Preliminary inter-rater reliability of the wheelchair components questionnaire for condition

The maintenance and interface of two wheelchairs used by children with cerebral palsy in Kenya: a cross-sectional study

Current wheelchairs used in low-resource settings lack the adjustability required for children with cerebral palsy and are not well-suited for rough terrain environments. This study aimed to examine the durability and functional interface of two wheelchairs specifically designed for use in low-resource settings. This descriptive study assessed 14 wheelchairs used by children with cerebral palsy living in Kenya, Africa (Momentum Wheels for Humanity's Liberty II wheelchair n = 6, Beeline's Honey Bee wheelchair n = 8). Four physical and occupational therapists evaluated durability using the Wheelchair Components Questionnaire (WCQ) and functionality using the Wheelchair Interface Questionnaire (WIQ). Medians were used to compare differences in the chair types using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test in Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) 9.4 with an alpha = 0.05. Median scores on the WCQ were 8.3/10 for the Liberty II and 7.8/10 for Beeline's Honey Bee wheelchair; however, the durability of the wheel locks was lower in the Beeline wheelchair (5.1/10 compared to the Liberty II 8.1/10 (p = 0.002). Median scores on the WIQ were lower and significantly different in the area of preventing distal lower extremity pain (Liberty II =3.7/10 and Beeline = 7.6/10, p = 0.045). Low scores occurred in both chairs in the areas of transfers and transporting the chairs in the community. The Beeline wheelchairs demonstrated higher average ratings for all areas of the WIQ, indicating the wheelchairs fit the children better and were more functional for use in the home and community environment.

Provision of paediatric wheelchairs in low resource settings: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Inadequate wheelchair provision in children can lead to delays in growth and development, poorer health, and decreased participation. Wheelchair provision for children can be challenging, especially in low-resource settings, due to limited resources. Therefore, the purpose of the scoping review was to gain an understanding of the current state of paediatric wheelchair provision in low resource settings and identify factors, strategies, and gaps that can lead to more successful wheelchair provision.

METHODS

This scoping review used literature published after 2010, related to paediatric wheelchair provision in low resource settings. We searched online databases and grey literature and extracted data based on categories from the World Health Organisation Guidelines to wheelchair provision in low resource settings.

RESULTS

34 articles were used to identify and analyse common themes and successful strategies related to wheelchair provision for children in low resource settings. Aspects of paediatric wheelchair provision were mentioned in the literature but were rarely the focus. End-user outcomes were the least represented category in the literature.

CONCLUSION

Based on the currently available evidence the overall state of a wheelchair for children is inadequate. Improvements in design and production, personnel capacity, and service delivery systems are recommended to promote best practices. The lack of child-focussed wheelchair provision and end-user involvement in the research process urgently needs to be addressed.Implications for RehabilitationIdentify best practiceIdentify gaps in knowledgeDetermine areas of need for future research.

Preliminary test-retest reliability of the Wheelchair Satisfaction Questionnaire

PURPOSE

Economic realities in lower-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) present an increased need for outcome measures for wheelchair efficacy, as these measures enable optimized use of funds. As the provision level of wheelchairs is low in these areas, and many wheelchairs are inappropriate for their intended users, use of funds based on evidence is especially necessary. The Wheelchair Satisfaction Questionnaire (WSQ) was designed to be a snapshot of a wheelchair user's level of satisfaction with their wheelchair. The WSQ is comprised of 16 visual analogue scale questions. Each question includes an option for a qualitative explanatory comment. The current study examined initial test-retest reliability of the WSQ.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The WSQ was administered twice to the same set of wheelchair users who were secondary students at a school for students with disabilities. A demonstration was given to the participants to explain how to mark the analogue scale. Participants were instructed to answer each item honestly and without peer input. A one-week time span separated test and retest. Scores for both sessions were entered into SPSS. An interclass coefficient of 0.70 or above indicates acceptable test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

The ages of participants ranged from 13 to 24, with a mean age of 17.86 years. Sixty-five participants completed the questionnaire fully in both test and retest and were included in this study. A high degree of reliability was found between scores from both tests. The interclass coefficient was r(63) = .863, p = .01, indicating statistically significant agreement between test and retest.

CONCLUSION

The results support the WSQ as a reliable measure, confirming the WSQ as a reliable tool for user feedback on wheelchair function. Because the WSQ is designed to provide user feedback with enough granularity to give data on particular aspects of wheelchair structure and function, data can facilitate repair and modifications to wheelchair parts. Studies using the WSQ to assess specific wheelchair types could indicate consistent patterns of user satisfaction and dissatisfaction, revealing relevant design issues. The WSQ is designed to give wheelchair users a voice that can empower user centred modification and design changes to facilitate improved health, opportunity, and social interaction.Implications for RehabilitationResults from the WSQ could enable manufacturers to utilize user feedback to improve the design of wheelchairs for use in LMIC's, and providers could be better-informed in the selection of wheelchair types for specific environments.The WSQ could provide immediate user feedback to inform wheelchair modification and selection to best serve a particular user.The WSQ could be used in clinical settings over time to collect longitudinal data from wheelchair users, which could identify the most commonly perceived reasons for user dissatisfaction in a particular clinical setting.

Preliminary inter-rater reliability of the wheelchair components questionnaire for condition

PURPOSE

The Wheelchair Components Questionnaire for Condition (WCQ-C) enables the collection of data on wheelchair maintenance condition and durability in resource-limited environments. It can be used in large studies to indicate typical patterns of wear at a location, or for a type of wheelchair. It can also be used in clinical settings as an evidence based indication that a wheelchair may need repair or replacement. This type of data can enable effective use of limited funds by wheelchair providers, manufacturers and users. The goal of this study was to investigate the inter-rater reliability of the WCQ-C.

METHODS

Two therapists from North America who have worked extensively in low-resource areas used the WCQ-C to independently evaluate 46 wheelchairs at a primary school for children with disabilities in Kenya.

RESULTS

Mean scores of ratings for each wheelchair by the two raters were used to calculate a two-way random interclass correlation coefficient. A value of 0.82 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.67-0.89 indicated good preliminary reliability.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary results indicate that the WCQ-C is a reliable method of assessment. Additional studies are needed with larger and more diverse groups of raters. Because WCQ-C findings are specific to wheelchair wear and maintenance at each location, studies at other locations are also needed. Implications for rehabilitation The importance of inter-rater reliability testing in confirming the reliability of an assessment tool such as the WCQ-C. The use of the WCQ-C to monitor wheelchair condition in low-resource settings and other field settings. If used at regular interval can produce data that can be used to describe typical changes over time at each individual setting. This could enable proactive planning at that setting to avoid typical breakdowns and the injuries or clinical complications that could result. The use of the WCQ-C to monitor the condition of groups of wheelchairs of the same type. It can describe typical patterns of wear and failure in a way that enables responsive change by manufacturers and designers. This enables more effective use of limited funds. On an individual basis, the use of the WCQ-C to alert users and health professionals of a need for repair or replacement. This could minimize the clinical problems and accidents that can result from wheelchair breakdown. Assessment of a wheelchair using the WCQ-C could provide evidence based data to insurance companies or wheelchair providers which indicates a need for wheelchair repair or replacement.