Patient characteristics and management practices in chronic myeloid leukemia in Turkey: reflections from an expert meeting

Current Status and Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Gulf Region: Survey Results and Expert Opinion

Studies on chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the Gulf region are scarce, consisting of a survey and expert meeting that included 15 experts in 2023 which discussed CML diagnosis, testing, treatment objectives, toxicities, and discontinuation in the Gulf region. Most patients were reported to be in first-line therapy, and the most common treatments were imatinib/imatinib generic in first-line and dasatinib in second- and third-lines. Mutation analysis was not reported to be routinely performed at the time of diagnosis but rather in case of progression to accelerated/blast phase or any sign of loss of response. While all participants were aware that BCR-ABL should be monitored every three months during the first year of treatment, 10% reported monitoring BCR-ABL every six months in practice due to test cost and lab capability. The most important first-line therapy objective was "achievement of major molecular response" (MMR) in younger patients and "overall survival" in older ones. The most important treatment objectives were "MMR" and "early molecular response followed by prolongation of overall survival" in the short term and "treatment-free remission" in the long term. The current practices in CML in the Gulf region appear to be similar to global figures.

A safety review of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Since the introduction of first tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib, the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has reached excellent survival expectancies. Long survival rates bring about issues regarding TKI safety.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to compare the side effects of current TKIs both in the first and later lines and outline a safety andprofile of CML treatment. Seminal studies on TKIs and other newer drugs and extended follow-up of these studies; real-life data of each drug were usedduring the course of this. PubMed was used as a search database and onlyarticles in English were included.

EXPERT OPINION

With longer follow-up CML patients, resistant slowgrade adverse events seem to be the major obstacle in the way of treatmentefficacy. If efficacy is the priority, vigorous treatment of side effect and administration of full dose TKI are reasonable. But when treatment goals are reached, dose modifications or alternative treatment regimens may be acceptedpossible. More studies are needed on dose modification protocols and potential benefits and safety of treatment-free remission.

Guidelines for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia from the NCCN and ELN: differences and similarities

Patients diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase can now have a life expectancy comparable to that of the general population thanks to the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies. Although most patients with CML require lifelong TKI therapy, it is possible for some patients to achieve treatment-free remission. These spectacular results have been made possible by the development of superior treatment modalities as well as clinicians' efforts in strictly adhering to clinical guidelines such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Leukemia Network (ELN). CML treatment recommendations reported in these guidelines are the result of years of selecting and incorporating the most reliable evidence. In this review, we provide a synopsis of the differences and similarities that exist between the NCCN and ELN guidelines.

From bench to bedside: bridging the gaps in best practices for real-world chronic myeloid leukemia care

INTRODUCTION

Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) determined an improvement of responses and overall survival (OS) in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients, some patients still fail the achievement of important milestones.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we focus on the need of appropriate molecular and mutational monitoring during TKI treatment with new laboratory tools and on new compounds developed to counteract the unmet clinical need in CP-CML.

EXPERT OPINION

The appropriate identification of BCR::ABL1 dependent and independent mechanisms of resistance with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) can allow to improve the therapeutic strategies and prevent the onset of a failure to treatment. New compounds have been recently approved or are still in investigational trials to improve the response in some critical forms of resistance and/or intolerance to available TKIs.