"Finally, I belong somewhere I can be proud of" - Experiences of being a Clubhouse member in Norway

Recovery at the Clubhouse: challenge, responsibility and growing into a role

Purpose: To explore how people with mental illness experience recovery in the Clubhouse context, and which ingredients of the model they find active in promoting recovery.

Methods: Hermeneutic–phenomenological design. Individual, semi-structured interviews with 18 Norwegian Clubhouse members. Systematic text condensation was used in analysis.

Results: Three main themes emerged: “Balancing unlimited support with meeting challenges”, with two sub-themes: “Unlimited membership: space for self-agency or hindering development?” and “Becoming a Clubhouse member: concerns and positive experiences”. The second main theme was: “Learning how to build new skills and roles in the community”. The third main theme was: “Getting better through and for work”, with two sub-themes: “Work at the Clubhouse as a means to recovery” and “Preparing for a working life in society”. Overall, participants experienced improved mental and social wellbeing and work readiness.

Conclusions: Recovery in the Clubhouse context requires members’ personal initiative, thus people having poor mental health might struggle with utilizing the Clubhouse. However, participants reported that lack of challenges within the community thwarted their recovery. Based on Salutogenesis, conscious application of challenge in Clubhouse activities might enhance members’ recovery. Furthermore, participants’ all-round involvement in their recovery journeys suggests the importance of shared decision-making in recovery-oriented services.

Salutogenesis as a theoretical framework for psychosocial rehabilitation: the case of the Clubhouse model

Purpose: This study explored whether the holistic theory of salutogenesis may be a suitable theoretical framework for the Clubhouse model of psychosocial rehabilitation, a pioneer among psychosocial rehabilitation programmes.

Methods: A systematic examination of elements of the Clubhouse model, as prescribed by the Clubhouse standards, was performed within the context of the theory of salutogenesis including its basic salutogenic orientation and the main concepts of sense of coherence and resistance resources.

Results: We found that several standards and practices within the Clubhouse model can be understood as applications of salutogenesis. We have hypothesized that the Clubhouse model promotes peoples’ sense of coherence and mental health. However, our investigation also showed that, to enhance the recovery of Clubhouse members, more explicitly incorporating some salutogenic principles, such as “appropriate challenges” and “active adaptation as the ideal in treatment”, may benefit Clubhouse practice.

Conclusions: The Clubhouse model of psychosocial rehabilitation is very consistent with the salutogenic orientation and main salutogenic concepts. The present study suggests that salutogenesis may be a suitable theoretical framework for the Clubhouse model and possibly in the psychosocial rehabilitation field in general.