Validity of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Traditional Chinese version of the Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire in Taiwanese community-dwelling adults

PURPOSE

This study aimed to translate the Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FFABQ) into Traditional Chinese (FFABQ-TC) and to evaluate the psychometric properties of FFABQ-TC in Taiwanese adults.

METHODS

We translated and culturally adapted the FFABQ into Traditional Chinese, ensuring linguistic accuracy and cultural relevance. A total of 230 Taiwanese community-dwelling adults participated in the study. Test-retest reliability was assessed in 30 participants, while 200 participants were included in the validity analysis. Known-groups validity was investigated by comparing the FFABQ-TC scores between fallers and non-fallers. Convergent validity was examined by correlating FFABQ-TC scores with Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Geriatric Fear of Falling Measure (GFFM), and Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) test.

RESULTS

The FFABQ-TC demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.884) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.930). Known-groups analysis revealed that FFABQ-TC significantly differentiated between fallers and non-fallers. Convergent validity was examined and showed significant correlations of FFABQ-TC with the ABC, the GFFM, and TUG.

CONCLUSION

The psychometric properties of FFABQ-TC was established in Taiwanese adults for assessing FOF-related avoidance behaviors. The translated and adapted FFABQ-TC is a reliable and valid clinical tool for evaluating fall risk in this population.

The Chinese Short Version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale: Its Validity, Reliability, and Predictive Value for Future Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Purpose

To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese short version of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC-6), and its predictive value for prospective falls in community-dwelling older adults.

Patients and Methods

A total of 391 community older adults completed the prospective study. Internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, structural validity and discriminant validity were analyzed. To determine the accuracy of ABC-6 total score in predicting falls, a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed, and comparisons with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC-16) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) were made.

Results

Excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.938) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0.964, 95% CI: 0.947–0.977) were found for the ABC-6. Exploratory factor analysis suggested that ABC-6 had a one-factor structure (explained variance, 68.30%). The optimal cutoff value, sensitivity and specificity of ABC-6 to distinguish fallers from non-fallers was ≤ 60.00%, 70.83% and 84.26%, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the predictive value among the ABC-6, ABC-16, and BBS.

Conclusion

The Chinese version of the ABC-6 scale was a valid and reliable tool for measuring self-perceived balance confidence in community-dwelling older adults, and can be used as an effective assessment tool to predict future falls.