ankle (41%), followed by the knee (27%) and the elbow (11%). The most common source of pain is also the ankle joint (32%). Back pain was also identified as one of the most common sources of pain, which is comparable to the elbow (elbow:15%; back:13%). The point prevalence in PwH for back pain was significantly higher compared to the general German population (P = .031).

CONCLUSION

Our data showed that the ankle is still the most affected joint and the most common source of pain in Germany. These results also showed the relevance of back pain as a pain source. The evaluations also demonstrated the high point prevalence of back pain in PwH. Future therapies should also focus on the spine because joint changes affect posture.