Avanafil - a further step to tailoring patient needs and expectations

A real-world pilot study assessing treatment satisfaction with avanafil in patients with erectile dysfunction

Background

Avanafil is a second-generation phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, and offers a rapid onset of action (15 minutes). Its real-world data, including treatment satisfaction, are still lacking.

Aim

The study sought to investigate the treatment outcomes of avanafil and the factors impacting treatment satisfaction in a real-world setting.

Methods

Between November 2021 and February 2023, erectile dysfunction (ED) patients prescribed avanafil were consecutively enrolled in this phase 4, open-label, cross-sectional, observational study. At each follow-up visit (4-week intervals), participants completed a questionnaire for assessing the use and treatment-emergent adverse events of avanafil, ED severity, and treatment satisfaction.

Outcomes

The outcome measures included the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction.

Results

Among 234 patients enrolled, 112 (47.9%) patients had follow-up visits and answered the questionnaire. Treatment with avanafil significantly improved the mean SHIM total score from 10.2 ± 5.6 at baseline to 17.5 ± 6.2 (P < .001). Of the patients treated with avanafil, 71.4% (n = 80 of 112) reported a >4-point improvement in the SHIM total score, and 33.1% (n = 37 of 112) reported normal erectile function. The proportion of patients satisfied with avanafil treatment (defined as Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction index score ≥60) was 87.5%. Several physical factors (younger age, lower waist circumference, and lower level of low-density lipoprotein), and sexual function factors (shorter duration of ED, higher SHIM total score at baseline, PDE5 inhibitor treatment naive, and acquired premature ejaculation) tended to contribute to satisfaction with avanafil treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 41.1% of patients, and all were mild in severity.

Clinical Implications

This study identifies the factors associated with treatment satisfaction of avanafil, which may ultimately lead to better treatment outcomes.

Strengths and Limitations

This is the first study to provide real-world evidence of avanafil for ED treatment, and validated questionnaires were used to assess erectile function and treatment satisfaction. However, the limitations of this study include single-center observational study design, small sample size, and short-term follow-up.

Conclusion

Avanafil is an effective treatment for ED, and satisfaction rate is high in an outpatient setting. The awareness of identified factors related to patient satisfaction may improve treatment outcomes.

A review on pharmacological options for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: state of the art and new strategies

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects between 12.9% and 28.1% of men worldwide, presenting a strong aged-correlated prevalence. Several pharmacological treatments are currently available for ED, which can be classified into oral, injection, and topical/intraurethral therapies.

AREAS COVERED

Extensive research on PubMed/MEDLINE until February 2023 was performed. For each of the aforementioned drug classes, available molecules, and formulations, their efficacy and most common adverse events as well as general guidelines on prescription were investigated and extensively described. A glimpse into future directions regarding ED pharmacotherapy is also present.

EXPERT OPINION

In recent years, there have been significant developments in pharmacological treatments for ED. It is essential for physicians to identify the best treatment option for patients based on their preferences and sexual habits. The treatment approach for ED has shifted from a sequential to a parallel paradigm, where all treatment options are available as first-line therapies. While there are promising regenerative therapies for ED, such as shockwaves and platelet-rich plasma injections, pharmacological treatment is still the most effective option for most patients.

Efficacy and safety of avanafil as compared with sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: A randomized, double blind, multicenter clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of avanafil as compared with sildenafil in the management of patients with erectile dysfunction.

METHODS

It was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, two-arm, active-controlled, parallel, multicenter, non-inferiority clinical study carried out in patients with erectile dysfunction for at least 3 months and International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function domain score of <26 at enrolment.

RESULTS

A total of 220 patients were randomized to receive either avanafil tablets 100 mg or sildenafil tablets 50 mg in 1:1 ratio. After 4 weeks of treatment, 40.0% of patients in the avanafil group and 45.6% of patients in the sildenafil group required dose escalation to a high dose (avanafil 200 mg/sildenafil 100 mg). The difference in the mean change of International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function score from baseline in the two groups increased from week 4 (1.1, 95% confidence interval -0.2 to 2.5) to week 8 (1.4, 95% confidence interval 0.1-2.7) and week 12 (2.1, 95% confidence interval 0.8-3.5), showing non-inferiority at week 4, and superiority at week 8 and week 12. Avanafil showed a faster onset of action as shown by a significantly better response to modified Sexual Encounter Profile 1 in the avanafil group (84.8%) as compared with that in the sildenafil group (28.2%; P < 0.001). Both avanafil and sildenafil were well tolerated by all the patients in the study; the most common adverse event reported during the study was headache in both the groups.

CONCLUSION

Avanafil is superior to sildenafil in improving the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function domain score at the end of 12 weeks of treatment with the added advantage of faster onset of action.

EDEUS, a Real-Life Study on the Users of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors: Prevalence, Perceptions, and Health Care-Seeking Behavior Among European Men With a Focus on 2nd-Generation Avanafil

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a multidimensional disorder with an estimated prevalence of 1% to 10% in men younger than 40 years and up to 100% in men in their 70s and 80s.

AIM

To evaluate the real-life characteristics and unmet needs of men with ED, its impact on well-being, and treatment rates across Europe.

METHODS

Adult men in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, and Spain were invited to participate in the survey. Men who did not use at least a drug for sexual health in the past 3 months, had cancer or spinal cord injuries, and/or underwent non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) with study-specific, self-constructed questions was used.

RESULTS

Overall, 940 subjects (age = 46.2 ± 13.4 years) were considered. Subjects (n = 778) using on-demand phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) were designated "performers" (60%) without a formal ED diagnosis or "patients" with a medical diagnosis. Patients were older than performers, with more self-reported comorbidities; patients used a higher PDE5i dosage and purchased it from official pharmacies more often than performers did. Of avanafil users (n = 39), no differences in total IIEF or subdomain scores were observed after adjusting for confounders. However, avanafil users less often declared its use without an ED diagnosis and a physician prescription. Overall, the latter condition was associated with higher PDE5i-related satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The survey shows 2 different attitudes toward ED and PDE5i use: for recreational use and without a medical prescription or with a formal diagnosis and medical prescription. Avanafil, a 2nd-generation PDE5i with a good balance between efficacy and tolerability profile, is more frequently prescribed by doctors than self-prescribed compared with other PDE5is. Because the major challenge is to decrease the high dropout of 1st-generation PDE5is, further studies will be needed to clarify this topic. Corona G, Maggi M, Jannini EA. EDEUS, a Real-Life Study on the Users of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors: Prevalence, Perceptions, and Health Care-Seeking Behavior Among European Men With a Focus on 2nd-Generation Avanafil. Sex Med 2018;6:15-23.