Designing ApplTree: usable scheduling software for people with cognitive impairments

AppReminders - a pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial of a memory aid app for people with acquired brain injury

Mobile phone reminding apps can be used by people with acquired brain injury (ABI) to compensate for memory impairments. This pilot feasibility trial aimed to establish the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial comparing reminder apps in an ABI community treatment setting. Adults with ABI and memory difficulty who completed the three-week baseline were randomized (n = 29) and allocated to Google Calendar or ApplTree app. Those who attended an intervention session (n = 21) watched a 30-minute video tutorial of the app then completed reminder setting assignments to ensure they could use the app. Guidance was given if needed from a clinician or researcher. Those who passed the app assignments (n = 19) completed a three-week follow up. Recruitment was lower than target (n = 50), retention rate was 65.5%, adherence rate was 73.7%. Qualitative feedback highlighted issues that may impact usability of reminding apps introduced within community brain injury rehabilitation. Feasibility results indicate a full trial would require 72 participants to demonstrate the minimally clinically important efficacy difference between apps, should a difference exist. Most participants (19 of 21) given an app could learn to use it with the short tutorial. Design features implemented in ApplTree have potential to improve the uptake and utility of reminding apps.

Electronic Assistive Technology to Support Memory Function After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and User Perspectives

Abstract Rapid technology advances have led to diverse assistive technology (AT) options for use in memory rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of electronic AT for supporting phases of memory in daily life after TBI. A secondary aim was to examine user perspectives on the utility of AT and factors influencing uptake or use. A systematic search of PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica database (Embase), Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted from database inception to June 13, 2022, to identify eligible studies. Methodological quality was assessed by two independent reviewers. Nineteen eligible articles involving a total of 311 participants included four randomized controlled trials (RCTs; Class I), five single-case experimental designs (Class II), and 10 pre-post group (n > 10) or single-case studies without experimental control (Class III). Three Class I studies, two Class II studies and eight Class III studies supported the efficacy of AT for supporting memory functioning. Treatment fidelity was not examined in any study. There was the most empirical support for the efficacy of AT for facilitating retrieval and execution phases of memory (i.e., supported by 6/9 studies) with external support to encode memory intentions or pre-programmed reminders. Further controlled studies are needed to determine whether outcomes vary according to individuals' level of independence with use (e.g., self-initiated vs. pre-programmed reminders) and to examine user characteristics and design features influencing uptake and effectiveness. Greater involvement of end-users with brain injury in the design and evaluation of AT features is also recommended to enhance usability and uptake in daily life.

Assessment of time-related deficits in older adults: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

People with cognitive impairments often have difficulties in managing their time for daily activities. In older adults with cognitive impairments such as dementia and stroke, these may present as disorientation, poor time awareness, time perception, daily time management and so on. Time-related deficits and associated behaviours impede independent living and add considerably to caregiver strain. Several interventions are being investigated to help people with cognitive impairments orient and navigate time and do their daily activities. The provision of interventions requires the use of sound assessment tools. However, it is not clear how time-related concepts are specifically evaluated in practice, what are the available assessments and how these assessments should be selected.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

This protocol follows the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual (2020) for scoping reviews and is registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/4ptgy/). We will include the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO. Two reviewers will independently screen eligible studies for inclusion against the selection criteria and then review the full-text of the selected studies. We will extract the bibliographic data, study design and setting, and details of assessments used in the studies to evaluate time-related concepts including format, mode and duration of administration, psychometric properties and so on. The identified assessments will be mapped with regard to time-related concepts being evaluated and described using narrative synthesis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As secondary data analysis, ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. We plan to disseminate the results through peer-reviewed journals and conferences targeting health professionals working with older adults.