I Work Out, Who Cares if I'm Bigger: What Matters to Youth with ASD regarding Weight and Their Bodies?

Putting weight-related conversations into practice: Lessons learned from implementing a knowledge translation casebook in a disability context

BACKGROUND

Due to reported challenges experienced by healthcare providers (HCPs) when having weight-related conversations with children with disabilities and their families, a knowledge translation (KT) casebook was developed, providing key communication principles with supportive resources. Our aim was to explore how the KT casebook could be implemented into a disability context. Study objectives were to develop and integrate needs-based implementation supports to help foster the uptake of the KT casebook communication principles.

METHODS

A sample of nurses, physicians, occupational therapists and physical therapists were recruited from a Canadian paediatric rehabilitation hospital. Informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, group interviews were conducted with participants to understand barriers to having weight-related conversations in their context. Implementation strategies were developed to deliver the KT casebook content that addressed these identified barriers, which included an education workshop, simulations, printed materials, and a huddle and email strategy. Participant experiences with the implementation supports were captured through workshop evaluations, pre-post surveys and qualitative interviews. Post-implementation interviews were analysed using descriptive content analysis.

RESULTS

Ten HCPs implemented the KT casebook principles over 6 months. Participants reported that the workshop provided a clear understanding of the KT casebook content. While HCPs appreciated the breadth of the KT casebook, they found the abbreviated printed educational materials more convenient. Strategies developed to address participants' need for a sense of community and opportunities to learn from each other did not achieve their aim. Increased confidence in integrating the KT casebook principles into practice was not demonstrated, due, in part, to having few opportunities to practice. This was partly because of the increase in competing clinical demands at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite positive feedback on the product itself, changes in the organisational and environmental context limited the success of the implementation plan. Monitoring and adapting implementation processes in response to unanticipated changes is critical to the success of implementation efforts.

Utilizing an Environmental Framework to Explore the Acceptability of a Health Promotion Program for Youth with Disabilities

This study explored the acceptability of Children and Teens in Charge of their Health (CATCH), a program for children with spina bifida or cerebral palsy to enhance their physical activity and diet. Qualitative interviews were conducted with children (n = 6) and their parents (n = 6) who participated in CATCH. Analysis used an environmental systems framework. Microsystem factors impacting acceptability of the program were: Children's motivations for change, their age, and their physical health. Mesosystem factors were: Use of virtual coaching and the relationship between coach and child. Macrosystem factors (e.g. Covid-19), did not impact acceptability, but affected some goal attainment strategies. CATCH was broadly acceptable to children and parents and shows promise as a health promotion program tailored to children with disabilities. An environmental systems framework can potentially help other health promotion programs enhance their acceptability and success.

'Our time is precious': An exploration of parental feeding behaviours for boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

INTRODUCTION

Due to the increased risk of obesity for boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), recent guidelines recommend that dietary intake is carefully managed. Parents play an important role in the development of their child's eating behaviours and patterns. However, despite what is known about the increased risk of obesity for children with DMD, little is known about parental feeding behaviours in this population. The objective of this study was to qualitatively explore the experiences of parents of children with DMD around their child's weight management and understand what influences their feeding behaviours.

METHODS

This paper reports a secondary data analysis. Semi-structured, individual interviews were conducted and analysed using qualitative description.

RESULTS

Thirteen parents were interviewed for the study. Three themes were developed: (1) parent responses to healthcare provider interactions, (2) mixed emotions contributing to feeding approach and (3) variable parenting feeding styles. Within the third theme, two subthemes arose including (1) control and preoccupation and (2) striking a balance.

CONCLUSION

Given the potential impact of higher weights on the progression of DMD, it is important that healthcare providers explore feeding behaviours with families. However, it is essential that healthcare providers consider the impact of these conversations on parents, as well as the broader issues that may place additional pressure on the lives of families.

A qualitative exploration of the priorities and experiences of children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, their parents, and healthcare professionals around weight management

PURPOSE

The quality and length of life for boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) has improved due to medical advancements, but obesity has emerged as and may pose a risk to their physical health. Clinical guidelines recommend attention to weight management, but healthcare professionals (HCPs) find implementing them in clinical care challenging. Little information is available about the perspectives of children with DMD and their families around weight management. This study explored the key priorities of children with DMD, their parents, and HCPs who treat them, around weight management.

METHODS

Qualitative, individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach.

RESULTS

Participants included parents of children with DMD (n = 13), children with DMD (n = 10), and HCPs (n = 14). Theme one: "Competing priorities between healthcare providers, parents, and boys" contained two sub-themes: (i) Body mechanics and function; and (ii) Psychosocial well-being. Theme two: "The realities of living with Duchenne's Muscular Dystrophy," with subthemes: (i) Striving for normality; (ii) The trajectory of DMD; (iii) The labour associated with DMD.

CONCLUSION

HCPs, parents, and boys have diverging worldviews around weight management, highlighting the importance of integrating the priorities of families into care, even when not aligned with guideline recommendations.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONHCPs must understand the competing priorities in the lives of children with DMD and their families when discussing weight, weight management, and lifestyle changes.Quality of life and living a "normal" life are prioritized by children and families over the surveillance and time demands of lifestyle routines recommended by clinicians for weight management.Weight management recommendations should be based upon the individual needs and priorities of the family.