An update on the evaluation and management of iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease

Anemia in inflammatory bowel disease-A comprehensive review

Anemia is a frequent complication in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The etiology is multifactorial, with iron deficiency and anemia of chronic disease being the main reasons. Other causes include vitamin B12 and folate deficiency, hemolytic anemia and medications such as azathioprine and sulfasalazine. Apart from physical symptoms, it is associated with several negative outcomes, including poor quality of life, increased risk of hospital admission, increased risk of surgery and higher treatment costs. Diagnostic evaluation aims to identify the underlying cause and severity to determine the appropriate therapeutic strategy. Investigations include a complete blood count, iron indices, inflammatory markers and vitamin B12 and folate levels. Patients with iron deficiency need adequate replacement therapy to improve hemoglobin and replenish iron stores. Those with moderate to severe anemia and/or active disease need intravenous iron, while mild anemia can be treated with oral iron. Multiple parenteral iron formulations are available which differ in dose and frequency of administration. Traditional oral iron supplements are available in ferrous forms, which, although effective, are associated with gastrointestinal side effects. Newer oral iron formulations have helped reduce these adverse effects but are expensive. Anemia of chronic disease is mainly driven by the effects of inflammatory mediators on iron metabolism and erythropoiesis and treatment requires control of disease activity. Relapse of anemia after therapy is frequent; hence, patients need to be closely followed up for early detection and appropriate management. Significant advances have been made in understanding the pathophysiology of anemia in IBD and better and safer iron formulations are available. However, a significant proportion of IBD patients with anemia go undetected or untreated and there is a need for improved recognition and better management practices. This review discusses various aspects of anemia in IBD and the current approach to diagnosis and management.

BRD4 as an emerging epigenetic therapeutic target for inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder, mainly comprising two subtypes: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). IBD, featured by recurrent symptoms and significant morbidity, poses a significant threat to global health and has an adverse impact on quality of life. Currently, there is no curative therapy for IBD, and the available medications are only for managing the disease condition, likely owing to the insufficient understanding of the underlying pathophysiology processes involved in IBD, and the lack of safe and effective medicines. Thus, novel targeted therapies for IBD are urgently needed for better efficacy with an improved adverse event profile. As the most extensively studied member of bromodomain and extra terminal domain (BET) family proteins, bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) is emerging as a promising epigenetic therapeutic target for IBD. Pharmacological inhibition of BRD4 with selective small molecule inhibitors shows potent anti-inflammatory effects in both in vitro and different IBD mouse models. Herein, we summarize current knowledge in understanding the role of BRD4 in the pathogenesis and development of IBD, and the clinical landscape of developing BET/BRD4 inhibitors and emerging BRD4-targeted degraders as promising therapeutical alternatives. Challenges and opportunities, as well as future directions in drug discovery by targeting BRD4 are also briefly discussed.

NOD1/CARD4(G796A) and NOD2/CARD15(R702W, G908R and L1007fsinC) polymorphisms associated with Crohn's disease in Iraqi patients

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) applies to two main forms of chronic relapsing inflammatory intestinal disorders: Crohn's disease (CD), Ulcerative colitis (UC). CD requires an irregular immune reaction that induces intense inflammation. The cause of CD disease is not yet fully known; previous research, however, indicated inflammation of the intestines elevated or continues due to inappropriate immune responses due to associations between genetic factors, intestinal microbiota, and environmental factors contributing to the production of IBD. This study aimed to investigate predisposing genes, single nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) NOD1/CARD4 and NOD2/CARD15) with CD in Iraqi patients. The common NOD1 (G796A) SNP and NOD2 SNPs R702W, G908R and L1007fsinC for NOD2 SNPs were selected. Thirty Iraqi citizens with a recognized diagnosis of CD and twenty apparently healthy controls were included in the study from November 2019 to December 2020; the common NOD1 and NOD2 polymorphisms have been screened by the polymerase chain reaction/restriction analysis length polymorphism (PCR/RFLP). The results of the current investigation for NOD1 polymorphism in studied patients and controls, the allelic and genotypic data show a highly significant association of G796A SNPs in the NOD1 with Crohn's disease, GA percentage was 56.67% in patients as compared to controls genotype was (0.00%). Furthermore, the G allele was more common in Crohn's patients than the A allele 0.72 vs. 0.28. Also, the allelic and genotypic frequency distribution of the studied NOD2 SNPs in the current study were (R702W, G908R, and L1007fs) in Iraqi patients, and controls revealed a highly significant connection between the G908R SNP with Crohn's disease susceptibility. The proportion of the genotype GC was 30% in patients while 0% in the control group, the frequency of the G allele was 0.85 vs 0.15 respectively, which was more than the frequency of the A allele. There were no significant changes in genotypic and allelic frequencies of the R702W and L1007fs SNPs in Iraqi Crohn's disease patients. The present study concluded that the NOD1 SNP of allelic and genotypic data show a highly significant association of G796A with a predisposition to Crohn's disease in Iraqi patients. And the NOD2 SNPs of G908R were also revealed to be highly effective. While the other studied SNPs were R702W and L1007fsinsC of NOD2, which showed no significant changes in the allelic and genotypic frequencies of the SNPs with Crohn's disease Iraqi patients. Keywords: Inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, NOD1/CARD4, NOD2/CARD15, polymorphisms.

ANEMIA AND IRON DEFICIENCY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PATIENTS IN A REFERRAL CENTER IN BRAZIL: PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Data regarding the prevalence of anemia in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are scarce in Brazil. Anemia and iron deficiency anemia have been known to cause significant functional impairment, lower quality of life, and higher morbidity and mortality and may be correlated with an impact on the cost of treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence and risk factors for anemia and iron deficiency anemia in patients with IBD in a tertiary IBD unit in Southeast Brazil. METHODS: We conducted an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective analysis of an adult IBD cohort (IBD Unit, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil) consisting of 579 patients between January 2014 and July 2018. Clinicoepidemiological data, hemoglobin measurements and serum ferritin were extracted from electronic medical records. Anemia prevalence was calculated among ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) phenotypes. Risk factors for anemia were also calculated. RESULTS: A total of 529 (91%) patients had complete blood counts available in their medical records. Only 35.5% of IBD patients were fully screened for anemia. The prevalence of anemia in IBD patients was 24.6% (29.1% in CD and 19.1% in UC, P=0.008). The anemia was moderate to severe in 16.9% (19.8% in CD and 11.4% in UC, P=0.34). The prevalence of iron deficiency was 52.3% (53.6% in CD and 51.2% in UC, P=0.95). Anemia of chronic disease was present in 14.1% of IBD patients. A total of 53.8% of patients with anemia were in clinical remission. CD was associated with an increased prevalence of anemia (P=0.008; OR=1.76; CI 95% =1.16-2.66) compared to UC. The penetrant disease phenotype in CD was associated with a lower risk of anemia (P<0.0001; OR=0.25; CI 95% =0.14-0.43). Active disease compared to the disease in clinical remission was associated with an increased risk of anemia (P=0.0003; OR=2.61; CI 95% =1.56-4.36) in CD. The presence of anemia was less frequent in patients with CD who underwent surgical bowel resection compared to those who did not undergo surgery (P<0.0001; OR=0.24; CI 95% =0.14-0.40). No differences in anemia prevalence were observed regarding CD localization, age at diagnosis, UC extension or biological therapy (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite the low levels of full screening, anemia and iron deficiency anemia were common manifestations of IBD. CD was associated with an increased risk of anemia, especially with active disease. In addition, patients with CD who underwent surgical bowel resection and penetrant disease phenotype in CD were associated with lower risk of anemia.