Dolutegravir and rilpivirine for the maintenance treatment of virologically suppressed HIV-1 infection

Dolutegravir plus rilpivirine: benefits beyond viral suppression: DORIPEX retrospective study

Switching dual therapy with dolutegravir (DTG) plus rilpivirine (RPV) was assessed in the SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 studies. Real-life data regarding the immunological impact of this approach on CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte counts and the CD4/CD8 ratio are scarce. We evaluated this strategy on the basis of clinical practice data.A multicentric retrospective cohort study.Treatment-experienced virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients who were switched to DTG plus RPV were included. Using different models for paired data, we evaluated the efficacy and immune status in terms of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts and CD4/CD8 ratio at 24 and 48 weeks of treatment.The study population comprised of 524 patients from 34 centers in Spain. Men accounted for 76.9% of patients, with a median age of 53 years. Patients receiving DTG plus RPV reached weeks 24 and 48 in 99.4% and 83.8% of cases, respectively, with only three (0.57%) virological failures. We found a significant decrease in CD8+ T-cell count (log OR -40) at week 24 and an increase in CD4+ T-cell count at week 48 (log OR +22.8). In acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-diagnosed patients, we found a significant increase in the CD4+ T-cell count at week 48 (log OR = 41.7, P = .0038), but no significant changes in the CD8+ T-cell count (log OR = -23.4, P = .54). No differences were found in the CD4/CD8 ratio between the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome subgroup and sex or age.In patients with controlled treatment, dual therapy with DTG plus RPV slightly improved the immune status during the first 48 weeks after switching, not only in terms of CD4+ T-cell count but also in terms of CD8+ T-cell count, with persistently high rates of viral control.

Predictors of Virological Failure Among People Living with HIV Switching from an Effective First-Line Antiretroviral Regimen

Aim of this study was to assess the predictors of virological failure (VF) among patients living with HIV (PLWHIV) switching from an effective first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen, and to evaluate the emergence of resistance-associated mutations. All adult patients enrolled in the Antiviral Response Cohort Analysis cohort who started ART after 2010, with at least 6 months of virological suppression (VS) before ART switch and with an available genotypic resistance test (GRT) at baseline were included. Thirty-two patients out of the 607 PLWHIV included (5.3%) experienced VF after a median of 11 months from ART switch. Younger age (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.99, p = .023), being male who have sex with male (aHR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.69, p = .014), and longer time from VS to ART switch (aHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, p = .021) resulted protective toward VF, while receiving a first-line regimen containing a backbone other than ABC/3TC or TXF/FTC (aHR 3.61, 95% CI 1.00-13.1, p = .050) and a boosted protease inhibitor as anchor drug (aHR 3.34, 95% CI 1.20-9.28, p = .021) were associated with higher risk of VF. GRT at the moment of VF was available only for 13 patients (40.6%). ART switch in patients with stable control of HIV infection is a safe practice, even if particular attention should be paid in certain cases of patients switching from regimens containing low-performance backbones or protease inhibitors.

Clinical Impact and Cost-effectiveness of Genotype Testing at Human Immunodeficiency Virus Diagnosis in the United States

BACKGROUND

US guidelines recommend genotype testing at human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) diagnosis ("baseline genotype") to detect transmitted drug resistance (TDR) to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), and protease inhibitors. With integrase strand inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimens now recommended as first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART), the of baseline genotypes is uncertain.

METHODS

We used the Cost-effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications model to examine the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of baseline genotype compared to no baseline genotype for people starting ART with dolutegravir (DTG) and an NRTI pair. For people with no TDR (83.8%), baseline genotype does not alter regimen selection. Among people with transmitted NRTI resistance (5.8%), baseline genotype guides NRTI selection and informs subsequent ART after adverse events (DTG AEs, 14%). Among people with transmitted NNRTI resistance (7.2%), baseline genotype influences care only for people with DTG AEs switching to NNRTI-based regimens. The 48-week virologic suppression varied (40%-92%) depending on TDR. Costs included $320/genotype and $2500-$3000/month for ART.

RESULTS

Compared to no baseline genotype, baseline genotype resulted in <1 additional undiscounted quality-adjusted life-day (QALD), cost an additional $500/person, and was not cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: $420 000/quality-adjusted life-year). In univariate sensitivity analysis, clinical benefits of baseline genotype never exceeded 5 QALDs for all newly diagnosed people with HIV. Baseline genotype was cost-effective at current TDR prevalence only under unlikely conditions, eg, DTG-based regimens achieving ≤50% suppression of transmitted NRTI resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

With INSTI-based first-line regimens in the United States, baseline genotype offers minimal clinical benefit and is not cost-effective.

Structure-based non-nucleoside inhibitor design: Developing inhibitors that are effective against resistant mutants

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) inhibit reverse transcription and block the replication of HIV-1. Currently, NNRTIs are usually used as part of a three-drug combination given to patients as antiretroviral therapy. These combinations involve other classes of anti-HIV-1 drugs, commonly nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). However, attempts are being made to develop two-drug maintenance therapies, some of which involve an NNRTI and an integrase strand transfer inhibitor. This has led to a renewed interest in developing novel NNRTIs, with a major emphasis on designing compounds that can effectively inhibit the known NNRTI-resistant mutants. We have generated and tested novel rilpivirine (RPV) analogs. The new compounds were designed to exploit a small opening in the upper right periphery of the NNRTI-binding pocket. The best of the new compounds, 12, was a more potent inhibitor of the NNRTI-resistant mutants we tested than either doravirine or efavirenz but was inferior to RPV. We describe the limitations on the modifications that can be appended to the "upper right side" of the RPV core and the effects of substituting other cores for the central pyrimidine core of RPV and make suggestions about how this information can be used in NNRTI design.

Durability of dolutegravir plus boosted darunavir as salvage or simplification of salvage regimens in HIV-1 infected, highly treatment-experienced subjects

BACKGROUND

Dolutegravir (DTG) plus boosted darunavir (bDRV) is a compact, adherence-friendly salvage regimen with the highest genetic barrier to HIV-1 resistance.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of the present study is to assess the long term (96-week) safety and efficacy of DTG + bDRV in a of multidrug-experienced HIV-1 infected patients, simplifying or building rescue regimens.

METHODS

All HIV-1-infected subjects from eleven Italian centers switched to DTG + bDRV between March 2014 and September 2015 were included and followed for minimum 96 weeks.

RESULTS

The cohort comprises 130 subjects, switched from 42 different, complex or at least twice-daily regimens, mainly for simplification (44.6%), viral failure (30.0%) or toxicity (16.6%). At baseline 118 had documented resistance to 1-5 antiretroviral classes and 12 lacked genotypic results either for historical reasons or for problems with primer annealing; 52 (40%) had uncontrolled viral replication, three above 500.000 copies/mL. At week 96 two showed ≥50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL, 23 had 1-49 copies/mL and 101 had no virus detected. The proportion of subjects presenting abnormal values at baseline significantly decreased for serum glucose, creatinine, AST, total cholesterol and triglycerides.

CONCLUSIONS

These long-term data confirm the reliability of the two-drug regimen consisting of bDRV plus DTG in salvage settings in HIV-1 infection.

Dolutegravir plus rilpivirine as dual regimen in virologically suppressed HIV-1 infected patients in a clinical setting

Objectives: There are scarce data on the combination of dolutegravir (DTG) plus rilpivirine (RPV) in the real world, including patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection, toxicity or previous failure, or at risk for severe drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Methods: Prospective cohort study of virologically suppressed HIV-1 infected patients, without resistance to DTG or RPV, switched to this dual regimen because of toxicity or risk of DDIs (NCT02491242). Results: Overall, 102 patients (mean age 54 years, 28% women) were included. Fifty-seven were coinfected with HCV (fibrosis grade 4 in 27 cases, 1 liver transplantation). Seven patients had chronic kidney disease (1 renal transplantation). At week 48, only 1 virologic failure occurred (<1%), and 6 patients (6%) left the regimen (3 with central nervous system adverse events, 1 each due to pregnancy, metformin interaction, and lost to follow up). Thus, the overall treatment success rates were 93% (95% CI, 88%-98%; ITT-e, snapshot analysis) and 96% (95% CI, 92%-99%; per protocol analysis). The CD4/CD8 ratio increased slightly (median, +0.03). Triglycerides levels improved significantly (-18.8%, p < 0.01). The creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased by a mean of -8.4 ml/min/1.73 m², but tubular renal parameters improved. A paired dual X-ray absorptiometry scan showed a mild improvement in spine (mean, +1.15%; -0.57 to +3.3%) and in femoral neck bone mineral density (mean, +0.4%; -3.3% to +2.57%). Conclusions: In the clinical setting, switching to the combination of DTG plus rilpivirine in virologically suppressed HIV-1 patients is effective and safe, and improves lipid, renal and bone evolution.