An update of pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of vonoprazan in acid-related disorders

Safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, due to their intrinsic limitations, there are still unmet clinical needs that have fostered the development of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs). Currently, four different drugs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan, and keverprazan) are marketed in some Asian countries, whereas only vonoprazan and tegoprazan are available in Western countries (USA and Brazil or Mexico, respectively).

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the current knowledge on P-CABs acute and long-term safety in GERD treatment compared to that of PPIs. Full-text articles and abstracts were searched in PubMed.

EXPERT OPINION

P-CABs proved to address some of the unmet clinical needs in GERD, with a favorable risk-benefit ratio compared to conventional PPIs. Preclinical and clinical findings have highlighted P-CAB safety to be superimposable, to that of PPIs, in short-term treatments, although further studies are warranted to monitor their effects in long-term therapy. From an epidemiological point of view, the paucity of rigorous data for many variables (e.g. age, ethnicity, drug interactions, comorbidities, genetic polymorphisms, interindividual susceptibility, and gut dysbiosis) deserves a worldwide framework of continuous pre/post-marketing pharmacovigilance programs to reduce potential confounding factors and accurately link acute and chronic P-CAB therapy to adverse outcomes.

Evaluating Vonoprazan for the treatment of erosive GERD and heartburn associated with GERD in adults

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common debilitating chronic disease presenting in two main forms based on esophageal mucosal appearance, the erosive reflux disease (ERD) and the non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). Acid secretion is a key factor in the disease pathogenesis and management. Potent acid-suppressant drugs have been manufactured since the mid of 1970s, initially with histamine-H2-receptors antagonists, and later, inhibitors of the proton pump (H+-K+-ATPase).More recently, potassium-competitive acid blockers (p-CABs), particularlyVonoprazan, have been introduced. Vonoprazan has shown high efficacy and safety profiles and exhibits several advantages that allow to overcome shortcomings of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide an updated summary of Vonoprazan pharmacodynamics and its role in clinical practice for the management of erosive esophagitis and GERD-related heartburn. Moreover, we discuss characteristics of Vonoprazan that allow to bypass some limitations of the older PPIs.

EXPERT OPINION

Long-term safety and efficacy of Vonoprazan have already been demonstrated for the induction and maintenance of ERD, preventing nocturnal acid breakthrough, reducing reflux symptoms in non-responder to standard therapy. Ongoing and future studies are expected to further elucidate its long-term benefits and potential applications in other acid-related disorders.

Network Meta-Analysis of Comparing Different Dosages of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker With Proton-Pump Inhibitor in Acid-Related Disorders

INTRODUCTION

Potassium-competitive acid blockers have emerged as a promising treatment of acid-related disorders. However, the optimal dosage for maximizing their efficacy remains unclear. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of various dosages of potassium-competitive acid blockers and proton-pump inhibitors for treating acid-related disorders.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to July 16, 2023. Data extraction was performed independently by 2 authors. The Cochrane Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials tool (RoB 2.0) was used for bias assessment. The efficacy and safety were compared using the odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Twelve articles were included in the present meta-analysis. For gastric/duodenal ulcers, keverprazan 30 mg (K30) exhibited the highest surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) value (92.8%) for healing rate. In terms of total adverse events, lansoprazole 30 mg (L30) exhibited the lowest SUCRA value (25.3%) in the treatment of gastric/duodenal ulcers. For the healing rate in erosive esophagitis, the maximum SUCRA value of vonoprazan 40 mg (V40) was 90.7% in the first subgroup (erosive esophagitis using vonoprazan, keverprazan, and lansoprazole) and the maximum SUCRA value of T50 was 72.1% in the second subgroup (erosive esophagitis using tegoprazan, fexuprazan, and esomeprazole). For the total adverse events in erosive esophagitis, L15 exhibited the lowest SUCRA value (12.2%) in the first group and E40 exhibited the lowest SUCRA value (24.4%) in the second group.

DISCUSSION

K30 may be the most effective dosage for increasing the healing rate of gastric/duodenal ulcers. For erosive esophagitis, V40 and T50 may be the preferred dosages.

Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan in Dual/Triple/Quadruple Regimens Both in First-Line and Rescue Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapies encompassing one or more antibiotics and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) has lately decreased. Vonoprazan (VPZ), a potassium-competitive acid blocker, provides higher gastric acid suppression than PPIs. We performed a meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of VPZ in H. pylori eradication therapies.

METHODS

Studies were searched in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to June 2023. Efficacy was evaluated by intention-to-treat analysis. Data were combined by meta-analyzing risk differences (RD). Heterogeneity was evaluated by subgrouping.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven studies (24 randomized clinical trials) evaluated 44,162 patients (22,297 receiving VPZ and 21,865 PPIs). Overall VPZ efficacy was 88% (95% CI = 87%-90%): 86%, 88%, and 94% for dual/triple/quadruple-VPZ-containing therapies. VPZ efficacy was 87% (86%-89%) in first-line and 90% (87%-93%) in rescue therapy. VPZ performed better than PPIs in treatment-naïve patients (87% vs. 70%; RD = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.11-0.15) and when using triple regimens. No significant differences were observed in rescue and quadruple therapies. In patients with clarithromycin-resistant infection, VPZ-based therapies demonstrated an 81% efficacy (76%-85%), surpassing PPIs (76% vs. 40%; RD = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.24-0.43). For clarithromycin-susceptible strains, VPZ efficacy was 92% (89%-95%), similar to PPIs. VPZ adverse events rate was 19% (16%-21%), comparable to PPI-based regimens (18% vs. 13%, respectively; RD = 0.00, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.02, p = 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of VPZ-based regimens was over 85% in all treatment combinations. In treatment-naïve and clarithromycin-resistant patients, VPZ performed better than PPIs. In rescue therapy, in clarithromycin-susceptible patients or when quadruple regimens were prescribed, this advantage was not confirmed. Tolerability was similar in both regimens.

The Clinical Spectrum of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Facts and Fictions

Background

This review addresses the intricate spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a condition affecting 10-30% of the Western population. GERD is characterized by the backflow of gastric contents into the esophagus, causing typical and atypical symptoms. Its pathophysiology involves various factors such as hiatal hernia, esophageal motor disorders, and dietary triggers. The review explores the complexities of GERD spectrum, including nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), reflux hypersensitivity (RH), and functional heartburn (FH).

Summary

The diagnostic process for GERD, based on the Lyon Consensus 2.0 criteria, encompasses clinical evaluation, endoscopy, and functional tests, including pH-impedance and wireless-pH monitoring. NERD, a significant subset of GERD, is defined by reflux symptoms and abnormal reflux burden without mucosal damage. RH, classified under functional esophageal disorders by Rome IV criteria, presents with typical esophageal symptoms associated with reflux but lacks of structural, inflammatory, or motor causes. FH is identified by heartburn with normal endoscopy, reflux testing, and esophageal manometry results. The management of RH and FH, focusing on reducing esophageal hypersensitivity, varies from standard GERD treatments.

Key Messages

The review emphasizes the necessity of personalized treatment strategies due to the complexity and overlap of GERD subtypes. It highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, involving gastroenterologists, psychologists, and other specialists, to improve patient outcomes and quality of life. The article underscores that understanding the distinctions and overlaps among NERD, RH, and FH is crucial for effective management, and the need for innovative approaches in diagnosis and treatment to address the unique challenges of each subtype.

Evaluation of commonly used cardiovascular drugs in inhibiting vonoprazan metabolism in vitro and in vivo

As a novel acid-suppressing drug, vonoprazan shows the potential to replace traditional proton-pump inhibitors. With its widespread use, some adverse effects that require further study have emerged due to drug–drug interactions. Our study is the first experiment that evaluated the drug–drug interactions of eleven common cardiovascular drugs that inhibit vonoprazan metabolism in vitro and in vivo. Rat liver microsome incubation and molecular simulation docking were applied to explore the inhibition mechanism. Amlodipine and nifedipine showed inhibitory effects on vonoprazan metabolism in both rat and human liver microsomes in the first evaluation part in vitro. The inhibition mechanism analysis results demonstrated that amlodipine and nifedipine might inhibit the metabolism of vonoprazan by a mixed type of competitive and non-competitive inhibition. However, the pharmacokinetic data of the vonoprazan prototype revealed that amlodipine affected vonoprazan in vivo while nifedipine did not. Thus, more attention should be paid when amlodipine is prescribed with vonoprazan. Furthermore, the changes in its carboxylic acid metabolites MI hinted at a complex situation. Molecular simulation suggested the CYP2B6 enzyme may contribute more to this than CYP3A4, and further inhibitory experiments preliminarily verified this speculation. In conclusion, the use of vonoprazan with cardiovascular drugs, especially amlodipine, should receive particular attention in clinical prescriptions.