To which extent can we decrease antibiotic duration in critically ill patients?

Short versus long course of colistin treatment for carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii in critically ill patients: A propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is one of the most commonly found nosocomial infections in critically ill patients. However, the appropriate treatment period for a specific group of critically ill patients with CRAB infection is currently being debated. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the optimal courses of therapy for critically ill patients with CRAB infection by comparing the outcomes of colistin therapy of short duration (< 14 days) versus long duration (≥ 14 days).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Nakornping Hospital on critically ill patients with CRAB infection who received either a short or long course of colistin treatment between 2015 and 2022. The primary outcome was the 30-day mortality rate while secondary outcomes were clinical response, microbiological response, and nephrotoxicity. Propensity score matching with a 1: 1 ratio was performed to reduce potential biases. Furthermore, a logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

A total of 374 patients met the inclusion criteria. Two hundred and forty-eight patients were recruited after utilizing propensity scores to match patients at a 1: 1 ratio. The results from the propensity score matching analysis demonstrated that the long-course therapy group had a lower 30-day mortality rate compared to the short-course therapy group (adjusted OR (aOR) = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26-0.83, p = 0.009). The clinical response and microbiological response rates were higher in patients who received the long course of colistin therapy compared to those receiving the short course (aOR = 3.24, 95% CI: 1.78-5.92, p = 0.001; aOR = 3.01, 95% CI: 1.63-5.57, p = 0.001). There was no significant different in the occurrence of nephrotoxicity (aOR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.74-2.22, p = 0.368) between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

A long course of colistin therapy resulted in a lower 30-day mortality rate in critically ill patients, and better clinical and microbiological outcomes, but similar nephrotoxicity as compared to a short course of colistin therapy. Therefore, a specific subset of critically ill patients who had CRAB infection needed to be considered for a long course of therapy.

Impact of reduced antibiotic treatment duration on antimicrobial resistance in critically ill patients in the randomized controlled SAPS-trial

Background

In the previously reported SAPS trial (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01139489), procalcitonin-guidance safely reduced the duration of antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients. We assessed the impact of shorter antibiotic treatment on antimicrobial resistance development in SAPS patients.

Materials and methods

Cultures were assessed for the presence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) or highly resistant organisms (HRMO) and compared between PCT-guided and control patients. Baseline isolates from 30 days before to 5 days after randomization were compared with those from 5 to 30 days post-randomization. The primary endpoint was the incidence of new MDR/HRMO positive patients.

Results

In total, 8,113 cultures with 96,515 antibiotic test results were evaluated for 439 and 482 patients randomized to the PCT and control groups, respectively. Disease severity at admission was similar for both groups. Median (IQR) durations of the first course of antibiotics were 6 days (4-10) and 7 days (5-11), respectively (p = 0.0001). Antibiotic-free days were 7 days (IQR 0-14) and 6 days (0-13; p = 0.05). Of all isolates assessed, 13% were MDR/HRMO positive and at baseline 186 (20%) patients were MDR/HMRO-positive. The incidence of new MDR/HRMO was 39 (8.9%) and 45 (9.3%) in PCT and control patients, respectively (p = 0.82). The time courses for MDR/HRMO development were also similar for both groups (p = 0.33).

Conclusions

In the 921 randomized patients studied, the small but statistically significant reduction in antibiotic treatment in the PCT-group did not translate into a detectable change in antimicrobial resistance. Studies with larger differences in antibiotic treatment duration, larger study populations or populations with higher MDR/HRMO incidences might detect such differences.

Impact of duration of antibiotic therapy in central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection due to Gram-negative bacilli

BACKGROUND

A progressive increase in the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) due to Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) has been reported. Current guidelines recommend antibiotic treatment for at least 7-14 days, although the supporting evidence is limited.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-centre study including all patients with a definite diagnosis of GNB CRBSI from January 2012 to October 2018 in which the central venous catheter (CVC) was removed. The occurrence of therapeutic failure [clinical failure (persistence of symptoms and laboratory signs of infection), microbiological failure (persistent bacteraemia or relapse) and/or all-cause 30 day mortality] was compared between episodes receiving short [≤7 days (SC)] or long courses [>7 days (LC)] of appropriate antibiotic therapy following CVC removal.

RESULTS

We included 54 GNB CRBSI episodes with an overall rate of therapeutic failure of 27.8% (15/54). Episodes receiving SC therapy were more frequently due to MDR GNB [60.9% (14/23) versus 34.5% (10/29); P = 0.058] and had higher Pitt scores [median (IQR) 1 (0-4) versus 0 (0-2); P = 0.086]. There were no significant differences in the rate of therapeutic failure between episodes treated with SC or LC therapy [30.4% (7/23) versus 27.6% (8/29); OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.34-3.83; P = 0.822]. The use of SCs was not associated with increased odds of therapeutic failure in any of the exploratory models performed.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of appropriate antibiotic therapy for ≤7 days may be as safe and effective as longer courses in episodes of GNB CRBSI once the CVC has been removed.

Optimal duration of antibiotic treatment in Gram-negative infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Whilst many guidelines recommend limiting the use of antibiotics because of the increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR), this strategy becomes challenging when dealing with severe infections in critically ill patients. Moreover, some Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) can exhibit mechanisms of resistance that make the patient more vulnerable to recurrence of infections. We reviewed recent data on the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy in these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Apart from having no additional clinical benefit at a certain point after initiation, antibiotics might have negative effects. Prolonged antibiotic exposure has been associated to development of AMR and represents a strong reason to avoid long courses of antibiotic therapy in GNB infections. Recent data suggest that also patients with severe infections, in whom source control is adequate, can be managed with short-course antibiotic therapy.

SUMMARY

The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy depends on many factors, but overall, many infections in the critically ill can be treated with short-course antibiotic therapy (7 days or less). The integration of signs of resolution, biomarkers, clinical judgment, and microbiologic eradication might help to define this optimal duration in patients with life-threatening infections caused by GNB.