Unconventional therapies for hidradenitis suppurativa

Golimumab and certolizumab pegol for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa: a literature review and future perspective

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin condition with an underlying inflammatory process. Due to the limited efficacy of available treatments, HS remains a therapeutic challenge. The safety and efficacy of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors, adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept, are well studied in this patient population, and in some cases, HS was unresponsive to them. In recent years, evidence has been growing regarding the application of other anti-TNFs, including certolizumab pegol (CPZ) and golimumab. We sought to evaluate the overall safety and efficacy of golimumab and CPZ in the management of HS. A comprehensive search was performed on the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Ovid Embase databases, as well as the Google Scholar search engine from initiation to 31 August 2023. A total of nine and four studies used CPZ and golimumab to treat HS, respectively. Individuals with concomitant inflammatory immune-mediated diseases, pregnant females, and patients who were refractory to previous treatments achieved a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response following CPZ administration. Also, golimumab showed promise in treating recalcitrant HS after the failure of other treatments, such as adalimumab and anti-interleukin-1. CPZ and golimumab can be efficacious treatment options for moderate-to-severe HS, especially in patients who are unresponsive to other TNF inhibitors, such as adalimumab.

The efficacy and safety of endo-radiofrequency for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic and recurrent disease of the axilla and groin with inflammatory lesions. There is no definitive medication or intervention to cure the disease. Radiofrequency (RF) is a modality to destroy the lesions by transferring heat into the skin. To date, few studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RF at HS.

METHODS

This 9-month, prospective, nonrandomized, and single-blinded study is a clinical trial conducted in 10 patients with refractory HS. In all patients, the initial grade of HS was evaluated. The procedure involved treating HS of the axilla with a endo-RF wave device. Post-treatment evaluation included: determination of the severity of the disease by a blinded dermatologist, the degree of patient satisfaction, tolerability in each patient, and complications of the procedure. We also evaluate the recurrence of the disease during a 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

The satisfaction level after the intervention among under-studied cases was excellent and good in six of cases. There was a significant difference in comparing the grading score of patients before and 3 months after receiving RF (P-value: 0.01). Regarding tolerability, eight of the patients could tolerate it. We had no complication after the intervention and four cases had not recurrence during a 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Endo-RF is an effective and safe modality for treating HS however to prevent the recurrence, periodic therapy sessions are needed.

Pilot study of fractional microneedling radiofrequency for hidradenitis suppurativa assessed by clinical response and histology

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a devastating chronic inflammatory skin disease with frequent recurrences. Various systemic treatments and procedures have been used but the efficacy of fractional microneedling radiofrequency (FMR) has not been reported.

AIM

To evaluate the clinical and histological efficacy of FMR in the treatment of HS lesions.

METHODS

An 8-week, prospective, split-body, unblinded study was conducted, which enrolled 10 adult patients with mild to moderate HS to receive 3 sessions of FMR treatment biweekly. HS severity was assessed using the number and type of lesions, HS Physician Global Assessment (HS-PGA) and the modified Sartorius score (mSS). Skin biopsies were performed on participants to assess change in inflammation before and after FMR.

RESULTS

Severity of HS was significantly reduced on the FMR-treated side of the body, but not on the control side. Inflammatory HS lesions were significantly reduced after 4 weeks, while HS-PGA and mSS were significantly decreased after 6 weeks. Immunohistochemistry staining showed decreased expression of inflammatory markers including neutrophil elastases, interleukin (IL)-8 and IL-17, tumour necrosis factor-α, transforming growth factor-β1 and matrix metalloproteinases.

CONCLUSION

FMR may be a viable treatment option for mild to moderate HS.

Hidradenitis suppurativa: Basic considerations for its approach: A narrative review

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic and debilitating skin disease, whose lesions can range from inflammatory nodules to abscesses and fistulas in the armpits, groin, perineum, inframammary region. Diagnosis can be confused with a large number of clinical pictures, and although studies on hidradenitis suppurativa are not so scarce in the literature, doctors are often unaware of this disease and therefore its diagnosis is often late. Pharmacological treatment ranges from retinoids to immunosuppression and radiation therapy, and surgical treatment ranges from incision and drainage to more complete excisions and laser therapies. Hidradenitis suppurativa is a disease seen and treated mainly by dermatologists and general surgeons, however, it is necessary for general practitioners to have basic knowledge about this entity, as they are the first line of care in the health system.

•

Hidradenitis suppurativa is an entity of necessary recognition by the surgeon.

•

It is a preventable and treatable condition with a good prognosis.

•

This condition should be managed by a multidisciplinary team.

Ultrasound-guided injection of intralesional steroids in acute hidradenitis suppurativa lesions: A prospective study

The management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) flares with intralesional steroids lacks strong scientific evidence but limited data suggest that it may be useful. The objective of this study is to assess the clinical and ultrasound responses of HS flares to ultrasound‐guided injections of intralesional triamcinolone (40 mg/ml) with a dilution 1:4 versus 1:2 at 30‐day (t1), 60‐day (t2), and 90‐day (t3) follow‐up. We recruited patients with ≤3 acute lesions, unresponsive to topical therapy. At baseline we assessed lesions clinically and by ultra‐high frequency ultrasound (48 or 70 MHz) and randomly performed an ultrasound‐guided injection of triamcinolone. Assessments were repeated at t1, t2, and t3 follow‐up, re‐injecting the lesion in the case of no or partial response. We treated 49 lesions: 38.8% showed improvements at t1; 46.9% at t2; 6% at t3; and 8.3% showed no clinical and ultrasound improvements. Long‐term follow‐up data confirmed a statistically significant reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)‐pain, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and HS‐Physician Global Assessment (HS‐PGA), as well as edema and vascular signals. No adverse effects were reported. Our study suggests that ultrasound‐injections with a 1:2 dilution are beneficial for HS flares that do not respond to topical treatment and should be included in the therapeutic algorithm.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa in a Patient Affected by Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome: Insight into the Role of Hormones in HS

Introduction

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin disease, which usually occurs after puberty. Even if the pathogenesis of HS is still unproven, numerous studies hypothesized that the disease is triggered by genetic and environmental factors, with hormones playing a central role. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is a congenital malformation in which a failure of Müllerian duct development results in absent uterus and fallopian tubes and malformations of the vagina.

Case Presentation

A 38-year-old Caucasian female referred at our outpatient clinic affected by HS. Before the appearance of HS manifestations, the patient referred to a gynecologist due to difficulties in getting pregnant. The sonographic findings were consistent with MRKH syndrome. An ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization was started. However, after 3 months the patient showed the first HS onset. After the hormonal treatment ended, a combined treatment with rifampicin and clindamycin was started, showing a great clinical improvement at week 10.

Discussion/Conclusion

HS usually appears after puberty, exhibits premenstrual flare, improves in pregnancy, and worsens postpartum, which indicates a role of hormones and particularly of androgens in its pathophysiology. Contrasting data are reported in the literature. Our case wants to strengthen the idea that hormones could play an important role, probably with other endogenous or exogenous factors. Multidisciplinary investigations will clarify which part is played by each factor in the pathogenesis of HS.

Methotrexate shows benefit in a subset of patients with severe hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate is an immunomodulatory therapy that may offer benefit to patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Despite its theoretical advantages, there is a paucity of available data regarding long-term methotrexate use in patients with HS.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess whether methotrexate treatment leads to improvement in HS disease severity.

METHODS

We conducted an institutional review board-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review of patients with HS who were treated with methotrexate between 2000 and 2018. Primary outcome measurements included the HS Physician's Global Assessment (HS PGA), Hurley staging, abscess count, fistula count, and inflammatory nodule count.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients were identified; 14 were excluded for reasons including never starting methotrexate and missing follow-up data. For remaining patients (n = 15), the average cumulative dose of methotrexate was 520.1 mg (range, 30-1665 mg) and the average length of treatment was 11.7 months (range, 1-38 months). Patients taking methotrexate as a primary therapy had a higher cumulative dose and length of treatment (520.13 mg; 14.6 months) compared with those taking biologics concomitantly (468.44 mg; 9.1 months). Patients using methotrexate as primary therapy demonstrated nonsignificant reductions in HS PGA, inflammatory nodule count, and abscess count. Patients on concomitant biologic therapy failed to demonstrate any change in HS PGA, inflammatory nodule count, and abscess count.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations of the study include its retrospective nature, small sample size, length of time on methotrexate between groups, and homogeneity of the patient population.

CONCLUSION

Methotrexate may represent an effective treatment option in older patients with lower body mass indices but fails to offer benefit in patients taking concurrent biologic therapy.